Overview of Sentencing

From Canadian Criminal Law Notebook
Jump to: navigation, search

Guilty plea or Conviction

A sentencing hearing is to be commenced "as soon as practicable" after the point where a conviction has been entered.[1]

  1. Section 720(1)

Timing of Sentencing

Sectin 720 requires that sentencings occur "as soon as practicable" once guilt is found.

Sentencing proceedings
720. (1) A court shall, as soon as practicable after an offender has been found guilty, conduct proceedings to determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed.
Court-supervised programs
(2) The court may, with the consent of the Attorney General and the offender and after considering the interests of justice and of any victim of the offence, delay sentencing to enable the offender to attend a treatment program approved by the province under the supervision of the court, such as an addiction treatment program or a domestic violence counselling program.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 720; 1995, c. 22, s. 6; 2008, c. 18, s. 35.


CCC

An exception to the requirement of a speedy sentencing is found in s. 720(2) when the Attorney General and the offender consent to an adjournment, and where the judge takes into account the interests of justice and the interests of any victims, for the purpose of a treatment program.

Submissions of counsel

Both the Crown and Defence are permitted to make submissions to facts for consideration.[1] However, submissions themselves do not constitute evidence.[2]

  1. s. 723(1); R v Digiacomo, 2002 BCCA 444
  2. R v Jackman, 1996 CanLII 11080 (NL CA), [1996] N.J. No. 107 (NLCA) (“cannot be over-emphasized that, in making submissions to Court, counsel are not giving evidence but rather making argument in support of their respective submissions.”)

Positions of the Parties

The judge is required in his decision on sentence, consider the "submissions" of counsel.[1]

The sentencing judge should "explain the basis" of giving a sentence above the Crown's position.[2]

  1. Section 726.1 ("In determining the sentence, a court shall consider any relevant information placed before it, including any representations or submissions made by or on behalf of the prosecutor or the offender.")
  2. R v Jones, 2012 ONCA 609 (CanLII), at para 10

Accused Addressing the Court

At the end of the submissions by counsel, the accused is entitled to make comments to the court.[1] Failure to allow the accused to speak will not invalidate the sentence if it is an inadvertent slip or error.[2]

The court may consider relevant information in sentencing, including the representations of the accused.[3]

  1. s. 726
  2. R v Senek (1998), 130 CCC (3d) 473, 1998 CanLII 17680 (MB CA)
    R v Holub and Kufrin, [2002] O.J. No. 579 (Q.L.).
    R v Haug 2002 SKCA 49 (CanLII)
  3. s. 726.1

Judgement on Sentence

A judge, in deciding on a sentence, after hearing the recommendations from both Crown and Defence, may go above the range recommended by Crown counsel, but must do so after giving reasons for the sentence given.[1]

It is also recommended that the judge give counsel an opportunity to make further submissions.[2]

Upon deciding on a particular sentence the judge shall comply with s.570 and 806 requiring him to make a minute or memorandum of conviction and upon request, make a conviction order under Form 35 or 36. Further a warrant of committal, if applicable, will be made under Form 21 or 22.

When imposing a sentence, the court should state the terms of sentence, the reasons for sentence and the terms.[3]

A single sentence is imposed upon multiple convictions the sentence will be valid as long as the sentence is justifiable on each count.[4]

It has been recommended that the following process be taken:

  • The judge should begin by determining "whether any or all of the offences are to be served consecutively".[5]

If they are all concurrent there is no need to consider totality. [6] Otherwise, the judge should sentence for each offence, applying standard sentencing principles.[7]

  • Where there are consecutive sentences, the judge should look at the total sentence to ensure that it satisfies the principle of proportionality.[8]
  1. R v Jones, 2012 ONCA 609 (CanLII) at para 10
  2. see R v Hood, 2011 ABCA 169 (CanLII) at para 15
    R v Keough, 2012 ABCA 14 (CanLII) at paras 19 to 20 and 51 to 57
  3. s. 726.2
  4. s. 728 states "Where one sentence is passed on a verdict of guilty on two or more counts of an indictment, the sentence is good if any of the counts would have justified the sentence."
  5. CAM at para 18
    see Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences
  6. CAM at para 18
  7. CAM at para 18
  8. CAM at para 18

See Also