Defamatory Libel (Offence) and Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement (Offence): Difference between pages

From Criminal Law Notebook
(Difference between pages)
m (Text replacement - "{{ReverseOnusCirc}}" to ":''Reverse Onus Bail'' {{ReverseOnusCirc}}")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderOffences}}
{{HeaderOffences}}


{{OffenceBox |OffenceTitle=Defamatory Libel |OffencePage=Defamatory Libel |Section=300, 301, and 302 |Act={{OBCCC}} |CrownElection={{OBIndictableElection}} |Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionAll}} |Bail={{OBBailOIC}} |IndictableDisp= {{OBDisp2to10}} |IndictableMin= {{OBMinNone}} |IndictableMax= {{OBTime|2 or 5 years}} }}
{{OffenceBox |OffenceTitle=Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement |OffencePage=Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement |Section=279(1.1), (2)|Act={{OBCCC}} |CrownElection={{OBIndictableElection}} (279(1.1)), {{OBHybridElection}} (279(2))|Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionAll}} |Bail={{OBBailVar}} |SummaryDisp= {{OBDispAll}} |SummaryMin= {{OBMinNone}} |SummaryMax= {{OBTime|18 months}} | IndictableDisp= <!--{{OBDispMinVar}}--> {{OBDisp14orMinVar}} |IndictableMin= {{OBTime|4, 5, 7 years}} (kipnap w/ firearm) |IndictableMax= {{OBTime|10 years}} (confine)<br> {{OBMaxLife}} (kidnap) }}


==Overview==
==Overview==
Section 300, 301, and 302 describes three offences. 
{{OverviewVIII|kidnapping and unlawful confinement}}


; Pleadings
; Pleadings
{{PleadingsHeader}}
{{PleadingsHeader}}
{{PleadingsIndictableList|s. 300 [publishing defamatory libel known to be false],<br>s. 302 [extortion by libel] | {{NA}} | Yes}}  
{{PleadingsIndictableList| s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] | {{NA}} | Yes}}
{{PleadingsHybridList|s. 279(2) [confinement] | Yes | {{YesIfCrown}} }}
{{PleadingsEnd}}
{{PleadingsEnd}}


{{PleadingsIndictElection|s. 300, 301 and 302}}
{{PleadingsIndictElection|s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping]}}
 
{{PleadingsHybridElection|s. 279(2) [confinement]}}
 
Notice is required if prior convictions are being relied upon to seek an [[Notice of Increased Penalty|increased penalty]] under s. 279(1.1)(a)(ii). {{Section109Notice}}


; Release
; Release
{{ReleaseHeader}}
{{ReleaseHeader}}
|s. 300, 301, or 302 || {{ReleaseProfileOnlyBail}}  
|s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] || {{ReleaseProfileOnlyBail}}
|-
|s. 279(2) [confinement] || {{ReleaseProfileAll}}  
|-
|-
{{ReleaseEnd}}
{{ReleaseEnd}}


{{ReleaseOICorBail|s. 300, 301, or 302}}
{{ReleaseOnlyBail|s. 279(1.1)}}
 
{{ReleaseAllOptions|s. 279(2)}}
 
Under s. 515(6)(a)(vii), offences charged under s. 279(1.1) have a [[Reverse Onus|reverse onus]] on bail where it has "been committed with a firearm".


:''Reverse Onus Bail''
:''Reverse Onus Bail''
Line 25: Line 36:


:''Fingeprints and Photos''
:''Fingeprints and Photos''
{{IDCriminalAct|s. 300, 301, or 302}}
{{IDCriminalAct|s. 279}}


; Publication Bans
; Publication Bans
{{GeneralPubBan|s. 300, 301, and 302}}
{{GeneralPubBan}}
 
; Offence Designations
{{DesignationHeader}}
|-
|s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping]|| {{OKMark}} <!--wire--> || {{OKMark}} (primary) <!--DO-->||{{OKMark}} <!--SPIO--> || {{XMark}} <!--consent-->
|-
|s. 279(2) [confinement]|| {{XMark}} <!--wire--> || {{OKMark}} <!--DO-->||{{OKMark}} <!--SPIO--> || {{XMark}} <!--consent-->
{{DesignationEnd}}


; Designations
{{WiretapDesignation|s. 279(1.1)}}
{{SeeBelowForAncillary}}
 
{{DOPrimaryDesignation|s. 279(1.1)}}


==Offence Wording==
{{DODesignation|s. 279(2)}}


{{quotation|
{{SPIODesignation|A|s. 279(1.1) or (2)}}
; Defamatory Libel
...<br>
'''Punishment of libel known to be false'''<br>
300. Every one who publishes a defamatory libel that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 264.
|[http://www.canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec300 CCC]
}}


{{quotation|
{{SeeBelowForAncillary}}
<s>'''Punishment for defamatory libel'''<br>
301. Every one who publishes a defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.</s>*
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 265.<br>
<nowiki>*</nowiki> found unconstitutional, see below
|[http://www.canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec301 CCC]
}}


==Offence Wording==
{{quotation|
{{quotation|
'''Extortion by libel'''<br>
; Kidnapping
302. (1) Every one commits an offence who, with intent
279. (1) Every person commits an offence who kidnaps a person with intent
:(a) to extort money from any person, or
:(a) to cause the person to be confined or imprisoned against the person’s will;
:(b) to induce a person to confer on or procure for another person an appointment or office of profit or trust,
:(b) to cause the person to be unlawfully sent or transported out of Canada against the person’s will; or
:(c) to hold the person for ransom or to service against the person’s will.<br>


publishes or threatens to publish or offers to abstain from publishing or to prevent the publication of a defamatory libel.
<br>
; Idem
(2) Every one commits an offence who, as the result of the refusal of any person to permit money to be extorted or to confer or procure an appointment or office of profit or trust, publishes or threatens to publish a defamatory libel.
<br>
; Punishment
; Punishment
(3) Every one who commits an offence under this section is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
:(a) if a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm is used in the commission of the offence or if any firearm is used in the commission of the offence and the offence is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organization, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of
::(i) in the case of a first offence, five years, and
::(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;
:(a.1) in any other case where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years;
:(a.2) if the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is under 16 years of age, to imprisonment for life and, unless the person who commits the offence is a parent, guardian or person having the lawful care or charge of the person referred to in that paragraph, to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years; and
:(b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.
 
...[(1.2), (1.21), and (1.3) regarding subsequent offences]...
<br>
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 266.
; Forcible confinement
|[http://www.canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec302 CCC]
(2) Every one who, without lawful authority, confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes another person is guilty of
:(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
:(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.<br>
 
...<br>
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec279 CCC]
}}
}}
==Proof of the Offence==
==Proof of the Offence==
There are three offences relating to Defamatory Libel.
{{ElementHeader}}
{{ElementHeader}}
{{ElementLeft}}
{{ElementLeft}}


{{Proving|publishing defamatory libel known to be false|300}}  
{{Proving|kidnapping|279(1.1)}}
{{InitialElements}}
{{InitialElements}}
# the culprit publishes materials
# {{box}} the culprit moved or took a person from one place to another<ref>e.g. see ''R v Oakley'', (1977) 36 CCC (2d) 436 (ABCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3fp 1977 ALTASCAD 118] (CanLII){{perABCA|Morrow JA}}</ref>
# the materials amounted to defamatory libel
# {{box}} the victim did not consent
# the culprit knows the materials is false
# {{box}} the culprit had no lawful authority to do so
# the culprit intended to
## {{box}} confine or imprison the victim
## {{box}} cause the person to be sent in or out of the country
## {{box}} holding the person for ransom or service


<!--
Kidnapping
279. (1) Every person commits an offence who kidnaps a person with intent
(a) to cause the person to be confined or imprisoned against the person’s will;
(b) to cause the person to be unlawfully sent or transported out of Canada against the person’s will; or
(c) to hold the person for ransom or to service against the person’s will.
Punishment
(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(a) if a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm is used in the commission of the offence or if any firearm is used in the commission of the offence and the offence is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organization, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of
(i) in the case of a first offence, five years, and
(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;
(a.1) in any other case where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years;
(a.2) if the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is under 16 years of age, to imprisonment for life and, unless the person who commits the offence is a parent, guardian or person having the lawful care or charge of the person referred to in that paragraph, to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years; and
-->
{{ElementRight}}
{{ElementRight}}


{{Proving|extortion by libel|302}}
{{Proving|Forcible Confinement|279(2)}}
# identity of the accused as the culprit
{{InitialElements}}
# the jurisdiction of the incident
# {{box}} the culprit "confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes" another person
# the time and date of the incident
# {{box}} the other person did not consent to the confinement
# the culprit does any one of the prohibited conduct:
# {{box}} the culprit had no "lawful authority" to confine the complainant
## publishes,
# {{box}} the culprit intended to confine the victim
##threatens to publish,
# {{box}} the culprit used force or threat of force
##offers to abstain from publishing, or
{{ElementEnd}}
##offers to prevent the publishing
# the subject matter of publishing is defamatory libel
# the culprit intended to either
##extort money from any person ''or''
##induce the person to confer on or procure for another person an appointment or office of profit or trust.


{{ElementEnd}}
{{reflist|2}}


==Interpretation of the Offence==
==Interpretation of the Offence==


'''Mens rea'''<br>
; Kidnapping vs Confinement
The offence under s. 300 is a specific intent offence that requires knowledge of falsity and intention to defame.<ref>
For the offence of kidnapping, the crown must prove that the accused took the victim from one place to another without consent. <ref>''R v Oakley'', (1977), [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3fp 1977 ALTASCAD 118] (CanLII), 4 AR 103, 36 CCC (2d) 436 (Alta SCAD){{perABCA|Morrow JA}}</ref> This is the key distinction between confinement and kidnapping. Confinement is the deprivation of a person's liberty to move, while kidnapping is the moving of a person. All kidnappings are confinements but not all confinements are kidnapping.<ref>
''R v Stevens'' (1993), 82 CCC (3d) 97, [http://canlii.ca/t/g9nnh 1993 CanLII 14706] (MB PC){{perMBPC|Giesbrecht J}}<br>
see ''R v Tremblay'' (1997), [http://canlii.ca/t/1nf70 1997 CanLII 10526] (QC CA), 117 CCC (3d) 86 (QCCA){{TheCourt}}<br>
''R v Lucas'', [1998] 1 SCR 439, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqt3 1998 CanLII 815] (SCC){{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
''R v Niedermier'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jk9g 2005 BCCA 15] (CanLII){{TheCourtBCCA}}<br>
</ref>
 
Kidnapping is considered "an aggravated form of unlawful confinement, which continues until the victim is freed".<ref>
''R v Vu'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fs54k 2012 SCC 40] (CanLII){{perSCC|Moldaver JA}}{{at|40}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


; Constitutionality
; Kienapple
The offence of publishing defamatory libel under s. 301 is of no force and effect as it violates s. 2 of the Charter is not savable under s. 1 of the Charter.<ref>
See [[Kienapple Principle]]
''R v Lucas'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1nrvd 1995 CanLII 6024] (SK QB), (1995) 129 Sask R 53 (QB){{perSKQB|Hrbainsky J}}<br>
{{reflist|2}}
''R v Byron Prior'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1ws2s 2008 NLTD 80] (CanLII){{perNLSC|Hoegg J}}<br>
===Confinement===
''R v Gill'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1w5p3 1996 CanLII 8147] (ON SC), 1996 CarswellOnt 1314 (Gen. Div.){{perONSC|Lally J}}<br>
The essence of the offence is "forcible deprivation of another person's physical liberty or freedom".<ref>
''R v Fagg'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gl88d 2014 BCSC 2632] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Saunders J}}{{at|38}}<br>
</ref>
It's guiding principle is "illegal domination of one person by another".<ref>
''R v Luxton'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fssl 1990 CanLII 83] (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 711{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Section 300 is constitutional.<ref>
; Meaning of Confinement
Lucas (SCC){{supra}}<br>
Unlawful confinement is made out by "physical restraint" that is "contrary to the wishes of the person restrained"  resulting in a deprivation of "liberty to move from one place to another".<ref>
''R v Stevens'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1npkb 1995 CanLII 5594] (MB CA){{perMBCA|Scott CJ}}
''R v Gratton'' (1985), 18 CCC (3d) 462 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/gbprd 1985 CanLII 3549] (ON CA){{perONCA|Cory JA}}{{at|29}}<br>
{{supra1|Fagg}}{{at|38}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


{{reflist|2}}
"Confinement" means "the state or condition of being confined, restriction or limitation".<ref>
''R v EB'', [2006] OJ 1864{{NOCANLII}}{{perONSC|Watt J}}{{at|115}}<br>
</ref>
It is to "keep that person in a place, within or to limits, or a defined area, to restrict or secure that person". <ref>
{{ibid1|EB}}{{at|115}}<br>
</ref>
 
Confinement includes "restraining another person's liberty, though not necessarily the other person's ability to escape."<ref>
{{ibid1|EB}} at para 115 and 116
</ref>
 
There is no requirement for "physical application of bindings".<ref>
{{supra1|Gratton}} at para 29
</ref> The restraint can be by "psychological means, such as threats, intimidation or the imposition of fear".<ref>
''R v Kematch'', [http://canlii.ca/t/28cmh 2010 MBCA 18] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin JA}}{{at|55}}<br>
{{supra1|Fagg}}{{at|41}}<br>
</ref>
There must either be "actual physical restraint" or "coercive restraint".<ref>
''R v Pritchard'', [http://canlii.ca/t/21b1w 2008 SCC 59] (CanLII){{perSCC|Binne J}}
</ref>
 
The victim must be "fully restrained" so that they cannot "move about from place to place".<ref>
{{ibid1|EB}}{{at|119}}<br>
</ref>
 
The duration of confinement must be "significant".<ref>
{{supra1|Gratton}}{{at|29}}<br>
{{supra1|EB}}{{at|119}}<br>
</ref>
However, the Crown does not need to prove that the confinement happened throughout the "entire period specified in the count."<ref>
{{supra1|EB}}{{at|119}}<br>
</ref>
 
A person who voluntarily enters into a car, but is then denied the ability to leave will usually make out the offence.<ref>
see for example {{supra1|Tremblay}}</ref>
 
Where consent was obtained by fraud, deceit, or trickery, then the consent is not valid.<ref>
''R v Metcalfe'', [http://canlii.ca/t/23m1c 1983 CanLII 248] (BC CA), (1983), 10 CCC (3d) 114{{perBCCA|Nemetz CJ}} at paras 9, 12, 11<br>
''R v Johnson'', (1984), 65 NSR (2d) 54 (NSSCAD){{NOCANLII}}, leave denied [1985] SCCA No. 263<br>
''R v Brown'' (1972), 8 CCC (2d) 13 (Ont CA), [http://canlii.ca/t/htzzt 1972 CanLII 1353] (ON CA){{perONCA|MacKay JA}}</ref>
 
'''''Actus Reus'''''<br>
There must be proven that there was at least a minimal deprivation of the victim's freedom. <ref>
R v B(SJ), [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1v 2002 ABCA 143] (CanLII), 312 AR 313{{perABCA|Berger JA}}</ref>
 
The duration of the confinement does not need to be lengthy. A "significant" period of time where the victim is "coercively restrained or directed contrary to her wishes, so that she could not move about according to her own inclination and desire" will be sufficient.<ref>
''R v Pritchard'', [http://canlii.ca/t/21b1w 2008 SCC 59] (CanLII){{perSCC|Binnie J}} (7:0) at para 24 ("The authorities establish that if for any significant period of time [the victim] was coercively restrained or directed contrary to her wishes, so that she could not move about according to her own inclination and desire, there was unlawful confinement")</ref>
 
A child confined by a lawful guardian can be considered lawful confinement.<ref>R v Whalen 2001 NWTSC 63{{NOCANLII}}</ref>


===Extortion===
An arrest by a peace officer or private citizen can be unlawful confinement. For example, where an officer takes a lawfully arrested man out to a remote area to abandon him in freezing weather makes out the offence.<ref>''R v Munson'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5cj9 2003 SKCA 28] (CanLII){{TheCourtSKCA}}</ref>
See "extortion" as defined in [[Extortion (Offence)|s. 346 (extortion)]].


===Defamatory Libel defined===
Confinement refers to the "physical restraint, contrary to the wishes of the person restrained, ...thereby depriving the person of his or her liberty to move from one place to another". <ref>
{{quotation|
{{supra1|Gratton}}<br>
; Definition
''R v Neidermier'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jk9g 2005 BCCA 15] (CanLII){{TheCourtBCCA}}</ref>
298. (1) A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it is published.
<br>
Mode of expression<br>
(2) A defamatory libel may be expressed directly or by insinuation or irony
:(a) in words legibly marked on any substance; or
:(b) by any object signifying a defamatory libel otherwise than by words.


R.S., c. C-34, s. 262.
There is no need for physical application of bindings.<ref>
|[http://www.canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec298 CCC]
{{supra1|Gratton}}</ref>
}}
===Publishing defined===
{{quotation|
; Publishing
299. A person publishes a libel when he
:(a) exhibits it in public;
:(b) causes it to be read or seen; or
:(c) shows or delivers it, or causes it to be shown or delivered, with intent that it should be read or seen by the person whom it defames or by any other person.


R.S., c. C-34, s. 263.
'''''Mens Rea'''''<br>
|[http://www.canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec299 CCC]
Confinement is a general intent offence.<ref>R v B(SJ) [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1v 2002 ABCA 143] (CanLII){{perABCA|Berger JA}}</ref>
}}


===Definition of Newspaper===
The offence requires an "intent to effect deprivation of freedom of movement"<ref>
{{quotation|
R v B(SJ), [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1v 2002 ABCA 143] (CanLII){{perABCA|Berger JA}}{{at|41}}
'''Definition of newspaper'''<br>
</ref>
297 In sections 303, 304 and 308, newspaper means any paper, magazine or periodical containing public news, intelligence or reports of events, or any remarks or observations thereon, printed for sale and published periodically or in parts or numbers, at intervals not exceeding thirty-one days between the publication of any two such papers, parts or numbers, and any paper, magazine or periodical printed in order to be dispersed and made public, weekly or more often, or at intervals not exceeding thirty-one days, that contains advertisements, exclusively or principally.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 261.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec297 CCC]
}}
===Presumption Responsibility===
{{quotation|
'''Proprietor of newspaper presumed responsible'''<br>
303 (1) The proprietor of a newspaper shall be deemed to publish defamatory matter that is inserted and published therein, unless he proves that the defamatory matter was inserted in the newspaper without his knowledge and without negligence on his part.
<br>
'''General authority to manager when negligence'''<br>
(2) Where the proprietor of a newspaper gives to a person general authority to manage or conduct the newspaper as editor or otherwise, the insertion by that person of defamatory matter in the newspaper shall, for the purposes of subsection (1), be deemed not to be negligence on the part of the proprietor unless it is proved that
:(a) he intended the general authority to include authority to insert defamatory matter in the newspaper; or
:(b) he continued to confer general authority after he knew that it had been exercised by the insertion of defamatory matter in the newspaper.


'''Selling newspapers'''<br>
A person who knowingly becomes involved with the confinement of a person known to them to have been kidnapped can be found to be a party to the initial offence of kidnapping.<ref>
(3) No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that he sells a number or part of a newspaper that contains a defamatory libel, unless he knows that the number or part contains defamatory matter or that defamatory matter is habitually contained in the newspaper.
''R v Vu'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fs54k 2012 SCC 40] (CanLII){{perSCC|Moldaver J}}
<br>
</ref>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 267.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec303 CCC]
}}


===Special Plea for Offence===
{{reflist|2}}
Section 607(2) states:
{{quotation|
607...<br>
'''In case of libel'''<br>
(2) An accused who is charged with defamatory libel may plead in accordance with sections 611 and 612.
<br>...<br>
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec607 CCC]
}}


{{quotation|
==Defences==
'''Libel, plea of justification'''<br>
{{seealso|Defences}}
611. (1) An accused who is charged with publishing a defamatory libel may plead that the defamatory matter published by him was true, and that it was for the public benefit that the matter should have been published in the manner in which and at the time when it was published.
* [[Consent|Consent]]
<br>
* [[Consent|Mistaken Belief of Consent]]
'''Where more than one sense alleged'''<br>
* [[Self-Defence and Defence of Another|Self-Defence or Defence of Another]]
(2) A plea that is made under subsection (1) may justify the defamatory matter in any sense in which it is specified in the count, or in the sense that the defamatory matter bears without being specified, or separate pleas justifying the defamatory matter in each sense may be pleaded separately to each count as if two libels had been charged in separate counts.
* [[Defence of Property|Defence of Property]]
<br>
'''Plea in writing'''<br>
(3) A plea that is made under subsection (1) shall be in writing and shall set out the particular facts by reason of which it is alleged to have been for the public good that the matter should have been published.
<br>
; Reply
(4) The prosecutor may in his reply deny generally the truth of a plea that is made under this section.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 539.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec611 CCC]
}}


===Non-Resistance Not a Defence===
{{quotation|
{{quotation|
'''Plea of justification necessary'''<br>
279<br>...<br>
612. (1) The truth of the matters charged in an alleged libel shall not be inquired into in the absence of a plea of justification under section 611 unless the accused is charged with publishing the libel knowing it to be false, in which case evidence of the truth may be given to negative the allegation that the accused knew that the libel was false.
'''Non-resistance'''<br>
(3) In proceedings under this section, the fact that the person in relation to whom the offence is alleged to have been committed did not resist is not a defence unless the accused proves that the failure to resist was not caused by threats, duress, force or exhibition of force.
<br>
<br>
'''Not guilty, in addition'''<br>
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.
(2) The accused may, in addition to a plea that is made under section 611, plead not guilty and the pleas shall be inquired into together.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec279 CCC]
<br>
'''Effect of plea on punishment'''<br>
(3) Where a plea of justification is pleaded and the accused is convicted, the court may, in pronouncing sentence, consider whether the guilt of the accused is aggravated or mitigated by the plea.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 540.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec611 CCC]
}}
}}


===Special Requirements on Counts===
==Participation of Third Parties==
{{seealso|Role of the Victim and Third Parties|Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses}}


{{quotation|
; Testimonial Aids
'''Special Provisions respecting Counts'''<br>
{{3rdPTestimonyAids}}
'''Sufficiency of count charging libel'''<br>
584 (1) No count for publishing a blasphemous, seditious or defamatory libel, or for selling or exhibiting an obscene book, pamphlet, newspaper or other written matter, is insufficient by reason only that it does not set out the words that are alleged to be libellous or the writing that is alleged to be obscene.
<br>
'''Specifying sense'''<br>
(2) A count for publishing a libel may charge that the published matter was written in a sense that by innuendo made the publication thereof criminal, and may specify that sense without any introductory assertion to show how the matter was written in that sense.
<br>
; Proof
(3) It is sufficient, on the trial of a count for publishing a libel, to prove that the matter published was libellous, with or without innuendo.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 513.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec584 CCC]
}}


{{quotation|
; On Finding of Guilt
'''Sufficiency of count relating to fraud'''<br>
{{606NoticeSPIO|s. 279(1.1) or (2)}}
586 No count that alleges false pretences, fraud or any attempt or conspiracy by fraudulent means is insufficient by reason only that it does not set out in detail the nature of the false pretence, fraud or fraudulent means.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 515.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec586 CCC]
}}


===Special Verdicts===
{{RestitutionNotice}}
{{quotation|
'''Verdicts in cases of defamatory libel'''<br>
317. Where, on the trial of an indictment for publishing a defamatory libel, a plea of not guilty is pleaded, the jury that is sworn to try the issue may give a general verdict of guilty or not guilty on the whole matter put in issue on the indictment, and shall not be required or directed by the judge to find the defendant guilty merely on proof of publication by the defendant of the alleged defamatory libel, and of the sense ascribed thereto in the indictment, but the judge may, in his discretion, give a direction or opinion to the jury on the matter in issue as in other criminal proceedings, and the jury may, on the issue, find a special verdict.
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 281.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec317 CCC]
}}


==Defences==
{{VISNotice}}
* [[Defamatory Libel Defences]]


==Principles and Factors of Sentencing==
==Sentencing Principles and Ranges==
{{seealsoSentencing}}
; Maximum Penalties
; Maximum Penalties
{{SProfileMaxHeader}}
{{SProfileMaxHeader}}
{{SProfileMax|s. 300 [publishing defamatory libel known to be false]| {{NA}} | 5 years custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping]| {{NA}} |life in custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 302 [extortion by libel] | {{NA}} | 2 years custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 279(2) [confinement]| Summary Election | 18 months custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 279(2) | Indictable Election | 10 years custody}}
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{MaxPenaltyIndictment|s. 279(1.1)|life incarceration}}


{{MaxPenaltyIndictment|s. 300, 301 and 302|'''5 years incarceration''' for s. 300 and 302 and '''2 years incarceration''' for s. 301}}
{{MaxPenaltyHybrid|s. 279(2)| 10 years incarceration| 18 months}}


; Minimum Penalties
; Minimum Penalties
{{NoMinimumPenalties}}
Where the aggravating factors in s. 279(1.1)(a) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of '''5 years''' incarceration or '''7 years''' incarceration with prior convictions.
Where the aggravating factor in s. 279(1.1)(a.1) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of '''4 years''' incarceration.
Where the aggravating factor in s. 279(1.1)(a.2) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of '''5 years''' incarceration.


; Available Dispositions
; Available Dispositions
{{SProfileAvailHeader}}
{{SProfileAvailHeader}}
|s. 300, 301, 302 || {{NA}} || {{SProfileAll}}
|s. 279(1.1) || {{NA}} || {{SProfileNoDischargeOrCSO}}
|-
| s. 279(2) || {{NA}} || {{SProfileAll}}
|-
|s. 279(1.1) <br> with aggravating factors || {{NA}} || {{SProfileOnlyFedJail}}
|-
|-
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{SProfileEnd}}


{{AllDispositionsAvailable}}  
{{NoCSOAvailable|F|s. 279(1)}}


; Consecutive Sentences
; Consecutive Sentences
{{NoConsecutive}}
{{NoConsecutive}}


; Costs
===Subsequent Offences===
 
{{quotation|
{{quotation|
'''Costs to successful party in case of libel'''<br>
279.<br>...[(1), (1.1)]...<br>
751. The person in whose favour judgment is given in proceedings by indictment for defamatory libel is entitled to recover from the opposite party costs in a reasonable amount to be fixed by order of the court.
; Subsequent offences
(1.2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1.1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:
:(a) an offence under subsection (1);
:(b) an offence under subsection 85(1) or (2) or section 244 or 244.2; or
:(c) an offence under section 220, 236, 239, 272, 273, 279.1, 344 or 346 if a firearm was used in the commission of the offence.
However, an earlier offence shall not be taken into account if 10 years have elapsed between the day on which the person was convicted of the earlier offence and the day on which the person was convicted of the offence for which sentence is being imposed, not taking into account any time in custody.
<br>
; Factors to consider
(1.21) In imposing a sentence under paragraph (1.1)(a.2), the court shall take into account the age and vulnerability of the victim.
<br>
<br>
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 751; 1995, c. 22, s. 6.
; Sequence of convictions only
(1.3) For the purposes of subsection (1.2), the only question to be considered is the sequence of convictions and no consideration shall be given to the sequence of commission of offences or whether any offence occurred before or after any conviction.
<br>
<br>
'''How recovered'''<br>
...<br>
751.1 Where costs that are fixed under section 751 are not paid forthwith, the party in whose favour judgment is given may enter judgment for the amount of the costs by filing the order in any civil court of the province in which the trial was held that has jurisdiction to enter a judgment for that amount, and that judgment is enforceable against the opposite party in the same manner as if it were a judgment rendered against that opposite party in that court in civil proceedings.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.
1995, c. 22, s. 6.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec279 CCC]
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec751.1 CCC]
}}
}}


Line 294: Line 316:


===Ranges===
===Ranges===
{{seealsoRanges|Defamatory Libel}}
The range of sentence should not be narrow given the variable range of circumstances of kidnapping.<ref>
R v Deo and Mangat, [http://canlii.ca/t/1v968 2007 BCCA 626] (CanLII)
</ref>


==Damages Orders==
One category of kidnapping, described as "the classic form of kidnapping" should be in a range of 10 years to life.<ref>
{{quotation|
''R v Brar'', [http://canlii.ca/t/g6s9j 2014 BCCA 175] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Willcock JA}} (3:0){{at|19}}
; Miscellaneous Provisions
</ref> Another category is a "technical" kidnapping, usually where there was a "relatively short period of confinement", which should range between 4 to 6 years.<ref>
'''Costs to successful party in case of libel'''<br>
Brar at para 19
751 The person in whose favour judgment is given in proceedings by indictment for defamatory libel is entitled to recover from the opposite party costs in a reasonable amount to be fixed by order of the court.
</ref>
<br>
 
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 751; 1995, c. 22, s. 6.
Hostage-taking has been interpreted as a form of terrorism.<ref>
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec751 CCC]
''R v Maltby'' (1986), 30 CCC (3d) 317, 17 O.A.C. 363 (C.A.){{NOCANLII}}</ref>
}}
 
{{quotation|
{{reflist|2}}
'''How recovered'''<br>
751.1 Where costs that are fixed under section 751 are not paid forthwith, the party in whose favour judgment is given may enter judgment for the amount of the costs by filing the order in any civil court of the province in which the trial was held that has jurisdiction to enter a judgment for that amount, and that judgment is enforceable against the opposite party in the same manner as if it were a judgment rendered against that opposite party in that court in civil proceedings.
<br>
1995, c. 22, s. 6.
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec751 CCC]
}}


==Ancillary Sentencing Orders==
==Ancillary Sentencing Order==
{{seealso|Ancillary Orders}}
; Offence-specific Orders
'''Offence-specific Orders'''
{{AOrderHeader}}
{{AOrderHeader}}
| [[DNA Orders]] ||s. 300 or 302 ||
 
* {{SecondDNA(AorB)|s. 300 or 302}}
{{AOrder1| [[DNA Orders]] |s. 279 |
* {{PrimDNA1|s. 279 [kidnapping or forceable confinement]}} }}
 
{{AOrder1| [[Weapons Prohibition Orders|Weapons Prohibition Orders]] |s. 279 |
* {{Section109|A|s. 279}}
* {{Section110|s. 279 [summary election]}} }}
 
{{AOrder1| [[SOIRA Orders|SOIRA Order]] |s. 279(1.1), (2) |
** {{SOIRA2|C|s. 279(1.1)}}
** {{SOIRA2|B|s. 279(2)}} }}
 
{{AOrder1| [[Delayed Parole Eligibility|Delayed Parole Order]] |s. 279 |
* {{ParoleDelayEligible|1|s. 279}} }}
 
{{AOrderEnd}}
{{AOrderEnd}}


'''General Sentencing Orders'''
; General Sentencing Orders
{{GeneralSentencingOrders}}
{{GeneralSentencingOrders}}


'''General Forfeiture Orders'''
; General Forfeiture Orders
{{GeneralForfeitureOrders}}
{{GeneralForfeitureOrders}}
==Record Suspensions and Pardons==
==History==
* [[History of Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement]]


==See Also==
==See Also==
'''Related Offences'''
* [[Abduction of a Young Person (Offence)]]
; References
; References
* [[Pre-Trial and Trial Motions Checklist]]
* [[Pre-Trial and Trial Motions Checklist]]
; Related Offences
* [[Miscellaneous Offences Against Public Order|Sedition]]


[[Category:Offences with Maximum Penalty of 2 Years]]
{{OffencesNavBar/Violence}}
[[Category:Offences with Maximum Penalty of 5 Years]]
[[Category:Unconstitutional Offences]]

Revision as of 18:59, 8 February 2019


Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement
s. 279(1.1), (2) of the Crim. Code
Election / Plea
Crown Election Indictment (279(1.1)), Hybrid (279(2))
summary proceedings must initiate within 12 months of the offence (786(2))
Jurisdiction Prov. Court

Sup. Court w/ Jury (*)
Sup. Court w/ Judge-alone (*)

* Must be indictable. Preliminary inquiry also available.
Summary Dispositions
Avail. Disp. Discharge (730)

Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a))
Fine (734)
Fine + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail (718.3, 787)
Jail + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail + Fine (734)

Conditional Sentence (742.1)
Minimum None
Maximum 18 months incarceration
Indictable Dispositions
Avail. Disp. Discharge (730)

Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a))*
Fine (734)*
Fine + Probation (731(1)(b))*
Jail (718.3, 787)
Jail + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail + Fine (734)
Conditional Sentence (742.1)

(* varies)
Minimum 4, 5, 7 years incarceration (kipnap w/ firearm)
Maximum 10 years incarceration (confine)
Life (kidnap)
Reference
Offence Elements
Sentence Digests

Overview

Offences relating to kidnapping and unlawful confinement are found in Part VIII of the Criminal Code concerning "Offences Against the Person and Reputation".

Pleadings
Template:PleadingsIndictableListTemplate:PleadingsHybridList
Offence
Section
Offence
Type
Crown Election Defence Election
s. 536(2)

Offences under s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] are straight indictable. There is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2).

Offences under s. 279(2) [confinement] are hybrid with a Crown election. If prosecuted by indictment, there is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2).

Notice is required if prior convictions are being relied upon to seek an increased penalty under s. 279(1.1)(a)(ii). Before the Crown can rely on provisions increasing the duration of the weapons prohibition order due to a prior weapons prohibition order notice under s. 727 must be given prior to plea.

Release
Offence(s) Appearance Notice
by Peace Officer

s. 497
Summons
by Judge or Justice

s. 508(1), 512(1), or 788
Release by
Peace Officer
on Undertaking

s. 498, 499, and 501
Release By
a Judge or Justice
on a Release Order

s. 515 to 519
Direct to Attend
for Fingerprints, etc.
Identification of Criminals Act

s. 2 ID Crim. Act
s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] Template:ReleaseProfileOnlyBail
s. 279(2) [confinement] Template:ReleaseProfileAll

Template:ReleaseOnlyBail

When charged under s. 279(2), the accused can be given an appearance notice without arrest under s. 497 or a summons. If arrested, he can be released by the arresting officer under s. 498 or 499 on an undertaking with or without conditions. He can also be released by a justice under s. 515.

Under s. 515(6)(a)(vii), offences charged under s. 279(1.1) have a reverse onus on bail where it has "been committed with a firearm".

Reverse Onus Bail

If police decide to bring the accused before a Justice pursuant to s. 503, there will be a presumption against bail (i.e. a reverse onus) if the offence, prosecuted by indictment, was committed:

  • while at large under s. 515 [bail release], 679 or 680 [release pending appeal or review of appeal] (s. 515(6)(a)(i));
  • "for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association" with a criminal organization (s. 515(6)(a)(ii));
  • where the offence involved a weapon, being a firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, while the accused was subject to a prohibition order preventing possession of these items (s. 515(6)(a)(viii)); or
  • where the accused is not "ordinarily a resident in Canada" (s. 515(6)(b)).

And, regardless of Crown election, if the offence alleged was one:

  • where the offence was an allegation of violence against an "intimate partner" and the accused had been previously convicted of an offence of violence against an "intimate partner" (s. 515(6)(b.1));
  • where the offence alleged is a breach under s. 145(2) to (5) while (s. 515(6)(c));
  • where the offence committed (or conspired to commit) was an offence under s. 5 to 7 of the CDSA that is punishable by life imprisonment (s. 515(6)(d));
Fingeprints and Photos

A peace officer who charges a person under s. 279 of the Code can require that person to attend for the taking of fingerprints, photographs or other similar recordings that are used to identify them under the Identification of Criminals Act.

Publication Bans

For all criminal or regulatory prosecutions, there is a discretionary general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of "any information that could identify the victim or witness" under s. 486.5(1) where it is "necessary" for the "proper administration of justice". Other available publication bans include prohibitions for publishing evidence or other information arising from a bail hearing (s. 517), preliminary inquiry (s. 539) or jury trial (s. 648). There is a mandatory publication ban in all youth prosecutions on information tending to identify young accused under s. 110 of the YCJA or young victims under s. 111 of the YCJA.

Offence Designations
Offence(s) Wiretap
Eligible

s. 183
Dangerous Offender
Designated Offence

s. 752
Serious Personal
Injury Offence

s. 752
AG Consent Required Serious Criminality
Offence
s. 36 IRPA
s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] (primary)
s. 279(2) [confinement]

Offences under s. 279(1.1) are designated offences eligible for wiretap under s. 183.

Section s. 279(1.1) offences are "primary designated offences" under s. 752 for a Dangerous Offender Order. The offender will be deemed a "substantial risk" for a Long-Term Offender Order under s. 753.1.

Offences under s. 279(2) are "designated" offences under s. 752 for dangerous offender applications.

Offences under s. 279(1.1) or (2) are designated "serious personal injury" offences under s. 752(a) only if it has a maximum penalty of 10 years incarceration or more and involves "use or attempted use of violence against another person" or "conduct endangering or likely to endanger the life or safety of another person or inflicting or likely to inflict severe psychological damage on another person".

See below in Ancillary Sentencing Orders for details on designations relating to sentencing orders.

Offence Wording

Kidnapping

279. (1) Every person commits an offence who kidnaps a person with intent

(a) to cause the person to be confined or imprisoned against the person’s will;
(b) to cause the person to be unlawfully sent or transported out of Canada against the person’s will; or
(c) to hold the person for ransom or to service against the person’s will.
Punishment

(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable

(a) if a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm is used in the commission of the offence or if any firearm is used in the commission of the offence and the offence is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organization, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of
(i) in the case of a first offence, five years, and
(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;
(a.1) in any other case where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years;
(a.2) if the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is under 16 years of age, to imprisonment for life and, unless the person who commits the offence is a parent, guardian or person having the lawful care or charge of the person referred to in that paragraph, to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years; and
(b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.

...[(1.2), (1.21), and (1.3) regarding subsequent offences]...

Forcible confinement

(2) Every one who, without lawful authority, confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes another person is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.


CCC

Proof of the Offence

Proving kidnapping under s. 279(1.1) should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit moved or took a person from one place to another[1]
  5. the victim did not consent
  6. the culprit had no lawful authority to do so
  7. the culprit intended to
    1. confine or imprison the victim
    2. cause the person to be sent in or out of the country
    3. holding the person for ransom or service

Proving Forcible Confinement under s. 279(2) should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit "confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes" another person
  5. the other person did not consent to the confinement
  6. the culprit had no "lawful authority" to confine the complainant
  7. the culprit intended to confine the victim
  8. the culprit used force or threat of force
  1. e.g. see R v Oakley, (1977) 36 CCC (2d) 436 (ABCA), 1977 ALTASCAD 118 (CanLII), per Morrow JA

Interpretation of the Offence

Kidnapping vs Confinement

For the offence of kidnapping, the crown must prove that the accused took the victim from one place to another without consent. [1] This is the key distinction between confinement and kidnapping. Confinement is the deprivation of a person's liberty to move, while kidnapping is the moving of a person. All kidnappings are confinements but not all confinements are kidnapping.[2]

Kidnapping is considered "an aggravated form of unlawful confinement, which continues until the victim is freed".[3]

Kienapple

See Kienapple Principle

  1. R v Oakley, (1977), 1977 ALTASCAD 118 (CanLII), 4 AR 103, 36 CCC (2d) 436 (Alta SCAD), per Morrow JA
  2. see R v Tremblay (1997), 1997 CanLII 10526 (QC CA), 117 CCC (3d) 86 (QCCA), per curiam
    R v Niedermier, 2005 BCCA 15 (CanLII), per curiam
  3. R v Vu, 2012 SCC 40 (CanLII), per Moldaver JA, at para 40

Confinement

The essence of the offence is "forcible deprivation of another person's physical liberty or freedom".[1] It's guiding principle is "illegal domination of one person by another".[2]

Meaning of Confinement

Unlawful confinement is made out by "physical restraint" that is "contrary to the wishes of the person restrained" resulting in a deprivation of "liberty to move from one place to another".[3]

"Confinement" means "the state or condition of being confined, restriction or limitation".[4] It is to "keep that person in a place, within or to limits, or a defined area, to restrict or secure that person". [5]

Confinement includes "restraining another person's liberty, though not necessarily the other person's ability to escape."[6]

There is no requirement for "physical application of bindings".[7] The restraint can be by "psychological means, such as threats, intimidation or the imposition of fear".[8] There must either be "actual physical restraint" or "coercive restraint".[9]

The victim must be "fully restrained" so that they cannot "move about from place to place".[10]

The duration of confinement must be "significant".[11] However, the Crown does not need to prove that the confinement happened throughout the "entire period specified in the count."[12]

A person who voluntarily enters into a car, but is then denied the ability to leave will usually make out the offence.[13]

Where consent was obtained by fraud, deceit, or trickery, then the consent is not valid.[14]

Actus Reus
There must be proven that there was at least a minimal deprivation of the victim's freedom. [15]

The duration of the confinement does not need to be lengthy. A "significant" period of time where the victim is "coercively restrained or directed contrary to her wishes, so that she could not move about according to her own inclination and desire" will be sufficient.[16]

A child confined by a lawful guardian can be considered lawful confinement.[17]

An arrest by a peace officer or private citizen can be unlawful confinement. For example, where an officer takes a lawfully arrested man out to a remote area to abandon him in freezing weather makes out the offence.[18]

Confinement refers to the "physical restraint, contrary to the wishes of the person restrained, ...thereby depriving the person of his or her liberty to move from one place to another". [19]

There is no need for physical application of bindings.[20]

Mens Rea
Confinement is a general intent offence.[21]

The offence requires an "intent to effect deprivation of freedom of movement"[22]

A person who knowingly becomes involved with the confinement of a person known to them to have been kidnapped can be found to be a party to the initial offence of kidnapping.[23]

  1. R v Fagg, 2014 BCSC 2632 (CanLII), per Saunders J, at para 38
  2. R v Luxton, 1990 CanLII 83 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 711, per Lamer CJ
  3. R v Gratton (1985), 18 CCC (3d) 462 (ONCA), 1985 CanLII 3549 (ON CA), per Cory JA, at para 29
    Fagg, supra, at para 38
  4. R v EB, [2006] OJ 1864(*no CanLII links) , per Watt J, at para 115
  5. EB, ibid., at para 115
  6. EB, ibid. at para 115 and 116
  7. Gratton, supra at para 29
  8. R v Kematch, 2010 MBCA 18 (CanLII), per Monnin JA, at para 55
    Fagg, supra, at para 41
  9. R v Pritchard, 2008 SCC 59 (CanLII), per Binne J
  10. EB, ibid., at para 119
  11. Gratton, supra, at para 29
    EB, supra, at para 119
  12. EB, supra, at para 119
  13. see for example Tremblay, supra
  14. R v Metcalfe, 1983 CanLII 248 (BC CA), (1983), 10 CCC (3d) 114, per Nemetz CJ at paras 9, 12, 11
    R v Johnson, (1984), 65 NSR (2d) 54 (NSSCAD)(*no CanLII links) , leave denied [1985] SCCA No. 263
    R v Brown (1972), 8 CCC (2d) 13 (Ont CA), 1972 CanLII 1353 (ON CA), per MacKay JA
  15. R v B(SJ), 2002 ABCA 143 (CanLII), 312 AR 313, per Berger JA
  16. R v Pritchard, 2008 SCC 59 (CanLII), per Binnie J (7:0) at para 24 ("The authorities establish that if for any significant period of time [the victim] was coercively restrained or directed contrary to her wishes, so that she could not move about according to her own inclination and desire, there was unlawful confinement")
  17. R v Whalen 2001 NWTSC 63(*no CanLII links)
  18. R v Munson, 2003 SKCA 28 (CanLII), per curiam
  19. Gratton, supra
    R v Neidermier, 2005 BCCA 15 (CanLII), per curiam
  20. Gratton, supra
  21. R v B(SJ) 2002 ABCA 143 (CanLII), per Berger JA
  22. R v B(SJ), 2002 ABCA 143 (CanLII), per Berger JA, at para 41
  23. R v Vu, 2012 SCC 40 (CanLII), per Moldaver J

Defences

See also: Defences

Non-Resistance Not a Defence

279
...
Non-resistance
(3) In proceedings under this section, the fact that the person in relation to whom the offence is alleged to have been committed did not resist is not a defence unless the accused proves that the failure to resist was not caused by threats, duress, force or exhibition of force.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.


CCC

Participation of Third Parties

See also: Role of the Victim and Third Parties and Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses
Testimonial Aids

Certain persons who testify are entitled to make application for the use of testimonial aids: Exclusion of Public (s. 486), Use of a Testimonial Screen (s. 486), Access to Support Person While Testifying (s. 486.1), Close Proximity Video-link Testimony (s. 486.2), Self-Represented Cross-Examination Prohibition Order (s. 486.3), and Witness Security Order (s. 486.7).

A witness, victim or complainant may also request publication bans (s. 486.4, 486.5) and/or a Witness Identity Non-disclosure Order (s. 486.31). See also, Publication Bans, above.

On Finding of Guilt

For serious personal injury offences or murder, s. 606(4.1) requires that after accepting a guilty plea, the judge must inquire whether "any of the victims had advised the prosecutor of their desire to be informed if such an agreement were entered into, and, if so, whether reasonable steps were taken to inform that victim of the agreement". Failing to take reasonable steps at guilty plea requires the prosecutor to "as soon as feasible, take reasonable steps to inform the victim of the agreement and the acceptance of the plea" (s. 606(4.3)).

Under s. 738, a judge must inquire from the Crown before sentencing whether "reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victims with an opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution for their losses and damages".

Under s. 722(2), the judge must inquire "[a]s soon as feasible" before sentencing with the Crown "if reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victim with an opportunity to prepare" a victim impact statement. This will include any person "who has suffered, or is alleged to have suffered, physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss" as a result of the offence. Individuals representing a community impacted by the crime may file a statement under s. 722.2.

Sentencing Principles and Ranges

See also: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing, Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offender, and Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offence
Maximum Penalties
Offence(s) Crown
Election
Maximum Penalty
s. 279(1.1) [kidnapping] N/A life in custody
s. 279(2) [confinement] Summary Election 18 months custody
s. 279(2) Indictable Election 10 years custody

Offences under s. 279(1.1) are straight indictable. The maximum penalty is life incarceration.

Offences under s. 279(2) are hybrid. If prosecuted by indictment, the maximum penalty is 10 years incarceration. If prosecuted by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is 18 months.

Minimum Penalties

Where the aggravating factors in s. 279(1.1)(a) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of 5 years incarceration or 7 years incarceration with prior convictions. Where the aggravating factor in s. 279(1.1)(a.1) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of 4 years incarceration. Where the aggravating factor in s. 279(1.1)(a.2) are established, there is a mandatory minimum of 5 years incarceration.

Available Dispositions
Offence(s) Crown
Election
Discharge
s. 730
Suspended
Sentence

s. 731(1)(a)
Stand-alone
Fine

s. 731(1)(b)
Custody
s. 718.3, 787
Custody and
Probation
s. 731(1)(b)
Custody and
Fine
s. 734
Conditional
Sentence
(CSO)
s. 742.1
s. 279(1.1) N/A
s. 279(2) N/A
s. 279(1.1)
with aggravating factors
N/A

Offences under s. 279(1) are ineligible for a conditional sentence order, when prosecuted by indictment, as the offence is enumerated as ineligible under s. 742.1(f).

Consecutive Sentences

There are no statutory requirements that the sentences be consecutive.

Subsequent Offences

279.
...[(1), (1.1)]...

Subsequent offences

(1.2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1.1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:

(a) an offence under subsection (1);
(b) an offence under subsection 85(1) or (2) or section 244 or 244.2; or
(c) an offence under section 220, 236, 239, 272, 273, 279.1, 344 or 346 if a firearm was used in the commission of the offence.

However, an earlier offence shall not be taken into account if 10 years have elapsed between the day on which the person was convicted of the earlier offence and the day on which the person was convicted of the offence for which sentence is being imposed, not taking into account any time in custody.

Factors to consider

(1.21) In imposing a sentence under paragraph (1.1)(a.2), the court shall take into account the age and vulnerability of the victim.

Sequence of convictions only

(1.3) For the purposes of subsection (1.2), the only question to be considered is the sequence of convictions and no consideration shall be given to the sequence of commission of offences or whether any offence occurred before or after any conviction.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 279; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 39; 1995, c. 39, s. 147; 1997, c. 18, s. 14; 2008, c. 6, s. 30; 2009, c. 22, s. 12; 2013, c. 32, s. 1.


CCC

Principles

Ranges

The range of sentence should not be narrow given the variable range of circumstances of kidnapping.[1]

One category of kidnapping, described as "the classic form of kidnapping" should be in a range of 10 years to life.[2] Another category is a "technical" kidnapping, usually where there was a "relatively short period of confinement", which should range between 4 to 6 years.[3]

Hostage-taking has been interpreted as a form of terrorism.[4]

  1. R v Deo and Mangat, 2007 BCCA 626 (CanLII)
  2. R v Brar, 2014 BCCA 175 (CanLII), per Willcock JA (3:0), at para 19
  3. Brar at para 19
  4. R v Maltby (1986), 30 CCC (3d) 317, 17 O.A.C. 363 (C.A.)(*no CanLII links)

Ancillary Sentencing Order

Offence-specific Orders
Order Conviction Description
DNA Orders s. 279
Weapons Prohibition Orders s. 279
  • On conviction under s. 279 where "violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted", and punishable by "imprisonment for ten years or more", the weapons prohibition order is mandatory under s. 109(1)(a) or where "violence was used, threatened or attempted against" an enumerated party relating to a domestic partnership a weapons prohibition order is mandatory under s. 109(1)(a.1).The order prohibits "the person from possessing any firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition and explosive".
      • Duration (first offence): The Order prohibiting to "firearms" (other than a prohibited firearm or restricted firearm) and "crossbow, restricted weapon, ammunition and explosive substance" is for not less than 10 years starting at release from custody or at sentencing where custody is not ordered. The Order prohibiting "prohibited firearm, restricted firearm, prohibited weapon, prohibited device" is for life.
      • Duration (subsequent s. 109 offence): The duration must be life for all enumerated weapons and firearms. Notice of increased penalty under s. 727 required.
  • Where there is a conviction under s. 279 [summary election] for an offence not otherwise referred to in s. 109, where "violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted" or "involves, or the subject-matter of which is a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance", a discretionary prohibition order of any of these items is permitted under s. 110 regardless of Crown election where "it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the person or of any other person".
      • Duration: The Order is for no more than 10 years starting at release from custody or at sentencing where custody is not ordered. If there is a prior conviction for an offence eligible for a s. 109 Order, the duration must be life. If violence is "used, threatened or attempted against" their past or present intimate partner, a child or parent of the said partner, or a person who resides with the said partner or the offender, the duration can be up to life in duration.
      • If the judge declines to make an Order or not order all the possible terms, "the court shall include in the record a statement of the court's reasons for not doing so." (s. 110(3))
SOIRA Order s. 279(1.1), (2)
    • On conviction under s. 279(1.1), listed as a "secondary offence" under s. 490.011(1)(a), a SOIRA Order shall be ordered under s. 490.011(1)(b), on application of the prosecutor, "if the prosecutor establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the offence with the intent to commit" any SOIRA designated offence listed under s. 490.011(a), (c), (c.1), or (d):
      • If the offender was subject to a SOIRA Order anytime prior to sentencing, the duration is life (s. 490.012(3))
      • Otherwise, the duration is life as the offence has "maximum term of imprisonment for the offence is life" (s. 490.013(2)(c))).
      • There is an option for early termination under s. 490.015 after 20 years.

Note that by function of s. 490.011(2) of the Code, SOIRA orders are not available when sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act

    • On conviction under s. 279(2), listed as a "secondary offence" under s. 490.011(1)(a), a SOIRA Order shall be ordered under s. 490.011(1)(b), on application of the prosecutor, "if the prosecutor establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the offence with the intent to commit" any SOIRA designated offence listed under s. 490.011(a), (c), (c.1), or (d):
      • If the offender was subject to a SOIRA Order anytime prior to sentencing, the duration is life (s. 490.012(3))
      • Otherwise, the duration is 20 years as the offence has "maximum term of imprisonment for the offence is 10 or 14 years" (s. 490.013(2)(b))).
      • There is an option for early termination under s. 490.015 available after 10 years (if 20 year order) or 20 years (if life order).

Note that by function of s. 490.011(2) of the Code, SOIRA orders are not available when sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act

Delayed Parole Order s. 279
  • Periods of imprisonment of 2 years or more for convictions under s. 279 are eligible for delayed parole order under s. 743.6(1) requiring the offender to serve at least "one half of the sentence or ten years, whichever is less", "where denunciation of the offence or the objective of specific or general deterrence so requires".
General Sentencing Orders
Order Conviction Description
Non-communication order while offender in custody (s. 743.21) any The judge has the discretion to order that the offender be prohibited "from communicating...with any victim, witness or other person" while in custody except where the judge "considers [it] necessary" to communicate with them.
Restitution Orders (s. 738) any A discretionary Order is available for things such as the replacement value of the property; the pecuniary damages incurred from harm, expenses fleeing a domestic partner; or certain expenses arising from the commission of an offence under s.402.2 or 403.
Victim Fine Surcharge (s. 737) any A discretionary surcharge under s. 737 of 30% of any fine order imposed, $100 per summary conviction or $200 per indictable conviction. If the offence occurs on or after October 23, 2013, the order has smaller minimum amounts (15%, $50, or $100).
General Forfeiture Orders
Forfeiture Conviction Description
Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime (s. 462.37(1) or (2.01)) any Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence under the Code or the CDSA in which property is "proceeds of crime" and offence was "committed in relation to that property", the property shall be forfeited to His Majesty the King on application of the Crown. NB: does not apply to summary offences.
Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture (s. 462.37(3)) any Where a Court is satisfied an order for the forfeiture of proceeds of crime under s. 462.37(1) or (2.01) can be made, but that property cannot be "made subject to an order", then the Court "may" order a fine in "an amount equal to the value of the property". Failure to pay the fine will result in a default judgement imposing a period of incarceration.
Forfeiture of Weapons or Firearms (s. 491) any Where there is finding of guilt for an offence where a "weapon, an imitation firearm, a prohibited device, any ammunition, any prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance was used in the commission of [the] offence and that thing has been seized and detained", or "that a person has committed an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance has been seized and detained, that the item be an enumerated weapon or related item be connected to the offence", then there will be a mandatory forfeiture order. However, under s. 491(2), if the lawful owner "was not a party to the offence" and the judge has "no reasonable grounds to believe that the thing would or might be used in the commission of an offence", then it should be returned to the lawful owner.
Forfeiture of Offence-related Property (s. 490.1) any Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence, "any property is offence-related property" where (a) by means or in respect of which an indictable offence under this Act or the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act is committed, (b) that is used in any manner in connection with the commission of such an offence, or (c) that is intended to be used for committing such an offence". Such property is to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province. NB: does not apply to summary offences.

Record Suspensions and Pardons

History

See Also

Related Offences

References