Section 525 Detention Review (Until December 18, 2019)

From Criminal Law Notebook
Revision as of 06:31, 13 February 2019 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/7vf2\#sec([0-9][0-9][0-9]) " to "{{CCCSec|$1}} ")

General Principles

See also: Bail Review

Where a detained accused's trial has been delayed, the court must review bail.

Section 525 authorizes an automatic review of the terms of detention where the trial has been delayed a period of more than 90 days (for indicatble offences) or 30 days (for summary offences).

Section 525 states:

Time for application to judge

525. (1) Where an accused who has been charged with an offence other than an offence listed in section 469 [exclusive jurisdiction offences] and who is not required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter is being detained in custody pending his trial for that offence and the trial has not commenced

(a) in the case of an indictable offence, within ninety days from
(i) the day on which the accused was taken before a justice under section 503 [Compelling first appearance], or
(ii) where an order that the accused be detained in custody has been made under section 521 [Crown-requested bail review] or 524 [Arrest of accused on bail], or a decision has been made with respect to a review under section 520, the later of the day on which the accused was taken into custody under that order and the day of the decision, or
(b) in the case of an offence for which the accused is being prosecuted in proceedings by way of summary conviction, within thirty days from
(i) the day on which the accused was taken before a justice under subsection 503(1), or
(ii) where an order that the accused be detained in custody has been made under section 521 or 524, or a decision has been made with respect to a review under section 520, the later of the day on which the accused was taken into custody under that order and the day of the decision,

the person having the custody of the accused shall, forthwith on the expiration of those ninety or thirty days, as the case may be, apply to a judge having jurisdiction in the place in which the accused is in custody to fix a date for a hearing to determine whether or not the accused should be released from custody.
...

Matters to be considered on hearing

(3) On the hearing described in subsection (1), the judge may, in deciding whether or not the accused should be released from custody, take into consideration whether the prosecutor or the accused has been responsible for any unreasonable delay in the trial of the charge.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 525; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 90; 1994, c. 44, s. 49; 1997, c. 18, s. 61.

[annotation(s) added]


CCC

The relevant offence must be one other than an offence under 469.[1]

Application

Section 525 applies to those ordered detained under s. 515 on any of the three grounds of detention. It does not apply for those granted release but had simply not satisfied the conditions of release.[2]

Where there has been no bail hearing and no detention order made, review under s. 525 does not apply.[3]

Purpose

The purpose of s. 525 is to "is to prevent the accused from languishing for lengthy periods of time in custody and to ensure a prompt trial".[4] It should "facilitate the obtaining of bail and the review of bail applications when originally refused".[5]

The is accomplished by requiring "the Court to monitor the continued detention or the accused to ensure that he is not needlessly detained, and to ensure that there is no unreasonable delay in proceeding with the trial."[6]

The section provides "oversight of delays in the trial process even where the defence does not desire a bail review hearing".[7]

"Forthwith"

The meaning of "forthwith" is equivalent to "as soon as practicable". This will depend on the circumstances of each case.[8]

Calculation of Time Period

Where the accused is subject to multiple detention orders, the 90 day review should take place "forthwith" on the expiration of the later of the detention orders.[9]

Expiration of Time Period

Should the time period lapse without a review of detetion, the detention does not automatically become unlawful.[10]

Failure of the hearing to proceed on the scheduled date does not result in a loss of jurisdiction.[11]

  1. See s. 525
    Includes offences such as Homicide
  2. Ex Parte Srebot, 1975 CanLII 1288 (BC CA), per Farris CJ
  3. R v Sarkozi, 2010 BCSC 1410 (CanLII), at para 32, per Gaul J ("...I should point out that I do not agree with the proposition that an accused has the right to a s. 525 review in a situation where there has been no bail hearing in Provincial Court, and more particularly no detention order made. In my opinion, a detention order is a prerequisite for a s. 525 review and that absent such an order an accused has no right to the review...")
  4. R v Gill, 2005 CanLII 22214 (ON SC), [2005] OJ No 2648 (S.C.J.) (QL), per Hill J, at para 3
  5. Gill, ibid., at para 3
  6. Fraser Regional Correctional Centre v Canada (Attorney General), [1993] BCJ No. 2348 (S.C.), 1993 CanLII 354 (BC SC), per Clancy J, at para 4
  7. R v Sawrenko, 2008 YKSC 27 (CanLII), per Veale J, at para 26
  8. Vukelich v British Columbia (Director of The Vancouver Pre-Trial Centre), 1993 CanLII 800 (BC CA), per curiam (5:0)
  9. R v Ferreira, 1981 CanLII 327 (BC CA), per Taggart JA, at para 6
  10. Vukelich, ibid., at para 39 to 40
    R v Pomfret, 1990 CanLII 11035 (MB CA), per Huband JA (3:0) cf. Burton v. British Columbia (Director of Surrey Pre-Trial Centre), 1993 CanLII 1438 (BC CA), per Hinds JA (3:0)
  11. R v Gagliardi, 1981 CanLII 341 (BC CA), per Seaton JA, at paras 13 to 16

Procedure

Show Cause Procedure Applies

525...

Provisions applicable to proceedings

(8) The provisions of sections 517 [Order directing matters not to be published for specified period], 518 [Inquiries to be made by justice and evidence during show cause hearing] and 519 [Release of accused] apply with such modifications as the circumstances require in respect of any proceedings under this section.
...


Burden

The onus is upon the same party who had the onus that the initial bail hearing.[1]

Early Trial Dates

525...

Directions for expediting trial

(9) Where an accused is before a judge under any of the provisions of this section, the judge may give directions for expediting the trial of the accused.
...


Directions for expediting proceedings

526 Subject to subsection 525(9), a court, judge or justice before which or whom an accused appears pursuant to this Part may give directions for expediting any proceedings in respect of the accused.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 526; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 91.


CCC

  1. R v Sarkozi, 2010 BCSC 1410 (CanLII), per Gaul J -- review of conflicting case law on question of burden

Notice

525...

Notice of hearing

(2) On receiving an application under subsection (1), the judge shall

(a) fix a date for the hearing described in subsection (1) to be held in the jurisdiction
(i) where the accused is in custody, or
(ii) where the trial is to take place; and
(b) direct that notice of the hearing be given to such persons, including the prosecutor and the accused, and in such manner as the judge may specify.

...


Justification for Detention

See also: Grounds for Release

The review under s. 525(1) considers whether or not continued detention is justified under s. 525(10).

515...

Justification for detention in custody

(10) For the purposes of this section, the detention of an accused in custody is justified only on one or more of the following grounds:

(a) where the detention is necessary to ensure his or her attendance in court in order to be dealt with according to law;
(b) where the detention is necessary for the protection or safety of the public, including any victim of or witness to the offence, or any person under the age of 18 years, having regard to all the circumstances including any substantial likelihood that the accused will, if released from custody, commit a criminal offence or interfere with the administration of justice; and
(c) if the detention is necessary to maintain confidence in the administration of justice, having regard to all the circumstances, including
(i) the apparent strength of the prosecution’s case,
(ii) the gravity of the offence,
(iii) the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence, including whether a firearm was used, and
(iv) the fact that the accused is liable, on conviction, for a potentially lengthy term of imprisonment or, in the case of an offence that involves, or whose subject-matter is, a firearm, a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of three years or more.


CCC

Release

525...

Order

(4) If, following the hearing described in subsection (1), the judge is not satisfied that the continued detention of the accused in custody is justified within the meaning of subsection 515(10), the judge shall order that the accused be released from custody pending the trial of the charge on his giving an undertaking or entering into a recognizance described in any of paragraphs 515(2)(a) to (e) with such conditions described in subsection 515(4) as the judge considers desirable.


Breach of Section 525 Release

Authority to Arrest on Breach of s. 525 Release Order

525...

Warrant of judge for arrest

(5) Where a judge having jurisdiction in the province where an order under subsection (4) for the release of an accused has been made is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused

(a) has contravened or is about to contravene the undertaking or recognizance on which he has been released, or
(b) has, after his release from custody on his undertaking or recognizance, committed an indictable offence,

he may issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused.

Arrest without warrant by peace officer

(6) Notwithstanding anything in this Act, a peace officer who believes on reasonable grounds that an accused who has been released from custody under subsection (4)

(a) has contravened or is about to contravene the undertaking or recognizance on which he has been released, or
(b) has, after his release from custody on his undertaking or recognizance, committed an indictable offence,

may arrest the accused without warrant and take him or cause him to be taken before a judge having jurisdiction in the province where the order for his release was made.

Hearing and order

(7) A judge before whom an accused is taken pursuant to a warrant issued under subsection (5) or pursuant to subsection (6) may, where the accused shows cause why his detention in custody is not justified within the meaning of subsection 515(10), order that the accused be released on his giving an undertaking or entering into a recognizance described in any of paragraphs 515(2)(a) to (e) with such conditions, described in subsection 515(4), as the judge considers desirable.