« Exclusion de personnes du tribunal » : différence entre les versions
m Remplacement de texte : « ([0-9]+) SCR ([0-9]) » par « $1 RCS $2 » Balises : Modification par mobile Modification par le web mobile |
m Remplacement de texte : « ([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]) SCC ([0-9]) » par « $1 CSC $2 » |
||
| Ligne 144 : | Ligne 144 : | ||
Described in {{CanLIIRP|Garofoli|1fss5|1990 CanLII 52 (SCC)|[1990] 2 RCS 1421}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}}<br> | Described in {{CanLIIRP|Garofoli|1fss5|1990 CanLII 52 (SCC)|[1990] 2 RCS 1421}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}}<br> | ||
affirmed in {{CanLIIRP|Leipert|1fr41|1997 CanLII 367 (SCC)|[1997] 1 RCS 281}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}}<br> | affirmed in {{CanLIIRP|Leipert|1fr41|1997 CanLII 367 (SCC)|[1997] 1 RCS 281}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Basi|26mxq|2009 | {{CanLIIRP|Basi|26mxq|2009 CSC 52 (CanLII)|[2009] 3 RCS 389}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The rationale for such an ''in camera'' hearing is that the risk posed to informers far outweighs the right to full answer and defence and the exception to privilege for innocence at stake.<ref> | The rationale for such an ''in camera'' hearing is that the risk posed to informers far outweighs the right to full answer and defence and the exception to privilege for innocence at stake.<ref> | ||