« Exclusion de personnes du tribunal » : différence entre les versions
m Remplacement de texte : « 200([0-9]), ch\. ([0-9]+), » par « {{LegHistory00s|200$1, ch. $2}}, » |
m Remplacement de texte : « (SCC) » par « (CSC) » |
||
| Ligne 27 : | Ligne 27 : | ||
Avant le début du procès, il est normalement prévu que tous les témoins potentiels soient exclus de la salle d'audience. À la demande de l’une ou l’autre des parties, le juge a le pouvoir discrétionnaire d’ordonner l’exclusion des témoins.<ref> | Avant le début du procès, il est normalement prévu que tous les témoins potentiels soient exclus de la salle d'audience. À la demande de l’une ou l’autre des parties, le juge a le pouvoir discrétionnaire d’ordonner l’exclusion des témoins.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Hoyt|hv0d6|1949 CanLII 391 (NB CA)| CCC 306}}{{perNBCA|Richards CJ}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Hoyt|hv0d6|1949 CanLII 391 (NB CA)| CCC 306}}{{perNBCA|Richards CJ}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Dobberthien|1z1gh|1974 CanLII 184 ( | {{CanLIIRP|Dobberthien|1z1gh|1974 CanLII 184 (CSC)|[1975] 2 RCS 560}}{{perSCC-H|Martland J}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Leitner|1ntzw|1998 CanLII 13871 (SK QB)|[1998] S.J. No 735 (Sask. Q.B.)}}{{perSKQB|Dawson J}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Leitner|1ntzw|1998 CanLII 13871 (SK QB)|[1998] S.J. No 735 (Sask. Q.B.)}}{{perSKQB|Dawson J}}<br> | ||
The Law of Evidence in Canada, Sopinka Lederman & Bryant, Butterworths, 2nd edition{{atps|826‑827}}<br> | The Law of Evidence in Canada, Sopinka Lederman & Bryant, Butterworths, 2nd edition{{atps|826‑827}}<br> | ||
| Ligne 130 : | Ligne 130 : | ||
===''In Camera'' Hearings=== | ===''In Camera'' Hearings=== | ||
An ''in camera'' hearing prohibits the accused from being present in court during the evidence. These hearings are not under legislation but are a judge-created procedure.<ref> | An ''in camera'' hearing prohibits the accused from being present in court during the evidence. These hearings are not under legislation but are a judge-created procedure.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Seaboyer|1fskf|1991 CanLII 76 ( | {{CanLIIRP|Seaboyer|1fskf|1991 CanLII 76 (CSC)|[1991] 2 RCS 577}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}}{{atL|1fskf|96}} ("Such procedures do not require legislation. It has always been open to the courts to devise such procedures as may be necessary to ensure a fair trial. The requirement of a voir dire before a confession can be admitted, for example, is judge-made law.")</ref> | ||
An ''in camera'' hearing is similar but different from a voir dire.<ref> | An ''in camera'' hearing is similar but different from a voir dire.<ref> | ||
| Ligne 142 : | Ligne 142 : | ||
Evidence that may reveal the identity of confidential informers will sometimes held ''in camera'', such as in the review of affidavits for wiretaps.<ref> | Evidence that may reveal the identity of confidential informers will sometimes held ''in camera'', such as in the review of affidavits for wiretaps.<ref> | ||
Described in {{CanLIIRP|Garofoli|1fss5|1990 CanLII 52 ( | Described in {{CanLIIRP|Garofoli|1fss5|1990 CanLII 52 (CSC)|[1990] 2 RCS 1421}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}}<br> | ||
affirmed in {{CanLIIRP|Leipert|1fr41|1997 CanLII 367 ( | affirmed in {{CanLIIRP|Leipert|1fr41|1997 CanLII 367 (CSC)|[1997] 1 RCS 281}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Basi|26mxq|2009 CSC 52 (CanLII)|[2009] 3 RCS 389}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Basi|26mxq|2009 CSC 52 (CanLII)|[2009] 3 RCS 389}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Ligne 149 : | Ligne 149 : | ||
{{supra1|Leipert}}<br> | {{supra1|Leipert}}<br> | ||
{{supra1|Basi}}<br> | {{supra1|Basi}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Edwards Books and Art Ltd|1ftpt|1986 CanLII 12 ( | {{CanLIIRP|Edwards Books and Art Ltd|1ftpt|1986 CanLII 12 (CSC)|[1986] 2 RCS 713}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}{{atL|1ftpt|117}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||