View source for Right to Counsel (Cases)

{{LevelZero}}
{{HeaderProcCases}}
==[[Right to Counsel|Right to counsel]]==
{|class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Case !! s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Manchulenko|fr56p|2012 ONSC 2558 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Gareau J}} || Y||Y|| 10(b) violation, evidence excluded, 253 charge
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nakamura|fnl3j|2011 BCSC 1443 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Romilly J}}
||Y||Y|| statements excluded; trafficking
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Buker|2b7gx|2010 ABPC 203 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC| Bascom J}} ||Y||Y||
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Volk|27hjx|2010 SKCA 3 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Ottenbreit JA}}||Y||N|| police pull over for illegal driving; they smell marijuana; utterance of drugs in car, failed to give right to counsel
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ewert|25xq4|2009 ABPC 270 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC| Fradsham J}} ||Y||Y|| accused offered lawyer and responded by saying "it's 4 a.m. I can't find a lawyer".
|-
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Melfi|, [2001] OJ No 4863 (SCJ)}} ||N||N|| detainee requested specific counsel--at 3:06am police left home voice-mail for counsel--at 3:09am a call was placed to duty counsel. At 3:15am, the duty counsel returned the call and spoke to detainee. No complaints of duty counsel advice, no further mention of original counsel. Acquittal set aside.
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Polashek|1f9ff|1999 CanLII 3714 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}
||Y||Y|| search vehicle after drug odour; failed to give notice of right to counsel
|}