Bail (Cases): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 22:11, 11 August 2021

< Procedure and Practice
< Cases

Case law regarding Judicial Interim Release

Bail Application

Case Name	Summary
R v EZL, 2013 BCPC 65 (CanLII), per Challenger J	bail denied. Charged with aggravated assualt, possn' firearm (85), unsafe storage. Secondary grounds.
R v W.R.B. 2011 ABQB 793 (CanLII), per Lee J	bail review on trafficking and weapon charges; trial date far down the road--denied
R v JHB 2012 ABQB 250 (CanLII), per Lee J	bail granted -- two counts armed robbery-- long criminal record
R v Gowen, 2010 NSSC 471 (CanLII), per Warner J	first degree murder bail denied
R v DDP 2012 ABQB 229 (CanLII), per Lee J	bail review -- charged with break and enter-- bail granted--aboriginal background
R v W.R.B. 2011 ABQB 793 (CanLII), per Lee J	bail review on trafficking and weapon charges; trial date far down the road--denied
R v Sarkozi, 2010 BCSC 1410 (CanLII), per Gaul J	review of law for 90 day bail review

Revocation

Case Name	Result	Summary
R v Ellis, 2013 ONSC 908 (CanLII), per Campbell J	revoked	convicted of firearm offences

Primary Grounds

Case Name	Result	Summary
R v Rosenburg, [1991] OJ No 543 (C.J. G.D.)(*no CanLII links)	released	accused alleged to have defrauded persons and company of $168 million. Accused resided in Florida, was permitted to reside there while case was pending.
R v Clarkson, [1993] AJ No 623 (CA)(*no CanLII links)	released	offender was resident of New Zealand and was permitted to return there while charges were pending.
Federal Republic of Germany v Schreiber, [2000] OJ No 2618 (SCJ)(*no CanLII links)

Bail on Appeal

Case Name	Result	Summary
R v Chubbs, 2013 NLCA 30 (CanLII), per Hoegg JA	denied
R v Bullerwell, 2013 BCCA 287 (CanLII), per Garson JA	denied

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ! Case Name !! Summary
 |-
-| R v E.Z.L., [http://canlii.ca/t/fx0p0 2013 BCPC 65] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} || bail denied. Charged with aggravated assualt, possn' firearm (85), unsafe storage. Secondary grounds.
+| {{CanLIIR-S|EZL|fx0p0|2013 BCPC 65 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Challenger J}} || bail denied. Charged with aggravated assualt, possn' firearm (85), unsafe storage. Secondary grounds.
 |-
 | R v W.R.B.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpcp5 2011 ABQB 793] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}  || bail review on trafficking and weapon charges; trial date far down the road--denied
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 | R v JHB<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr1p4 2012 ABQB 250] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}  || bail granted -- two counts armed robbery-- long criminal record
 |-
-| R v Gowen<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmnh9 2010 NSSC 471] (CanLII){{perNSSC| Warner J}} || first degree murder bail denied
+| {{CanLIIR-S|Gowen|fmnh9|2010 NSSC 471 (CanLII)}}{{perNSSC| Warner J}} || first degree murder bail denied
 |-
 | R v DDP<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqx8j 2012 ABQB 229] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}  || bail review -- charged with break and enter-- bail granted--aboriginal background
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 | R v W.R.B.<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpcp5 2011 ABQB 793] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}  || bail review on trafficking and weapon charges; trial date far down the road--denied
 |-
-| R v Sarkozi<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2cvh4 2010 BCSC 1410] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Gaul J}} || review of law for 90 day bail review
+| {{CanLIIR-S|Sarkozi|2cvh4|2010 BCSC 1410 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Gaul J}} || review of law for 90 day bail review
 |}
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ! Case Name !! Result !!Summary
 |-
-|R v Ellis<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw1rk 2013 ONSC 908] (CanLII){{perONSC|Campbell J}} || revoked || convicted of firearm offences
+|{{CanLIIR-S|Ellis|fw1rk|2013 ONSC 908 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Campbell J}} || revoked || convicted of firearm offences
 |}
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 ! Case Name !! Result !!Summary
 |-
-|R v Rosenburg <Br>[1991] O.J. No. 543 (C.J. G.D.){{NOCANLII}} || released || accused alleged to have defrauded persons and company of $168 million. Accused resided in Florida, was permitted to reside there while case was pending.
+|{{CanLIIR-SN|Rosenburg| [1991] OJ No 543 (C.J. G.D.)}} || released || accused alleged to have defrauded persons and company of $168 million. Accused resided in Florida, was permitted to reside there while case was pending.
 |-
-|R v Clarkson <Br>[1993] A.J. No. 623 (C.A.){{NOCANLII}} || released || offender was resident of New Zealand and was permitted to return there while charges were pending.
+|{{CanLIIR-SN|Clarkson| [1993] AJ No 623 (CA)}} || released || offender was resident of New Zealand and was permitted to return there while charges were pending.
 |-
-|Federal Republic of Germany v Schreiber<Br>[2000] O.J. No. 2618 (S.C.J.){{NOCANLII}} || ||
+|{{CanLIIRC-SN|Federal Republic of Germany v Schreiber| [2000] OJ No 2618 (SCJ)}} || ||
 |}
@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 ! Case Name !! Result !!Summary
 |-
-| R v Chubbs, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fxctl 2013 NLCA 30] (CanLII){{perNLCA|Hoegg JA}} || denied||
+| {{CanLIIR-S|Chubbs|fxctl|2013 NLCA 30 (CanLII)}}{{perNLCA|Hoegg JA}} || denied||
 |-
-| R v Bullerwell, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fz770 2013 BCCA 287] (CanLII){{perBCCA| Garson JA}} || denied||
+| {{CanLIIR-S|Bullerwell|fz770|2013 BCCA 287 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA| Garson JA}} || denied||
 |}