Definition of Bodily Harm: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\{\{fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "fr:$1"
 
(32 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[fr:Définition_des_lésions_corporelles]]
{{Currency2|January|2020}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{HeaderCrimLaw}}
{{HeaderCrimLaw}}
Line 7: Line 9:
Section 2 of the Criminal Code defines "bodily harm" as:
Section 2 of the Criminal Code defines "bodily harm" as:


{{quotation1|
{{quotation3|
s.2
2<br>
<br>...<br>
{{Ellipsis}}
“bodily harm” means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;
'''"bodily harm"''' means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;<br>
<br>
{{Ellipsis}}
...<br>
{{History-S2}}
{{History-S2}}
|[{{CCCSec|2}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|2}}
|{{NoteUp|}}
|{{NoteUp|2}}
|{{terms-
|[[Definitions_of_Parties,_Persons,_Places_and_Organizations#Person|"person" (s. 2)]]
}}
}}
}}


; Standard
; Standard
Bodily harm is considered a "low threshold" to meet.<ref>
Bodily harm is considered a "low threshold" to meet.<ref>
''R v Bulldog'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gk9xr 2015 ABCA 251] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}}{{atL|gk9xr|44}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Bulldog|gk9xr|2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII)|326 CCC (3d) 385}}{{TheCourtABCA}}{{atL|gk9xr|44}}<br>
''R v Dorscheid'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2dbsz 1994 ABCA 18] (CanLII), [1994] AJ No 56 (CA){{perABCA|Cote JA}}{{AtL|2dbsz|11}}
{{CanLIIRP|Dorscheid|2dbsz|1994 ABCA 18 (CanLII)|[1994] AJ No 56 (CA)}}{{perABCA|Cote JA}}{{AtL|2dbsz|11}}
</ref>
</ref>


It must be more than "a very short time period and an injury of very minor degree which results in a very minor degree of distress".<ref>
It must be more than "a very short time period and an injury of very minor degree which results in a very minor degree of distress."<ref>
{{supra1|Bulldog}}{{atL|gk9xr|44}}<br>
{{supra1|Bulldog}}{{atL|gk9xr|44}}<br>
''R v Dixon'' (1988), [http://canlii.ca/t/20xgw 1988 CanLII 2824] (BC CA), 42 CCC (3d) 318 at 332, [1988] 5 WWR 577{{perBCCA|Carrothers JA}}
{{CanLIIRP|Dixon|20xgw|1988 CanLII 2824 (BC CA)|42 CCC (3d) 318 at 332, [1988] 5 WWR 577}}{{perBCCA|Carrothers JA}}
</ref>
It must be "more than merely transient or trifling."<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Kooner|jttmm|2023 BCCA 8 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Griffin JA}}{{atL|jttmm|50}}
</ref>
 
Minor injuries that interfere with comfort for a "short time" can be found to be bodily harm, including small bruises, swelling and headaches.<Ref>
{{ibid1|Kooner}} at para 50<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Dixon|20xgw|1988 CanLII 2824 (BC CA)|42 CCC (3d) 318}}{{perBCCA|Carrothers JA}}{{atL|20xgw|45}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Bulldog|gk9xr|2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII)|326 CCC (3d) 385}}{{TheCourtABCA}}{{AtL|gk9xr|44}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|CK|4zdm|2001 BCCA 379 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}}{{AtsL|4zdm|7| to 9}}
</ref>
</ref>


Bodily harm could include psychological injury to the victim.<ref>
Bodily harm could include psychological injury to the victim.<ref>
''R v McCraw'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fshr 1991 CanLII 29] (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 72, (1991), 66 CCC (3d) 517 (SCC){{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|McCraw|1fshr|1991 CanLII 29 (SCC)|[1991] 3 SCR 72, 66 CCC (3d) 517}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
see also ''R v C.D.; R v CDK'', [2005] 3 SCR 668, [http://canlii.ca/t/1m6bp 2005 SCC 78] (CanLII){{perSCC| Bastarache J}}<br>
see also {{CanLIIRP|C.D.; R v CDK|1m6bp|2005 SCC 78 (CanLII)|[2005] 3 SCR 668}}{{perSCC| Bastarache J}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 38: Line 52:


This definition is similar (if it is not word for word) to the English common law definition of actual bodily harm stated.<ref>
This definition is similar (if it is not word for word) to the English common law definition of actual bodily harm stated.<ref>
''R v Donovan'' [1934] 2 KB 498 (also 25 Cr. App. Rep.1 CCA) at page 509 and ''R v Chan-Fook'' [1994] 2 All ER 552 at 557D where the reference to transient or trifling injuries is taken as applying to actual bodily harm rather than bodily harm</ref>
{{UKCase|R v Donovan| [1934] 2 KB 498 (also 25 Cr. App. Rep.1 CCA)}} at page 509 and {{UKCase|R v Chan-Fook| [1994] 2 All ER 552}} at 557D where the reference to transient or trifling injuries is taken as applying to actual bodily harm rather than bodily harm</ref>


; Transient or Trifling
; Transient or Trifling
An injury must be ''both'' transient and trifling to be excluded from the definition.<ref>
An injury must be ''both'' transient and trifling to be excluded from the definition.<ref>
''R v JA'', [http://canlii.ca/t/28wdg 2010 ONCA 226] (CanLII){{perONCA|Simmons JA}} - reversed on other grounds at [2011] 2 SCR 440<br>
{{CanLIIRP|JA|28wdg|2010 ONCA 226 (CanLII)|253 CCC (3d) 153}}{{perONCA|Simmons JA}} - reversed on other grounds at [2011] 2 SCR 440<br>
</ref>
</ref>


"Transient" has been interpreted as "Passing by or away with time; not durable or permanent; temporary, transitory"<ref>
"Transient" has been interpreted as "[p]assing by or away with time; not durable or permanent; temporary, transitory"<ref>
{{supra1|Dixon}}{{atp|331}}</ref>
{{supra1|Dixon}}{{atp|331}}</ref>


"Trifling" has been interpreted as "Of little moment or value; trumpery; insignificant, petty"<ref>
"Trifling" has been interpreted as "[o]f little moment or value; trumpery; insignificant, petty"<ref>
{{supra1|Dixon}}{{atp|331}}</ref>
{{supra1|Dixon}}{{atp|331}}</ref>


It is wrong to conclude that merely because the injury heals in less than a week would not be bodily harm as serious life-threatening injuries can be of short duration.<ref>
It is wrong to conclude that merely because the injury heals in less than a week would not be bodily harm as serious life-threatening injuries can be of short duration.<ref>
''R v Garrett'' (1995), 169 A.R. 394 (C.A.)</ref>
{{CanLIIR-N|Garrett| (1995), 169 AR 394 (CA)}}</ref>


The court should look at the overall effect of the injuries, rather than the individual's injuries that may be trifling in isolation.<ref>
The court should look at the overall effect of the injuries, rather than the individual's injuries that may be trifling in isolation.<ref>
Line 59: Line 73:
; Medical Evidence
; Medical Evidence
It is not necessary to call medical evidence to prove bodily harm.<ref>
It is not necessary to call medical evidence to prove bodily harm.<ref>
''R v Giroux'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2dc3q 1995 ABCA 393] (CanLII), [1995] AJ No 900 (C.A.){{perABCA|Fraser CJ}} (2:1)</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Giroux|2dc3q|1995 ABCA 393 (CanLII)|[1995] AJ No 900 (CA)}}{{perABCA|Fraser CJ}} (2:1)</ref>


; Bruising
; Bruising
Generally mere bruising will not be bodily harm.<ref>
Generally mere bruising will not be bodily harm.<ref>
''R v Dupperon'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1pfn2 1984 CanLII 61] (SK CA){{TheCourtSKCA}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Dupperon|1pfn2|1984 CanLII 61 (SK CA)|16 CCC (3d) 453}}{{TheCourtSKCA}}<br>
</ref>  
</ref>  
However, more serious bruising such as those which last 10 or more days or are present in the facial area will be considered bodily harm.<ref>
However, more serious bruising such as those which last 10 or more days or are present in the facial area will be considered bodily harm.<ref>
''R v Dixon'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1pd4l 1988 CanLII 205] (YK CA){{perYKCA|Carrothers JA}}
{{CanLIIRP|Dixon|1pd4l|1988 CanLII 205 (YK CA)|64 CR (3d) 372}}{{perYKCA|Carrothers JA}}
</ref>
</ref>


; Examples
; Examples
Specific examples of bodily harm:<ref>See ''R v Moquin'', [http://canlii.ca/t/28c9s 2010 MBCA 22] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Beard JA}}</ref>
Specific examples of bodily harm:<ref>See {{CanLIIRP|Moquin|28c9s|2010 MBCA 22 (CanLII)|253 CCC (3d) 96}}{{perMBCA|Beard JA}}</ref>
* fracture of the nasal bones <ref>
* fracture of the nasal bones <ref>
''R v Papalia'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fq69m 2012 BCSC 245] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Bruce J}}{{AtL|fq69m|135}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Papalia|fq69m|2012 BCSC 245 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Bruce J}}{{AtL|fq69m|135}}</ref>
* scrapes, lacerations and bruises, especially around the eye and a large amount of hair pulled out by the roots<ref>
* scrapes, lacerations and bruises, especially around the eye and a large amount of hair pulled out by the roots<ref>
''R v Dorscheid'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2dbsz 1994 ABCA 18] (CanLII), [1994] AJ No 56 (C.A.){{perABCA|Cote JA}}{{atL|2dbsz|11}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Dorscheid|2dbsz|1994 ABCA 18 (CanLII)|[1994] AJ No 56 (CA)}}{{perABCA|Cote JA}}{{atL|2dbsz|11}}</ref>
* superficial injuries, consisting primarily of bruising and abrasions less than an inch in length<ref>
* superficial injuries, consisting primarily of bruising and abrasions less than an inch in length<ref>
''R v Rabieifar (A.)'', [http://canlii.ca/t/55jm 2003 CanLII 22353] (ON CA), [2003] OJ No 3833 (C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Rabieifar (A.)|55jm|2003 CanLII 22353 (ON CA)|[2003] OJ No 3833 (CA)}}{{TheCourtONCA}}</ref>
* "a number of bruises to the neck and arms, a number of lacerations to the face, chest, shoulder and wrist that which cleared up within a week, difficulty speaking for three or four days as a result of choking and a scar on her forearm from a laceration"<ref>
* "a number of bruises to the neck and arms, a number of lacerations to the face, chest, shoulder and wrist that which cleared up within a week, difficulty speaking for three or four days as a result of choking and a scar on her forearm from a laceration"<ref>
{{supra1|Moquin}}</ref>  
{{supra1|Moquin}}</ref>  
Line 82: Line 96:
{{supra1|Giroux}}</ref>
{{supra1|Giroux}}</ref>
* small bruise on calf, small anal tear and deviated septum all of which would "resolve ... within a few days"<ref>
* small bruise on calf, small anal tear and deviated septum all of which would "resolve ... within a few days"<ref>
''R v CK'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4zdm 2001 BCCA 379] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}}{{atL|4zdm|3}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|CK|4zdm|2001 BCCA 379 (CanLII)|BCJ No 1119}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}}{{atL|4zdm|3}}</ref>
* bruises going away after 11 days, sore hand and sore throat.<ref>
* bruises going away after 11 days, sore hand and sore throat.<ref>
{{supra1|Moquin}}{{AtsL|28c9s|32|, 33}}</ref>
{{supra1|Moquin}}{{AtsL|28c9s|32|, 33}}</ref>


There is not necessarily a requirement of an injury being present for a certain duration to be considered bodily harm. The injury may be short and still not be trifling.<ref>
There is not necessarily a requirement of an injury being present for a certain duration to be considered bodily harm. The injury may be short and still not be trifling.<ref>
''R v Dixon'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1pd4l 1988 CanLII 205] (YK CA){{perYKCA|Carrothers JA}}
{{CanLIIRP|Dixon|1pd4l|1988 CanLII 205 (YK CA)|64 CR (3d) 372}}{{perYKCA|Carrothers JA}}
</ref>
</ref>


; Appeals
; Appeals
Whether facts meet the definition of "bodily harm" is reviewable on a standard of correctness.<ref>
Whether facts meet the definition of "bodily harm" is reviewable on a standard of correctness.<ref>
''R v Bulldog'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gk9xr 2015 ABCA 251] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}}{{atL|gk9xr|18}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Bulldog|gk9xr|2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII)|326 CCC (3d) 385}}{{TheCourtABCA}}{{atL|gk9xr|18}}<br>
''R v Morin'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fs8t 1992 CanLII 40] (SCC), [1992] 3 SCR 286 at 294, 66 CCC (3d) 193{{perSCC|Sopinka J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Morin|1fs8t|1992 CanLII 40 (SCC)|[1992] 3 SCR 286 at 294, 66 CCC (3d) 193}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>



Latest revision as of 14:23, 14 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95351)

General Principles

See also: Criminal Code and Related Definitions
See also: Aggravated Assault (Offence) and Aggravated Sexual Assault (Offence)

Section 2 of the Criminal Code defines "bodily harm" as:

2
...
"bodily harm" means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 2; R.S., 1985, c. 11 (1st Supp.), s. 2, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 2, 203, c. 31 (1st Supp.), s. 61, c. 1 (2nd Supp.), s. 213, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10, c. 35 (2nd Supp.), s. 34, c. 32 (4th Supp.), s. 55, c. 40 (4th Supp.), s. 2; 1990, c. 17, s. 7; 1991, c. 1, s. 28, c. 40, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 1, 9; 1992, c. 20, s. 216, c. 51, s. 32; 1993, c. 28, s. 78, c. 34, s. 59; 1994, c. 44, s. 2; 1995, c. 29, ss. 39, 40, c. 39, s. 138; 1997, c. 23, s. 1; 1998, c. 30, s. 14; 1999, c. 3, s. 25, c. 5, s. 1, c. 25, s. 1(Preamble), c. 28, s. 155; 2000, c. 12, s. 91, c. 25, s. 1(F); 2001, c. 32, s. 1, c. 41, ss. 2, 131; 2002, c. 7, s. 137, c. 22, s. 324; 2003, c. 21, s. 1; 2004, c. 3, s. 1; 2005, c. 10, s. 34, c. 38, s. 58, c. 40, ss. 1, 7; 2006, c. 14, s. 1; 2007, c. 13, s. 1; 2012, c.1, s. 160, c. 19, s. 371; 2013, c. 13, s. 2; 2014, c. 17, s. 1, c. 23, s. 2, c. 25, s. 2; 2015, c. 3, s. 44, c. 13, s. 3, c. 20, s. 15; 2018, c. 21, s. 12; 2019, c. 13, s. 140; 2019, c. 25, s. 1; 2022, c. 17, s. 1.

CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)


Note up: 2


Defined terms: "person" (s. 2)

Standard

Bodily harm is considered a "low threshold" to meet.[1]

It must be more than "a very short time period and an injury of very minor degree which results in a very minor degree of distress."[2] It must be "more than merely transient or trifling."[3]

Minor injuries that interfere with comfort for a "short time" can be found to be bodily harm, including small bruises, swelling and headaches.[4]

Bodily harm could include psychological injury to the victim.[5]

Once bodily harm was found, the wording of s. 2 only requires interference of "health" or comfort of the person.[6]

This definition is similar (if it is not word for word) to the English common law definition of actual bodily harm stated.[7]

Transient or Trifling

An injury must be both transient and trifling to be excluded from the definition.[8]

"Transient" has been interpreted as "[p]assing by or away with time; not durable or permanent; temporary, transitory"[9]

"Trifling" has been interpreted as "[o]f little moment or value; trumpery; insignificant, petty"[10]

It is wrong to conclude that merely because the injury heals in less than a week would not be bodily harm as serious life-threatening injuries can be of short duration.[11]

The court should look at the overall effect of the injuries, rather than the individual's injuries that may be trifling in isolation.[12]

Medical Evidence

It is not necessary to call medical evidence to prove bodily harm.[13]

Bruising

Generally mere bruising will not be bodily harm.[14] However, more serious bruising such as those which last 10 or more days or are present in the facial area will be considered bodily harm.[15]

Examples

Specific examples of bodily harm:[16]

  • fracture of the nasal bones [17]
  • scrapes, lacerations and bruises, especially around the eye and a large amount of hair pulled out by the roots[18]
  • superficial injuries, consisting primarily of bruising and abrasions less than an inch in length[19]
  • "a number of bruises to the neck and arms, a number of lacerations to the face, chest, shoulder and wrist that which cleared up within a week, difficulty speaking for three or four days as a result of choking and a scar on her forearm from a laceration"[20]
  • a sore neck that lasted for approximately one month[21]
  • small bruise on calf, small anal tear and deviated septum all of which would "resolve ... within a few days"[22]
  • bruises going away after 11 days, sore hand and sore throat.[23]

There is not necessarily a requirement of an injury being present for a certain duration to be considered bodily harm. The injury may be short and still not be trifling.[24]

Appeals

Whether facts meet the definition of "bodily harm" is reviewable on a standard of correctness.[25]

  1. R v Bulldog, 2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII), 326 CCC (3d) 385, per curiam, at para 44
    R v Dorscheid, 1994 ABCA 18 (CanLII), [1994] AJ No 56 (CA), per Cote JA, at para 11
  2. Bulldog, supra, at para 44
    R v Dixon, 1988 CanLII 2824 (BC CA), 42 CCC (3d) 318 at 332, [1988] 5 WWR 577, per Carrothers JA
  3. R v Kooner, 2023 BCCA 8 (CanLII), per Griffin JA, at para 50
  4. Kooner, ibid. at para 50
    R v Dixon, 1988 CanLII 2824 (BC CA), 42 CCC (3d) 318, per Carrothers JA, at para 45
    R v Bulldog, 2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII), 326 CCC (3d) 385, per curiam, at para 44
    R v CK, 2001 BCCA 379 (CanLII), per Hall JA, at paras 7 to 9
  5. R v McCraw, 1991 CanLII 29 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 72, 66 CCC (3d) 517, per Cory J
    see also R v C.D.; R v CDK, 2005 SCC 78 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 668, per Bastarache J
  6. Dixon, supra
  7. R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 (also 25 Cr. App. Rep.1 CCA) (UK) at page 509 and R v Chan-Fook [1994] 2 All ER 552 (UK) at 557D where the reference to transient or trifling injuries is taken as applying to actual bodily harm rather than bodily harm
  8. R v JA, 2010 ONCA 226 (CanLII), 253 CCC (3d) 153, per Simmons JA - reversed on other grounds at [2011] 2 SCR 440
  9. Dixon, supra, at p. 331
  10. Dixon, supra, at p. 331
  11. R v Garrett (1995), 169 AR 394 (CA)(*no CanLII links)
  12. Garrett, ibid.
  13. R v Giroux, 1995 ABCA 393 (CanLII), [1995] AJ No 900 (CA), per Fraser CJ (2:1)
  14. R v Dupperon, 1984 CanLII 61 (SK CA), 16 CCC (3d) 453, per curiam
  15. R v Dixon, 1988 CanLII 205 (YK CA), 64 CR (3d) 372, per Carrothers JA
  16. See R v Moquin, 2010 MBCA 22 (CanLII), 253 CCC (3d) 96, per Beard JA
  17. R v Papalia, 2012 BCSC 245 (CanLII), per Bruce J, at para 135
  18. R v Dorscheid, 1994 ABCA 18 (CanLII), [1994] AJ No 56 (CA), per Cote JA, at para 11
  19. R v Rabieifar (A.), 2003 CanLII 22353 (ON CA), [2003] OJ No 3833 (CA), per curiam
  20. Moquin, supra
  21. Giroux, supra
  22. R v CK, 2001 BCCA 379 (CanLII), BCJ No 1119, per Hall JA, at para 3
  23. Moquin, supra, at paras 32, 33
  24. R v Dixon, 1988 CanLII 205 (YK CA), 64 CR (3d) 372, per Carrothers JA
  25. R v Bulldog, 2015 ABCA 251 (CanLII), 326 CCC (3d) 385, per curiam, at para 18
    R v Morin, 1992 CanLII 40 (SCC), [1992] 3 SCR 286 at 294, 66 CCC (3d) 193, per Sopinka J