Remote Attendance: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\{\{fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "fr:$1" |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[fr:Téléassistance]] | |||
{{Currency2|January|2020}} | |||
{{HeaderRemote}} | {{HeaderRemote}} | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
Remote Attendance in Court of persons other than witnesses is largely governed by Part XXII.01 of the ''Criminal Code'' (s. 715.21 to 715.26). | Remote Attendance in Court of persons other than witnesses is largely governed by Part XXII.01 of the ''Criminal Code'' (s. 715.21 to 715.26). | ||
{{ | {{quotation3| | ||
; Attendance | ; Attendance | ||
715.21 Except as otherwise provided in this Act, a person who appears at, participates in or presides at a proceeding shall do so personally. | 715.21 Except as otherwise provided in this Act, a person who appears at, participates in or presides at a proceeding shall do so personally. | ||
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 292. | {{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 292. | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|715.21}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|715.21}} | |{{NoteUp|715.21}} | ||
|{{Terms- | |||
|"Act" (s. 2) | |||
|"person" (s. 2) | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{quotation3| | ||
; Provisions providing for audioconference or videoconference | ; Provisions providing for audioconference or videoconference | ||
715.22 The purpose of the provisions of this Act that allow a person to appear at, participate in or preside at a proceeding by audioconference or videoconference, in accordance with the rules of court, is to serve the proper administration of justice, including by ensuring fair and efficient proceedings and enhancing access to justice. | 715.22 The purpose of the provisions of this Act that allow a person to appear at, participate in or preside at a proceeding by audioconference or videoconference, in accordance with the rules of court, is to serve the proper administration of justice, including by ensuring fair and efficient proceedings and enhancing access to justice. | ||
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 292. | {{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 292. | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|715.22}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|715.22}} | |{{NoteUp|715.22}} | ||
|{{Terms- | |||
|"Act" (s. 2) | |||
|"person" (s. 2) | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
* [[Remote Attendance of Judges or Jurors]] | |||
* [[Remote Attendance of Accused]] (715.23 to 715.24) | * [[Remote Attendance of Accused]] (715.23 to 715.24) | ||
** [[Obligation of Accused to be Present During Proceedings]] | ** [[Obligation of Accused to be Present During Proceedings]] | ||
* [[Remote Attendance of Counsel or Other Participants]] (715.25 and 715.26 | * [[Remote Attendance of Witnesses]] (Remote Testimony) | ||
* [[Remote Attendance of Counsel or Certain Other Participants]] (715.25 and 715.26) | |||
* [[Remote Attendance at the Court of Appeal]] | * [[Remote Attendance at the Court of Appeal]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:40, 14 July 2024
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95560) |
General Principles
Remote Attendance in Court of persons other than witnesses is largely governed by Part XXII.01 of the Criminal Code (s. 715.21 to 715.26).
- Attendance
715.21 Except as otherwise provided in this Act, a person who appears at, participates in or presides at a proceeding shall do so personally.
2019, c. 25, s. 292.
- Provisions providing for audioconference or videoconference
715.22 The purpose of the provisions of this Act that allow a person to appear at, participate in or preside at a proceeding by audioconference or videoconference, in accordance with the rules of court, is to serve the proper administration of justice, including by ensuring fair and efficient proceedings and enhancing access to justice.
2019, c. 25, s. 292.
Topics
- Remote Attendance of Judges or Jurors
- Remote Attendance of Accused (715.23 to 715.24)
- Remote Attendance of Witnesses (Remote Testimony)
- Remote Attendance of Counsel or Certain Other Participants (715.25 and 715.26)
- Remote Attendance at the Court of Appeal