Seizure of Property: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "\{\{fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "fr:$1"
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[fr:Saisie_de_biens]]
{{Currency2|January|2020}}
{{LevelOne}}{{HeaderProperty}}
{{LevelOne}}{{HeaderProperty}}


Line 12: Line 14:


For any warrantless seizure of property, the burden is upon the Crown to prove that it did not violate s. 8 of the Charter. To put the burden on the accused "ignores the reality that the Crown is in the best position to know how and why the seizure took place"<ref>
For any warrantless seizure of property, the burden is upon the Crown to prove that it did not violate s. 8 of the Charter. To put the burden on the accused "ignores the reality that the Crown is in the best position to know how and why the seizure took place"<ref>
R v Hass, [http://canlii.ca/t/1l84h 2005 CanLII 26440] (ON CA) at para 37
{{CanLIIRP|Hass|1l84h|2005 CanLII 26440 (ON CA)|200 CCC (3d) 81}}{{perONCA|Goudge JA}}{{atL|1l84h|37}}
</ref>
</ref>


Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule".<ref>
Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule."<ref>
R v Pham, [http://canlii.ca/t/52mw 1999 BCCA 571] (CanLII)<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Pham|52mw|1999 BCCA 571 (CanLII)|139 CCC (3d) 539}}{{perBCCA|Braidwood JA}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 23: Line 25:
==Topics==
==Topics==
===General Seizure Powers===
===General Seizure Powers===
* [[Warrantless Seizure Under Section 489]]
* [[Procedure on Seizure of Property]]
** [[Warrantless Seizure Under Section 489]]
* [[Ancillary Powers Doctrine]]
* [[Ancillary Powers Doctrine]]
* [[Procedure on Seizure of Property]]


===Detention, Access, Disposal of Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11===
===Detention, Access, Disposal of Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11===
Line 31: Line 33:
* [[Access to Things Detained Under Section 490]]
* [[Access to Things Detained Under Section 490]]
* Disposal of Things Detained Under Section 490
* Disposal of Things Detained Under Section 490
** [[Forfeiture of Things Detained Under Section 490]
** [[Forfeiture of Things Detained Under Section 490]]
** [[Return of Things Seized to Lawful Owners]]
** [[Return of Things Seized to Lawful Owners]]


===Other Seizure and Detention Powers===
===Other Seizure and Detention Powers===
* [[Seizure and Detention of Property under CDSA]]
* [[Restraint of Terrorism-related Property]]
* [[Restraint of Terrorism-related Property]]
* [[Restraint of Offence-related Property]]
* [[Restraint of Offence-related Property]]
Line 45: Line 48:
==See Also==
==See Also==
* [[Forfeiture Orders|Forfeiture]]
* [[Forfeiture Orders|Forfeiture]]
* [[Disclosure#Lost Evidence|Lost Evidence (Disclosure)]]
* [[Lost or Destroyed Evidence|Lost Evidence (Disclosure)]]

Latest revision as of 14:41, 14 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95577)

Introduction

Property can be seized and then detain by police under the Code in several ways.

Detention can occur as:

For any warrantless seizure of property, the burden is upon the Crown to prove that it did not violate s. 8 of the Charter. To put the burden on the accused "ignores the reality that the Crown is in the best position to know how and why the seizure took place"[1]

Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule."[2]

  1. R v Hass, 2005 CanLII 26440 (ON CA), 200 CCC (3d) 81, per Goudge JA, at para 37
  2. R v Pham, 1999 BCCA 571 (CanLII), 139 CCC (3d) 539, per Braidwood JA

Topics

General Seizure Powers

Detention, Access, Disposal of Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11

Other Seizure and Detention Powers

See Also