Warrant Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
m Text replacement - "Applying for Judicial Authorizations" to "Applications for Judicial Authorizations"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[fr:Recherches_de_mandats_(affaires)]]
<!--
<!--
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderProcCases}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderProcCases}}
==Generally==
==Generally==
{{seealso|Applying for Judicial Authorizations}}
{{seealso|Applications for Judicial Authorizations}}
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Mahmood'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnr5s 2011 ONCA 693] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Mahmood|fnr5s|2011 ONCA 693 (CanLII)}}||N||-|| warrant for cell phone number log upheld
||N||-|| warrant for cell phone number log upheld
|-
|-
|''R v Ngo'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnsl3 2011 ONSC 6676] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ngo|fnsl3|2011 ONSC 6676 (CanLII)}}||N||-|| search warrant upheld on s. 8 challenge
||N||-|| search warrant upheld on s. 8 challenge
|-
|-
|''R v Nguyen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flxb7 2011 ONCA 465] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen|flxb7|2011 ONCA 465 (CanLII)}}|| || ||search warrant challenged; no violation
|| || ||search warrant challenged; no violation
|-
|-
|R v Pike<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29w7k 2010 NLTD 97] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Pike|29w7k|2010 NLTD 97 (CanLII)}}
||Y||?||secured blood samples prior to warrant being issued
||Y||?||secured blood samples prior to warrant being issued
|-
|-
|R v Nguyen<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5t2v 2002 BCPC 12] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen|5t2v|2002 BCPC 12 (CanLII)}}
|| N||-|| search warrant executed to search house; police also searched parked car
|| N||-|| search warrant executed to search house; police also searched parked car
|-
|-
|R v Nguyen and Nguyen<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29l69 2010 ONSC 1520] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen and Nguyen|29l69|2010 ONSC 1520 (CanLII)}}
||Y||Y||
||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|R v Parasiris<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27jmp 2008 QCCS 2460] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Parasiris|27jmp|2008 QCCS 2460 (CanLII)}}
||Y||?||
||Y||?||
|-
|-
|''R v Darby'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fps2j 2012 ABCA 27] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld anonymous informer
|{{CanLIIR-S|Darby|fps2j|2012 ABCA 27 (CanLII)}}|| |||| ITO upheld anonymous informer
|-
|-
|''R v Dionisi'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fprmp 2012 ABCA 20] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld, based on anonymous informer
|{{CanLIIR-S|Dionisi|fprmp|2012 ABCA 20 (CanLII)}}|| |||| ITO upheld, based on anonymous informer
|-
|-
|''R v Morgan'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmhg 2012 ONCA 28] (CanLII) |||||| ITO found valid despite errors in affidavit
|{{CanLIIR-S|Morgan|fpmhg|2012 ONCA 28 (CanLII)}}|||||| ITO found valid despite errors in affidavit
|}
|}


Line 41: Line 39:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Afshar'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274z7 2009 ABPC 368] (CanLII) ||Y||Y|| The search warrant to find cocaine and money was founded valid. The ITO contained "conclusory statements" and the informants credibility could not be tested. Certain information was a general knowledge. Such as ownership of the vehicle and occupancy of the residence.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Afshar|274z7|2009 ABPC 368 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y|| The search warrant to find cocaine and money was founded valid. The ITO contained "conclusory statements" and the informants credibility could not be tested. Certain information was a general knowledge. Such as ownership of the vehicle and occupancy of the residence.
|-
|-
|''R v Fan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwk7p 2013 BCSC 445] (CanLII) ||N||N|| search warrant of residence based on informer upheld
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fan|fwk7p|2013 BCSC 445 (CanLII)}}||N||N|| search warrant of residence based on informer upheld
|-
|-
|R v Odette<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw5kq 2013 ONCJ 62] (CanLII) ||N||N|| residental search on a drug warrant
|{{CanLIIR-S|Odette|fw5kq|2013 ONCJ 62 (CanLII)}} ||N||N|| residental search on a drug warrant
|-
|-
|R v Gobin<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw5bw 2013 ONSC 1042] (CanLII)||N ||N|| Police search residence for evidence of gun from a robbery.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Gobin|fw5bw|2013 ONSC 1042 (CanLII)}}||N ||N|| Police search residence for evidence of gun from a robbery.
|-
|-
| R v Watts<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqpzk 2012 ONSC 1865] (CanLII) ||N||N||no s.8 violation—ITO search warrant for hard entry into house looking for guns and drugs—warrant based on confidential informer—contained errors—upheld
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watts|fqpzk|2012 ONSC 1865 (CanLII)}} ||N||N||no s.8 violation—ITO search warrant for hard entry into house looking for guns and drugs—warrant based on confidential informer—contained errors—upheld
|-
|-
|R v Dowling<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf0d 2011 ABQB 790] (CanLII) || N|| N|| search warrant of house with suspicious traffic
|{{CanLIIR-S|Dowling|fpf0d|2011 ABQB 790 (CanLII)}} || N|| N|| search warrant of house with suspicious traffic
|-
|-
|R v Lee<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnng1 2011 ABCA 310] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lee|fnng1|2011 ABCA 310 (CanLII)}}
|| || || warrant to enter home upheld
|| || || warrant to enter home upheld
|-
|-
|R v Puskas<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/6hlg 1997 CanLII 1159]
|{{CanLIIR-S|Puskas|6hlg|1997 CanLII 1159}}
||Y||N|| Search warrant to house based on anonymous tip upheld trial level acquitted; overturned on issue of s.24(2) analysis
||Y||N|| Search warrant to house based on anonymous tip upheld trial level acquitted; overturned on issue of s.24(2) analysis
|}
|}
Line 66: Line 64:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Bulatci'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqxsv 2012 NWTCA 6] (CanLII)||Y || N||  wiretap of accused in prison violated s.8 but admissible
|{{CanLIIR-S|Bulatci|fqxsv|2012 NWTCA 6 (CanLII)}}||Y || N||  wiretap of accused in prison violated s.8 but admissible
|-
|-
|''R v Martin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2b3ls 2010 NBCA 41] (CanLII) ||Y ||N||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Martin|2b3ls|2010 NBCA 41 (CanLII)}}||Y ||N||  
|-
|-
|''R v Della Penna'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpl3t 2012 BCCA 3] (CanLII) || || || wiretap allowed on appeal
|{{CanLIIR-S|Della Penna|fpl3t|2012 BCCA 3 (CanLII)}}|| || || wiretap allowed on appeal
|}
|}


Line 78: Line 76:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Ramage'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII) ||Y||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Emshey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bmxc 2010 ABPC 237] (CanLII) ||Y||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Emshey|2bmxc|2010 ABPC 237 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||
|}
|}


Line 89: Line 87:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|R v Trapp<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp3n3 2011 SKCA 143] (CanLII) ||  ||||search warrant for ISP seeking account info attached to IP address upheld
|{{CanLIIR-S|Trapp|fp3n3|2011 SKCA 143 (CanLII)}} ||  ||||search warrant for ISP seeking account info attached to IP address upheld
|-
|-
|R v Lo<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnpzl 2011 ONSC 6532] (CanLII) || ||||no s.8 violation—production order by police was validly granted for login records of Facebook account
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lo|fnpzl|2011 ONSC 6532 (CanLII)}} || ||||no s.8 violation—production order by police was validly granted for login records of Facebook account
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 100: Line 98:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
|R v Lao et al,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwwzt 2013 ONSC 1951] (CanLII) || leave denied
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lao et al|fwwzt|2013 ONSC 1951 (CanLII)}} || leave denied
|}
|}


Latest revision as of 20:30, 3 September 2024


Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Warrant_Searches_(Cases)&oldid=96327"