Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm (Offence): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\{\{fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "fr:$1"
 
(102 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[fr:Utilisation_ou_stockage_négligent_d’une_arme_à_feu_(infraction)]]{{Currency2|January|2018}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderOffences}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderOffences}}


{{OffenceBox |OffenceTitle=Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm|OffencePage=Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm|Section=86 |Act={{OBCCC}} |CrownElection={{OBHybridElection}} |Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionAll}}|Bail={{OBBailAll}}|SummaryDisp={{OBDispAll}} |SummaryMin= {{OBMinNone}} |SummaryMax={{OBSConviction}} |IndictableDisp={{OBDispSame}} |IndictableMin= {{OBMinNone}} |IndictableMax={{OBTime|2 years}} (first), {{OBTime|5 years}} (subsequent) }}
{{OffenceBox  
|OffenceTitle=Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm
|OffencePage=Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm
|Section=86  
|Act={{OBCCC}}  
|CrownElection={{OBHybridElection}}  
|Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionAll-Under14}}
|Bail={{OBBailAll}}
|SummaryDisp={{OBDispAll}}  
|SummaryMin= {{OBMinNone}}
|SummaryMax={{OBSConviction}}  
|IndictableDisp={{OBDispSame}}  
|IndictableMin= {{OBMinNone}}  
|IndictableMax={{OBTime|2 years}} (first), {{OBTime|5 years}} (subsequent) }}


==Overview=={{seealso|Weapon Offences}}
==Overview==
{{seealso|Weapon Offences}}


{{OverviewIII|careless use or storage of a firearm}}
{{OverviewIII|careless use or storage of a firearm}}


'''Pleadings'''<br>
; Pleadings
{{PleadingsHeader}}
{{PleadingsHeader-N}}
{{PleadingsHybridList|s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] | Yes | {{YesIfCrown}} }}
{{PleadingsHybridList-N|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} | {{Yes}} | {{Yes-IfCrown}}  | {{No-Under14}} }}
{{PleadingsEnd}}
{{PleadingsEnd}}


{{PleadingsHybridElection|s. 86}}
{{PleadingsHybridElection-Under14|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}}}}


{{IncreasedPenalty|s. 86|s. 665}} {{Section109Notice}}
{{IncreasedPenalty|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} |s. 665}} {{Section109Notice}}


'''Release'''<Br>
; Release
{{ReleaseHeader}}
{{ReleaseHeader}}
|s. 86 || {{ReleaseProfileAll}}  
|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} || {{ReleaseProfile-Hybrid}}  
|-
|-
{{ReleaseEnd}}
{{ReleaseEnd}}


{{ReleaseAllOptions|s. 86}}
{{ReleaseOptions-Hybrid|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}}}}


:''<u>Reverse Onus Bail</u>''
{{ReverseOnusCirc}}
{{ReverseOnusCirc}}


{{IDCriminalAct|s. 86}}
:''Fingerprints and Photos''
{{IDCriminalAct|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} }}


'''Publication Bans'''<br>
; Publication Bans
{{GeneralPubBan}}
{{GeneralPubBan}}


'''Offence Designations'''<br>
; Offence Designations
{{DesignationHeader}}
|-
|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} || {{XMark}} <!--wire--> || {{XMark}} <!--DO-->||{{XMark-Under10}}<!--SPIO--> || {{XMark}} <!--consent--> || {{OKMark}}
{{DesignationEnd}}


{{SeeBelowForAncillary}}
{{SeeBelowForAncillary}}


==Offence Wording==
==Offence Wording==
{{quotation|
{{quotation2|
'''Careless use of firearm, etc.'''<br>
; Careless use of firearm, etc.
86. (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.
86 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.
<br>
<br>
'''Contravention of storage regulations, etc.'''<br>
; Contravention of storage regulations, etc.
(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.
(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the ''Firearms Act'' respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.
<br>
<br>
'''Punishment'''<br>
; Punishment
(3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (2)
(3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) {{AnnSec0|86(1)}} or (2) {{AnnSec0|86(2)}}
:(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
:(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
::(i) in the case of a first offence, for a term not exceeding two years, and
::(i) in the case of a first offence, for a term not exceeding two years, and
Line 50: Line 71:
:(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
:(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.


R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 86; 1991, c. 40, s. 3; 1995, c. 39, s. 139.  
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 86;
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec86 CCC]
{{LegHistory90s|1991, c. 40}}, s. 3;  
{{LegHistory90s|1995, c. 39}}, s. 139.  
{{Annotation}}
|{{CCCSec2|86}}
|{{NoteUp|86|1|2|3}}
}}
}}
===Draft Form of Charges===
{{seealso|Draft Form of Charges}}
{{DraftHeader}}
|-
|86(1)
| careless use or storage of firearm
|"{{ellipsis1}} without lawful excuse, did use, carry, handle, ship, transport or store a firearm, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device or ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of [person]{{ToWit-Conduct}} contrary to section 86(1){{CCC}}."
|-
|86(2)
| contravention of storage regs under Firearms Act
|"{{ellipsis1}} did contravene [regulation made under s. 117(h) of the Firearms Act] respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising or mail order sale of a firearm or restricted weapon{{ToWit-Conduct}} contrary to section 86(2){{CCC}}."
{{DraftEnd}}


==Proof of the Offence==
==Proof of the Offence==
Line 59: Line 97:
{{ElementLeft}}
{{ElementLeft}}


{{Proving|careless use or storage|86(1)}}
{{Proving|careless use or storage|86(1)}}<Ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Critch|fqw9m|2012 CanLII 17795 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}}
</ref>
{{InitialElements}}
{{InitialElements}}
# accused carried, handled, shipped, transported or stored an item
# {{box}} accused carried, handled, shipped, transported or stored an item
# the item is a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition <br>(see [[Definition of Firearms|Firearms]]: barreled weapon, capable of causing serious bodily injury or death)
# {{box}} the item is a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition <br>(see [[Definition of Firearms|Firearms]]: barreled weapon, capable of causing serious bodily injury or death)
# the item was stored in an unsafe or careless manner and no reasonable precautions taken for the safety of others(e.g. no trigger locks, out of case, loaded)
# {{box}} the item was stored in an unsafe or careless manner and no reasonable precautions taken for the safety of others(e.g. no trigger locks, out of case, loaded)
## a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances
## {{box}} a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances


{{ElementRight}}
{{ElementRight}}
Line 70: Line 110:
{{Proving|breach of storage regulation|86(2)}}
{{Proving|breach of storage regulation|86(2)}}
{{InitialElements}}
{{InitialElements}}
# the culprit violated ''any'' regulation under s. 117(h) of the Firearms Act concerning "storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail order sales" of firearms and restricted weapons.
# {{box}} the culprit violated ''any'' regulation under s. 117(h) of the ''Firearms Act'' concerning "storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail order sales" of firearms and restricted weapons.


{{ElementEnd}}
{{ElementEnd}}


==Interpretation of the Offence==
==Interpretation of the Offence==
“Storage” does not require an intention for the weapon’s placement to be “long-term or permanent storage”. It can include temporary hiding of a firearm.<ref> R v Carlos [http://canlii.ca/t/5271 2002 SCC 35] (CanLII)<br>
“Storage” does not require an intention for the weapon’s placement to be “long-term or permanent storage”. It can include temporary hiding of a firearm.<ref>  
R v Critch, [http://canlii.ca/t/fqw9m 2012 CanLII 17795] (NL PC) -- stored weapon under bed for 1 hour</reF>
{{CanLIIRP|Carlos|5271|2002 SCC 35 (CanLII)|[2002] 2 SCR 411}}{{perSCC-H|Arbour J}} (7:0)<br>
{{CanLIIRx|Critch|fqw9m|2012 CanLII 17795 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}} -- stored weapon under bed for 1 hour</ref>


A breach of regulations under the Firearms Act does not necessarily result in a conviction under s. 86(1).<ref>R v Gorr [2003] OJ No. 3252 (Ont. CJ){{NOCANLII}}</ref>
A breach of regulations under the ''Firearms Act'' does not necessarily result in a conviction under s. 86(1).<ref>
{{CanLIIR-N|Gorr|, [2003] OJ No 3252 (Ont. CJ)}}</ref>


'''Lesser Included Offences'''<br>
; Lesser Included Offences
This offence is not a lesser included offence to [[Pointing a Firearm (Offence)|pointing a firearm]].<ref>
This offence is not a lesser included offence to [[Pointing a Firearm (Offence)|pointing a firearm]].<ref>
R v Morrison, [http://canlii.ca/t/1d8tt 1991 CanLII 995] (BC CA)
{{CanLIIRP|Morrison|1d8tt|1991 CanLII 995 (BC CA)|66 CCC (3d) 257}}{{perBCCA|Taylor JA}} (3:0)
</ref>
</ref>


Line 88: Line 130:
===Duty of Care===
===Duty of Care===
{{seealso|Duty of Care}}
{{seealso|Duty of Care}}
This offence is consider an offence of "penal negligence".<Ref>
This offence is consider an offence of "penal negligence."<ref>
R v Gosset, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fs0c 1993 CanLII 62] (SCC), 1993 83 CCC (3d) 494 ("Negligence in a criminal setting, or what I shall hereinafter refer to as ‘penal negligence’ to distinguish it from offences involving a fault element of criminal negligence under s. 219 of the Code, subjects those convicted to the possibility of imprisonment.")<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Gosset|1fs0c|1993 CanLII 62 (SCC)|1993 83 CCC (3d) 494}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} ("Negligence in a criminal setting, or what I shall hereinafter refer to as ‘penal negligence’ to distinguish it from offences involving a fault element of criminal negligence under s. 219 of the Code, subjects those convicted to the possibility of imprisonment.")<br>
R v Blanchard (1994), 103 CCC (3d) 360, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p1hj 1994 CanLII 5251] (YK TC)
{{CanLIIRP|Blanchard|1p1hj|1994 CanLII 5251 (YK TC)|103 CCC (3d) 360}}{{perYKTC|Manson J}}
</ref>
</ref>


Section 86(1) imposes a “a specific and rigorous duty of care” upon the accused to store firearms and ammunition. <ref>R v Finlay [http://canlii.ca/t/1fs0f 1993 CanLII 63] (SCC), (1993) 83 CCC (3d) 513 (“Parliament has seen fit to impose on all people owning or using firearms a specific and rigorous duty of care.”)</reF>
Section 86(1) imposes a “a specific and rigorous duty of care” upon the accused to store firearms and ammunition. <ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Finlay|1fs0f|1993 CanLII 63 (SCC)|83 CCC (3d) 513}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} (“Parliament has seen fit to impose on all people owning or using firearms a specific and rigorous duty of care.”)</ref>


The Crown must prove that the accused’s conduct “constitutes a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person”.<ref>Optimum Insurance Co. v Donovan [http://canlii.ca/t/29vmt 2009 NBCA 6] (CanLII) at para 40</ref>  
The Crown must prove that the accused’s conduct “constitutes a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person”.<ref>
{{CanLIIRPC|Optimum Insurance Co. v Donovan|29vmt|2009 NBCA 6 (CanLII)|871 APR 45}}{{perNBCA|Drapeau CJ}}{{atL|29vmt|40}}</ref>  


However, even where there is a marked departure from the standard of care, where “reasonable precautions were taken” or there is otherwise doubt, then the court must acquit. <Ref>R v Finlay citing R v Gosset [http://canlii.ca/t/1fs0c 1993 CanLII 62] (SCC), (1993), 83 CCC (3d) 494 (S.C.C.) </ref> The court must also be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that there were not enough "precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk" and the accused had the "capacity ...to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances” but failed to do so.<ref>R v Finlay, supra, ("“the existence of a reasonable doubt as to either the sufficiency of the precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk, or the capacity of the accused to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances.")</ref>   
However, even where there is a marked departure from the standard of care, where “reasonable precautions were taken” or there is otherwise doubt, then the court must acquit. <ref>
{{supra1|Finlay}} citing {{CanLIIRP|Gosset|1fs0c|1993 CanLII 62 (SCC)|83 CCC (3d) 494}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} </ref>
The court must also be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that there were not enough "precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk" and the accused had the "capacity ...to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances” but failed to do so.<ref>
{{supra1|Finlay}} ("“the existence of a reasonable doubt as to either the sufficiency of the precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk, or the capacity of the accused to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances.")</ref>   


The offence does not violate s. 7 of the Charter for creating a duty of care.<ref>
The offence does not violate s. 7 of the Charter for creating a duty of care.<ref>
R v Gosset
{{supra1|Gosset}}
</ref>
</ref>


This offence can be a predicate offence for manslaughter.<Ref>
This offence can be a predicate offence for manslaughter.<ref>
Gosset<br>
{{supra1|Gosset}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


The standard of care is assessed objectively while taking into account the accused’s capacities in the circumstances and the “accused’s ability to control or compensate for his … incapacities”.<ref>R v Finlay</ref>
The standard of care is assessed objectively while taking into account the accused’s capacities in the circumstances and the “accused’s ability to control or compensate for his … incapacities”.<ref>
{{supra1|Finlay}}</ref>


Unlike offences that require standard of care, there is no defence of due diligence if the offence is otherwise made out.  
Unlike offences that require a standard of care, there is no defence of due diligence if the offence is otherwise made out.  


Offences of breach of duty of care do not require a purely subjective intention.<ref>R v Naglik, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fs0h 1993 CanLII 64] (SCC), [1993] 3 SCR 122 at 33</ref> They only require "proof of intention or actual foresight of a prohibited consequence.<ref>R v J.F. [http://canlii.ca/t/21bgx 2008 SCC 60] (CanLII) at para 7</ref>
Offences of breach of duty of care do not require a purely subjective intention.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Naglik|1fs0h|1993 CanLII 64 (SCC)|[1993] 3 SCR 122}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} at 33</ref>
They only require "proof of intention or actual foresight of a prohibited consequence.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|JF|21bgx|2008 SCC 60 (CanLII)|[2008] 3 SCR 215}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}} (6:1){{atL|21bgx|7}}</ref>


Federal firearms regulations are relevant to determination of the standard of care required for the firearm.<ref>
Federal firearms regulations are relevant to determination of the standard of care required for the firearm.<ref>
R v Halliday at p. 15 ("the federal firearm storage regulations are relevant in determining the appropriate standard for those who are transporting or storing guns to the same degree that the rules of the road would be relevant in determining the basic standard of conduct for drivers.")<br>
{{supra1|Halliday}}{{atp|15}} ("the federal firearm storage regulations are relevant in determining the appropriate standard for those who are transporting or storing guns to the same degree that the rules of the road would be relevant in determining the basic standard of conduct for drivers.")<br>
</ref>
</ref>
Where regulations for storage cannot be relied upon an expert will normally be required to establish carelessness.<ref>
Where regulations for storage cannot be relied upon an expert will normally be required to establish carelessness.<ref>
R v Halliday, [http://canlii.ca/t/6jl2 1995 CanLII 982] (ON CA)
{{CanLIIRP|Halliday|6jl2|1995 CanLII 982 (ON CA)|100 CCC (3d) 574}}{{TheCourtONCA}}
</ref>
</ref>


'''Examples'''<br>
; Examples
Burying ammunition in the woods amounts to careless storage of ammunition.<ref>
Burying ammunition in the woods amounts to careless storage of ammunition.<ref>
R v Haridge, [http://canlii.ca/t/fspbv 2012 ONSC 5049] (CanLII), [2012] O.J. No. 4222 (O.S.C.)</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Haridge|fspbv|2012 ONSC 5049 (CanLII)|[2012] OJ No 4222 (O.S.C.)}}{{perONSC|M Linhares De Sousa J}}</ref>


A rifle leaning against the wall in an upstairs bedroom in open view is stored in a "careless manner".<ref>
A rifle leaning against the wall in an upstairs bedroom in open view is stored in a "careless manner."<ref>
R v Elsby, [http://canlii.ca/t/fps8t 2012 BCSC 125] (CanLII), [2012] BCJ No. 157(B.C.S.C.) at para 91 to 93 </ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Elsby|fps8t|2012 BCSC 125 (CanLII)|[2012] BCJ No 157(BCSC)}}{{perBCSC|Arnold-Bailey J}}{{atsL|fps8t|91| to 93}} </ref>
Similarly, a non-restricted rifle stored in an unlocked closet, in an unlocked case was found to be careless and without reasonable precautions.<Ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Price|jclls|2021 NLSC 6 (CanLII)}}{{perNLSC|O'Brien J}}{{atL|jclls|78}}
</ref>


Discharging a firearm over the head of a person in order to scare them is careless use of the firearm.<Ref>
Discharging a firearm over the head of a person in order to scare them is careless use of the firearm.<ref>
R v Zimmer, [http://canlii.ca/t/23lxr 1981 CanLII 338] (BC CA)
{{CanLIIRP|Zimmer|23lxr|1981 CanLII 338 (BC CA)|60 CCC (2d) 190}}{{perBCCA|McFarlane JA}} (3:0)
</ref>
</ref>


See also: Firearms Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/7vsx SC 1995, c 39] and Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individuals Regulations,  [http://canlii.ca/t/80qs SOR/98-209]
See also: ''Firearms Act'', [http://canlii.ca/t/7vsx SC 1995, c 39] and Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individuals Regulations,  [http://canlii.ca/t/80qs SOR/98-209]


{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}
Line 137: Line 191:
===Violation of Regulations===
===Violation of Regulations===
Section 86(2) is a strict liability offence.<ref>
Section 86(2) is a strict liability offence.<ref>
R v Porter, [http://canlii.ca/t/1j9fs 2004 BCSC 1520] (CanLII)
{{CanLIIRP|Porter|1j9fs|2004 BCSC 1520 (CanLII)|193 CCC (3d) 254}}{{perBCSC|Dorgan J}}
</ref>
</ref>


The offence under s. 86(2) is constitutional.<ref>
The offence under s. 86(2) is constitutional.<ref>
R v Smillie, [http://canlii.ca/t/1dxqx 1998 CanLII 7050] (BC CA)
{{CanLIIRP|Smillie|1dxqx|1998 CanLII 7050 (BC CA)|129 CCC (3d) 414}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} (3:0)
</ref>
</ref>


Line 157: Line 211:
==Traditional Defences==
==Traditional Defences==
* [[Possession]] - where the weapon was not found in actual possession of the accused, it can often be argued that the accused was not aware of the weapon and so did not have joint or constructive possession.
* [[Possession]] - where the weapon was not found in actual possession of the accused, it can often be argued that the accused was not aware of the weapon and so did not have joint or constructive possession.
* [[Defence of Property]]<ref>see R v Gunning, [2005] 1 SCR 627, [http://canlii.ca/t/1kt5b 2005 SCC 27] (CanLII)</ref>
* [[Defence of Property]]<ref>see {{CanLIIRP|Gunning|1kt5b|2005 SCC 27 (CanLII)|[2005] 1 SCR 627}}{{perSCC|Charron J}} (9:0)</ref>


A defence of mistake of fact or [[Due Diligence|due diligence]] is available against offences under s. 86(2).<ref>
A defence of mistake of fact or [[Due Diligence|due diligence]] is available against offences under s. 86(2).<ref>
R v Smillie, [http://canlii.ca/t/1dxqx 1998 CanLII 7050] (BC CA)
{{CanLIIRP|Smillie|1dxqx|1998 CanLII 7050 (BC CA)|129 CCC (3d) 414}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} (3:0)
</ref>
</ref>


Line 168: Line 222:
{{seealso|Role of the Victim and Third Parties|Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses}}
{{seealso|Role of the Victim and Third Parties|Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses}}


'''Testimonial Aids'''<br>
; Testimonial Aids
{{3rdPTestimonyAids}}
{{3rdPTestimonyAids}}


'''On Finding of Guilt'''<br>
; On Finding of Guilt
<!--
{{VictimHeader}} <!-- Sections / Notice of Agree / Notice of Restitution / Notice of VIS -->
|s. x {{DescrSec|x}} || || ||
|-
{{VictimEnd}}<!--
{{606Notice5Y|XX}}
{{606Notice5Y|XX}}
{{606NoticeSPIO|XX}}
{{606NoticeSPIO|XX}}
Line 184: Line 241:
{{seealsoSentencingWeapons}}
{{seealsoSentencingWeapons}}


'''Maximum Penalties'''<br>
; Maximum Penalties
{{SProfileMaxHeader}}
{{SProfileMaxHeader}}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 [careless use or careless storage of a firearm] | Summary Election | {{summaryconviction}} }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} | {{Summary}} | {{summaryconviction}} }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 [careless use or careless storage of a firearm] <Br> No prior convictions| Indictable Election | 2 years custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} <br> No prior convictions| {{indictment}} | {{Max2Years}} }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 [careless use or careless storage of a firearm] <Br> With prior convictions| Indictable Election | 5 years custody }}
{{SProfileMax|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} <br> With prior convictions| {{indictment}} | {{Max5Years}}}}
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{MaxPenaltyHybrid|s. 86|'''2 years incarceration''' (no priors) and '''5 years incarceration''' (with prior convictions under s. 86)| '''{{summaryconviction}}'''}}
{{MaxPenaltyHybrid|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} |'''{{Max2Years}}''' (no priors) and '''{{Max5Years}}''' (with prior convictions under s. 86)| '''{{summaryconviction}}'''}}


'''Minimum Penalties'''<br>
; Minimum Penalties
{{NoMinimumPenalties}}
{{NoMinimumPenalties}}


'''Available Dispositions'''<br>
; Available Dispositions
{{SProfileAvailHeader}}
{{SProfileAvailHeader}}
|s. 86 || any || {{SProfileAll}}
|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}}|| any || {{SProfileAll}}
|-
|-
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{SProfileEnd}}
Line 203: Line 260:
{{AllDispositionsAvailable}}
{{AllDispositionsAvailable}}


'''Consecutive Sentences'''<br>
; Consecutive Sentences
{{NoConsecutive}}
{{NoConsecutive}}


'''Notice of Increased Penalty'''<br>
; Notice of Increased Penalty
Where a prior related conviction exists there must be [[Notice of Increased Penalty|notice]] under s. 665 in order to rely on the higher penalties.
Where a prior related conviction exists there must be [[Notice of Increased Penalty|notice]] under s. 665 in order to rely on the higher penalties.


Line 217: Line 274:
{{seealso|Ancillary Orders}}
{{seealso|Ancillary Orders}}
'''Offence-specific Orders'''
; Offence-specific Orders
{{AOrderHeader}}
{{AOrderHeader}}
| [[DNA Orders]] || s. 86(a)(ii) ||
| [[DNA Orders]] || s. 86(a)(ii) ||
* {{SecondDNA(AorB)Hybrid|s. 86(a)(ii) [with prior conviction]}}
* {{SecondDNA(AorB)Hybrid|s. 86(a)(ii) [with prior conviction]}}
|-
|-
| [[Weapons Prohibition Orders|Weapons Prohibition]]  ||s. 86 ||
| [[Weapons Prohibition Orders|Weapons Prohibition]]  ||s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}} ||
* {{Section109|D|s. 86}}
* {{Section109|D|s. 86}}
* {{Section110|s. 86}}
* {{Section110|s. 86}}
|-
|-
{{AOrderEnd}}
{{AOrderEnd}}
'''General Sentencing Orders'''
; General Sentencing Orders
{{GeneralSentencingOrders}}
{{GeneralSentencingOrders}}


'''General Forfeiture Orders'''
; General Forfeiture Orders
{{GeneralForfeitureOrders}}
{{GeneralForfeitureOrders}}
==Record Suspensions and Pardons==
{{RecordSuspension|s. 86 {{DescrSec|86}}  }}


==See Also==
==See Also==
Line 237: Line 297:


{{OffencesNavBox/Weapons}}
{{OffencesNavBox/Weapons}}
[[Category:Offences Punishable on Summary Conviction]]
[[Category:Offences with Maximum Penalty of 2 Years]]
[[Category:Offences with Maximum Penalty of 5 Years]]

Latest revision as of 14:27, 14 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2018. (Rev. # 95423)


Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm
s. 86 of the Crim. Code
Election / Plea
Crown Election Hybrid
summary proceedings must initiate within 12 months of the offence (786(2))
Jurisdiction Prov. Court

Sup. Court w/ Jury (*)
Sup. Court w/ Judge-alone (*)

* Must be indictable.
Summary Dispositions
Avail. Disp. Discharge (730)

Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a))
Fine (734)
Fine + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail (718.3, 787)
Jail + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail + Fine (734)

Conditional Sentence (742.1)
Minimum None
Maximum 2 years less a day jail and/or a $5,000 fine (from Sept 19, 2019)
Indictable Dispositions
Avail. Disp. same as summary
Minimum None
Maximum 2 years incarceration (first), 5 years incarceration (subsequent)
Reference
Offence Elements
Sentence Digests

Overview

See also: Weapon Offences

Offences relating to careless use or storage of a firearm are found in Part III of the Criminal Code relating to "Firearms and Other Weapons".

Pleadings
Offence
Section
Offence
Type
Crown Election Defence Election
s. 536(2)
Preliminary Inquiry
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] Hybrid Offence(s) (* only if Crown proceeds by Indictment) (under 14 years max)

Offences under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] are hybrid with a Crown election. If prosecuted by indictment, there is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2) to trial by provincial court, superior court judge-alone or superior court judge-and-jury.

Before the statutory increased penalties can be applied for convictions under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] , notice of increased penalty under s. 727 must be given. Before the Crown can rely on provisions increasing the duration of the weapons prohibition order due to a prior weapons prohibition order notice under s. 727 must be given prior to plea.

Release
Offence(s) Appearance Notice
by Peace Officer

s. 497
Summons
by Judge or Justice

s. 508(1), 512(1), or 788
Release by
Peace Officer
on Undertaking

s. 498, 499, and 501
Release By
a Judge or Justice
on a Release Order

s. 515 to 519
Direct to Attend
for Fingerprints, etc.
Identification of Criminals Act

s. 2 ID Crim. Act
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm]

When charged under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm], the accused can be given an appearance notice without arrest under s. 497 or a summons. If arrested, he can be released by the arresting officer under s. 498 or 499 on an undertaking with or without conditions. He can also be released by a justice under s. 515.

Reverse Onus Bail

If police decide to bring the accused before a Justice pursuant to s. 503, there will be a presumption against bail (i.e. a reverse onus) if the offence, prosecuted by indictment, was committed:

  • while at large under s. 515 [bail release], 679 or 680 [release pending appeal or review of appeal] (s. 515(6)(a)(i));
  • "for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association" with a criminal organization (s. 515(6)(a)(ii));
  • where the offence involved a weapon, being a firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, while the accused was subject to a prohibition order preventing possession of these items (s. 515(6)(a)(viii)); or
  • where the accused is not "ordinarily a resident in Canada" (s. 515(6)(b)).

And, regardless of Crown election, if the offence alleged was one:

  • where the offence was an allegation of violence against an "intimate partner" and the accused had been previously convicted of an offence of violence against an "intimate partner" (s. 515(6)(b.1));
  • where the offence alleged is a breach under s. 145(2) to (5) while (s. 515(6)(c));
  • where the offence committed (or conspired to commit) was an offence under s. 5 to 7 of the CDSA that is punishable by life imprisonment (s. 515(6)(d));
Fingerprints and Photos

A peace officer who charges a person under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] of the Code can require that person to attend for the taking of fingerprints, photographs or other similar recordings that are used to identify them under the Identification of Criminals Act.

Publication Bans

For all criminal or regulatory prosecutions, there is a discretionary general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of "any information that could identify the victim or witness" under s. 486.5(1) where it is "necessary" for the "proper administration of justice". Other available publication bans include prohibitions for publishing evidence or other information arising from a bail hearing (s. 517), preliminary inquiry (s. 539) or jury trial (s. 648). There is a mandatory publication ban in all youth prosecutions on information tending to identify young accused under s. 110 of the YCJA or young victims under s. 111 of the YCJA.

Offence Designations
Offence(s) Wiretap
Eligible

s. 183
Dangerous Offender
Designated Offence

s. 752
Serious Personal
Injury Offence

s. 752
AG Consent Required Serious Criminality
Offence
s. 36 IRPA
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] (under 10 years max)

See below in Ancillary Sentencing Orders for details on designations relating to sentencing orders.

Offence Wording

Careless use of firearm, etc.

86 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.

Contravention of storage regulations, etc.

(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.

Punishment

(3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) [careless use of firearm, etc.] or (2) [contravention of storage regulations, etc.]

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
(i) in the case of a first offence, for a term not exceeding two years, and
(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, for a term not exceeding five years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 86; 1991, c. 40, s. 3; 1995, c. 39, s. 139.
[annotation(s) added]

CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)


Note up: 86(1), (2) and (3)

Draft Form of Charges

See also: Draft Form of Charges
Pre-ambles
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, between the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR> and <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>***, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, on or about the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR
"AND FURTHER at the same time and place aforesaid, he [or she]..."
Code Section Subject of Offence Draft Wording
86(1) careless use or storage of firearm "... without lawful excuse, did use, carry, handle, ship, transport or store a firearm, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device or ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of [person], to wit: [conduct], contrary to section 86(1) of the Criminal Code."
86(2) contravention of storage regs under Firearms Act "... did contravene [regulation made under s. 117(h) of the Firearms Act] respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising or mail order sale of a firearm or restricted weapon, to wit: [conduct], contrary to section 86(2) of the Criminal Code."

Proof of the Offence

Proving careless use or storage under s. 86(1) should include:[1]

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. accused carried, handled, shipped, transported or stored an item
  5. the item is a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition
    (see Firearms: barreled weapon, capable of causing serious bodily injury or death)
  6. the item was stored in an unsafe or careless manner and no reasonable precautions taken for the safety of others(e.g. no trigger locks, out of case, loaded)
    1. a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances

Proving breach of storage regulation under s. 86(2) should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit violated any regulation under s. 117(h) of the Firearms Act concerning "storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail order sales" of firearms and restricted weapons.

Interpretation of the Offence

“Storage” does not require an intention for the weapon’s placement to be “long-term or permanent storage”. It can include temporary hiding of a firearm.[2]

A breach of regulations under the Firearms Act does not necessarily result in a conviction under s. 86(1).[3]

Lesser Included Offences

This offence is not a lesser included offence to pointing a firearm.[4]

  1. R v Critch, 2012 CanLII 17795 (NL PC), per Gorman J
  2. R v Carlos, 2002 SCC 35 (CanLII), [2002] 2 SCR 411, per Arbour J (7:0)
    R v Critch, 2012 CanLII 17795 (NL PC), per Gorman J -- stored weapon under bed for 1 hour
  3. R v Gorr, [2003] OJ No 3252 (Ont. CJ)(*no CanLII links)
  4. R v Morrison, 1991 CanLII 995 (BC CA), 66 CCC (3d) 257, per Taylor JA (3:0)

Duty of Care

See also: Duty of Care

This offence is consider an offence of "penal negligence."[1]

Section 86(1) imposes a “a specific and rigorous duty of care” upon the accused to store firearms and ammunition. [2]

The Crown must prove that the accused’s conduct “constitutes a marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person”.[3]

However, even where there is a marked departure from the standard of care, where “reasonable precautions were taken” or there is otherwise doubt, then the court must acquit. [4] The court must also be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that there were not enough "precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk" and the accused had the "capacity ...to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances” but failed to do so.[5]

The offence does not violate s. 7 of the Charter for creating a duty of care.[6]

This offence can be a predicate offence for manslaughter.[7]

The standard of care is assessed objectively while taking into account the accused’s capacities in the circumstances and the “accused’s ability to control or compensate for his … incapacities”.[8]

Unlike offences that require a standard of care, there is no defence of due diligence if the offence is otherwise made out.

Offences of breach of duty of care do not require a purely subjective intention.[9] They only require "proof of intention or actual foresight of a prohibited consequence.[10]

Federal firearms regulations are relevant to determination of the standard of care required for the firearm.[11] Where regulations for storage cannot be relied upon an expert will normally be required to establish carelessness.[12]

Examples

Burying ammunition in the woods amounts to careless storage of ammunition.[13]

A rifle leaning against the wall in an upstairs bedroom in open view is stored in a "careless manner."[14] Similarly, a non-restricted rifle stored in an unlocked closet, in an unlocked case was found to be careless and without reasonable precautions.[15]

Discharging a firearm over the head of a person in order to scare them is careless use of the firearm.[16]

See also: Firearms Act, SC 1995, c 39 and Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individuals Regulations, SOR/98-209

  1. R v Gosset, 1993 CanLII 62 (SCC), 1993 83 CCC (3d) 494, per McLachlin J ("Negligence in a criminal setting, or what I shall hereinafter refer to as ‘penal negligence’ to distinguish it from offences involving a fault element of criminal negligence under s. 219 of the Code, subjects those convicted to the possibility of imprisonment.")
    R v Blanchard, 1994 CanLII 5251 (YK TC), 103 CCC (3d) 360, per Manson J
  2. R v Finlay, 1993 CanLII 63 (SCC), 83 CCC (3d) 513, per McLachlin J (“Parliament has seen fit to impose on all people owning or using firearms a specific and rigorous duty of care.”)
  3. Optimum Insurance Co. v Donovan, 2009 NBCA 6 (CanLII), 871 APR 45, per Drapeau CJ, at para 40
  4. Finlay, supra citing R v Gosset, 1993 CanLII 62 (SCC), 83 CCC (3d) 494, per McLachlin J
  5. Finlay, supra ("“the existence of a reasonable doubt as to either the sufficiency of the precautions taken by the accused to avoid the creation of risk, or the capacity of the accused to meet the standard of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances.")
  6. Gosset, supra
  7. Gosset, supra
  8. Finlay, supra
  9. R v Naglik, 1993 CanLII 64 (SCC), [1993] 3 SCR 122, per McLachlin J at 33
  10. R v JF, 2008 SCC 60 (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 215, per Fish J (6:1), at para 7
  11. Halliday, supra, at p. 15 ("the federal firearm storage regulations are relevant in determining the appropriate standard for those who are transporting or storing guns to the same degree that the rules of the road would be relevant in determining the basic standard of conduct for drivers.")
  12. R v Halliday, 1995 CanLII 982 (ON CA), 100 CCC (3d) 574, per curiam
  13. R v Haridge, 2012 ONSC 5049 (CanLII), [2012] OJ No 4222 (O.S.C.), per M Linhares De Sousa J
  14. R v Elsby, 2012 BCSC 125 (CanLII), [2012] BCJ No 157(BCSC), per Arnold-Bailey J, at paras 91 to 93
  15. R v Price, 2021 NLSC 6 (CanLII), per O'Brien J, at para 78
  16. R v Zimmer, 1981 CanLII 338 (BC CA), 60 CCC (2d) 190, per McFarlane JA (3:0)

Violation of Regulations

Section 86(2) is a strict liability offence.[1]

The offence under s. 86(2) is constitutional.[2]

This offence will generally concern violations of the Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individuals Regulations, SOR/98-209

  1. R v Porter, 2004 BCSC 1520 (CanLII), 193 CCC (3d) 254, per Dorgan J
  2. R v Smillie, 1998 CanLII 7050 (BC CA), 129 CCC (3d) 414, per Ryan JA (3:0)

Analysis of Firearms

Misc Definitions

Traditional Defences

  • Possession - where the weapon was not found in actual possession of the accused, it can often be argued that the accused was not aware of the weapon and so did not have joint or constructive possession.
  • Defence of Property[1]

A defence of mistake of fact or due diligence is available against offences under s. 86(2).[2]

  1. see R v Gunning, 2005 SCC 27 (CanLII), [2005] 1 SCR 627, per Charron J (9:0)
  2. R v Smillie, 1998 CanLII 7050 (BC CA), 129 CCC (3d) 414, per Ryan JA (3:0)

Participation of Third Parties

See also: Role of the Victim and Third Parties and Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses
Testimonial Aids

Certain persons who testify are entitled to make application for the use of testimonial aids: Exclusion of Public (s. 486), Use of a Testimonial Screen (s. 486), Access to Support Person While Testifying (s. 486.1), Close Proximity Video-link Testimony (s. 486.2), Self-Represented Cross-Examination Prohibition Order (s. 486.3), and Witness Security Order (s. 486.7).

A witness, victim or complainant may also request publication bans (s. 486.4, 486.5) and/or a Witness Identity Non-disclosure Order (s. 486.31). See also, Publication Bans, above.

On Finding of Guilt
Offence(s) Victim Notice
of Agreement
s. 606(4.1)
[SPIO]
Victim Queried
for Interest in Agreement
s. 606(4.2)
[5+ years]
Victim Notice
for Restitution
s. 737.1
Victim Notice
of Impact Statement
s. 722(2)
s. x [x]

Under s. 738, a judge must inquire from the Crown before sentencing whether "reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victims with an opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution for their losses and damages".

Under s. 722(2), the judge must inquire "[a]s soon as feasible" before sentencing with the Crown "if reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victim with an opportunity to prepare" a victim impact statement. This will include any person "who has suffered, or is alleged to have suffered, physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss" as a result of the offence. Individuals representing a community impacted by the crime may file a statement under s. 722.2.

Sentencing Principles and Ranges

See also: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing, Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offender, and Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offence
See Weapons Offences (Sentencing) for general principles
Maximum Penalties
Offence(s) Crown
Election
Maximum Penalty
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] summary election 2 years less a day jail and/or a $5,000 fine (from Sept 19, 2019)
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm]
No prior convictions
indictable election 2 years incarceration
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm]
With prior convictions
indictable election 5 years incarceration

Offences under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] are hybrid. If prosecuted by indictment, the maximum penalty is 2 years incarceration (no priors) and 5 years incarceration (with prior convictions under s. 86). If prosecuted by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is 2 years less a day jail and/or a $5,000 fine (from Sept 19, 2019).

Minimum Penalties

These offences have no mandatory minimum penalties.

Available Dispositions
Offence(s) Crown
Election
Discharge
s. 730
Suspended
Sentence

s. 731(1)(a)
Stand-alone
Fine

s. 731(1)(b)
Custody
s. 718.3, 787
Custody and
Probation
s. 731(1)(b)
Custody and
Fine
s. 734
Conditional
Sentence
(CSO)
s. 742.1
s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] any

All dispositions are available.The judge may order a discharge (s. 730), suspended sentence (s. 731(1)(a)), fine (s. 731(1)(b)), custody (s. 718.3, 787), custody with probation (s. 731(1)(b)), custody with a fine (s. 734), or a conditional sentence (s. 742.1).

Consecutive Sentences

There are no statutory requirements that the sentences be consecutive.

Notice of Increased Penalty

Where a prior related conviction exists there must be notice under s. 665 in order to rely on the higher penalties.

Principles

Ranges

see also: Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm (Sentencing Cases)

Ancillary Sentencing Orders

See also: Ancillary Orders
Offence-specific Orders
Order Conviction Description
DNA Orders s. 86(a)(ii)
Weapons Prohibition s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm]
  • For offences under s. 86 where "the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, any ammunition, any prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance and, at the time of the offence, the person was prohibited" by court order, a mandatory weapons prohibition order under s. 109(1)(d) is required regardless of election.The order prohibits "the person from possessing any firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition and explosive".
      • Duration (first offence): The Order prohibiting to "firearms" (other than a prohibited firearm or restricted firearm) and "crossbow, restricted weapon, ammunition and explosive substance" is for not less than 10 years starting at release from custody or at sentencing where custody is not ordered. The Order prohibiting "prohibited firearm, restricted firearm, prohibited weapon, prohibited device" is for life.
      • Duration (subsequent s. 109 offence): The duration must be life for all enumerated weapons and firearms. Notice of increased penalty under s. 727 required.
  • Where there is a conviction under s. 86 for an offence not otherwise referred to in s. 109, where "violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted" or "involves, or the subject-matter of which is a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance", a discretionary prohibition order of any of these items is permitted under s. 110 regardless of Crown election where "it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the person or of any other person".
      • Duration: The Order is for no more than 10 years starting at release from custody or at sentencing where custody is not ordered. If there is a prior conviction for an offence eligible for a s. 109 Order, the duration must be life. If violence is "used, threatened or attempted against" their past or present intimate partner, a child or parent of the said partner, or a person who resides with the said partner or the offender, the duration can be up to life in duration.
      • If the judge declines to make an Order or not order all the possible terms, "the court shall include in the record a statement of the court's reasons for not doing so." (s. 110(3))
General Sentencing Orders
Order Conviction Description
Non-communication order while offender in custody (s. 743.21) any The judge has the discretion to order that the offender be prohibited "from communicating...with any victim, witness or other person" while in custody except where the judge "considers [it] necessary" to communicate with them.
Restitution Orders (s. 738) any A discretionary Order is available for things such as the replacement value of the property; the pecuniary damages incurred from harm, expenses fleeing a domestic partner; or certain expenses arising from the commission of an offence under s.402.2 or 403.
Victim Fine Surcharge (s. 737) any A discretionary surcharge under s. 737 of 30% of any fine order imposed, $100 per summary conviction or $200 per indictable conviction. If the offence occurs on or after October 23, 2013, the order has smaller minimum amounts (15%, $50, or $100).
General Forfeiture Orders
Forfeiture Conviction Description
Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime (s. 462.37(1) or (2.01)) any Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence under the Code or the CDSA in which property is "proceeds of crime" and offence was "committed in relation to that property", the property shall be forfeited to His Majesty the King on application of the Crown. NB: does not apply to summary offences.
Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture (s. 462.37(3)) any Where a Court is satisfied an order for the forfeiture of proceeds of crime under s. 462.37(1) or (2.01) can be made, but that property cannot be "made subject to an order", then the Court "may" order a fine in "an amount equal to the value of the property". Failure to pay the fine will result in a default judgement imposing a period of incarceration.
Forfeiture of Weapons or Firearms (s. 491) any Where there is finding of guilt for an offence where a "weapon, an imitation firearm, a prohibited device, any ammunition, any prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance was used in the commission of [the] offence and that thing has been seized and detained", or "that a person has committed an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance has been seized and detained, that the item be an enumerated weapon or related item be connected to the offence", then there will be a mandatory forfeiture order. However, under s. 491(2), if the lawful owner "was not a party to the offence" and the judge has "no reasonable grounds to believe that the thing would or might be used in the commission of an offence", then it should be returned to the lawful owner.
Forfeiture of Offence-related Property (s. 490.1) any Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence, "any property is offence-related property" where (a) by means or in respect of which an indictable offence under this Act or the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act is committed, (b) that is used in any manner in connection with the commission of such an offence, or (c) that is intended to be used for committing such an offence". Such property is to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province. NB: does not apply to summary offences.

Record Suspensions and Pardons

Convictions under s. 86 [careless use of careless storage of a firearm] are eligible for record suspensions pursuant to s. 3 and 4 of the Criminal Records Act after 5 years after the expiration of sentence for summary conviction offences and 10 years after the expiration of sentence for all other offences. The offender may not have the record suspended where the offender was (1) convicted of 3 or more offences with a maximum penalty of life, and (2) for each 3 offences he "was sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more".

See Also