Similar Fact Evidence (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "R v ([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.," to "''R v $1$2'',"
m Text replacement - "{{perSCC|Binnie J}}" to "{{perSCC-H|Binnie J}}"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
{{TCaseHeader}}
{{TCaseHeader}}


{{TCase|R v Edwards,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/g7jhm 2014 ONSC 3729] (CanLII){{perONSC|Donohue J}} |admitted| multiple robberies }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Edwards|g7jhm|2014 ONSC 3729 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Donohue J}} |admitted| multiple robberies }}


{{TCase|R v Donszelmann, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6t2f 2014 ABQB 284] (CanLII){{perABQB|Clackson J}} | admitted | multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges  }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Donszelmann|g6t2f|2014 ABQB 284 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Clackson J}} | admitted | multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges  }}


{{TCase|''R v TIE'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6r8t 2014 MBCA 40] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin and Burnett JJA}}|admitted | sexual assault against two boys. }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|TIE|g6r8t|2014 MBCA 40 (CanLII)}}{{perMBCA|Monnin and Burnett JJA}}|admitted | sexual assault against two boys. }}


{{TCase|R v DLW,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fz49v 2013 BCSC 1016] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | admitted| detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|DLW|fz49v|2013 BCSC 1016 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | admitted| detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.}}


{{TCase|''R v JW'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw3mm 2013 ONCA 89] (CanLII){{perONCA|Weiler JA}} | admitted |Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|JW|fw3mm|2013 ONCA 89 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Weiler JA}} | admitted |Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence}}


{{TCase|R v Fletcher<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw8kj 2013 ABCA 74] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} | Not admitted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Fletcher|fw8kj|2013 ABCA 74 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}} | Not admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v JR<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fvf3m 2012 CanLII 81292] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} |  admitted| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|JR|fvf3m|2012 CanLII 81292 (NLSCTD)}}{{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} |  admitted| }}


{{TCase|R v Edwards<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw0gv 2013 ONSC 835] (CanLII){{perONSC|Mennie J}} | Not admitted| SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Edwards|fw0gv|2013 ONSC 835 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Mennie J}} | Not admitted| SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected}}


{{TCase| R v O’Quinn<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftnz4 2012 CanLII 67731] (NL PC){{perNLPC|}} | admitted ( limited purpose)|The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|O’Quinn|ftnz4|2012 CanLII 67731 (NLPC)}}{{perNLPC|}} | admitted ( limited purpose)|The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.}}


{{TCase| R v Patey<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frxxg 2012 CanLII 37589] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Seaborn J}} | admitted| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Patey|frxxg|2012 CanLII 37589 (NLSCTD)}}{{perNLSC|Seaborn J}} | admitted| }}


{{TCase| R v Logan<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqcwp 2012 BCCA 102] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Saunders JA}} | admitted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Logan|fqcwp|2012 BCCA 102 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Saunders JA}} | admitted | }}


{{TCase| R v Webb<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpqw2 2012 CanLII 1972] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} | Not admitted| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Webb|fpqw2|2012 CanLII 1972 (NLSCTD)}}{{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} | Not admitted| }}


{{TCase| R v Blea<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpw8w 2012 ABCA 41] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}| admitted | similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults }}
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Blea|fpw8w|2012 ABCA 41 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}}| admitted | similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults }}


{{TCase| R v Boden<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdx 2011 BCPC 366] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Giardini J}} | Not admitted| }}
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Boden|fpmdx|2011 BCPC 366 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Giardini J}} | Not admitted| }}


{{TCase|R v Carpenter<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27k3l 2010 BCCA 27] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults. }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Carpenter|27k3l|2010 BCCA 27 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults. }}


{{TCase|R v Jesse,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28gkd 2010 BCCA 108] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Chiasson JA}} |admitted |  Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Jesse|28gkd|2010 BCCA 108 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Chiasson JA}} |admitted |  Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.}}


{{TCase| R v J. H.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q3wl 2006 CanLII 40664] (ONCA){{perONCA|Lang JA}} | Not admitted| the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|JH|1q3wl|2006 CanLII 40664 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Lang JA}} | Not admitted| the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault }}


{{TCase|R v Brown, <br>[2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1v3h4 2006 CanLII 60340] (ON CA){{TheCourt}}|admitted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Brown|1v3h4|2006 CanLII 60340 (ON CA)| [2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA)}}{{TheCourtONCA}}|admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v Morin, <br>[2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1lsh9 2005 CanLII 37252] (ON CA){{TheCourt}} |admitted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Morin|1lsh9|2005 CanLII 37252 (ON CA)| [2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA)}}{{TheCourtONCA}} |admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v W(S), <br>[2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA){{NOCANLII}} |admitted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-SN|W(S)|, [2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA)}} |admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v Grabowski, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pp2l 2004 BCSC 328] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Bennett J}} | admitted  | 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Grabowski|1pp2l|2004 BCSC 328 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Bennett J}} | admitted  | 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.}}


{{TCase|R v Stewart,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gclz 2004 BCCA 56] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.  }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Stewart|1gclz|2004 BCCA 56 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.  }}


{{TCase|R v Blake (2003), <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1fzl6 2003 CanLII 13682] (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 169 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Simmons JA}} (2:1) aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/1j0wd 2004 SCC 69] (CanLII){{TheCourtSCC}} | rejected | The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Blake|1fzl6|2003 CanLII 13682 (ON CA)|181 CCC (3d) 169}}{{perONCA|Simmons JA}} (2:1) aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/1j0wd 2004 SCC 69] (CanLII){{TheCourtSCC}} | rejected | The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.}}


{{TCase|R v Shearing,<br>[2002] 3 SCR 33, [http://canlii.ca/t/51rb 2002 SCC 58] (CanLII){{perSCC|Binnie J}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Shearing|51rb|2002 SCC 58 (CanLII)|[2002] 3 SCR 33}}{{perSCC-H|Binnie J}} | | }}


{{TCase|R v KW, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6hxm 1996 CanLII 396] (ON CA){{TheCourt}}| not admitted | The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|KW|6hxm|1996 CanLII 396 (ON CA)}}{{TheCourtONCA}}| not admitted | The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".}}


{{TCaseEnd}}
{{TCaseEnd}}

Latest revision as of 15:21, 30 April 2023

Similar Fact Evidence

Case Name Result Summary
R v Edwards, 2014 ONSC 3729 (CanLII), per Donohue J admitted multiple robberies
R v Donszelmann, 2014 ABQB 284 (CanLII), per Clackson J admitted multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges
R v TIE, 2014 MBCA 40 (CanLII), per Monnin and Burnett JJA admitted sexual assault against two boys.
R v DLW, 2013 BCSC 1016 (CanLII), per Romilly J admitted detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.
R v JW, 2013 ONCA 89 (CanLII), per Weiler JA admitted Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence
R v Fletcher, 2013 ABCA 74 (CanLII), per curiam Not admitted
R v JR, 2012 CanLII 81292 (NLSCTD), per Goodridge J admitted
R v Edwards, 2013 ONSC 835 (CanLII), per Mennie J Not admitted SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected
R v O’Quinn, 2012 CanLII 67731 (NLPC), per [[Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador|]] admitted ( limited purpose) The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.
R v Patey, 2012 CanLII 37589 (NLSCTD), per Seaborn J admitted
R v Logan, 2012 BCCA 102 (CanLII), per Saunders JA admitted
R v Webb, 2012 CanLII 1972 (NLSCTD), per Goodridge J Not admitted
R v Blea, 2012 ABCA 41 (CanLII), per curiam admitted similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults
R v Boden, 2011 BCPC 366 (CanLII), per Giardini J Not admitted
R v Carpenter, 2010 BCCA 27 (CanLII), per Hall JA admitted Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults.
R v Jesse, 2010 BCCA 108 (CanLII), per Chiasson JA admitted Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.
R v JH, 2006 CanLII 40664 (ON CA), per Lang JA Not admitted the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault
R v Brown,
2006 CanLII 60340 (ON CA), [2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA), per curiam
admitted
R v Morin,
2005 CanLII 37252 (ON CA), [2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA), per curiam
admitted
R v W(S), , [2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA)(*no CanLII links) admitted
R v Grabowski, 2004 BCSC 328 (CanLII), per Bennett J admitted 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.
R v Stewart, 2004 BCCA 56 (CanLII), per Hall JA admitted The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.
R v Blake,
2003 CanLII 13682 (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 169, per Simmons JA (2:1) aff'd 2004 SCC 69 (CanLII), per curiam
rejected The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.
R v Shearing,
2002 SCC 58 (CanLII), [2002] 3 SCR 33, per Binnie J
R v KW, 1996 CanLII 396 (ON CA), per curiam not admitted The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".