Guilty Pleas (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>"
m Text replacement - "perONCA|Doherty" to "perONCA-H|Doherty"
 
(25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
{{TCaseHeader}}
{{TCaseHeader}}


{{TCase|R v Granados, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/h36hj 2017 MBQB 69] (CanLII){{perMBQB|Menzies J}} | Granted | The judge found that the plea was not fully informed of consequences of the plea.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Granados|h36hj|2017 MBQB 69 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Menzies J}} | Granted | The judge found that the plea was not fully informed of consequences of the plea.}}


{{TCase|R v Fiske, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g7g2m 2014 SKQB 152] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Konkin J}}| Granted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Fiske|g7g2m|2014 SKQB 152 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Konkin J}}| Granted | }}


{{TCase|R v Meadus, <br>[2014 ONCA 445] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} | Denied | charged with sexual interference. }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Meadus|g7c0g|2014 ONCA 445 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtONCA}}{{TheCourtONCA}} | Denied | charged with sexual interference. }}


{{TCase|R v Gililov, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g5lhs 2014 ONCJ 94] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Bourque J}} | Denied | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Gililov|g5lhs|2014 ONCJ 94 (CanLII)}}{{perONCJ|Bourque J}} | Denied | }}


{{TCase|R v Dupin, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fzv7r 2013 SKPC 119] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Cardinal J}} | Denied | Charged with drug trafficking. Plead guilty with counsel in open court. Judge did not confirm elements of plea, no facts were read.}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Dupin|fzv7r|2013 SKPC 119 (CanLII)}}{{perSKPC|Cardinal J}} | Denied | Charged with drug trafficking. Plead guilty with counsel in open court. Judge did not confirm elements of plea, no facts were read.}}


{{TCase|Mc''Laughlin v R'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fx61d 2013 NBCA 28] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} | denied| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|McLaughlin|fx61d|2013 NBCA 38 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtNBCA}} | denied| }}


{{TCase|R v Wiebe, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvfd0 2012 BCCA 519] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} | denied | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Wiebe|fvfd0|2012 BCCA 519 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} | denied | }}


{{TCase|R v Lewis, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fsgnh 2012 SKCA 81] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Jackson JA}} | Granted | accused changed plea with lawyer on day of trial. He never admitted offence and appeared confused. }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Lewis|fsgnh|2012 SKCA 81 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Jackson JA}} | Granted | accused changed plea with lawyer on day of trial. He never admitted offence and appeared confused. }}


{{TCase|R v Williams, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs3v5 2012 BCCA 314] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Frankel JA}} | denied| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Williams|fs3v5|2012 BCCA 314 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Frankel JA}} | denied| }}


{{TCase| R v Sutton, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frprs 2012 NLCA 35] (CanLII){{perNLCA|Rowe JA}} | Granted | }}
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Sutton|frprs|2012 NLCA 35 (CanLII)}}{{perNLCA|Rowe JA}} | Granted | }}


{{TCase|R v Downes, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpv02 2012 ONCJ 45] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Marin J}} | denied | }}  
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Downes|fpv02|2012 ONCJ 45 (CanLII)}}{{perONCJ|Marin J}} | denied | }}  


{{TCase|R v Greenall and Collins<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fpss 2011 BCPC 28] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Skilnick J}}|withdraw denied | }}
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Greenall and Collins|2fpss|2011 BCPC 28 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Skilnick J}}|withdraw denied | }}


{{TCase|R v Lamontagne, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fmm95 2011 QCCA 1486] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}| GP upheld | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Lamontagne|fmm95|2011 QCCA 1486 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtQCCA}}| GP upheld | }}


{{TCase|R v Chisholm, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bj93 2010 ONSC 3877] (CanLII){{perONSC|Mulligan J}} |  denied | argued that was not given an option but to plead guilty}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Chisholm|2bj93|2010 ONSC 3877 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Mulligan J}} |  denied | argued that was not given an option but to plead guilty}}


{{TCase|R v Messervey, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2b612 2010 NSCA 55] (CanLII){{perNSCA| Beveridge JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Messervey|2b612|2010 NSCA 55 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA| Beveridge JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|''R v IBB'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/24btq 2009 SKPC 76] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Whelan J}} | | detailed summary of law}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|IBB|24btq|2009 SKPC 76 (CanLII)}}{{perSKPC|Whelan J}} | | detailed summary of law}}


{{TCase|R v White, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/26dw9 2009 NSSC 313] (CanLII){{perNSSC| Cacchione J}}| | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|White|26dw9|2009 NSSC 313 (CanLII)}}{{perNSSC| Cacchione J}}| | }}


{{TCase|R v Maniaol, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274zc 2009 ABPC 390] (CanLII){{perABPC|Allen J}} || granted ||withdraw permitted due to misapprehension on admission of intent. Accused believed he was admitting willful blindness in intent when plea required actual intent.(see R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 at para 23) }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Maniaol|274zc|2009 ABPC 390 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Allen J}} || granted ||withdraw permitted due to misapprehension on admission of intent. Accused believed he was admitting willful blindness in intent when plea required actual intent.(see {{CanLIIRx|Maniaol|274zc|2009 ABPC 390 (CanLII)}}{{atL|274zc|23}}) }}


{{TCase|''R v McCollum'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ww90 2008 NSCA 36] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|McCollum|1ww90|2008 NSCA 36 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA-H|Bateman JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|''R v DWS'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21qz6 2008 BCCA 453] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bauman JA}} | upheld| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|DWS|21qz6|2008 BCCA 453 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Bauman JA}} | upheld| }}


{{TCase|''R v KDH'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1t5jj 2007 ABPC 264] (CanLII){{perABPC| LeGrandeur J}} | withdraw granted| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|KDH|1t5jj|2007 ABPC 264 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC| LeGrandeur J}} | withdraw granted| }}


{{TCase|R v Leonard, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1twnh 2007 SKCA 128] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | updheld| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Leonard|1twnh|2007 SKCA 128 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | updheld| }}


{{TCase|R v Nevin, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nx31 2006 NSCA 72] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Nevin|1nx31|2006 NSCA 72 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA-H|Bateman JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|R v Dodge, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1lpsz 2005 NSPC 24] (CanLII){{perNSPC|Gibson J}} | | guilty plea withdrawn due to false acceptance to help another (see para 22 to 25)}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Dodge|1lpsz|2005 NSPC 24 (CanLII)}}{{perNSPC|Gibson J}} | | guilty plea withdrawn due to false acceptance to help another (see para 22 to 25)}}


{{TCase|R v Moore, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1knqr 2004 BCPC 560] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}  |withdraw denied | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Moore|1knqr|2004 BCPC 560 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}  |withdraw denied | }}


{{TCase|R v Gold, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gvkw 2004 BCCA 179] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Gold|1gvkw|2004 BCCA 179 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | | }}


{{TCase|''R v McIntosh'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gmn0 2004 NSCA 19] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|McIntosh|1gmn0|2004 NSCA 19 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|R v Barry, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1jfdz 2004 NSCA 145] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }}  
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Barry|1jfdz|2004 NSCA 145 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA-H|Bateman JA}} | | }}  


{{TCase|R v Wetmore, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/5bl7 2003 ABQB 350] (CanLII){{perABQB|Macklin J}} | denied | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Wetmore|5bl7|2003 ABQB 350 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Macklin J}} | denied | }}


{{TCase|R v Hallam, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/5903 2003 BCPC 201] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}| withdraw denied| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Hallam|5903|2003 BCPC 201 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}| withdraw denied| }}


{{TCase|R v Moser, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1wcwt 2002 CanLII 49649] (ON SC){{perONSC|Hill J}} | withdraw denied| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Moser|1wcwt|2002 CanLII 49649 (ONSC)}}{{perONSC|Hill J}} | withdraw denied| }}


{{TCase|R v Hector, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1fb50 2000 CanLII 5725] (ON CA){{perONCA|Finlayson J}} | upheld | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Hector|1fb50|2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Finlayson J}} | upheld | }}


{{TCase|R v Clermont, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/234d8 1996 CanLII 10244] (NS CA), (1996) NSJ 170{{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Clermont|234d8|1996 CanLII 10244 (NSCA)|, (1996) NSJ 170}}{{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} | | }}


{{TCase|R v Pottie, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mpvm 1996 CanLII 5604] (NSCA){{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}|  | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Pottie|1mpvm|1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA)}}{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}|  | }}


{{TCase|R v Murphy, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mqdm 1995 CanLII 4329], [1995] NSJ No.41{{perNSCA|Chipman JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Murphy|1mqdm|1995 CanLII 4329 (NSCA)|[1995] NSJ No 41}}{{perNSCA|Chipman JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|''R v SK'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/231v4 1995 CanLII 8926] (ON CA){{perONCA|Carthy JA}} | granted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|{{SK}}|231v4|1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Carthy JA}} | granted | }}


{{TCase|R v Morris, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dd0p 1994 CanLII 1669] (BC CA){{perBCCA|Legg JA}} | granted | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Morris|1dd0p|1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA}}{{perBCCA|Legg JA}} | granted | }}


{{TCase|R v Porter, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mqmv 1994 CanLII 4019] (NS CA), (1994) 132 NSR 107{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Porter|1mqmv|1994 CanLII 4019 (NSCA)|, (1994) 132 NSR 107}}{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}} | | }}


{{TCase|''R v RT'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1p793 1992 CanLII 2834] (ON CA), (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | appeal dismissed| }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|RT|1p793|1992 CanLII 2834 (ON CA)|, (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}} | appeal dismissed| }}


{{TCase|R v Gautreau, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1thb5 1991 CanLII 4232] (NB CA){{TheCourt}} | dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court}}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Gautreau|1thb5|1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA)}}{{TheCourt}} | dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court}}


{{TCase|R v Rubenstein, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/22kn1 1987 CanLII 2834] (ON CA){{perONCA|Zuber JA}} | denied| The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Rubenstein|22kn1|1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Zuber JA}} | denied| The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. }}


{{TCase|R v Melanson, <br>(1983) NSJ 453{{NOCANLII}}| | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-SN|Melanson| (1983) NSJ 453}}| | }}


{{TCase|R v Igoe, <br>(1982) 54 NSR 113{{NOCANLII}} | | }}
{{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Igoe| (1982) 54 NSR 113}} | | }}


{{TCase| R v MacNeil, <br>(1982) 51 NSR 2d 541{{NOCANLII}}| | }}
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-SN|MacNeil|(1982) 51 NSR 2d 541}}| | }}


{{TCaseEnd}}
{{TCaseEnd}}

Latest revision as of 21:23, 9 May 2024

Withdraw of Guilty Plea

See also: Guilty Plea
Case Name Result Summary
R v Granados, 2017 MBQB 69 (CanLII), per Menzies J Granted The judge found that the plea was not fully informed of consequences of the plea.
R v Fiske, 2014 SKQB 152 (CanLII), per Konkin J Granted
R v Meadus, 2014 ONCA 445 (CanLII), per curiam, per curiam Denied charged with sexual interference.
R v Gililov, 2014 ONCJ 94 (CanLII), per Bourque J Denied
R v Dupin, 2013 SKPC 119 (CanLII), per Cardinal J Denied Charged with drug trafficking. Plead guilty with counsel in open court. Judge did not confirm elements of plea, no facts were read.
R v McLaughlin, 2013 NBCA 38 (CanLII), per curiam denied
R v Wiebe, 2012 BCCA 519 (CanLII), per Ryan JA denied
R v Lewis, 2012 SKCA 81 (CanLII), per Jackson JA Granted accused changed plea with lawyer on day of trial. He never admitted offence and appeared confused.
R v Williams, 2012 BCCA 314 (CanLII), per Frankel JA denied
R v Sutton, 2012 NLCA 35 (CanLII), per Rowe JA Granted
R v Downes, 2012 ONCJ 45 (CanLII), per Marin J denied
R v Greenall and Collins, 2011 BCPC 28 (CanLII), per Skilnick J withdraw denied
R v Lamontagne, 2011 QCCA 1486 (CanLII), per curiam GP upheld
R v Chisholm, 2010 ONSC 3877 (CanLII), per Mulligan J denied argued that was not given an option but to plead guilty
R v Messervey, 2010 NSCA 55 (CanLII), per Beveridge JA
R v IBB, 2009 SKPC 76 (CanLII), per Whelan J detailed summary of law
R v White, 2009 NSSC 313 (CanLII), per Cacchione J
R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 (CanLII), per Allen J granted
R v McCollum, 2008 NSCA 36 (CanLII), per Bateman JA
R v DWS, 2008 BCCA 453 (CanLII), per Bauman JA upheld
R v KDH, 2007 ABPC 264 (CanLII), per LeGrandeur J withdraw granted
R v Leonard, 2007 SKCA 128 (CanLII), per Richards JA updheld
R v Nevin, 2006 NSCA 72 (CanLII), per Bateman JA
R v Dodge, 2005 NSPC 24 (CanLII), per Gibson J guilty plea withdrawn due to false acceptance to help another (see para 22 to 25)
R v Moore, 2004 BCPC 560 (CanLII), per Brecknell J withdraw denied
R v Gold, 2004 BCCA 179 (CanLII), per Finch CJ
R v McIntosh, 2004 NSCA 19 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA
R v Barry, 2004 NSCA 145 (CanLII), per Bateman JA
R v Wetmore, 2003 ABQB 350 (CanLII), per Macklin J denied
R v Hallam, 2003 BCPC 201 (CanLII), per Brecknell J withdraw denied
R v Moser, 2002 CanLII 49649 (ONSC), per Hill J withdraw denied
R v Hector, 2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA), per Finlayson J upheld
R v Clermont,
1996 CanLII 10244 (NSCA), , (1996) NSJ 170, per Clarke CJ
R v Pottie, 1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA), per Puglsey JA
R v Murphy,
1995 CanLII 4329 (NSCA), [1995] NSJ No 41, per Chipman JA
R v SK , 1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA), per Carthy JA granted
R v Morris, 1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA, per Legg JA granted
R v Porter,
1994 CanLII 4019 (NSCA), , (1994) 132 NSR 107, per Puglsey JA
R v RT,
1992 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), , (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514, per Doherty JA
appeal dismissed
R v Gautreau, 1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA), per curiam dismissed appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court
R v Rubenstein, 1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), per Zuber JA denied The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected.
R v Melanson, (1983) NSJ 453(*no CanLII links)
R v Igoe,
(1982) 54 NSR 113 {{{3}}}, {{{4}}}
R v MacNeil, (1982) 51 NSR 2d 541(*no CanLII links)