Defences (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)<br>" to "''$1''<br>" |
m Text replacement - "CanLII ([0-9]+) \(([A-Z][A-Z])([A-Z][A-Z])\)" to "CanLII $1 ($2 $3)" |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|SM|fr17n|2012 ONCA 255 (CanLII)}}||failure to raised self-defence in murder trial upheld--offender was robbing victim with a knife when a struggle arose for the knife | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|McKay|fm0xq|2011 ONCJ 318 (CanLII)}}||acquitted of choking wife | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Rempel|fng0z|2011 SKPC 156 (CanLII)}}||not guilty of driving while impaired | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Giancone|1vvbn|2008 ONCJ 54 (CanLII)}}|| defence rejected | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Cassan (E.R.)|frj65|2012 MBCA 46 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Olazo|fpx2x|2012 BCCA 59 (CanLII)}} || no entrapment found | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Gosselin|2c702|2010 BCPC 164 (CanLII)}} || charges stayed | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Peters|1wcmw|2002 CanLII 49629 (ON SC)}} || charges stayed | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Neville|fwb41|2013 CanLII 9088 (NLSCTD)}} and [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb46 2013 CanLII 9087] (NLSCTD)|| defence has air of reality in circumstances of homicide | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Key|fqtth|2012 SKPC 33 (CanLII)}}|| government granting a licence to a person on a driving prohibition permitted the defence of officially induced error. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||