Impaired Driving and Over 80 (Offence Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)<br>" to "''$1''<br>"
m Text replacement - "CanLII ([0-9]+) \(ONCA\)" to "CanLII $1 (ON CA)"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--****-->
<!--
<!--
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderCrimCases}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderCrimCases}}
Line 9: Line 8:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Lee'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flsrr 2011 BCPC 88] (CanLII) ||Y ||-||-||Y||s. 8 violation on ASD, removed from evidence
| {{CanLIIR-S|Lee|flsrr|2011 BCPC 88 (CanLII)}}||Y ||-||-||Y||s. 8 violation on ASD, removed from evidence
|-
|-
| ''R v Hannigan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9x 2011 ABPC 305] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y||N||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hannigan|fnm9x|2011 ABPC 305 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y||N||
|-
|-
| Paterson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dnpd 2010 BCCA 442] (CanLII)||Y||-||-||?||s. 8 no grounds of arrest  
| Paterson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dnpd 2010 BCCA 442] (CanLII)||Y||-||-||?||s. 8 no grounds of arrest  
|-
|-
| ''R v White'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/263qq 2009 BCPC 312] (CanLII)||?||?||Y||N||
| {{CanLIIR-S|White|263qq|2009 BCPC 312 (CanLII)}}||?||?||Y||N||
|}
|}


'''reasonable and probable grounds to administer Screening Device'''<br>
; reasonable and probable grounds to administer Screening Device
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
|-
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Monykal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2503d 2009 ABPC 220] (CanLII) || Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Monykal|2503d|2009 ABPC 220 (CanLII)}}|| Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period.
|-
|-
|  ''R v Ogertschnig'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2185f 2008 ABPC 293] (CanLII)|| no grounds for suspicion  
|  {{CanLIIR-S|Ogertschnig|2185f|2008 ABPC 293 (CanLII)}}|| no grounds for suspicion  
|-
|-
| ''R v Ellis'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng0j2011 SKPC 148] (CanLII) || no breach
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ellis|fng0j|2011 SKPC 148 (CanLII)}} || no breach
|-
|-
| ''R v Nahorniak'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b0mz 2010 SKCA 68] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Nahorniak|2b0mz|2010 SKCA 68 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Hansen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b9zz 2010 ABPC 195] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hansen|2b9zz|2010 ABPC 195 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
|''R v Steeves'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmzr 2011 ABQB 661] (CanLII)|| reasonable grounds based on failed screening device
|{{CanLIIR-S|Steeves|fnmzr|2011 ABQB 661 (CanLII)}}|| reasonable grounds based on failed screening device
|-
|-
| ''R v Formales'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fnf7k 2011 BCPC 257] (CanLII) || breach; excluded certificate
| {{CanLIIR-S|Formales|fnf7k|2011 BCPC 257 (CanLII)}}|| breach; excluded certificate
|-
|-
| ''R v Rosien'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp50c 2011 ONCJ 608] (CanLII) || impaired charge - not enough grounds -- acquitted
| {{CanLIIR-S|Rosien|fp50c|2011 ONCJ 608 (CanLII)}}|| impaired charge - not enough grounds -- acquitted
|}
|}


Line 45: Line 44:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Kenneth Steeves'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29q08 2010 NBPC 25] (CanLII) ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Kenneth Steeves|29q08|2010 NBPC 25 (CanLII)}}||
|}
|}


Line 54: Line 53:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Mailey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqqv5 2012 ABQB 138] (CanLII) || good overview of history of "soon as practicable" - 25 min of a 37 min delay was due to driver sitting on a Check Stop bus  
| {{CanLIIR-S|Mailey|fqqv5|2012 ABQB 138 (CanLII)}}|| good overview of history of "soon as practicable" - 25 min of a 37 min delay was due to driver sitting on a Check Stop bus  
|-
|-
| ''R v Hughes'',  <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnf85 2011 BCPC 263] (CanLII)||judicial stay
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hughes|fnf85|2011 BCPC 263 (CanLII)}}||judicial stay
|-
|-
| ''R v Malenfant'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fndh9 2011 ONCJ 510] (CanLII)||no violation
| {{CanLIIR-S|Malenfant|fndh9|2011 ONCJ 510 (CanLII)}}||no violation
|-
|-
| ''R v McGonigal'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fm5wh 2011 ABPC 183] (CanLII)|| 45 minute wait for tow truck  
| {{CanLIIR-S|McGonigal|fm5wh|2011 ABPC 183 (CanLII)}}|| 45 minute wait for tow truck  
|-
|-
| ''R v Kleinsasser'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm6fc 2011 ABPC 206] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Kleinsasser|fm6fc|2011 ABPC 206 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Thompson'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fmm12 2011 BCPC 202] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Thompson|fmm12|2011 BCPC 202 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
|''R v Megahy'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1x27d 2008 ABCA 207] (CanLII) || 34 minute delay resulted in Charter violation
|{{CanLIIR-S|Megahy|1x27d|2008 ABCA 207 (CanLII)}}|| 34 minute delay resulted in Charter violation
|-
|-
|''R v Lemarchant''<br> [2009] OJ No 4297 (S.C.J.) {{NOCANLII}}||
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Lemarchant| [2009] OJ No 4297 (SCJ)}}||
|-
|-
|R v Forsythe <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21vdp 2008 MBQB 316] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Forsythe|21vdp|2008 MBQB 316 (CanLII)}} ||
|-
|-
| ''R v Guenter''<br> 2011 OJ 2233 {{NOCANLII}} || collision with injuries, officer was distracted and forgot to make the demand until 60 minutes after arrest when it was done by the qualified technician
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Guenter| 2011 OJ 2233}} || collision with injuries, officer was distracted and forgot to make the demand until 60 minutes after arrest when it was done by the qualified technician
|-
|-
|R v Chung <br>[2009] OJ No 1546 (S.C.J.) {{NOCANLII}}||
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Chung| [2009] OJ No 1546 (SCJ)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Price''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29cc4 2010 ONSC 1898] (CanLII), [2010] OJ No 1587 (S.C.J.)||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Price|29cc4|2010 ONSC 1898 (CanLII)|[2010] OJ No 1587 (SCJ)}} ||
|-
|-
| R v Singleton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pwh9 2006 CanLII 36500] (ON SC), [2006] OJ 4332 || 29 minute delay  - not ASAP - driver failed ASD, transported to station, demand read at station 29 minutes later. Officer fails to explain the full delay.
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Singleton|1pwh9|2006 CanLII 36500 (ONSC)|[2006] OJ 4332}} || 29 minute delay  - not ASAP - driver failed ASD, transported to station, demand read at station 29 minutes later. Officer fails to explain the full delay.
|-
|-
| ''R v Squires'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ctn1 2002 CanLII 44982] (ON CA), [2002] OJ No 2314 || 59 minutes after arrest -- vehicle collision, driver taken to hospital by ambulance, police delayed until patient available to speak
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Squires|1ctn1|2002 CanLII 44982 (ON CA)|[2002] OJ No 2314}} || 59 minutes after arrest -- vehicle collision, driver taken to hospital by ambulance, police delayed until patient available to speak
|-
|-
| ''R v Janssen''<br> (1997) OJ 758 {{NOCANLII}}|| 93 minute delay after encountering driver - vehicle collision, ambulance takes driver to hospital, accused claims to have had a stroke.
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Janssen| (1997) OJ 758}}|| 93 minute delay after encountering driver - vehicle collision, ambulance takes driver to hospital, accused claims to have had a stroke.
|}
|}


Line 90: Line 89:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
| R v Zeller <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bt40 2010 SKPC 99] (CanLII) || results as "milligrams percent" is not sufficient
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zeller|2bt40|2010 SKPC 99 (CanLII)}} || results as "milligrams percent" is not sufficient
|}
|}


Line 99: Line 98:
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Andersen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqs4q 2012 SKCA 37] (CanLII) || guilty || asleep in drivers seat, engine running, doors locked
| {{CanLIIR-S|Andersen|fqs4q|2012 SKCA 37 (CanLII)}}|| guilty || asleep in drivers seat, engine running, doors locked
|-
|-
|''R v Page'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng12 2011 SKPC 152] (CanLII) || guilty||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Page|fng12|2011 SKPC 152 (CanLII)}}|| guilty||
|-
|-
| ''R v Zmurchyk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2d8kw 2010 ABPC 359] (CanLII) || guilty || review of case law
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zmurchyk|2d8kw|2010 ABPC 359 (CanLII)}}|| guilty || review of case law
|-
|-
| ''R v Yakobchuk''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lhc5 2005 ABPC 189] (CanLII) || not guilty ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Yakobchuk|1lhc5|2005 ABPC 189 (CanLII)}} || not guilty ||
|-
|-
| ''R v Brahniuk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5hqg 2002 SKCA 104] (CanLII) || guilty || turned on truck, locked door and passed out across the front seats. Risk of putting in motion.
| {{CanLIIR-S|Brahniuk|5hqg|2002 SKCA 104 (CanLII)}}|| guilty || turned on truck, locked door and passed out across the front seats. Risk of putting in motion.
|-
|-
| ''R v Sherbrook'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nv0q 1998 CanLII 13896] (SK QB), [1998] S.J. No. 88 (Sask.Q.B.) || not guilty ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Sherbrook|1nv0q|1998 CanLII 13896 (SKQB)|[1998] S.J. No 88 (Sask.Q.B.)}} || not guilty ||
|}
|}


-->
-->

Latest revision as of 19:00, 9 September 2021

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Impaired_Driving_and_Over_80_(Offence_Cases)&oldid=79201"