Arrest and Detention: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "} at para ([0-9][0-9])<" to "}{{at|$1}}<"
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Fr:Arrestation_et_détention]]
{{currency2|January|2016}}
{{LevelOne}}
{{LevelOne}}
{{HeaderArrest}}
{{HeaderArrest}}
<!--****-->
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
The police powers of detention and arrest are some of the most important powers available to a peace officer in their investigation of criminal activity. It is also some of the most invasive powers upon a person's liberty. This is a classic issue of procedural law that circumscribes the peace officers authority in these matters.
The police powers of detention and arrest are some of the most important powers available to a peace officer in their investigation of criminal activity. It is also some of the most invasive powers upon a person's liberty.  


These chapters cover not only the powers of police to detain or arrest, but also the right a person has when the police engage in such conduct and remedies for breaches of those rights.
That being said, the law should not "unduly hamper" the police in criminal investigations.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Hart|fsr1k|2012 NLCA 61 (CanLII)|}}{{perNLCA|Barry JA}} appealed to [http://canlii.ca/t/g88cp 2014 SCC 52] (CanLII){{perSCC-H|Moldaver J}}
</ref>


; Distinction Between Detention and Arrest
The transition from investigative detention to arrest and search is a fluid and dynamic process in situations such a traffic stop. It is not to be segmented into discrete parts.<ref>
The transition from investigative detention to arrest and search is a fluid and dynamic process in situations such a traffic stop. It is not to be segmented into discrete parts.<ref>
see R v Schrenk (C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/29ft9 2010 MBCA 38] (CanLII), 255 Man.R. (2d) 12{{perMBCA|Steel JA}}<br>
see {{CanLIIRP|Schrenk (CA)|29ft9|2010 MBCA 38 (CanLII)|255 Man.R. (2d) 12}}{{perMBCA|Steel JA}}<br>
R v Amofa (R.), [http://canlii.ca/t/flb79 2011 ONCA 368] (CanLII), 282 O.A.C. 114{{perONCA|Blair JA}}{{at|19}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Amofa (R.)|flb79|2011 ONCA 368 (CanLII)|282 OAC 114}}{{perONCA|Blair JA}}{{atL|flb79|19}}<br>
</ref>
 
In general terms, the law should not "unduly hamper" the police in criminal investigations.<ref>
''R v Hart'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fsr1k 2012 NLCA 61] (CanLII){{perNLCA|Barry JA}} appealed to [http://canlii.ca/t/g88cp 2014 SCC 52] (CanLII){{perSCC|Moldaver J}}
</ref>
</ref>


'''State Agency'''<br>
; State Agency
The law relating to detention and arrest concerns the conduct of peace officers.
Arrest and detention by private security on the basis of committing a criminal offence and then delivery to the police does not amount to state conduct.<ref>
Arrest and detention by private security on the basis of committing a criminal offence and then delivery to the police does not amount to state conduct.<ref>
''R v Dell'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1l5rs 2005 ABCA 246] (CanLII){{perABCA|Fruman JA and Cote JA}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Dell|1l5rs|2005 ABCA 246 (CanLII)|199 CCC (3d) 110}}{{perABCA|Fruman JA and Cote JA}}<br>
See also [[Charter Applications#State Agent]]
See also [[Charter Applications#State Agent]]
</ref>
</ref>
Line 25: Line 26:


==Topics==
==Topics==
These topics cover not only the powers of police to detain or arrest, but also the right a person has when the police engage in such conduct and remedies for breaches of those rights.
* [[Investigative Detention]]
* [[Investigative Detention]]
* [[Warrant Arrests]]
* Arrest
* [[Warrantless Arrests]]
** [[Warrant Arrests]]
* [[Arrest Procedure]]
** [[Warrantless Arrests]]
** [[Arrest Procedure]]
* [[Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the Charter]]
* [[Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the Charter]]
* [[Waiver of Charter Rights]]
* [[Waiver of Charter Rights]]

Latest revision as of 07:04, 23 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2016. (Rev. # 95666)

Introduction

The police powers of detention and arrest are some of the most important powers available to a peace officer in their investigation of criminal activity. It is also some of the most invasive powers upon a person's liberty.

That being said, the law should not "unduly hamper" the police in criminal investigations.[1]

Distinction Between Detention and Arrest

The transition from investigative detention to arrest and search is a fluid and dynamic process in situations such a traffic stop. It is not to be segmented into discrete parts.[2]

State Agency

The law relating to detention and arrest concerns the conduct of peace officers. Arrest and detention by private security on the basis of committing a criminal offence and then delivery to the police does not amount to state conduct.[3]

  1. R v Hart, 2012 NLCA 61 (CanLII), per Barry JA appealed to 2014 SCC 52 (CanLII), per Moldaver J
  2. see R v Schrenk (CA), 2010 MBCA 38 (CanLII), 255 Man.R. (2d) 12, per Steel JA
    R v Amofa (R.), 2011 ONCA 368 (CanLII), 282 OAC 114, per Blair JA, at para 19
  3. R v Dell, 2005 ABCA 246 (CanLII), 199 CCC (3d) 110, per Fruman JA and Cote JA
    See also Charter Applications#State Agent

Topics

These topics cover not only the powers of police to detain or arrest, but also the right a person has when the police engage in such conduct and remedies for breaches of those rights.

See Also