Discharging a Juror: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:24, 14 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95363)

General Principles

Section 644 (1) and (2) states that:

Discharge of juror

644 (1) Where in the course of a trial the judge is satisfied that a juror should not, by reason of illness or other reasonable cause, continue to act, the judge may discharge the juror.
[omitted (1.1)]

Trial may continue

(2) Where in the course of a trial a member of the jury dies or is discharged pursuant to subsection (1)[discharge of juror for reasonble cause], the jury shall, unless the judge otherwise directs and if the number of jurors is not reduced below ten, be deemed to remain properly constituted for all purposes of the trial and the trial shall proceed and a verdict may be given accordingly.

Trial may continue without jury

(3) If in the course of a trial the number of jurors is reduced below 10, the judge may, with the consent of the parties, discharge the jurors, continue the trial without a jury and render a verdict.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 644; 1992, c. 41, s. 6; 1997, c. 18, s. 75; 2019, c. 25, s. 273.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 644 (1), (2) and (3)

A juror can be discharged where there is well-established information that a juror's impartiality is in questioned.^[1]

The judge will make inquiries to the alleged biased juror in open court. Counsel will be able to make submissions and suggest questions to be put to the juror.^[2]

A judge has the discretion to discharge a juror under s. 644 and continue the trial or can dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. ^[3] The procedure requires the judge to:

"apply the proper legal test for determining whether the information gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias”, and
"at a minimum, conduct an inquiry into the circumstances in order to obtain the necessary information upon which to exercise his or her discretion" ^[4]

Wide discretion

The decision to discharge is "highly discretionary" and so is afforded deference.^[5]

A judge generally should but need not consult with counsel before dismissing a juror.^[6]

Timing of Discharge

Jurors can be dismissed during deliberations.^[7]

Requests Must be On the Record

A judge may not hear requests and reasons for requests to be excused from members of the jury off the record and without the presence of the accused.^[8]

The jury can be reduced to as little as 10 members without a mistrial or a violation of s. 11(f) Charter rights.^[9]

Jury secrecy is an ancient part of the common law. ^[10] The purpose is to allow juries to explore reasonings without risk of impeachment.^[11]

It exists today in section 649.^[12]

This rule, however, does not prevent the court from taking evidence from a third party or a juror about problems that may taint the verdict.

Once the jury gives a verdict the judge is functus and so cannot deal with any issues of irregularities in deliberation.^[13]

Discharge for Medical Emergency

Wher the trial judge is informed of a credible medical emergency in a juror's family while the jury is deliberating, the judge may advise the juror in camera to determine whether the juror should continue.^[14]

↑ R v Budai, 2001 BCCA 349 (CanLII), 154 CCC (3d) 289, per Cumming and Mackenzie JJA, at paras 27 to 40
R v Wolfe, 2005 BCCA 307 (CanLII), 197 CCC (3d) 486, per Levine JA, at para 5 (“When a juror’s conduct raises questions of possible bias, the trial judge may discharge the juror or dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. Whether to take such a step is a matter which falls within the discretion of the trial judge....”)
↑ R v Chambers, 1990 CanLII 47 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 1293, per Cory J (6:1)
↑ Budai, supra, at para 39
↑ Budai, supra, at para 40
↑ R v Li, 2012 ONCA 291 (CanLII), 284 CCC (3d) 207, per Feldman JA, at paras 77 to 78
R v Brost, 2017 ABCA 113 (CanLII), per curiam, at para 7
↑ Brost, ibid., at para 7
↑ R v Krieger, 2005 ABCA 202 (CanLII), [2005] AJ No 683 (CA), per Cote JA
R v Peters, 1999 BCCA 406 (CanLII), 137 CCC (3d) 26, per McEachern JA
R v Kum, 2012 ONSC 1194 (CanLII), 281 CCC (3d) 553, per Wein J
↑ R v Sinclair, 2013 ONCA 64 (CanLII), 300 CCC (3d) 69, per Rouleau JA
↑ R v Genest, 1990 CanLII 3175 (QC CA), 61 CCC (3d) 251, per Mailhot JA
↑ dating back to "Lord Mansfield's Rule" of 1785 which prohibits evidence of jury deliberation
↑ R v Pan, 2001 SCC 42 (CanLII), [2001] 2 SCR 344, per Arbour J (9:0)
↑ see Disclosure of Jury Proceeings
↑ see R v Lewis, 2012 ONSC 1074 (CanLII), OJ No 742, per Hill J
R v Mirza, [2004] 1 A.C. 1118(*no CanLII links)
↑ R v Vivian, 2012 ONCA 324 (CanLII), 290 CCC (3d) 73, per MacPherson JA

Standing Aside a Juror

Stand by

633 The judge may direct a juror who has been called under subsection 631(3) [manner of drawing cards] or (3.1) [power to order calling out names on cards] to stand by for reasons of personal hardship, maintaining public confidence in the administration of justice or any other reasonable cause.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 633 R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F); 1992, c. 41, s. 2; 2001, c. 32, s. 40; 2019, c. 25, s. 269.
[annotation(s) added]

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 633

Calling persons who have stood by

641 (1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors have not been sworn and no cards remain to be drawn, the persons who have been directed to stand by shall be called again in the order in which their cards were drawn and shall be sworn, unless excused by the judge or challenged by the accused or the prosecutor.

Other persons becoming available

(2) If, before a person is sworn as a juror under subsection (1) [calling persons who have stood by], other persons in the panel become available, the prosecutor may require the cards of those persons to be put into and drawn from the box in accordance with section 631 [procedure for jury cards], and those persons shall be challenged, directed to stand by, excused or sworn, as the case may be, before the persons who were originally directed to stand by are called again.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 641; 1992, c. 41, s. 3; 2001, c. 32, s. 41; 2002, c. 13, s. 55; 2011, c. 16, s. 10.
[annotation(s) added]

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 641 (1) and (2)

Discharging Surplus Jury Members

Trying of issues of indictment by jury

652.1 (1) After the charge to the jury, the jury shall retire to try the issues of the indictment.

Reduction of number of jurors to 12

(2) However, if there are more than 12 jurors remaining, the judge shall identify the 12 jurors who are to retire to consider the verdict by having the number of each juror written on a card that is of equal size, by causing the cards to be placed together in a box that is to be thoroughly shaken together and by drawing one card if 13 jurors remain or two cards if 14 jurors remain. The judge shall then discharge any juror whose number is drawn.
2011, c. 16, s. 13.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 652.1 (1) and (2)

Replacing Jurors

Section 644(1.1) permits the judge to select new jurors:

644
[omitted (1)]

Replacement of juror

(1.1) A judge may select another juror to take the place of a juror who by reason of illness or other reasonable cause cannot continue to act, if the jury has not yet begun to hear evidence, either by drawing a name from a panel of persons who were summoned to act as jurors and who are available at the court at the time of replacing the juror or by using the procedure referred to in section 642 [summoning other jurors when panel exhausted].
[omitted (2) and (3)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 644; 1992, c. 41, s. 6; 1997, c. 18, s. 75; 2019, c. 25, s. 273.
[annotation(s) added]

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 644 (1.1)

[1] R v Budai, 2001 BCCA 349 (CanLII), 154 CCC (3d) 289, per Cumming and Mackenzie JJA, at paras 27 to 40
R v Wolfe, 2005 BCCA 307 (CanLII), 197 CCC (3d) 486, per Levine JA, at para 5 (“When a juror’s conduct raises questions of possible bias, the trial judge may discharge the juror or dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. Whether to take such a step is a matter which falls within the discretion of the trial judge....”)

[2] R v Chambers, 1990 CanLII 47 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 1293, per Cory J (6:1)

[3] Budai, supra, at para 39

[4] Budai, supra, at para 40

[5] R v Li, 2012 ONCA 291 (CanLII), 284 CCC (3d) 207, per Feldman JA, at paras 77 to 78
R v Brost, 2017 ABCA 113 (CanLII), per curiam, at para 7

[6] Brost, ibid., at para 7

[7] R v Krieger, 2005 ABCA 202 (CanLII), [2005] AJ No 683 (CA), per Cote JA
R v Peters, 1999 BCCA 406 (CanLII), 137 CCC (3d) 26, per McEachern JA
R v Kum, 2012 ONSC 1194 (CanLII), 281 CCC (3d) 553, per Wein J

[8] R v Sinclair, 2013 ONCA 64 (CanLII), 300 CCC (3d) 69, per Rouleau JA

[9] R v Genest, 1990 CanLII 3175 (QC CA), 61 CCC (3d) 251, per Mailhot JA

[10] ting back to "Lord Mansfield's Rule" of 1785 which prohibits evidence of jury deliberation

[11] R v Pan, 2001 SCC 42 (CanLII), [2001] 2 SCR 344, per Arbour J (9:0)

[12] see Disclosure of Jury Proceeings

[13] see R v Lewis, 2012 ONSC 1074 (CanLII), OJ No 742, per Hill J
R v Mirza, [2004] 1 A.C. 1118(*no CanLII links)

[14] R v Vivian, 2012 ONCA 324 (CanLII), 290 CCC (3d) 73, per MacPherson JA

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[[fr:Décharge_d%27un_juré]]
+{{Currency2|January|2020}}
 {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderJuries}}
 ==General Principles==
-<!-- -->
 Section 644 (1) and (2) states that:
-{{quotation|
+{{quotation2|
-'''Discharge of juror'''<br>
+; Discharge of juror
-(1) Where in the course of a trial the judge is satisfied that a juror should not, by reason of illness or other reasonable cause, continue to act, the judge may discharge the juror.<br>...<br>
+(1) Where in the course of a trial the judge is satisfied that a juror should not, by reason of illness or other reasonable cause, continue to act, the judge may discharge the juror.
-'''Trial may continue'''<br>
-(2) Where in the course of a trial a member of the jury dies or is discharged pursuant to subsection (1), the jury shall, unless the judge otherwise directs and if the number of jurors is not reduced below ten, be deemed to remain properly constituted for all purposes of the trial and the trial shall proceed and a verdict may be given accordingly.
 <br>
-R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 644; 1992, c. 41, s. 6; 1997, c. 18, s. 75.
+{{removed|(1.1)}}
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec644 CCC]
+; Trial may continue
+(2) Where in the course of a trial a member of the jury dies or is discharged pursuant to subsection (1){{AnnSec6|644(1)}}, the jury shall, unless the judge otherwise directs and if the number of jurors is not reduced below ten, be deemed to remain properly constituted for all purposes of the trial and the trial shall proceed and a verdict may be given accordingly.
+<br>
+; Trial may continue without jury
+(3) If in the course of a trial the number of jurors is reduced below 10, the judge may, with the consent of the parties, discharge the jurors, continue the trial without a jury and render a verdict.
+R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 644;
+{{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 41}}, s. 6;
+{{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 18}}, s. 75;
+{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 273.
+|{{CCCSec2|644}}
+|{{NoteUp|644|1|2|3}}
 }}
 A juror can be discharged where there is well-established information that a juror's impartiality is in questioned.<ref>
-''R v Budai'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4zcr 2001 BCCA 349] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Cumming and Mackenzie JJA}} at paras 27-40 <br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Budai|4zcr|2001 BCCA 349 (CanLII)|154 CCC (3d) 289}}{{perBCCA|Cumming and Mackenzie JJA}}{{AtsL|4zcr|27| to 40}}<br>
-''R v Wolfe'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1kxqt 2005 BCCA 307] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Levine JA}} at para 5 (“When a juror’s conduct raises questions of possible bias, the trial judge may discharge the juror or dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. Whether to take such a step is a matter which falls within the discretion of the trial judge....”)<br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Wolfe|1kxqt|2005 BCCA 307 (CanLII)|197 CCC (3d) 486}}{{perBCCA|Levine JA}}{{atL|1kxqt|5}} (“When a juror’s conduct raises questions of possible bias, the trial judge may discharge the juror or dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. Whether to take such a step is a matter which falls within the discretion of the trial judge....”)<br>
 </ref>
 The judge will make inquiries to the alleged biased juror in open court. Counsel will be able to make submissions and suggest questions to be put to the juror.<ref>
-''R v Chambers'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsrt 1990 CanLII 47] (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 1293{{perSCC|Cory J}} (6:1)</ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|Chambers|1fsrt|1990 CanLII 47 (SCC)|[1990] 2 SCR 1293}}{{perSCC|Cory J}} (6:1)</ref>
-A judge has the discretion to discharge a juror under s. 644 and continue the trial or can dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. <ref> {{supra1|Budai}} at 39</ref>
+A judge has the discretion to discharge a juror under s. 644 and continue the trial or can dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial. <ref>
+{{supra1|Budai}}{{atL|4zcr|39}}</ref>
 The procedure requires the judge to:
 # "apply the proper legal test for determining whether the information gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias”, and
-# "at a minimum, conduct an inquiry into the circumstances in order to obtain the necessary information upon which to exercise his or her discretion" <ref>{{supra1|Budai}}{{at|40}}</ref>
+# "at a minimum, conduct an inquiry into the circumstances in order to obtain the necessary information upon which to exercise his or her discretion" <ref>
+{{supra1|Budai}}{{atL|4zcr|40}}</ref>
-'''Wide discretion'''<br>
+; Wide discretion
 The decision to discharge is "highly discretionary" and so is afforded deference.<ref>
-''R v Li'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fr791 2012 ONCA 291] (CanLII){{perONCA|Feldman JA}} at paras 77-8<br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Li|fr791|2012 ONCA 291 (CanLII)|284 CCC (3d) 207}}{{perONCA|Feldman JA}}{{AtsL|fr791|77| to 78}}<br>
-''R v Brost'', [http://canlii.ca/t/h367z 2017 ABCA 113] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}{{at|7}}<br>
+{{CanLIIRx|Brost|h367z|2017 ABCA 113 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}}{{atL|h367z|7}}<br>
 </ref>
 A judge generally ''should'' but need not consult with counsel before dismissing a juror.<ref>
-Brost{{ibid}}{{at|7}}<br>
+{{ibid1|Brost}}{{atL|h367z|7}}<br>
 </ref>
-'''Timing of Discharge'''<br>
+; Timing of Discharge
-Jurors can be dismissed during deliberations.<ref>''R v Krieger'', [2005] AJ No 683 (C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/1l01f 2005 ABCA 202] (CanLII){{perABCA| Cote JA}}<br>
+Jurors can be dismissed during deliberations.<ref>
-''R v Peters'', [http://canlii.ca/t/541n 1999 BCCA 406] (CanLII), 137 CCC (3d) 26 (BCCA){{perBCCA|McEachern JA}}<br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Krieger|1l01f|2005 ABCA 202 (CanLII)|[2005] AJ No 683 (CA)}}{{perABCA|Cote JA}}<br>
-''R v Kum'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fq8tp 2012 ONSC 1194] (CanLII){{perONSC|Wein J}}</ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|Peters|541n|1999 BCCA 406 (CanLII)|137 CCC (3d) 26}}{{perBCCA|McEachern JA}}<br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Kum|fq8tp|2012 ONSC 1194 (CanLII)|281 CCC (3d) 553}}{{perONSC|Wein J}}</ref>
-'''Requests Must be On the Record'''<br>
+; Requests Must be On the Record
 A judge may not hear requests and reasons for requests to be excused from members of the jury off the record and without the presence of the accused.<ref>
-''R v Sinclair'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fvx90 2013 ONCA 64] (CanLII){{perONCA|Rouleau JA}}
+{{CanLIIRP|Sinclair|fvx90|2013 ONCA 64 (CanLII)|300 CCC (3d) 69}}{{perONCA|Rouleau JA}}
 </ref>
-The jury can be reduced to as little as 10 members without a mistrial or a violation of s. 11(f) Charter rights.<ref>R v Genest [http://canlii.ca/t/1phw5 1990 CanLII 3175] (QC CA), (1990), 61 CCC (3d) 251 (Que.C.A.){{perQCCA|Mailhot JA}}</ref>
+The jury can be reduced to as little as 10 members without a mistrial or a violation of s. 11(f) Charter rights.<ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|Genest|1phw5|1990 CanLII 3175 (QC CA)|61 CCC (3d) 251}}{{perQCCA|Mailhot JA}}</ref>
-Jury secrecy is an ancient part of the common law. <ref>dating back to "Lord Mansfield's Rule" of 1785 which prohibits evidence of jury deliberation</ref> The purpose is to allow juries to explore reasonings without risk of impeachment.<ref>''R v Pan'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5203 2001 SCC 42] (CanLII){{perSCC|Arbour J}} (9:0)</ref>
+Jury secrecy is an ancient part of the common law. <ref>dating back to "Lord Mansfield's Rule" of 1785 which prohibits evidence of jury deliberation</ref>
+The purpose is to allow juries to explore reasonings without risk of impeachment.<ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|Pan|5203|2001 SCC 42 (CanLII)|[2001] 2 SCR 344}}{{perSCC-H|Arbour J}} (9:0)</ref>
-It exists today in section 649:
+It exists today in section 649.<Ref>
-{{quotation|
+see [[Miscellaneous_Administration_of_Justice_Offences#Disclosure_of_Jury_Proceedings|Disclosure of Jury Proceeings]]
-'''Disclosure of jury proceedings'''<br>
+</ref>
-. Every member of a jury, and every person providing technical, personal, interpretative or other support services to a juror with a physical disability, who, except for the purposes of
-:(a) an investigation of an alleged offence under subsection 139(2) in relation to a juror, or
-:(b) giving evidence in criminal proceedings in relation to such an offence,<br>
-discloses any information relating to the proceedings of the jury when it was absent from the courtroom that was not subsequently disclosed in open court is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
-<br>
-R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 649; 1998, c. 9, s. 7.
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec649 CCC]
-}}
 This rule, however, does not prevent the court from taking evidence from a third party or a juror about problems that may taint the verdict.
 Once the jury gives a verdict the judge is ''functus'' and so cannot deal with any issues of irregularities in deliberation.<ref>
-see ''R v Lewis'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fn5zq 2012 ONSC 1074] (S.C.J.){{perONSC|Hill J}}<br>
+see {{CanLIIRP|Lewis|fq4rl|2012 ONSC 1074 (CanLII)|OJ No 742}}{{perONSC|Hill J}}<br>
-''R v Mirza'', [2004] 1 A.C. 1118{{NOCANLII}}</ref>
+{{CanLIIR-N|Mirza|, [2004] 1 A.C. 1118}}</ref>
+; Discharge for Medical Emergency
+Wher the trial judge is informed of a credible medical emergency in a juror's family while the jury is deliberating, the judge may advise the juror ''in camera'' to determine whether the juror should continue.<ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|Vivian|frc49|2012 ONCA 324 (CanLII)|290 CCC (3d) 73}}{{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}
+</ref>
 {{Reflist|2}}
@@ Line 73: / Line 85: @@
 ==Standing Aside a Juror==
-{{quotation|
+{{quotation2|
-'''Stand by'''<br>
+; Stand by
-. The judge may direct a juror who has been called pursuant to subsection 631(3) or (3.1) to stand by for reasons of personal hardship or any other reasonable cause.
+The judge may direct a juror who has been called under subsection 631(3) {{AnnSec6|631(3)}} or (3.1) {{AnnSec6|631(3.1)}} to stand by for reasons of personal hardship, maintaining public confidence in the administration of justice or any other reasonable cause.
-<br>
-R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 633; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F); 1992, c. 41, s. 2; 2001, c. 32, s. 40.
+R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 633
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec633 CCC]
+R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)}}, s. 185(F);
+{{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 41}}, s. 2;
+{{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 32}}, s. 40;
+{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 269.
+{{Annotation}}
+|{{CCCSec2|633}}
+|{{NoteUp|633}}
 }}
-{{quotation|
+{{quotation2|
-'''Calling persons who have stood by'''<br>
+; Calling persons who have stood by
-. (1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors have not been sworn and no cards remain to be drawn, the persons who have been directed to stand by shall be called again in the order in which their cards were drawn and shall be sworn, unless excused by the judge or challenged by the accused or the prosecutor.
+(1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors have not been sworn and no cards remain to be drawn, the persons who have been directed to stand by shall be called again in the order in which their cards were drawn and shall be sworn, unless excused by the judge or challenged by the accused or the prosecutor.
 <br>
-'''Other persons becoming available'''<br>
+; Other persons becoming available
-(2) If, before a person is sworn as a juror under subsection (1), other persons in the panel become available, the prosecutor may require the cards of those persons to be put into and drawn from the box in accordance with section 631, and those persons shall be challenged, directed to stand by, excused or sworn, as the case may be, before the persons who were originally directed to stand by are called again.
+(2) If, before a person is sworn as a juror under subsection (1) {{AnnSec6|641(1)}}, other persons in the panel become available, the prosecutor may require the cards of those persons to be put into and drawn from the box in accordance with section 631 {{AnnSec6|631}}, and those persons shall be challenged, directed to stand by, excused or sworn, as the case may be, before the persons who were originally directed to stand by are called again.
 <br>
-R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 641; 1992, c. 41, s. 3; 2001, c. 32, s. 41; 2002, c. 13, s. 55; 2011, c. 16, s. 10.
+R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 641;
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec633 CCC]
+{{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 41}}, s. 3;
+{{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 32}}, s. 41; {{LegHistory00s|2002, c. 13}}, s. 55;
+{{LegHistory10s|2011, c. 16}}, s. 10.
+{{Annotation}}
+|{{CCCSec2|641}}
+|{{NoteUp|641|1|2}}
 }}
 ==Discharging Surplus Jury Members==
-{{quotation|
+{{quotation2|
-'''Trying of issues of indictment by jury'''<br>
+; Trying of issues of indictment by jury
 .1 (1) After the charge to the jury, the jury shall retire to try the issues of the indictment.
 <br>
-'''Reduction of number of jurors to 12'''<br>
+; Reduction of number of jurors to 12
 (2) However, if there are more than 12 jurors remaining, the judge shall identify the 12 jurors who are to retire to consider the verdict by having the number of each juror written on a card that is of equal size, by causing the cards to be placed together in a box that is to be thoroughly shaken together and by drawing one card if 13 jurors remain or two cards if 14 jurors remain. The judge shall then discharge any juror whose number is drawn.
 <br>
-, c. 16, s. 13.
+{{LegHistory10s|2011, c. 16}}, s. 13.
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec652.1 CCC]
+|{{CCCSec2|652.1}}
+|{{NoteUp|652.1|1|2}}
 }}
 ==Replacing Jurors==
 Section 644(1.1) permits the judge to select new jurors:
-{{quotation|
+{{quotation2|
-<br>...<br>
+<br>
-'''Replacement of juror'''<br>
+{{removed|(1)}}
-(1.1) A judge may select another juror to take the place of a juror who by reason of illness or other reasonable cause cannot continue to act, if the jury has not yet begun to hear evidence, either by drawing a name from a panel of persons who were summoned to act as jurors and who are available at the court at the time of replacing the juror or by using the procedure referred to in section 642 [''Summoning other jurors when panel exhausted''].
+; Replacement of juror
-<br>...<br>
+(1.1) A judge may select another juror to take the place of a juror who by reason of illness or other reasonable cause cannot continue to act, if the jury has not yet begun to hear evidence, either by drawing a name from a panel of persons who were summoned to act as jurors and who are available at the court at the time of replacing the juror or by using the procedure referred to in section 642 {{AnnSec6|642}}.
-R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 644; 1992, c. 41, s. 6; 1997, c. 18, s. 75.<br>[''annotation added'']
+<br>
-|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec644 CCC]
+{{removed|(2) and (3)}}
+R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 644; {{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 41}}, s. 6;
+{{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 18}}, s. 75;
+{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 273.
+{{Annotations}}
+|{{CCCSec2|644}}
+|{{NoteUp|644|1.1}}
 }}