Immigration Consequences from a Conviction: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "'''([a-zA-Z]+ [a-zA-Z]+ [a-zA-Z]+ [a-zA-Z]+)'''<br>" to "; $1" |
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(32 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Fr:Conséquences_d%27une_condamnation_en_matière_d%27immigration]] | |||
{{Currency2|April|2023}} | |||
{{LevelZero}} | {{LevelZero}} | ||
{{HeaderSentencing}} | {{HeaderSentencing}} | ||
Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
{{seealso|Consequences of Criminal Records After Sentencing|Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offender#Effect on Immigration}} | {{seealso|Consequences of Criminal Records After Sentencing|Sentencing Factors Relating to the Offender#Effect on Immigration}} | ||
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 renders foreign nationals and permanent residents inadmissible and subject to a removal order by virtue of certain types of criminal convictions depending on the circumstances. | The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 renders foreign nationals and permanent residents inadmissible and subject to a removal order by virtue of certain types of criminal convictions depending on the circumstances. | ||
A non-citizen person does not have an unqualified right to enter or remain in Canada.<ref> | |||
{{CanLIIRPC|Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Chiarelli|1fsf6|1992 CanLII 87 (SCC)|[1992] 1 SCR 711}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}} | |||
</ref> | |||
There are four ground classes for which a person is inadmissible under the IRPA: | There are four ground classes for which a person is inadmissible under the IRPA: | ||
Line 12: | Line 19: | ||
* organized criminality. | * organized criminality. | ||
Persons who fall under any one of these categories may be deported, even to "moratorium countries" | Persons who fall under any one of these categories may be deported, even to "moratorium countries."<ref> | ||
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227) at s. 230(3)(c) | Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227) at s. 230(3)(c) | ||
</ref> | |||
; Recommendation at Sentence | |||
A sentencing judge may make a recommendation on the disposition of whether to deport an offender.<ref> | |||
{{CanLIIR|Okito|jw27p|2023 ONSC 1514 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Forestall J}}{{atL|jw27p|34}} | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 19: | Line 31: | ||
==Security== | ==Security== | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
; Security | ; Security | ||
34 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for | 34 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for | ||
Line 30: | Line 42: | ||
:(f) being a member of an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (b.1) or (c). | :(f) being a member of an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (b.1) or (c). | ||
(2) [Repealed, 2013, c. 16, s. 13] | (2) [Repealed, {{LegHistory10s|2013, c. 16}}, s. 13] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
2001, c. 27, s. 34; 2013, c. 16, s. 13. | {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 34; {{LegHistory10s|2013, c. 16}}, s. 13. | ||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec34 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec34 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 40: | Line 52: | ||
===Criminality=== | ===Criminality=== | ||
Section 36(2) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "criminality": | Section 36(2) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "criminality": | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
36 | 36<br> | ||
<br> | {{removed|(1)}} | ||
; Criminality | ; Criminality | ||
(2) A foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of criminality for | (2) A foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of criminality for | ||
Line 49: | Line 61: | ||
:(c) committing an act outside Canada that is an offence in the place where it was committed and that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an indictable offence under an Act of Parliament; or | :(c) committing an act outside Canada that is an offence in the place where it was committed and that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an indictable offence under an Act of Parliament; or | ||
:(d) committing, on entering Canada, an offence under an Act of Parliament prescribed by regulations. | :(d) committing, on entering Canada, an offence under an Act of Parliament prescribed by regulations. | ||
{{removed|(3)}} | |||
2001, c. 27, s. 36; 2008, c. 3, s. 3; 2010, c. 8, s. 7; 2012, c. 1, s. 149. | {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 36; 2008, c. 3, s. 3; 2010, c. 8, s. 7; {{LegHistory10s|2012, c. 1}}, s. 149. | ||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 66: | Line 78: | ||
* offences where a "record suspension" has been granted (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | * offences where a "record suspension" has been granted (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | ||
* offences where there was an acquittal (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | * offences where there was an acquittal (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | ||
* offences where convictions were under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (s. 36(3)(e)(iii)). | * offences where convictions were under the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'' (s. 36(3)(e)(iii)). | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Line 72: | Line 84: | ||
===Serious Criminality=== | ===Serious Criminality=== | ||
Section 36(1) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "serious criminality": | Section 36(1) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "serious criminality": | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
; Serious criminality | ; Serious criminality | ||
36 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality for | 36 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality for | ||
Line 79: | Line 91: | ||
:(c) committing an act outside Canada that is an offence in the place where it was committed and that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years. | :(c) committing an act outside Canada that is an offence in the place where it was committed and that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years. | ||
{{removed|(2) and (3)}} | |||
{{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 36; | |||
2001, c. 27, s. 36; 2008, c. 3, s. 3; 2010, c. 8, s. 7; 2012, c. 1, s. 149. | 2008, c. 3, s. 3; | ||
2010, c. 8, s. 7; | |||
{{LegHistory10s|2012, c. 1}}, s. 149. | |||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 95: | Line 109: | ||
; Maximum Penalty | ; Maximum Penalty | ||
The maximum penalty refers to the maximum penalty at the time the offence was committed.<ref> | The maximum penalty refers to the maximum penalty at the time the offence was committed.<ref> | ||
Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) | {{CanLIIRPC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)|[2017] 2 SCR 289}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; 6 Month Sentence | |||
The requirement of a sentence of 6 months or more must be a jail or prison sentence. It does not include conditional sentence orders.<ref> | The requirement of a sentence of 6 months or more must be a jail or prison sentence. It does not include conditional sentence orders.<ref> | ||
{{ibid1|Tran}}{{ | {{ibid1|Tran}}{{atL|h6pmh|81}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 106: | Line 120: | ||
In calculating the amount of time served, pre-trial custody will be included.<ref> | In calculating the amount of time served, pre-trial custody will be included.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Freckleton|gnbw2|2016 ONCA 130 (CanLII)|128 WCB (2d) 434}}{{TheCourtONCA}}{{atL|gnbw2|6}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The set period of imprisonment is calculated on a per-charge basis. A global sentence in excess of the limit will not trigger inadmissibility unless one or more of the individual charges has a sentence in excess of the set period of imprisonment.<ref> | The set period of imprisonment is calculated on a per-charge basis. A global sentence in excess of the limit will not trigger inadmissibility unless one or more of the individual charges has a sentence in excess of the set period of imprisonment.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Hennessey|1sn6w|2007 ONCA 581 (CanLII)|228 OAC 29}}{{TheCourtONCA}} | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 123: | Line 137: | ||
* offences where a "record suspension" has been granted (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | * offences where a "record suspension" has been granted (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | ||
* offences where there was an acquittal (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | * offences where there was an acquittal (s. 36(3)(b) IRPA) | ||
* offences where convictions were under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (s. 36(3)(e)(iii)). | * offences where convictions were under the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'' (s. 36(3)(e)(iii)). | ||
An offender who receives a discharge as a sentence are not "convicted" within the meaning of s. 36 IRPA.<ref> | An offender who receives a discharge as a sentence are not "convicted" within the meaning of s. 36 IRPA.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Lu|fxg12|2013 ONCA 324 (CanLII)|307 OAC 40}}{{perONCA|Gillese JA}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 132: | Line 146: | ||
===Application=== | ===Application=== | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
36<br> | 36<br> | ||
{{removed|(1) and (2)}} | |||
; Application | ; Application | ||
(3) The following provisions govern subsections (1) and (2): | (3) The following provisions govern subsections (1) and (2): | ||
:(a) an offence that may be prosecuted either summarily or by way of indictment is deemed to be an indictable offence, even if it has been prosecuted summarily; | :(a) an offence that may be prosecuted either summarily or by way of indictment is deemed to be an indictable offence, even if it has been prosecuted summarily; | ||
:(b) inadmissibility under subsections (1) and (2) may not be based on a conviction in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered and has not been revoked or ceased to have effect under the Criminal Records Act, or in respect of which there has been a final determination of an acquittal; | :(b) inadmissibility under subsections (1) and (2) may not be based on a conviction in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered and has not been revoked or ceased to have effect under the ''Criminal Records Act'', or in respect of which there has been a final determination of an acquittal; | ||
:(c) the matters referred to in paragraphs (1)(b) and (c) and (2)(b) and (c) do not constitute inadmissibility in respect of a permanent resident or foreign national who, after the prescribed period, satisfies the Minister that they have been rehabilitated or who is a member of a prescribed class that is deemed to have been rehabilitated; | :(c) the matters referred to in paragraphs (1)(b) and (c) and (2)(b) and (c) do not constitute inadmissibility in respect of a permanent resident or foreign national who, after the prescribed period, satisfies the Minister that they have been rehabilitated or who is a member of a prescribed class that is deemed to have been rehabilitated; | ||
:(d) a determination of whether a permanent resident has committed an act described in paragraph (1)(c) must be based on a balance of probabilities; and | :(d) a determination of whether a permanent resident has committed an act described in paragraph (1)(c) must be based on a balance of probabilities; and | ||
:(e) inadmissibility under subsections (1) and (2) may not be based on an offence | :(e) inadmissibility under subsections (1) and (2) may not be based on an offence | ||
::(i) designated as a contravention under the Contraventions Act, | ::(i) designated as a contravention under the ''Contraventions Act'', | ||
::(ii) for which the permanent resident or foreign national is found guilty under the Young Offenders Act, chapter Y-1 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, or | ::(ii) for which the permanent resident or foreign national is found guilty under the Young Offenders Act, chapter Y-1 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, or | ||
::(iii) for which the permanent resident or foreign national received a youth sentence under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. | ::(iii) for which the permanent resident or foreign national received a youth sentence under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. | ||
2001, c. 27, s. 36; 2008, c. 3, s. 3; 2010, c. 8, s. 7; 2012, c. 1, s. 149. | {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 36; 2008, c. 3, s. 3; 2010, c. 8, s. 7; {{LegHistory10s|2012, c. 1}}, s. 149. | ||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec36 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 154: | Line 169: | ||
Section 37(1) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "organized criminality": | Section 37(1) defines the class of offenders who are inadmissible on the basis of "organized criminality": | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
; Organized criminality | ; Organized criminality | ||
37 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of organized criminality for | 37 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of organized criminality for | ||
Line 163: | Line 178: | ||
(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not lead to a determination of inadmissibility by reason only of the fact that the permanent resident or foreign national entered Canada with the assistance of a person who is involved in organized criminal activity. | (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not lead to a determination of inadmissibility by reason only of the fact that the permanent resident or foreign national entered Canada with the assistance of a person who is involved in organized criminal activity. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
2001, c. 27, s. 37; 2013, c. 16, s. 15; 2015, c. 3, s. 109(E). | {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 37; {{LegHistory10s|2013, c. 16}}, s. 15; 2015, c. 3, s. 109(E). | ||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec37 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hdn#sec37 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 177: | Line 192: | ||
; Two Approaches to Sentencing | ; Two Approaches to Sentencing | ||
There are two considered approaches to sentencing where deportation is at issue.<ref> | There are two considered approaches to sentencing where deportation is at issue.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|McKenzie|gxhj1|2017 ONCA 128 (CanLII)|346 CCC (3d) 477}}{{perONCA|Trotter JA}}{{atsL|gxhj1|28| to 34}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
One approach is to take a two step process:<ref> | One approach is to take a two step process:<ref> | ||
{{ibid1|McKenzie}}<br> | {{ibid1|McKenzie}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRx|Kljajic|h6k33|2017 PECA 19 (CanLII)}}{{perPEICA|Mitchell JA}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
# determine an appropriate sentence should be without factoring the immigration consequences; | # determine an appropriate sentence should be without factoring the immigration consequences; | ||
# determine whether it would be appropriate to reduce the sentence to avoid impact of the immigration consequences. | # determine whether it would be appropriate to reduce the sentence to avoid impact of the immigration consequences. | ||
Another approach is to consider the immigration consequences "along with along with all of the other personal factors in determining the appropriate sentence" | Another approach is to consider the immigration consequences "along with along with all of the other personal factors in determining the appropriate sentence."<ref> | ||
{{supra1|McKenzie}} | {{supra1|McKenzie}}{{atL|gxhj1|25}} - cited as a "creat[ing] difficulties" and was not endorsed<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; No Separate Sentencing Range | ; No Separate Sentencing Range | ||
Despite immigration consequences being a consideration on sentence, it should not have the effect of creating a "separate sentencing scheme" with a "special range of sentencing options where deportation is at risk" | Despite immigration consequences being a consideration on sentence, it should not have the effect of creating a "separate sentencing scheme" with a "special range of sentencing options where deportation is at risk."<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Pham|fwhz1|2013 SCC 15 (CanLII)|293 CCC (3d) 530}}{{perSCC|Wagner J}}{{atL|fwhz1|16}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; "Term of Imprisonment" | |||
The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref> | The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref> | ||
Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) | {{CanLIIRPC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)|[2017] 2 SCR 289}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 204: | Line 219: | ||
==Appealing Serious Criminality Violation== | ==Appealing Serious Criminality Violation== | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
; No appeal for inadmissibility | ; No appeal for inadmissibility | ||
64 (1) No appeal may be made to the Immigration Appeal Division by a foreign national or their sponsor or by a permanent resident if the foreign national or permanent resident has been found to be inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, <u>serious criminality or organized criminality.</u> | 64 (1) No appeal may be made to the Immigration Appeal Division by a foreign national or their sponsor or by a permanent resident if the foreign national or permanent resident has been found to be inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, <u>serious criminality or organized criminality.</u> | ||
Line 214: | Line 229: | ||
(3) No appeal may be made under subsection 63(1) in respect of a decision that was based on a finding of inadmissibility on the ground of misrepresentation, unless the foreign national in question is the sponsor’s spouse, common-law partner or child. | (3) No appeal may be made under subsection 63(1) in respect of a decision that was based on a finding of inadmissibility on the ground of misrepresentation, unless the foreign national in question is the sponsor’s spouse, common-law partner or child. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
2001, c. 27, s. 64; 2013, c. 16, s. 24. | {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 27}}, s. 64; {{LegHistory10s|2013, c. 16}}, s. 24.{{Annotation}} | ||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/7vwq#sec64 IRPA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/7vwq#sec64 IRPA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 220: | Line 235: | ||
==Staying a Removal Order== | ==Staying a Removal Order== | ||
{{ | {{quotation1| | ||
; Removal order stayed | ; Removal order stayed | ||
68 (1) To stay a removal order, the Immigration Appeal Division must be satisfied, taking into account the best interests of a child directly affected by the decision, that sufficient humanitarian and compassionate considerations warrant special relief in light of all the circumstances of the case. | 68 (1) To stay a removal order, the Immigration Appeal Division must be satisfied, taking into account the best interests of a child directly affected by the decision, that sufficient humanitarian and compassionate considerations warrant special relief in light of all the circumstances of the case. | ||
Line 241: | Line 256: | ||
Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref> | Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref> | ||
Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration) | {{CanLIIRPC|Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)|4kq3|2000 CanLII 16271 (CAF)|[2001] 2 RCF 3}}, ''per'' Létourneau JA | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada. | Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada. | ||
Collins v | {{CanLIIRPC|Collins v Canada (Attorney General)|fqf07|2012 FC 268 (CanLII)|406 FTR 87}}, ''per'' Near J<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; History | ; History | ||
In 2013, s. 68 was amended under the ''Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act'', SC 2013, c 16. This Act, among other things, removed the right to appeal for offences punished by a penalty of 6 months or more.<ref> | In 2013, s. 68 was amended under the ''Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act'', SC 2013, c 16. This Act, among other things, removed the right to appeal for offences punished by a penalty of 6 months or more.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|McKenzie|gxhj1|2017 ONCA 128 (CanLII)|346 CCC (3d) 477}}{{perONCA|Trotter JA}}{{atL|gxhj1|24}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 259: | Line 274: | ||
; Citizenship | ; Citizenship | ||
A person applying for citizenship must satisfy, among other requirements, the requirement of physical presence in Canada for a fixed duration. Time spent physically in Canada but under the following orders does not count towards the presence requirement:<ref> | A person applying for citizenship must satisfy, among other requirements, the requirement of physical presence in Canada for a fixed duration. Time spent physically in Canada but under the following orders does not count towards the presence requirement:<ref> | ||
Citizenship Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/7vdp RSC, 1985, c. C-29], at s. 21 and 22 | ''Citizenship Act'', [http://canlii.ca/t/7vdp RSC, 1985, c. C-29], at s. 21 and 22 | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
* probation order | * probation order |