Initial Post-Charge Detention: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1" |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Fr:Détention_initiale_après_l'inculpation]] | |||
{{Currency2|January|2020}} | |||
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderArrest}} | {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderArrest}} | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
{{seealso|Release by Police on Undertaking|Continued Detention After Appearing Before a Justice}} | {{seealso|Release by Police on Undertaking|Continued Detention After Appearing Before a Justice}} | ||
Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.<ref> | Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Grant|24kwz|2009 SCC 32 (CanLII)| | {{CanLIIRP|Grant|24kwz|2009 SCC 32 (CanLII)|[2009] 2 SCR 353}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin CJ and Charron J}}{{atL|24kwz|54}} (“[A] detention not authorized by law is arbitrary and violates s. 9 [of the Charter]”)</ref> | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:08, 23 July 2024
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95808) |
General Principles
Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.[1]
- ↑ R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 (CanLII), [2009] 2 SCR 353, per McLachlin CJ and Charron J, at para 54 (“[A] detention not authorized by law is arbitrary and violates s. 9 [of the Charter]”)