Stay of Proceedings (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(CanLII\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',[\s]*<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [a-zA-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}{" |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Chen|25tlr|2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII)}}{{perONCJ|Fairgrieve J}} || stayed || breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. | | {{CanLIIR-S|Chen|25tlr|2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII)}}{{perONCJ|Fairgrieve J}} || stayed || breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Arcand|20hqp|2008 ONCA 595 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Cronk JA}}||denied || alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Vader|fw36g|2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB| Ross J}} || not stayed || | | {{CanLIIR-S|Vader|fw36g|2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB| Ross J}} || not stayed || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Tweedly|fxkfs|2013 BCSC 910 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC| Greyell J}} || stayed || Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:45, 1 March 2021
Section 7: Prosecutor Abuse of Process
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Chen, 2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII), per Fairgrieve J | stayed | breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. |
| R v Arcand, 2008 ONCA 595 (CanLII), per Cronk JA | denied | alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. |
Section 7 - Disclosure
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Vader, 2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII), per Ross J | not stayed | |
| R v Tweedly, 2013 BCSC 910 (CanLII), per Greyell J | stayed | Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. |
Section 12 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Tang, 2011 ONCJ 525 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J | stay granted |
Abuse by Police
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Maskell, 2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII), per Groves J | stay | force used while arresting for driving while disqualified |
| R v Steele, 2010 ABQB 191 (CanLII), per Macklin J | stay | excessive force in arresting accused |