Informations and Indictments (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "CanLII ([0-9]+) \(ONCA\)" to "CanLII $1 (ON CA)"
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Schwark|4vmt|2001 MBQB 273 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Glowacki J}} ||amendments that were not initialized did not result in a nullity.
| {{CanLIIR-S|Schwark|4vmt|2001 MBQB 273 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Glowacki J}} ||amendments that were not initialized did not result in a nullity.
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Van Kralingen| [1994] OJ No 196 (C.A.)}} ||conviction was entered on an information that had no date at all--court upheld the information
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Van Kralingen| [1994] OJ No 196 (CA)}} ||conviction was entered on an information that had no date at all--court upheld the information
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRP|Akey|g1ck8|1990 CanLII 6755 (ON SC)|, [1990] OJ No 2205 (Gen. Div.)}}{{perONSC|Granger J}} || information sworn “17th day of 1989,” without any reference to the month--overturned nullity--“the defect would not be one of substance as the purpose of the information would be fulfilled as it would let the accused know it was sworn before a justice of the peace within the required six months.”
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Akey|g1ck8|1990 CanLII 6755 (ONSC)|[1990] OJ No 2205 (Gen. Div.)}}{{perONSC|Granger J}} || information sworn “17th day of 1989,” without any reference to the month--overturned nullity--“the defect would not be one of substance as the purpose of the information would be fulfilled as it would let the accused know it was sworn before a justice of the peace within the required six months.”
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRP|Dean|27t5r|1985 CanLII 1142 (ABQB)|, (1985), 36 Alta. L.R. (2d) 8 (Q.B.)}}{{perABQB|McFadyen J}} ||information sworn “30th day of August A.D. 19__.” without any reference to a year--overturned nullity--information was valid
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Dean|27t5r|1985 CanLII 1142 (ABQB)|36 Alta LR (2d) 8 (Q.B.)}}{{perABQB|McFadyen J}} ||information sworn “30th day of August A.D. 19__.” without any reference to a year--overturned nullity--information was valid
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-N|Platt; R v Cowan| [1981] 4 W.W.R. 601 (Man. Q.B.)}}||information was missing a date--declared a nullity
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Platt; R v Cowan| [1981] 4 WWR 601 (Man. Q.B.)}}||information was missing a date--declared a nullity
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Bobcaygeon|hv08z|1974 CanLII 1497 (ON CA)|, 17 CCC (2d)}}{{perONCA|Kelly JA}}||the month on the date was omitted as well as the county--declared a nullity
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Bobcaygeon|hv08z|1974 CanLII 1497 (ON CA)|17 CCC (2d)}}{{perONCA|Kelly JA}}||the month on the date was omitted as well as the county--declared a nullity
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Justice of the Peace, Ex parte Robinson|[1971] OJ No 1924 (C.A.)}} ||information sworn  “A Justice of the Peace in and for the County of ___" and later saying "Province of Ontario".
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Justice of the Peace, Ex parte Robinson|[1971] OJ No 1924 (CA)}} ||information sworn  “A Justice of the Peace in and for the County of ___" and later saying "Province of Ontario".
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Boutilier|htxph|1928 CanLII 528 (NS SC)|, 50 CCC 186}}{{perNSSC|O'Hearn J}}||information for an offence year of 1927 was stated as sworn in 1900 which would have been impossible--declared a nullity
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Boutilier|htxph|1928 CanLII 528 (NS SC)|50 CCC 186}}{{perNSSC|O'Hearn J}}||information for an offence year of 1927 was stated as sworn in 1900 which would have been impossible--declared a nullity
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 19:07, 9 September 2021

Validity of an Information

Case Name Summary
R v Delgado, 2011 ONSC 4646 (CanLII), per Garton J information was read as being sworn in 2016--nullity was overturned--mandamus ordered
R v Schwark, 2001 MBQB 273 (CanLII), per Glowacki J amendments that were not initialized did not result in a nullity.
R v Van Kralingen, [1994] OJ No 196 (CA)(*no CanLII links) conviction was entered on an information that had no date at all--court upheld the information
R v Akey,
1990 CanLII 6755 (ONSC), [1990] OJ No 2205 (Gen. Div.), per Granger J
information sworn “17th day of 1989,” without any reference to the month--overturned nullity--“the defect would not be one of substance as the purpose of the information would be fulfilled as it would let the accused know it was sworn before a justice of the peace within the required six months.”
R v Dean,
1985 CanLII 1142 (ABQB), 36 Alta LR (2d) 8 (Q.B.), per McFadyen J
information sworn “30th day of August A.D. 19__.” without any reference to a year--overturned nullity--information was valid
R v Platt; R v Cowan, [1981] 4 WWR 601 (Man. Q.B.)(*no CanLII links) information was missing a date--declared a nullity
R v Bobcaygeon,
1974 CanLII 1497 (ON CA), 17 CCC (2d), per Kelly JA
the month on the date was omitted as well as the county--declared a nullity
R v Justice of the Peace, Ex parte Robinson, [1971] OJ No 1924 (CA)(*no CanLII links) information sworn “A Justice of the Peace in and for the County of ___" and later saying "Province of Ontario".
R v Boutilier,
1928 CanLII 528 (NS SC), 50 CCC 186, per O'Hearn J
information for an offence year of 1927 was stated as sworn in 1900 which would have been impossible--declared a nullity

Severance of Charges

Case Summary
R v IB, 2013 ONSC 1652 (CanLII), per Cornell J denied
R v WHA, 2011 NSSC 156 (CanLII), per Rosinski J granted