Jury Selection: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1"
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Fr:Sélection_du_jury]]
{{Currency2|January|2015}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderJurySelection}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderJurySelection}}
==General Principles==
==General Principles==
Every person charged with a crime has a right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. This right includes the right to an impartial jury.<ref>
Every person charged with a crime has a right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. This right includes the right to an impartial jury.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Sherratt|1fslt|1991 CanLII 86 (SCC)|, (1991), 63 CCC (3d) 192 (SCC), [1991] 1 SCR 509}}{{perSCC|L'Heureux-Dube J}}{{atL|1fslt|57}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Sherratt|1fslt|1991 CanLII 86 (SCC)|[1991] 1 SCR 509}}{{perSCC|L'Heureux-Dube J}}{{atL|1fslt|57}}<br>
{{CanLIIR|Douse|24ck7|2009 CanLII 34990 (ONSC)}}{{perONSC|Durno J}}{{atL|24ck7|40}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Douse|24ck7|2009 CanLII 34990 (ON SC)|246 CCC (3d) 227}}{{perONSC|Durno J}}{{atL|24ck7|40}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


The right to a jury is protected by s. 1(d) which guarantees the right to be tried by an "independent and impartial tribunal" and s. 11(f) which guarantees the right to a jury that is "impartial and representative".<ref>
The right to a jury is protected by s. 1(d) which guarantees the right to be tried by an "independent and impartial tribunal" and s. 11(f) which guarantees the right to a jury that is "impartial and representative."<ref>
{{supra1|Sherratt}}{{atL|1fslt|35}}<br>
{{supra1|Sherratt}}{{atL|1fslt|35}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll".<ref>
A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll."<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Pan|gfm83|2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Boswell J}}{{atsL|gfm83|34| to 37}}<br>
{{CanLIIRx|Pan|gfm83|2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Boswell J}}{{atsL|gfm83|34| to 37}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.<ReF>{{CanLIIR|Barrow|1ftjh|1987 CanLII 11 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourt}}{{atp|714}}</ref>
Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.<ReF>{{CanLIIRP|Barrow|1ftjh|1987 CanLII 11 (SCC)|[1987] 2 SCR 694}}{{TheCourt}}{{atp|714}}</ref>
This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.<ReF>
This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.<ReF>
{{CanLIIRP|Barnes|1f9r8|1999 CanLII 3782 (ON CA)|, (1999), 46 OR (3d) 116}}{{atL|1f9r8|30}}, 138 CCC (3d) 500 (CA){{perONCA|Moldaver JA}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Barnes|1f9r8|1999 CanLII 3782 (ON CA)|138 CCC (3d) 500}}{{perONCA|Moldaver JA}}{{atL|1f9r8|30}}</ref>


{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}

Latest revision as of 07:05, 23 July 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2015. (Rev. # 95700)

General Principles

Every person charged with a crime has a right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. This right includes the right to an impartial jury.[1]

The right to a jury is protected by s. 1(d) which guarantees the right to be tried by an "independent and impartial tribunal" and s. 11(f) which guarantees the right to a jury that is "impartial and representative."[2]

A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll."[3]

Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.[4] This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.[5]

  1. R v Sherratt, 1991 CanLII 86 (SCC), [1991] 1 SCR 509, per L'Heureux-Dube J, at para 57
    R v Douse, 2009 CanLII 34990 (ON SC), 246 CCC (3d) 227, per Durno J, at para 40
  2. Sherratt, supra, at para 35
  3. R v Pan, 2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII), per Boswell J, at paras 34 to 37
  4. R v Barrow, 1987 CanLII 11 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 694, per curiam, at p. 714
  5. R v Barnes, 1999 CanLII 3782 (ON CA), 138 CCC (3d) 500, per Moldaver JA, at para 30

Topics