Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "perONCA|Doherty" to "perONCA-H|Doherty" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hope|fnjm2|2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII)}}{{perNLSC|Stack J}} ||sexual assault and sexual interference | | {{CanLIIR-S|Hope|fnjm2|2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII)}}{{perNLSC|Stack J}} ||sexual assault and sexual interference | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | | {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)| | | {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|[1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|[1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|[1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|[1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|[1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:40, 9 May 2024
Kienapple
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J | sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA | Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), [1985] 2 SCR 476, per Estey and Lamer JJ |
|
| R v Davis, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), [1999] 3 SCR 759, per Lamer CJ |
|
| R v Prince, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 480, per Dickson CJ |
|
| R v Pringle, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 1645, per Lamer J |
|
| R v Wigman, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam |