Competence of Children and Witnesses of Diminished Capacity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "\|\[\{\{CEASec\|([^\}\}]+)\}\} CEA\]" to "|{{CEASec2|$1}}" |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Fr:Compétence_des_enfants_et_des_témoins_de_capacité_diminuée]] | |||
{{Currency2|January|2015}} | |||
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderTestimony}} | {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderTestimony}} | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
There is no minimum age to give testimony. | There is no minimum age to give testimony. | ||
At common law, evidence given by children was considered "inherently unreliable and therefore to be treated with special caution" | At common law, evidence given by children was considered "inherently unreliable and therefore to be treated with special caution."<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|RW|1fsbj|1992 CanLII 56 (SCC)| | {{CanLIIRP|RW|1fsbj|1992 CanLII 56 (SCC)|[1992] 2 SCR 122}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Similarly, previous versions of the Criminal Code, Canada Evidence Act, and Young Offenders Act required that a child's evidence be corroborated.<ref> | Similarly, previous versions of the Criminal Code, Canada Evidence Act, and Young Offenders Act required that a child's evidence be corroborated.<ref> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
These assumptions have since been recognized as stereotypes.<ref> | These assumptions have since been recognized as stereotypes.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Find|521b|2001 SCC 32 (CanLII)| | {{CanLIIRP|Find|521b|2001 SCC 32 (CanLII)|[2001] 1 SCR 863}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin CJ}}{{atsL|521b|102|, 103}}</ref> | ||
Section 16 of the ''Canada Evidence Act'' outlines the competency requirements for persons 14 years of age or older. In 2005, s. 16.1 was added to outline the competency requirements of persons under 14 years of age. | Section 16 of the ''Canada Evidence Act'' outlines the competency requirements for persons 14 years of age or older. In 2005, s. 16.1 was added to outline the competency requirements of persons under 14 years of age. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
{{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 26. | {{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 26. | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CEASec2|16}} | ||
|{{NoteUpCEA|16|1|2|3|4|5}} | |{{NoteUpCEA|16|1|2|3|4|5}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Where a challenge is made is mandatory that an inquiry be made.<ref> | Where a challenge is made is mandatory that an inquiry be made.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Ferguson (L.D.)|1wnvb|1996 CanLII 8409 (BC CA)| | {{CanLIIRP|Ferguson (L.D.)|1wnvb|1996 CanLII 8409 (BC CA)|112 CCC (3d) 342 }}{{perBCCA|Finch JA}}{{atp|358}} [CCC]</ref> | ||
The inquiry will seek to determine whether: | The inquiry will seek to determine whether: | ||
# the witness "understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation", and | # the witness "understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation", and | ||
| Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
In the voir dire, "the Crown must decide whether to call the child or not." If the child is not called and a hearsay statement is tendered, "the judge must determine whether the child could not have testified, making it necessary to call substitute evidence."<ref> | In the voir dire, "the Crown must decide whether to call the child or not." If the child is not called and a hearsay statement is tendered, "the judge must determine whether the child could not have testified, making it necessary to call substitute evidence."<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Rockey|1fr4t|1996 CanLII 151 (SCC)| | {{CanLIIRP|Rockey|1fr4t|1996 CanLII 151 (SCC)|[1996] 3 SCR 829}}{{perSCC-H|Sopinka J}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
If the witness does not understand the nature of an oath, then the witness may still be competent under s. 16(3) if it can be established that:<ref> | If the witness does not understand the nature of an oath, then the witness may still be competent under s. 16(3) if it can be established that:<ref> | ||
{{ibid1|Rockey}}{{perSCC|McLachlin J}}{{atp|493}} [CCC]<br> | {{ibid1|Rockey}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}}{{atp|493}} [CCC]<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Farley (A.W.)|1dh7p|1995 CanLII 3501 (ON CA)|99 CCC (3d) 76}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
# the witness has the ability to promise to tell the truth; and | # the witness has the ability to promise to tell the truth; and | ||
| Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
A failure to obtain a promise to tell the truth is a procedural error that may be cured by applying the curative provisio under s. 686(1)(b)(iv).<ref> | A failure to obtain a promise to tell the truth is a procedural error that may be cured by applying the curative provisio under s. 686(1)(b)(iv).<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Peterson|6jbp|1996 CanLII 874 (ON CA)|106 CCC (3d) 64}}{{perONCA|Osborne JA}}{{atsL|6jbp|39| to 42}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
There is no strict formula for satisfying s. 16, but there must be an undertaking to tell the truth.<ref> | There is no strict formula for satisfying s. 16, but there must be an undertaking to tell the truth.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Wilson (W.M.)|230f8|1995 CanLII 8899 (NS CA)|38 CR (4th) 209}}{{perNSCA|Freeman JA}} {{atL|230f8|24}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
An inquiry under s. 16 should take place in front of the jury, but where it may be prejudicial it can be done without the jury.<ref> | An inquiry under s. 16 should take place in front of the jury, but where it may be prejudicial it can be done without the jury.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|RJB|5rwb|2000 ABCA 103 (CanLII)|33 CR (5th) 166}}{{perABCA|Hetherington JA}} {{atL|5rwb|11}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 84: | Line 86: | ||
A failure of the part of a preliminary inquiry judge to follow s.16(3) results in a loss of jurisdiction.<ref> | A failure of the part of a preliminary inquiry judge to follow s.16(3) results in a loss of jurisdiction.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Nitsiza|5brm|2001 NWTSC 34 (CanLII)|7 WWR 608}}, ''per'' Vertes J {{atL|5brm|10}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The judge cannot make it a prerequisite under s. 16 to determine if the child witness has a recollection of the events at issue before receiving it.<ref> | The judge cannot make it a prerequisite under s. 16 to determine if the child witness has a recollection of the events at issue before receiving it.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Marquard|1frx2|1993 CanLII 37 (SCC)| | {{CanLIIRP|Marquard|1frx2|1993 CanLII 37 (SCC)|[1993] 4 SCR 223}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin J}} ("necessary to determine in advance that the child perceived and recollects the very events at issue in the trial, as a condition of ruling that his or her evidence be received. That is not required of adult witnesses, and should not be required for children.") | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 102: | Line 104: | ||
==Competency of Children Under the Age of 14== | ==Competency of Children Under the Age of 14== | ||
In 2006, section [http://canlii.ca/t/7vf5 16.1] of the CEA added to create a presumption for child witnesses under 14 "to have the capacity to testify" | In 2006, section [http://canlii.ca/t/7vf5 16.1] of the CEA added to create a presumption for child witnesses under 14 "to have the capacity to testify."<ref>see 16.1 (1)</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
There is no need for the child to take solemn oath or affirmation. (16.1(2)) | There is no need for the child to take solemn oath or affirmation. (16.1(2)) | ||
There are only two requirements that need to be met before a child witness under 14 may testify: | There are only two requirements that need to be met before a child witness under 14 may testify: | ||
# the child must be able to "understand and respond to questions"<ref> | # the child must be able to "understand and respond to questions"<ref> | ||
16.1(3) | see 16.1(3)</ref> | ||
# the court shall "require [the child] to promise to tell the truth" <ref> | # the court shall "require [the child] to promise to tell the truth" <ref> | ||
16.1 (6) | see 16.1 (6) | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Section 16.1(6) does not require that the judge explicitly ask the child whether he or she promises to tell the truth. | Section 16.1(6) does not require that the judge explicitly ask the child whether he or she promises to tell the truth. | ||
It is only necessary that the evidence show that the "witness has clearly committed to tell the truth" | It is only necessary that the evidence show that the "witness has clearly committed to tell the truth."<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRx|CCF|g6mk9|2014 ONCA 327 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtONCA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
{{quotation2| | |||
; Person under fourteen years of age | |||
16.1 (1) A person under fourteen years of age is presumed to have the capacity to testify.<br> | |||
{{removed|(2)}} | |||
; Evidence shall be received | |||
(3) The evidence of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age shall be received if they are able to understand and respond to questions. | |||
{{removed|(4), (5), (6), (7) and (8)}} | |||
{{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 27. | |||
|{{CEASec2|16.1}} | |||
|{{NoteUpCEA|16.1|1|3}} | |||
}} | |||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
===Form of Promise=== | |||
{{quotation2| | |||
; Person under fourteen years of age | |||
16.1<br> | |||
{{removed|(1)}} | |||
; No oath or solemn affirmation | |||
(2) A proposed witness under fourteen years of age shall not take an oath or make a solemn affirmation despite a provision of any Act that requires an oath or a solemn affirmation.<br> | |||
{{removed|(3), (4) and (5)}} | |||
; Promise to tell truth | |||
(6) The court shall, before permitting a proposed witness under fourteen years of age to give evidence, require them to promise to tell the truth.<br> | |||
{{removed|(7) and (8)}} | |||
{{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 27. | |||
|{{CEASec2|16.1}} | |||
|{{NoteUpCEA|16.1|2|4|5|7|8}} | |||
}} | |||
===Challenging Mental Capacity=== | ===Challenging Mental Capacity=== | ||
Section 16.1 addresses the competency of a child under the age of 14 to testify. | Section 16.1 addresses the competency of a child under the age of 14 to testify. | ||
{{quotation2| | {{quotation2| | ||
; Person under fourteen years of age | ; Person under fourteen years of age | ||
16.1<br> | |||
16 | {{removed|(1), (2) and (3)}} | ||
{{removed|(3)}} | |||
; Burden as to capacity of witness | ; Burden as to capacity of witness | ||
(4) A party who challenges the capacity of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age has the burden of satisfying the court that there is an issue as to the capacity of the proposed witness to understand and respond to questions. | (4) A party who challenges the capacity of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age has the burden of satisfying the court that there is an issue as to the capacity of the proposed witness to understand and respond to questions. | ||
| Line 144: | Line 169: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 27. | {{LegHistory00s|2005, c. 32}}, s. 27. | ||
| | |{{CEASec2|16.1}} | ||
|{{NoteUpCEA|16.1 | |{{NoteUpCEA|16.1|4|5|7|8}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:00, 25 July 2024
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2015. (Rev. # 95930) |
General Principles
There is no minimum age to give testimony.
At common law, evidence given by children was considered "inherently unreliable and therefore to be treated with special caution."[1] Similarly, previous versions of the Criminal Code, Canada Evidence Act, and Young Offenders Act required that a child's evidence be corroborated.[2]
These assumptions have since been recognized as stereotypes.[3]
Section 16 of the Canada Evidence Act outlines the competency requirements for persons 14 years of age or older. In 2005, s. 16.1 was added to outline the competency requirements of persons under 14 years of age.
- ↑ R v RW, 1992 CanLII 56 (SCC), [1992] 2 SCR 122, per McLachlin J
- ↑
In 1988, s. 586 of Code requiring corroboration was removed.
See comments in R v WR
See A History of Canadian Sexual Assault Legislation 1900-2000 - ↑ R v Find, 2001 SCC 32 (CanLII), [2001] 1 SCR 863, per McLachlin CJ, at paras 102, 103
Challenging Mental Capacity of Children Age 14 and Above
Under s. 16(1) the mental capacity that renders a child age 14 and above competent to testify may be challenged.
- Witness whose capacity is in question
16 (1) If a proposed witness is a person of fourteen years of age or older whose mental capacity is challenged, the court shall, before permitting the person to give evidence, conduct an inquiry to determine
- (a) whether the person understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation; and
- (b) whether the person is able to communicate the evidence.
- Testimony under oath or solemn affirmation
(2) A person referred to in subsection (1) [when witness whose capacity is in question] who understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation and is able to communicate the evidence shall testify under oath or solemn affirmation.
- Testimony on promise to tell truth
(3) A person referred to in subsection (1) [when witness whose capacity is in question] who does not understand the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation but is able to communicate the evidence may, notwithstanding any provision of any Act requiring an oath or a solemn affirmation, testify on promising to tell the truth.
- Inability to testify
(4) A person referred to in subsection (1) [when witness whose capacity is in question] who neither understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation nor is able to communicate the evidence shall not testify.
- Burden as to capacity of witness
(5) A party who challenges the mental capacity of a proposed witness of fourteen years of age or more has the burden of satisfying the court that there is an issue as to the capacity of the proposed witness to testify under an oath or a solemn affirmation.
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 16; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 18; 1994, c. 44, s. 89; 2005, c. 32, s. 26.
[annotation(s) added]
Where a challenge is made is mandatory that an inquiry be made.[1] The inquiry will seek to determine whether:
- the witness "understands the nature of an oath or a solemn affirmation", and
- the witness "is able to communicate the evidence."
In the voir dire, "the Crown must decide whether to call the child or not." If the child is not called and a hearsay statement is tendered, "the judge must determine whether the child could not have testified, making it necessary to call substitute evidence."[2]
If the witness does not understand the nature of an oath, then the witness may still be competent under s. 16(3) if it can be established that:[3]
- the witness has the ability to promise to tell the truth; and
- the witness has the ability to communicate the evidence.
A failure to obtain a promise to tell the truth is a procedural error that may be cured by applying the curative provisio under s. 686(1)(b)(iv).[4]
There is no strict formula for satisfying s. 16, but there must be an undertaking to tell the truth.[5]
An inquiry under s. 16 should take place in front of the jury, but where it may be prejudicial it can be done without the jury.[6]
A child who simply states she understands what it means to tell the truth and says she is capable of telling the truth does not satisfy s. 16(3).[7]
A failure of the part of a preliminary inquiry judge to follow s.16(3) results in a loss of jurisdiction.[8]
The judge cannot make it a prerequisite under s. 16 to determine if the child witness has a recollection of the events at issue before receiving it.[9]
- ↑ R v Ferguson (L.D.), 1996 CanLII 8409 (BC CA), 112 CCC (3d) 342, per Finch JA, at p. 358 [CCC]
- ↑ R v Rockey, 1996 CanLII 151 (SCC), [1996] 3 SCR 829, per Sopinka J
- ↑
Rockey, ibid., per McLachlin J, at p. 493 [CCC]
R v Farley (A.W.), 1995 CanLII 3501 (ON CA), 99 CCC (3d) 76, per Doherty JA
- ↑
R v Peterson, 1996 CanLII 874 (ON CA), 106 CCC (3d) 64, per Osborne JA, at paras 39 to 42
- ↑ R v Wilson (W.M.), 1995 CanLII 8899 (NS CA), 38 CR (4th) 209, per Freeman JA , at para 24
- ↑ R v RJB, 2000 ABCA 103 (CanLII), 33 CR (5th) 166, per Hetherington JA , at para 11
- ↑
RJB, ibid., at paras 7, 8
- ↑ R v Nitsiza, 2001 NWTSC 34 (CanLII), 7 WWR 608, per Vertes J , at para 10
- ↑ R v Marquard, 1993 CanLII 37 (SCC), [1993] 4 SCR 223, per McLachlin J ("necessary to determine in advance that the child perceived and recollects the very events at issue in the trial, as a condition of ruling that his or her evidence be received. That is not required of adult witnesses, and should not be required for children.")
Competency of Children Under the Age of 14
In 2006, section 16.1 of the CEA added to create a presumption for child witnesses under 14 "to have the capacity to testify."[1] There is no need for the child to take solemn oath or affirmation. (16.1(2))
There are only two requirements that need to be met before a child witness under 14 may testify:
- the child must be able to "understand and respond to questions"[2]
- the court shall "require [the child] to promise to tell the truth" [3]
Section 16.1(6) does not require that the judge explicitly ask the child whether he or she promises to tell the truth. It is only necessary that the evidence show that the "witness has clearly committed to tell the truth."[4]
- Person under fourteen years of age
16.1 (1) A person under fourteen years of age is presumed to have the capacity to testify.
[omitted (2)]
- Evidence shall be received
(3) The evidence of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age shall be received if they are able to understand and respond to questions.
[omitted (4), (5), (6), (7) and (8)]
2005, c. 32, s. 27.
- ↑ see 16.1 (1)
- ↑ see 16.1(3)
- ↑ see 16.1 (6)
- ↑ R v CCF, 2014 ONCA 327 (CanLII), per curiam
Form of Promise
- Person under fourteen years of age
16.1
[omitted (1)]
- No oath or solemn affirmation
(2) A proposed witness under fourteen years of age shall not take an oath or make a solemn affirmation despite a provision of any Act that requires an oath or a solemn affirmation.
[omitted (3), (4) and (5)]
- Promise to tell truth
(6) The court shall, before permitting a proposed witness under fourteen years of age to give evidence, require them to promise to tell the truth.
[omitted (7) and (8)]
2005, c. 32, s. 27.
Challenging Mental Capacity
Section 16.1 addresses the competency of a child under the age of 14 to testify.
- Person under fourteen years of age
16.1
[omitted (1), (2) and (3)]
- Burden as to capacity of witness
(4) A party who challenges the capacity of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age has the burden of satisfying the court that there is an issue as to the capacity of the proposed witness to understand and respond to questions.
- Court inquiry
(5) If the court is satisfied that there is an issue as to the capacity of a proposed witness under fourteen years of age to understand and respond to questions, it shall, before permitting them to give evidence, conduct an inquiry to determine whether they are able to understand and respond to questions.
[omitted (6)]
- Understanding of promise
(7) No proposed witness under fourteen years of age shall be asked any questions regarding their understanding of the nature of the promise to tell the truth for the purpose of determining whether their evidence shall be received by the court.
- Effect
(8) For greater certainty, if the evidence of a witness under fourteen years of age is received by the court, it shall have the same effect as if it were taken under oath.
2005, c. 32, s. 27.
A person under the age of 14 is presumed competent to testify (s. 16.1(1)). The burden is on the challenger to prove that the child:
- cannot understand and respond to simple questions; or,
- cannot promise to tell the truth (16.1(6)).