Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\)\|, \[([0-9]{4})\] ([0-9]+) SCR" to ")|[$1] $2 SCR"
m Text replacement - "perONCA|Doherty" to "perONCA-H|Doherty"
 
Line 10: Line 10:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hope|fnjm2|2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII)}}{{perNLSC|Stack J}} ||sexual assault and sexual interference
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hope|fnjm2|2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII)}}{{perNLSC|Stack J}} ||sexual assault and sexual interference
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|[1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
| {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|[1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  

Latest revision as of 21:40, 9 May 2024

Kienapple

See also: Kienapple Principle
Case Name Summary
R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J sexual assault and sexual interference
R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
John v The Queen,
1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), [1985] 2 SCR 476, per Estey and Lamer JJ
R v Davis,
1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), [1999] 3 SCR 759, per Lamer CJ
R v Prince,
1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 480, per Dickson CJ
R v Pringle,
1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 1645, per Lamer J
R v Wigman,
1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam