Precedent - Agreed Statement of Fact: Difference between revisions
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{TITLE|Agreed Statement of Facts|</b><i>[describe whether it is for trial under s. 655 or for an Application]</i><b>}} | {{TITLE|Agreed Statement of Facts|</b><i>[describe whether it is for trial under s. 655 or for an Application]</i><b>}} | ||
This statement of facts is agreed to for the purposes of providing an evidentiary record for the [type hearing]. Any text within this agreed statement of fact that would tend to paraphrase, summarize or suggest a preferred interpretation of a source document, or contradict a source document, | This statement of facts is agreed to for the purposes of providing an evidentiary record for the [type hearing]. Any text within this agreed statement of fact that would tend to paraphrase, summarize or suggest a preferred interpretation of a source document, or contradict a source document, should not be considered agreed upon as a fact beyond dispute but rather is merely a characterization and/or interpretation that is intended to assist the Court. Further, this agreed statement of facts is to be understood and interpreted in light of any viva voce testimony on issues before the court. Where viva voce testimony contradicts the agreed statement, the testimony will prevail. | ||
; Statement of Facts | ; Statement of Facts |
Latest revision as of 08:34, 19 September 2021
All forms, templates and precedents, including anything found on this page, can be used without the need for any attribution. |
Agreed Statement of Fact
Agreed Statement of Facts |
---|
C A N A D A File# ________________ IN THE [LEVEL OF COURT] OF [PROVINCE] BETWEEN: – and –
Agreed Statement of Facts This statement of facts is agreed to for the purposes of providing an evidentiary record for the [type hearing]. Any text within this agreed statement of fact that would tend to paraphrase, summarize or suggest a preferred interpretation of a source document, or contradict a source document, should not be considered agreed upon as a fact beyond dispute but rather is merely a characterization and/or interpretation that is intended to assist the Court. Further, this agreed statement of facts is to be understood and interpreted in light of any viva voce testimony on issues before the court. Where viva voce testimony contradicts the agreed statement, the testimony will prevail.
|
<gdoc id="1Et13GjPn4Lc4DSwollMQE26nqxc-eh7SQhUcL-zsYJM" width="750" height="1000" />