Criminal Law Notebook

Immigration Consequences from a Conviction: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
Visual
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Fr:Conséquences_d%27une_condamnation_en_matière_d%27immigration]]
{{Currency2|April|2023}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{HeaderSentencing}}
{{HeaderSentencing}}
Line 17: Line 19:
* organized criminality.
* organized criminality.


Persons who fall under any one of these categories may be deported, even to "moratorium countries".<ref>
Persons who fall under any one of these categories may be deported, even to "moratorium countries."<ref>
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227) at s. 230(3)(c)
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227) at s. 230(3)(c)
</ref>
; Recommendation at Sentence
A sentencing judge may make a recommendation on the disposition of whether to deport an offender.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Okito|jw27p|2023 ONSC 1514 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Forestall J}}{{atL|jw27p|34}}
</ref>
</ref>


Line 195: Line 202:
# determine whether it would be appropriate to reduce the sentence to avoid impact of the immigration consequences.
# determine whether it would be appropriate to reduce the sentence to avoid impact of the immigration consequences.


Another approach is to consider the immigration consequences "along with along with all of the other personal factors in determining the appropriate sentence".<ref>
Another approach is to consider the immigration consequences "along with along with all of the other personal factors in determining the appropriate sentence."<ref>
{{supra1|McKenzie}}{{atL|gxhj1|25}} - cited as a "creat[ing] difficulties" and was not endorsed<br>
{{supra1|McKenzie}}{{atL|gxhj1|25}} - cited as a "creat[ing] difficulties" and was not endorsed<br>
</ref>
</ref>


; No Separate Sentencing Range
; No Separate Sentencing Range
Despite immigration consequences being a consideration on sentence, it should not have the effect of creating a "separate sentencing scheme" with a "special range of sentencing options where deportation is at risk".<ref>
Despite immigration consequences being a consideration on sentence, it should not have the effect of creating a "separate sentencing scheme" with a "special range of sentencing options where deportation is at risk."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Pham|fwhz1|2013 SCC 15 (CanLII)|293 CCC (3d) 530}}{{perSCC|Wagner J}}{{atL|fwhz1|16}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Pham|fwhz1|2013 SCC 15 (CanLII)|293 CCC (3d) 530}}{{perSCC|Wagner J}}{{atL|fwhz1|16}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>
Line 206: Line 213:
; "Term of Imprisonment"
; "Term of Imprisonment"
The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref>
The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref>
{{CanLIIRC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRPC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)|[2017] 2 SCR 289}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 249: Line 256:


Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref>
Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref>
{{CanLIIRC|Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)|4kq3|2000 CanLII 16271 (CAF)|[2001] 2 RCF 3}}, ''per'' Létourneau JA
{{CanLIIRPC|Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)|4kq3|2000 CanLII 16271 (CAF)|[2001] 2 RCF 3}}, ''per'' Létourneau JA
</ref>
</ref>


Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada.
Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada.
{{CanLIIRC|Collins v Canada (Attorney General)|fqf07|2012 FC 268 (CanLII)}}, ''per'' Near J<br>
{{CanLIIRPC|Collins v Canada (Attorney General)|fqf07|2012 FC 268 (CanLII)|406 FTR 87}}, ''per'' Near J<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Immigration_Consequences_from_a_Conviction"