Section 276 Applications (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "{{Currency\|([A-Za-z]+) ([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])}}" to "{{Currency2|$1|$2}}"
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Currency|January 2016}}
{{Currency2|January|2016}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{HeaderEvidenceCases}}
{{HeaderEvidenceCases}}

Latest revision as of 13:41, 13 May 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2016. (Rev. # 92837)

Extrinsic Sexual Activity of the Complainant

See also: Complainant's Sexual History
Case Name Result Summary
R v Boone, 2016 ONCA 227 (CanLII), per Sharpe JA some admitted The accused is alleged to have had unprotected sex while HIV positive without notifying partner. Judge permitted to use a prior inconsistent statement of complainant relating to past sexual practice.
R v Butts, 2012 ONCA 24 (CanLII), per curiam admitted exclusion of sexual conduct under 276 results in new trial
R v Sanghar, 2012 ABPC 34 (CanLII), per Ogle J admitted evidence of prior intercourse between inmates admitted in s. 272 charge
R v Gill, 2011 ONCJ 345(*no CanLII links)
R v Quesnelle, 2010 ONSC 2698 (CanLII), per Thorburn J admitted evidence that the accused paid for sex with victim twice in the months before allegation.
R v R.R.W. (No. 1), , 2010 NLTD 136(*no CanLII links) admitted
R v Nepinak, 2010 BCSC 1677 (CanLII), per Romilly J not admitted
R v Salehi, 2009 CanLII 2034 (ONSC), per Himel J not admitted
R v JT, 2010 ONSC 5246 (CanLII), per Ricchetti J admitted
R v Harris, 1997 CanLII 6317 (ON CA), per Moldaver JA