Adjournments (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\(3d\) ([0-9]+) \([^\)]+\)" to "(3d) $1" |
m Text replacement - "{{Currency\|([A-Za-z]+) ([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])}}" to "{{Currency2|$1|$2}}" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Currency2|January|2013}} | ||
{{LevelZero}} | {{LevelZero}} | ||
{{HeaderProcCases}} | {{HeaderProcCases}} | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Marshall|22jrb|2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII)}}{{perNSPC|Tax J}} || Trial adjournment granted | | {{CanLIIR-S|Marshall|22jrb|2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII)}}{{perNSPC|Tax J}} || Trial adjournment granted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Oliver and Morrison|1jspp|2005 CanLII 3582 (2005)| 194 CCC (3d) 92}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|| | | {{CanLIIRP-S|Oliver and Morrison|1jspp|2005 CanLII 3582 (2005)| 194 CCC (3d) 92}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Brundia|1tc1g|2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtONCA}} || | | {{CanLIIR-S|Brundia|1tc1g|2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtONCA}} || | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Smith|gb20m|1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA)|52 CCC (3d) 90}}{{perNSCA|R MacDonald JA}}|| | | {{CanLIIRP-S|Smith|gb20m|1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA)|52 CCC (3d) 90}}{{perNSCA|R MacDonald JA}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Manhas|1z46h|1980 CanLII 72 (SCC)|[1980] 1 SCR 591}}{{perSCC|Martland J}} || | | {{CanLIIRP-S|Manhas|1z46h|1980 CanLII 72 (SCC)|[1980] 1 SCR 591}}{{perSCC-H|Martland J}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Barrette|1z6cp|1976 CanLII 80 (SCC)| [1977] 2 SCR 121}}{{perSCC|Pigeon J}} || | | {{CanLIIRP-S|Barrette|1z6cp|1976 CanLII 80 (SCC)| [1977] 2 SCR 121}}{{perSCC|Pigeon J}} || |
Latest revision as of 13:02, 13 May 2024
This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2013. (Rev. # 92225) |
Case Digests
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Kandola and Johal, 2012 BCSC 1012 (CanLII), per Romilly J | adjournment for pre-sentence report denied |
R v Sanborn, 2012 BCPC 41 (CanLII), per Skilnick J | crown not opposed -- adjournment denied |
R v Downey, 2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII), per Tilleman J | failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned |
R v Cole, 2010 NSCA 59 (CanLII), per curiam | crown adjournment of trial refused |
R v Marshall, 2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII), per Tax J | Trial adjournment granted |
R v Oliver and Morrison, 2005 CanLII 3582 (2005), 194 CCC (3d) 92, per Doherty JA |
|
R v Brundia, 2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII), per curiam | |
R v Roebuck, 2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII), per Lee J | |
R v Nichols, 2001 CanLII 5680 (ON CA), per Laskin JA | refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel |
R v JEB, 1989 CanLII 1495 (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA) |
|
R v Smith, 1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA), 52 CCC (3d) 90, per R MacDonald JA |
|
R v Manhas, 1980 CanLII 72 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 591, per Martland J |
|
R v Barrette, 1976 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1977] 2 SCR 121, per Pigeon J |
|
R v Spataro, 1972 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1974] SCR 253, per Judson J |
|
R v Warren(1973), 14 CCC 188(*no CanLII links) | |
R v Darville, 1956 CanLII 463 (SCC), 116 CCC 113, 25 CR 1, per Taschereau J |