User:Admin

This is my user account. Contact me at [email protected]. I am also on twitter @pjdostal.

cpanel: https://vm4497.tmdcloud.com:2083 WHM panel: https://vm4497.tmdcloud.com:2087

• http://criminalnotebook.ca/test5.html

French grammarly-type grammar correction

• https://www.antidote.info/fr/
• https://bonpatron.com/

Reg Ex - Copy/paste from CanLII

• Expression (SEnteincing cases) https://regexr.com/7rao4:
  • ([A-Za-z0-9]+), ([0-9]+) ([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9])([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9]) ([0-9]+) \(CanLII\), <https://canlii\.ca/t/([A-Za-z0-9]+)
  • ([A-Za-z0-9]+), ([0-9]+) CanLII ([0-9]+) \(([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9]) ([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9])\), <https://canlii\.ca/t/([A-Za-z0-9]+)
• Output:
  • {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$6|$2 $3$4 $5 (CanLII)}}{{per$3$4| J}} | {{$3}} | {{$4}} | | {{FindSummaries|$6}} {{keywords|}} }}
  • {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$6|$2 CanLII $3 ($4 $5)}}{{per$4$5| J}} | {{$4}} | {{$5}} | | {{FindSummaries|$6}} {{keywords|}} }}
    • regular citation {{CanLIIR|$1|$6|$2 CanLII $3 ($4 $5)}}{{per$4$5| J}}
• Expression (Quote for sentencing cases):
  • R[/.]* v[/.]* ([A-Za-z0-9]+), ([0-9]+) ([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9])([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9]) ([0-9]+) \(CanLII\), at para [0-9]+, <https://canlii\.ca/t/([A-Za-z0-9]+)#par([0-9]+)>, retrieved on 20[0-9]+-[0-9]+-[0-9]+
• Output:
  • {{summfrom|$1|$6#par$7|$2 $3$4 $5 (CanLII)}}
• Expression (Quote for regular cases):
  • R[/.]* v[/.]* ([A-Za-z0-9]+), ([0-9]+) ([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9])([A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9]) ([0-9]+) \(CanLII\), at para [0-9]+, <https://canlii\.ca/t/([A-Za-z0-9]+)#par([0-9]+)>, retrieved on 20[0-9]+-[0-9]+-[0-9]+
• Output:
  • {{CanLIIR|$1|$6|$2 $3$4 $5 (CanLII)}}{{per$3$4| J}}{{atL|$6|$7}}

• https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Evidence&action=edit

Short todo:

• O’Connor notice
• MMS table
• head notes

Precedent

https://youtu.be/GOE1IMF5J08

https://jsfiddle.net/mL2c2xb6/

• Special:RecentChanges
• Special:ReplaceText

LISTS OF PAGES

• recent Talk pages
• list of All Pages
• list all Template pages
• Oldest pages
• Search by ID #

TRAFFIC

• Web analytics (google)

Random Category:

• Special:RandomInCategory

Create:

• Sentencing for Property Offences
• Accessory After the Fact to Murder (Offence)

Export:

• Special:Export

MEDIA POLICY

• Ontario Media Policy
• Nova Scotia Media Policy
• British Columbia Media Policy

Crown policy Manual

• BC Crown Policy Manual

Some writing tools:

• slick write
• text to speech
• Text compare

• compress pdfs (good for books of authority)

Regular Expressions

• regexr.com
• nearby: (?:quotation2\W+(?:\w+\W+){0,240}?\.\.\.)
• (R[\.]* v[\.]* [^,]+, [^\.]+).[\s][A-Za-z][a-z] --> pull out all cases from briefs
• see also PowerGREP
• \s(\w+)\s(?=information)

Validate JSON and javascript

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]

• gdoc id="xx" width="900" height="1200" /

Services

• freeplane mindmap

New Decisions

• criminal cases Ontario court of appeal
• recent decisions published in the CCC
• recent decisions published in the WCB

• Last week on CanLII
• Last week on CanLII (Appellate)
• NS (all)
• ONCA
• ONSC
• ONCJ
• MBCA
• MBQB
• BCPC
• BCSC
• BCCA

Templates

1

{{SummaryPending}}

2

{{LinkNeeded}}

3

{{DraftCharge}}

4

; On Finding of Guilt
{{VictimHeader}} <!-- Sections / Notice of Agree / Notice of Restitution / Notice of VIS -->
|s. 151 {{DescrSec|151}} || || ||
|-
{{VictimEnd}}

5

{{DesignationHeader}}
|-
|s. 266 {{DescrSec|266}}|| {{XMark}} <!--wire--> || {{OKMark}} <!--DO-->||{{OKMark}} <!--SPIO--> || {{XMark}} <!--consent-->
{{DesignationEnd}}

7

{{ProbationM| }}
{{ProbationY| }}
{{SDNA}} Template:SDNA</nowiki>
{{DRAFT}}

THIS TEXT IS IN ROUGH DRAFT STATE. NOTHING HERE WILL BE OF USE TO READERS.

</nowiki>

Quote box

The court may allow video testimony if it is "appropriate" in "all the circumstances" including:

• the location and personal circumstances of the witness
• the costs that would be incurred if the witness had to be physically present; and
• the nature of the witness’ anticipated evidence.

s. 714.1

1. Item1
Something

2. Item2
<source lang=javascript> var a = 1; </source>

Take a list of pages and put into JSON formatting

• replace \n([^\n]+)\r
• with \t\t\t{\n\t\t\t\t"EvidenceID"\: "X",\n\t\t\t\t"EvidenceName"\: "$1",\n\t\t\t\t"EvidenceLink"\: "$1"\n\t\t\t\},\r

Tasks

• checklist of wiretap applications
• update participating in terrorist activities, there are many errors

Reference

Maintenance

Grammar

• "the the"
• "hte"

Terminology

• supra
• infra
• cf
• contra
• esp
• aff'd
• rev'd

test

<googlespreadsheet width="600" height="200" style="width: 50%">19G1x4KvbUHERXxUKTWPvDtbMil2Ec89YqUXFIn8bv3w</googlespreadsheet>

Lawyering

“First, all prospective lawyers should make themselves intimately familiar with the fundamentals of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning... is based on the act of proving a conclusion by means of two other propositions. Perhaps 90 percent of legal issues can be resolved by deduction, so the importance of understanding this type of reasoning cannot be overstated. Second, students should acquaint themselves with the principles of inductive generalization.” [4]

“Third, reasoning by analogy—another form of inductive reasoning—is a powerful tool in a lawyer’s arsenal. Analogies help lawyers and judges solve legal problems not controlled by precedent and help law students deflect the nasty hypotheticals that are the darlings of professors.”

Defined broadly, deduction is reasoning in which a conclusion is compelled by known facts.

The basic principle of the syllogism is surprisingly straightforward: What is true of the universal is true of the particular.

We start with the basics. To shape a legal issue in the form of a syllogism, begin by stating the general rule of law or widely-known legal rule that governs your case as your major premise. Then, in your next statement, the minor premise, describe the key facts of the legal problem at hand.

If you find yourself having trouble organizing a brief or memo, try shoehorning your argument into this generic model, which is based on the argument made by prosecutors in nearly every criminal case:

Major premise: [Doing something] [violates the law.]

Minor premise: [The defendant] [did something.]

Conclusion: [The defendant] [violated the law.]

Notice that the three parts of a syllogism—the two premises and the conclusion—are themselves built from three units. Logicians call these units “terms.” Two terms appear in each statement: the “major term” in the major premise and conclusion, the “minor term” in the minor premise and conclusion, and the “middle term” in the major and minor premises but not in the conclusion. Notice that the middle term covers a broad range of facts, and that if the conclusion is to be valid, the minor term must be a fact that is included within the middle term. Although the jargon can get confusing, the basic idea isn’t hard to grasp: Each statement in a syllogism must relate to the other two.

Other

• x
• xx

• xxx
• [5]

• [6]: The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the Courts.

• [7]
• [8]

List of Cases

• User:Admin/Sandbox/0_to_A
• User:Admin/Sandbox/B
• User:Admin/Sandbox/C
• User:Admin/Sandbox/D
• User:Admin/Sandbox/E to G
• User:Admin/Sandbox/H to J
• User:Admin/Sandbox/K to L
• User:Admin/Sandbox/M to O
• User:Admin/Sandbox/P to R
• User:Admin/Sandbox/S to Z
• User:Admin/Sandbox/S to Z
• User:Admin/Sandbox/Sort the Repeat

Presentation Outlines

• User:Admin/Sandbox/Being a Witness
• User:Admin/Sandbox/Cross-Examination