Abuse of Process by Crown Counsel: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\{\{fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "fr:$1" |
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
{{supra1|Anderson}}<br> | {{supra1|Anderson}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; Examples | |||
By way of example, allegations of abusive conduct can target alleged conduct such as:<REf> | |||
e.g. R. v. Trang, 2002 ABQB 744 (CanLII), at para 29, <https://canlii.ca/t/5jnf#par29> | |||
</ref> | |||
* '''breach of prosecutorial duty''': illegitimate or unreasonable tactical decisions, including overloaded indictments, unreasonable splitting charges or accused; | |||
* '''continuous non-dislcosure''': a consistent pattern to make timely and complete disclosure, | |||
* '''misrepresentations to the Court''': use of exagerations or misleading comments about the true state of affairs; | |||
* '''mala fides''': Crown taking contradictory positions at various points throughout the proceedings; | |||
* '''Tunnel vision''' | |||
* '''interference with solicitor-client relationship''': | |||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||