Recent Possession (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "R v ([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.," to "''R v $1$2$3$4'',"
Line 12: Line 12:
| R v Harris, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mpwt 1995 CanLII 4187] (NS CA){{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} || convicted of B&E
| R v Harris, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mpwt 1995 CanLII 4187] (NS CA){{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} || convicted of B&E
|-
|-
| R v J.R.L.J.,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1zxgd 1994 CanLII 7617] (NSCA){{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} || convicted of B&E
| ''R v JRLJ'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1zxgd 1994 CanLII 7617] (NSCA){{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} || convicted of B&E
|}
|}


==See Also==
==See Also==
* [[Recent Possession]]
* [[Recent Possession]]

Revision as of 15:13, 12 January 2019

Case Summary
R v Palaga,
2008 SKCA 36 (CanLII), per Smith JA
acquitted of B&E
R v Goulet,
2005 SKPC 104 (CanLII), per Goliath J
convicted of B&E
R v Harris,
1995 CanLII 4187 (NS CA), per Clarke CJ
convicted of B&E
R v JRLJ,
1994 CanLII 7617 (NSCA), per Clarke CJ
convicted of B&E

See Also