Terms of Release (Until December 18, 2019): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
There must be some "real purpose" behind the imposition of the condition.<ref> | There must be some "real purpose" behind the imposition of the condition.<ref> | ||
R v Hill (1989), 9 W.C.B. (2d) 3 (ONCJ){{NOCANLII}} | R v Hill (1989), 9 W.C.B. (2d) 3 (ONCJ){{NOCANLII}}{{perONCJ|Greco J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 22:09, 11 January 2019
General Principles
Despite the presumption of innocence the court is entitled to deprive the accused of liberty before any findings of guilt.[1]
The restrictions on liberty through bail may be made "in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice where there are reasonable grounds for doing so, rather than only after guilt has been established beyond a reasonable doubt."[2]
The release powers of a Justice is given in sections 515(1) and (2) which state:
Order of release
515. (1) Subject to this section, where an accused who is charged with an offence other than an offence listed in section 469 [Exclusive jurisdiction offences] is taken before a justice, the justice shall, unless a plea of guilty by the accused is accepted, order, in respect of that offence, that the accused be released on his giving an undertaking without conditions, unless the prosecutor, having been given a reasonable opportunity to do so, shows cause, in respect of that offence, why the detention of the accused in custody is justified or why an order under any other provision of this section should be made and where the justice makes an order under any other provision of this section, the order shall refer only to the particular offence for which the accused was taken before the justice.
Release on undertaking with conditions, etc.
(2) Where the justice does not make an order under subsection (1), he shall, unless the prosecutor shows cause why the detention of the accused is justified, order that the accused be released
- (a) on his giving an undertaking with such conditions as the justice directs;
- (b) on his entering into a recognizance before the justice, without sureties, in such amount and with such conditions, if any, as the justice directs but without deposit of money or other valuable security;
- (c) on his entering into a recognizance before the justice with sureties in such amount and with such conditions, if any, as the justice directs but without deposit of money or other valuable security;
- (d) with the consent of the prosecutor, on his entering into a recognizance before the justice, without sureties, in such amount and with such conditions, if any, as the justice directs and on his depositing with the justice such sum of money or other valuable security as the justice directs; or
- (e) if the accused is not ordinarily resident in the province in which the accused is in custody or does not ordinarily reside within two hundred kilometres of the place in which he is in custody, on his entering into a recognizance before the justice with or without sureties in such amount and with such conditions, if any, as the justice directs, and on his depositing with the justice such sum of money or other valuable security as the justice directs.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 515; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 83, 186; 1991, c. 40, s. 31; 1993, c. 45, s. 8; 1994, c. 44, s. 44; 1995, c. 39, s. 153; 1996, c. 19, ss. 71, 93.3; 1997, c. 18, s. 59, c. 23, s. 16; 1999, c. 5, s. 21, c. 25, s. 8(Preamble); 2001, c. 32, s. 37, c. 41, ss. 19, 133; 2008, c. 6, s. 37; 2009, c. 22, s. 17, c. 29, s. 2; 2010, c. 20, s. 1; 2012, c. 1, s. 32.
[annotation(s) added]
– CCC
- ↑ R v Pearson 1992 CanLII 52 (SCC), (1992), 77 CCC (3d) 124 (S.C.C.), per Lamer CJ
- ↑ Pearson, ibid.
Issuance of a Release Order
Release of accused
519 (1) Where a justice makes an order under subsection 515(1), (2), (7) or (8),
- (a) if the accused thereupon complies with the order, the justice shall direct that the accused be released
- (i) forthwith, if the accused is not required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter, or
- (ii) as soon thereafter as the accused is no longer required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter; and
- (b) if the accused does not thereupon comply with the order, the justice who made the order or another justice having jurisdiction shall issue a warrant for the committal of the accused and may endorse thereon an authorization to the person having the custody of the accused to release the accused when the accused complies with the order
- (i) forthwith after the compliance, if the accused is not required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter, or
- (ii) as soon thereafter as the accused is no longer required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter
and if the justice so endorses the warrant, he shall attach to it a copy of the order.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 519; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 85.
– CCC
Conditions
The crown must establish the evidentiary basis that underlies the condition sought.
There must be some "real purpose" behind the imposition of the condition.[1]
515
...
Conditions authorized
(4) The justice may direct as conditions under subsection (2) that the accused shall do any one or more of the following things as specified in the order:
- (a) report at times to be stated in the order to a peace officer or other person designated in the order;
- (b) remain within a territorial jurisdiction specified in the order;
- (c) notify the peace officer or other person designated under paragraph (a) of any change in his address or his employment or occupation;
- (d) abstain from communicating, directly or indirectly, with any victim, witness or other person identified in the order, or refrain from going to any place specified in the order, except in accordance with the conditions specified in the order that the justice considers necessary;
- (e) where the accused is the holder of a passport, deposit his passport as specified in the order;
- (e.1) comply with any other condition specified in the order that the justice considers necessary to ensure the safety and security of any victim of or witness to the offence; and
- (f) comply with such other reasonable conditions specified in the order as the justice considers desirable.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 515; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 83, 186; 1991, c. 40, s. 31; 1993, c. 45, s. 8; 1994, c. 44, s. 44; 1995, c. 39, s. 153; 1996, c. 19, ss. 71, 93.3; 1997, c. 18, s. 59, c. 23, s. 16; 1999, c. 5, s. 21, c. 25, s. 8(Preamble); 2001, c. 32, s. 37, c. 41, ss. 19, 133; 2008, c. 6, s. 37; 2009, c. 22, s. 17, c. 29, s. 2; 2010, c. 20, s. 1; 2012, c. 1, s. 32; 2014, c. 17, s. 14; 2015, c. 13, s. 20.
– CCC
Firearms Prohibition
Under s. 515(4.1), the court shall order a firearm prohibition on persons released for certain charges including:
- offences where violence is used, threatened, or attempted
- criminal harassment
- intimidation of a justice system participant
- terrorism offences
- certain firearms offences
- certain CDSA offences
- certain offences under Security of Information Act
Where the judge refuses to do so he must give reasons.(s. 515(4.12))
Contact
The court may order that that there be no contact with named individuals, if a person is ordered detained (s.515(12)) or remanded (s.516(2)). Note that these orders are not stand-alone orders and only last up until the next court appearance. Thus, it must be renewed at each time the matter is in court.[2]
The purpose of "no contact" conditions prior to trial is to balance the right of the accused to be in the community and the right of the complainant or witnesses to privacy and safety.[3]
- ↑
R v Hill (1989), 9 W.C.B. (2d) 3 (ONCJ)(*no CanLII links)
, per Greco J
- ↑
R v Brown 2000 NSCA 147 (CanLII), per Roscoe JA - re 515(12) orders
R v Kalashnikoff, 2004 CanLII 20454 (ON SC), [2004] OJ No 113 (ONSC), per Pierce J - re 516(2) orders
see also Imprisonment#No Contact Orders while in Prison - ↑
R v JF, [2001] O.J. No. 2054 (Ont. S.C.J.), per Hill J(*no CanLII links)
R v Lofstrom, 2016 ABPC 197 (CanLII), per Saccomani J, at para 92 ("the imposition of a “no contact” provision in a court order is intended to strike a balance by allowing an accused person to be in the community pending trial while providing complainant(s) with some measure of protection and reasonable assurance that their privacy and individual security concerns are not at risk.")
"Other Reasonable Conditions"
Section 515(4)(f) permits the court to impose “other reasonable conditions”.
The condition must relate "to a purpose which would otherwise justify the accused's pre-trial detention." which means they must relate to ensuring attendance in court, to the protection or safety of the public or to maintaining confidence in the administration of justice.[1]
Where the offence involves the use of alcohol or the accused has a history of committing offences while intoxicated and there is a risk that further offences may be committed due to substance abuse, a condition requiring the accused to abstain from alcohol or intoxicating substances should be imposed.[2] However, there is some suggestion that an alcoholic should not be put on unreasonable conditions to abstain entirely from alcohol.[3]
- ↑
R v Keenan, 1979 ABCA 278 (CanLII), (1979), 12 C.R. (3d) 135 (Que. C.A.), per Lamer JA
R v Merasty, 2008 SKPC 28 (CanLII), per Kalenith J
- ↑ R v Peddle, [2001] O.J. No.2116 (S.C.)(*no CanLII links) at para 12
- ↑
Runciman and Baker, "Final report on the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs" (June 2017) at p. 6
Mandatory Conditions for Certain Offences
515
...
Condition prohibiting possession of firearms, etc.
(4.1) When making an order under subsection (2), in the case of an accused who is charged with
- (a) an offence in the commission of which violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted,
- (a.1) a terrorism offence,
- (b) an offence under section 264 (criminal harassment),
- (b.1) an offence under section 423.1 (intimidation of a justice system participant),
- (c) an offence relating to the contravention of any of sections 5 to 7 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act,
- (d) an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance, or
- (e) an offence under subsection 20(1) of the Security of Information Act, or an offence under subsection 21(1) or 22(1) or section 23 of that Act that is committed in relation to an offence under subsection 20(1) of that Act,
the justice shall add to the order a condition prohibiting the accused from possessing a firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, or all those things, until the accused is dealt with according to law unless the justice considers that such a condition is not required in the interests of the safety of the accused or the safety and security of a victim of the offence or of any other person.
Surrender, etc.
(4.11) Where the justice adds a condition described in subsection (4.1) to an order made under subsection (2), the justice shall specify in the order the manner and method by which
- (a) the things referred to in subsection (4.1) that are in the possession of the accused shall be surrendered, disposed of, detained, stored or dealt with; and
- (b) the authorizations, licences and registration certificates held by the person shall be surrendered.
Reasons
(4.12) Where the justice does not add a condition described in subsection (4.1) to an order made under subsection (2), the justice shall include in the record a statement of the reasons for not adding the condition.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 515; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 83, 186; 1991, c. 40, s. 31; 1993, c. 45, s. 8; 1994, c. 44, s. 44; 1995, c. 39, s. 153; 1996, c. 19, ss. 71, 93.3; 1997, c. 18, s. 59, c. 23, s. 16; 1999, c. 5, s. 21, c. 25, s. 8(Preamble); 2001, c. 32, s. 37, c. 41, ss. 19, 133; 2008, c. 6, s. 37; 2009, c. 22, s. 17, c. 29, s. 2; 2010, c. 20, s. 1; 2012, c. 1, s. 32; 2014, c. 17, s. 14; 2015, c. 13, s. 20.
– CCC
Conditions on Terrorism-type Offences
515
...
Additional conditions
(4.2) Before making an order under subsection (2), in the case of an accused who is charged with an offence referred to in subsection (4.3), the justice shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety and security of any person, particularly a victim of or witness to the offence or a justice system participant, to include as a condition of the order
- (a) that the accused abstain from communicating, directly or indirectly, with any victim, witness or other person identified in the order, or refrain from going to any place specified in the order; or
- (b) that the accused comply with any other condition specified in the order that the justice considers necessary to ensure the safety and security of those persons.
Offences
(4.3) The offences for the purposes of subsection (4.2) are
- (a) a terrorism offence;
- (b) an offence described in section 264 or 423.1;
- (c) an offence in the commission of which violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted; and
- (d) an offence under subsection 20(1) of the Security of Information Act, or an offence under subsection 21(1) or 22(1) or section 23 of that Act that is committed in relation to an offence under subsection 20(1) of that Act.
...
– CCC
Variation and Review of Conditions
The terms of a release order can be varied according to s. 523 (2) of the Code:
523
...
Order vacating previous order for release or detention
(2) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (1.1),
- (a) the court, judge or justice before which or whom an accused is being tried, at any time,
- (b) the justice, on completion of the preliminary inquiry in relation to an offence for which an accused is ordered to stand trial, other than an offence listed in section 469, or
- (c) with the consent of the prosecutor and the accused or, where the accused or the prosecutor applies to vacate an order that would otherwise apply pursuant to subsection (1.1), without such consent, at any time
- (i) where the accused is charged with an offence other than an offence listed in section 469, the justice by whom an order was made under this Part or any other justice,
- (ii) where the accused is charged with an offence listed in section 469, a judge of or a judge presiding in a superior court of criminal jurisdiction for the province, or
- (iii) the court, judge or justice before which or whom an accused is to be tried,
may, on cause being shown, vacate any order previously made under this Part for the interim release or detention of the accused and make any other order provided for in this Part for the detention or release of the accused until his trial is completed that the court, judge or justice considers to be warranted.
Provisions applicable to proceedings under subsection (2)
(3) The provisions of sections 517, 518 and 519 apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, in respect of any proceedings under subsection (2), except that subsection 518(2) does not apply in respect of an accused who is charged with an offence listed in section 469.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 523; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 89; 2011, c. 16, s. 2.
– CCC
This section has been interpreted by most courts as meaning that a provincial court judge cannot vary the conditions on demand without the consent of the crown.[1] A Superior Court judge, however, will have jurisdiction to change conditions on application.
See also 520, 521, 522, 524, 525.
Effect of Variation of Undertaking or Recognizance
Variation of undertaking or recognizance
515.1 An undertaking or recognizance pursuant to which the accused was released that has been entered into under section 499, 503 or 515 may, with the written consent of the prosecutor, be varied, and where so varied, is deemed to have been entered into pursuant to section 515.
1997, c. 18, s. 60.
– CCC
- ↑
R v Mukpo 2012 NSSC 107 (CanLII), per Rosinski J
R v Arkison [1996] BCJ No. 2549(*no CanLII links)
R v Hill 2005 NSPC 50 (CanLII), per Ross J
c.f. R v Greener 2003 NSPC 58 (CanLII), per WD MacDonald J