Credibility (Evidence Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "R v ([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.," to "''R v $1$2$3'',"
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
Line 8: Line 8:
! Case !! Summary
! Case !! Summary
|-
|-
| R v Hussain, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2373k 2009 CanLII 18224] (ON S.C.) ||
| ''R v Hussain'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2373k 2009 CanLII 18224] (ON S.C.) ||
|-
|-
| R v Mensah,<br> [2003] O.J. No. 1096 [http://canlii.ca/t/1v8kx 2003 CanLII 57419] || leading motive evidence in fraud case permitted
| ''R v Mensah'',<br> [2003] O.J. No. 1096 [http://canlii.ca/t/1v8kx 2003 CanLII 57419] || leading motive evidence in fraud case permitted
|}
|}


Line 20: Line 20:
| ''R v NAA'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1zrpd 1996 CanLII 8700] (NS C.A.)||
| ''R v NAA'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1zrpd 1996 CanLII 8700] (NS C.A.)||
|-
|-
| R v Krause, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ftr1 1986 CanLII 39] (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 466||
| ''R v Krause'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ftr1 1986 CanLII 39] (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 466||
|}
|}


Line 30: Line 30:
! Case !! Summary
! Case !! Summary
|-
|-
| R v Zebedee, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nqhw 2006 CanLII 22099] (ON C.A.)||
| ''R v Zebedee'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nqhw 2006 CanLII 22099] (ON C.A.)||
|-
|-
| R v Pollock<br> (2004), 187 CCC (3d) 213 (Ont. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/1hcgv 2004 CanLII 16082] (ON C.A.)||
| R v Pollock<br> (2004), 187 CCC (3d) 213 (Ont. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/1hcgv 2004 CanLII 16082] (ON C.A.)||
Line 36: Line 36:
| R v Sauvé<br> (2004), 182 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/1g9tq 2004 CanLII 9054] (ON C.A.) ||
| R v Sauvé<br> (2004), 182 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/1g9tq 2004 CanLII 9054] (ON C.A.) ||
|-
|-
| R v Neville,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb482013 CanLII 9089] (NL SCTD) || application for warning granted
| ''R v Neville'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb482013 CanLII 9089] (NL SCTD) || application for warning granted
|}
|}


-->
-->

Revision as of 21:44, 12 January 2019