Defences (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "R v ([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.," to "''R v $1$2''," |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| R v McKay, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fm0xq 2011 ONCJ 318] (CanLII) ||acquitted of choking wife | | R v McKay, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fm0xq 2011 ONCJ 318] (CanLII) ||acquitted of choking wife | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Rempel, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng0z 2011 SKPC 156] (CanLII) ||not guilty of driving while impaired | | ''R v Rempel'', <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng0z 2011 SKPC 156] (CanLII) ||not guilty of driving while impaired | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Giancone, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vvbn 2008 ONCJ 54] (CanLII) || defence rejected | | ''R v Giancone'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vvbn 2008 ONCJ 54] (CanLII) || defence rejected | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Cassan (E.R.),<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frj65 2012 MBCA 46] (CanLII)|| | | R v Cassan (E.R.),<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frj65 2012 MBCA 46] (CanLII)|| | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Neville,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb41 2013 CanLII 9088] (NL SCTD) [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb46 2013 CanLII 9087] (NL SCTD)|| defence has air of reality in circumstances of homicide | | ''R v Neville'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb41 2013 CanLII 9088] (NL SCTD) [http://canlii.ca/t/fwb46 2013 CanLII 9087] (NL SCTD)|| defence has air of reality in circumstances of homicide | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Key,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqtth 2012 SKPC 33] (CanLII) || government granting a licence to a person on a driving prohibition permitted the defence of officially induced error. | | ''R v Key'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqtth 2012 SKPC 33] (CanLII) || government granting a licence to a person on a driving prohibition permitted the defence of officially induced error. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||