Impaired Driving and Over 80 (Offence Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "O.J. No. " to "OJ No " |
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>" |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Lee,< | | R v Lee,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flsrr 2011 BCPC 88] (CanLII) ||Y ||-||-||Y||s. 8 violation on ASD, removed from evidence | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hannigan,< | | R v Hannigan,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9x 2011 ABPC 305] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Paterson,< | | Paterson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dnpd 2010 BCCA 442] (CanLII)||Y||-||-||?||s. 8 no grounds of arrest | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v White,< | | R v White,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/263qq 2009 BCPC 312] (CanLII)||?||?||Y||N|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Monykal,< | |R v Monykal,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2503d 2009 ABPC 220] (CanLII) || Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Ogertschnig, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2185f 2008 ABPC 293] (CanLII)|| no grounds for suspicion | | R v Ogertschnig, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2185f 2008 ABPC 293] (CanLII)|| no grounds for suspicion | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Kenneth Steeves, < | | R v Kenneth Steeves, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29q08 2010 NBPC 25] (CanLII) || | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 08:18, 13 January 2019