Mental Illness (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>"
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
Line 7: Line 7:
! Case !! Summary
! Case !! Summary
|-
|-
|R v Miller, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqzft 2012 BCSC 534] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Joyce J}} || accused unfit to stand trial
|''R v Miller'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqzft 2012 BCSC 534] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Joyce J}} || accused unfit to stand trial
|}
|}


Line 17: Line 17:
! Case !! Summary
! Case !! Summary
|-
|-
| R v Brown,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr9t2 2012 BCSC 686] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Fenlon J}}|| NCR finding upheld
| ''R v Brown'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr9t2 2012 BCSC 686] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Fenlon J}}|| NCR finding upheld
|-
|-
| R v Hoknes, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bkxn 2010 ABCA 221] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} || Accused fails in overturning NCR finding
| ''R v Hoknes'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bkxn 2010 ABCA 221] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} || Accused fails in overturning NCR finding
|}
|}

Revision as of 10:07, 13 January 2019

Fitness to Stand Trial

Case Summary
R v Miller,
2012 BCSC 534 (CanLII), per Joyce J
accused unfit to stand trial


Not Criminally Responsible Due to Mental Disorder

Case Summary
R v Brown,
2012 BCSC 686 (CanLII), per Fenlon J
NCR finding upheld
R v Hoknes,
2010 ABCA 221 (CanLII), per curiam
Accused fails in overturning NCR finding