Examinations: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>"
m Text replacement - "'''([A-Z][a-z]+)'''<br>" to "; $1"
Line 18: Line 18:
}}
}}


'''Objections'''<br>
; Objections
Where trial counsel does not object to inadmissible evidence, that failure cannot make inadmissible evidence admissible.<ref>
Where trial counsel does not object to inadmissible evidence, that failure cannot make inadmissible evidence admissible.<ref>
R v D(LE), [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4x 1989 CanLII 74] (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 111{{perSCC|Sopinka J}} at 126-27 <br>
R v D(LE), [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4x 1989 CanLII 74] (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 111{{perSCC|Sopinka J}} at 126-27 <br>

Revision as of 16:54, 13 January 2019

General Principles

All examinations of witnesses are expected to be done in open court.[1]

Summary Conviction Trials

802
...
Examination of witnesses
(2) The prosecutor or defendant, as the case may be, may examine and cross-examine witnesses personally or by counsel or agent.
On oath
(3) Every witness at a trial in proceedings to which this Part applies shall be examined under oath.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 737.


CCC

Objections

Where trial counsel does not object to inadmissible evidence, that failure cannot make inadmissible evidence admissible.[2]

  1. Re Krakat, 1965 CanLII 358 (ON SC), per Hughes J
  2. R v D(LE), 1989 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 111, per Sopinka J at 126-27
    R v DCB, 1994 CanLII 6412 (MB CA), (1994), 95 Man.R. (2d) 220, per Philp JA at para 14 (C.A.)

Topics

See Also