Identity (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>" |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Banish,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fvj75 2012 ABPC 350] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} | | ID in sexual assault case established by proof of IP and email address source and vehicle ownership. Victim could not visually ID assailant.}} | {{TCase| ''R v Banish'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fvj75 2012 ABPC 350] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} | | ID in sexual assault case established by proof of IP and email address source and vehicle ownership. Victim could not visually ID assailant.}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Oliver,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs0km 2012 CanLII 38957] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Adams J}} | acquitted | }} | {{TCase| ''R v Oliver'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs0km 2012 CanLII 38957] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Adams J}} | acquitted | }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Wheyee,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpwz7 2012 ABPC 35] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fradsham J}} | acquitted| home invasion -- acquitted- thorough canvas of evidence }} | {{TCase| ''R v Wheyee'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpwz7 2012 ABPC 35] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fradsham J}} | acquitted| home invasion -- acquitted- thorough canvas of evidence }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Colwell,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp508 2011 ONCJ 611] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Reinhardt J}} | acquitted| assault}} | {{TCase| ''R v Colwell'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp508 2011 ONCJ 611] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Reinhardt J}} | acquitted| assault}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Smith,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmz9f 2011 BCCA 362] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Neilson JA}} | guilty | }} | {{TCase| ''R v Smith'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmz9f 2011 BCCA 362] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Neilson JA}} | guilty | }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Flynn,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp4z5 2011 CanLII 77299] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Orr J}} | acquitted | dog tracking }} | {{TCase| ''R v Flynn'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp4z5 2011 CanLII 77299] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Orr J}} | acquitted | dog tracking }} | ||
{{TCase|''R v McNaughton'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp54l 2011 ABPC 356] (CanLII){{perABPC|Lamoureux J}} | acquitted |drug trafficking -- no line up made}} | {{TCase|''R v McNaughton'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp54l 2011 ABPC 356] (CanLII){{perABPC|Lamoureux J}} | acquitted |drug trafficking -- no line up made}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Wilband,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp2x4 2011 ABPC 298] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} | convicted | bank robbery}} | {{TCase|''R v Wilband'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp2x4 2011 ABPC 298] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} | convicted | bank robbery}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Benmore,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp69l 2011 CanLII 77762] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Flynn J}} | guilty | attempted case }} | {{TCase|''R v Benmore'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp69l 2011 CanLII 77762] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Flynn J}} | guilty | attempted case }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Pierce,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp14c 2011 BCCA 485] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Smith J}} | conviction upheld| }} | {{TCase|''R v Pierce'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp14c 2011 BCCA 485] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Smith J}} | conviction upheld| }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Al-Kisadi,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmv0 2011 ONSC 6412] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | acquitted| }} | {{TCase|R v Al-Kisadi,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmv0 2011 ONSC 6412] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | acquitted| }} | ||
{{TCase|R v John,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2d7h6 2010 ONSC 6085] (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} || acquitted | }} | {{TCase|''R v John'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2d7h6 2010 ONSC 6085] (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} || acquitted | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v T.(R.),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bn4l 2010 ONCJ 289] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Barnes J}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v T.(R.),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bn4l 2010 ONCJ 289] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Barnes J}} | | }} | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{TCase|R v L.(W.M),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bp5w 2010 BCCA 355] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman J}} || conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID}} | {{TCase|R v L.(W.M),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bp5w 2010 BCCA 355] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman J}} || conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Thompson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2680h 2009 NSPC 51] (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} || acquitted}} | {{TCase|''R v Thompson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2680h 2009 NSPC 51] (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} || acquitted}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Martin,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1vgv5 2007 NSCA 121] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Oland JA}} | conviction| }} | {{TCase|''R v Martin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1vgv5 2007 NSCA 121] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Oland JA}} | conviction| }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Hill,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1l8g1 2005 NSCA 108] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} || }} | {{TCase| ''R v Hill'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1l8g1 2005 NSCA 108] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} || }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Goulart-Nelson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1hz5s 2004 CanLII 32077] (Ont.C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} | | }} | {{TCase| R v Goulart-Nelson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1hz5s 2004 CanLII 32077] (Ont.C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Zurowski,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4pjf 2003 ABCA 315] (CanLII){{perABCA|McClung JA}} (2:1) || acquitted on appeal to SCC}} | {{TCase| ''R v Zurowski'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4pjf 2003 ABCA 315] (CanLII){{perABCA|McClung JA}} (2:1) || acquitted on appeal to SCC}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Williams <br>[2003] OJ No 4095, [http://canlii.ca/t/4rms 2003 CanLII 21327] (ON CA){{TheCourtONCA}} ||}} | {{TCase| R v Williams <br>[2003] OJ No 4095, [http://canlii.ca/t/4rms 2003 CanLII 21327] (ON CA){{TheCourtONCA}} ||}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Hibbert,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/51s0 2002 SCC 39] (CanLII){{perSCC|Arbour J}} | | }} | {{TCase| ''R v Hibbert'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/51s0 2002 SCC 39] (CanLII){{perSCC|Arbour J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Dhillon<br> (2002), 166 CCC (3d) 262 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1cqpr 2002 CanLII 41540] (ONCA){{perONCA|Laskin and Goudge JJA}} |acquitted | witness shown only one photo}} | {{TCase| R v Dhillon<br> (2002), 166 CCC (3d) 262 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1cqpr 2002 CanLII 41540] (ONCA){{perONCA|Laskin and Goudge JJA}} |acquitted | witness shown only one photo}} | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
{{TCase| R v Field <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/54d4 1999 BCCA 382] (CanLII), (1999), 126 BCAC 103{{{perBCCA|Esson JA}} ||}} | {{TCase| R v Field <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/54d4 1999 BCCA 382] (CanLII), (1999), 126 BCAC 103{{{perBCCA|Esson JA}} ||}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Reitsma,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqtq 1998 CanLII 825] (S.C.C.), [1998] 1 SCR 769, rev’g (1997), 125 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA) | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Reitsma'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqtq 1998 CanLII 825] (S.C.C.), [1998] 1 SCR 769, rev’g (1997), 125 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA) | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Vu <br>[1998] BCJ No. 986 [http://canlii.ca/t/1f6j8 1998 CanLII 6791] (BCSC){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v Vu <br>[1998] BCJ No. 986 [http://canlii.ca/t/1f6j8 1998 CanLII 6791] (BCSC){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | | }} | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
{{TCase|R v Tat and Long <br>(1997) 117 CCC (3d) 481 [http://canlii.ca/t/6hgr 1997 CanLII 2234] (ONCA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v Tat and Long <br>(1997) 117 CCC (3d) 481 [http://canlii.ca/t/6hgr 1997 CanLII 2234] (ONCA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Miaponoose, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6hz0 1996 CanLII 1268] (ONCA){{perONCA|Charron JA}} ||}} | {{TCase|''R v Miaponoose'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6hz0 1996 CanLII 1268] (ONCA){{perONCA|Charron JA}} ||}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Tam <br>(1995), [http://canlii.ca/t/1dddm 1995 CanLII 1805] (BC CA), 100 CCC (3d) 196 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Prowse JA}} ||}} | {{TCase|R v Tam <br>(1995), [http://canlii.ca/t/1dddm 1995 CanLII 1805] (BC CA), 100 CCC (3d) 196 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Prowse JA}} ||}} | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
{{TCase|R v Fengstad <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1dchg 1994 CanLII 240] (BC C.A.), (1994), 27 C.R. (4th) 383 (BCCA){{TheCourtBCCA}} ||}} | {{TCase|R v Fengstad <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1dchg 1994 CanLII 240] (BC C.A.), (1994), 27 C.R. (4th) 383 (BCCA){{TheCourtBCCA}} ||}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Dilling,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dbw5 1993 CanLII 1943] (BCCA){{perBCCA|Goldie JA}} ||}} | {{TCase|''R v Dilling'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dbw5 1993 CanLII 1943] (BCCA){{perBCCA|Goldie JA}} ||}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Izzard <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gd876 1990 CanLII 11055] (ON CA), [1990] 54 CCC (3d) 252{{perONCA|Morden JA}} ||}} | {{TCase|R v Izzard <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gd876 1990 CanLII 11055] (ON CA), [1990] 54 CCC (3d) 252{{perONCA|Morden JA}} ||}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Quercia,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npnc 1990 CanLII 2595] (ONCA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Quercia'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npnc 1990 CanLII 2595] (ONCA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{TCase|R v Hang<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ctqv 1990 CanLII 8] (BCCA), (1990), 55 CCC (3d) 195 (BCCA){{TheCourtBCCA}}| | }} | {{TCase|R v Hang<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ctqv 1990 CanLII 8] (BCCA), (1990), 55 CCC (3d) 195 (BCCA){{TheCourtBCCA}}| | }} | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{TCase| R v Faryna<br> [1982] 3 CCC (3d) 58, [http://canlii.ca/t/gclwl 1982 CanLII 3796] (MB CA){{perMBCA|Huband JA}} (2:1) | | }} | {{TCase| R v Faryna<br> [1982] 3 CCC (3d) 58, [http://canlii.ca/t/gclwl 1982 CanLII 3796] (MB CA){{perMBCA|Huband JA}} (2:1) | | }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Spatola, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/g1bgt 1970 CanLII 390] (ON CA), [1970] 3 O.R. 74-84{{perONCA|Laskin JA}} (2:1)| |duty to direct jury on frailties of ID }} | {{TCase| ''R v Spatola'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/g1bgt 1970 CanLII 390] (ON CA), [1970] 3 O.R. 74-84{{perONCA|Laskin JA}} (2:1)| |duty to direct jury on frailties of ID }} | ||
{{TCase| R v Howarth <br>(1970), 1 CCC (2d) 546 (Ont.C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htzb3 1970 CanLII 1065] (ON CA){{perONCA|Gale CJ}} | | }} | {{TCase| R v Howarth <br>(1970), 1 CCC (2d) 546 (Ont.C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htzb3 1970 CanLII 1065] (ON CA){{perONCA|Gale CJ}} | | }} | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Badgerow,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28kv4 2010 ONSC 937] (CanLII){{perONSC|Taylor J}} | | }} | {{TCase| ''R v Badgerow'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28kv4 2010 ONSC 937] (CanLII){{perONSC|Taylor J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Bear,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqj1q 2012 ABCA 85] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} || lineup ID sufficient even thought witness ID’d at 70-80% accuracy stating that it “maybe” was the accused}} | {{TCase|''R v Bear'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqj1q 2012 ABCA 85] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} || lineup ID sufficient even thought witness ID’d at 70-80% accuracy stating that it “maybe” was the accused}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Lussier,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dxlb 1998 CanLII 4143] (BCCA){{perBCCA|MacKenzie JA}} ||line-up conducted, accused ID'd by complainant sometime later and admitted she was not sure}} | {{TCase|''R v Lussier'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dxlb 1998 CanLII 4143] (BCCA){{perBCCA|MacKenzie JA}} ||line-up conducted, accused ID'd by complainant sometime later and admitted she was not sure}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Atfield <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f0t4 1983 ABCA 44] (CanLII), [1983] AJ No 870{{perABCA|Belzil JA}} || some time after sexual assault, accused was ID'd in a line-up by a "fleeting glance" eye-witness. The line up process used by the police in that case as "unacceptable, botched and farcical".}} | {{TCase|R v Atfield <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f0t4 1983 ABCA 44] (CanLII), [1983] AJ No 870{{perABCA|Belzil JA}} || some time after sexual assault, accused was ID'd in a line-up by a "fleeting glance" eye-witness. The line up process used by the police in that case as "unacceptable, botched and farcical".}} | ||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Basi, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2122t 2008 ONCJ 469] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Bovard J}} | acquitted | }} | {{TCase|''R v Basi'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2122t 2008 ONCJ 469] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Bovard J}} | acquitted | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Moran,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1w0xm 2008 SKPC 33] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Hinds J}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Moran'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1w0xm 2008 SKPC 33] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Hinds J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Meier, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22pqf 2009 SKPC 29] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Morgan J}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Meier'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22pqf 2009 SKPC 29] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Morgan J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Bigsky, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1qfkn 2006 SKCA 145] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Jackson JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Bigsky'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1qfkn 2006 SKCA 145] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Jackson JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Coutu et al., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21x9r 2008 MBCA 151] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Freedman JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v Coutu et al., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21x9r 2008 MBCA 151] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Freedman JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Goran, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1w6gw 2008 ONCA 195] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Goran'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1w6gw 2008 ONCA 195] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Jones,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wkzt 2005 CanLII 60168] (MBPC){{perMBPC|Kopstein J}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Jones'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wkzt 2005 CanLII 60168] (MBPC){{perMBPC|Kopstein J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Delorme,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1jgtl 2004 SKPC 130] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Delorme'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1jgtl 2004 SKPC 130] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Schmidt, [http://canlii.ca/t/fs468 2012 BCPC 247] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Woods J}} | convicted | based on recognition evidence}} | {{TCase|''R v Schmidt'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fs468 2012 BCPC 247] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Woods J}} | convicted | based on recognition evidence}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Cranham, [http://canlii.ca/t/frv2r 2012 ONCA 457] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} | conviction quashed |}} | {{TCase|''R v Cranham'', [http://canlii.ca/t/frv2r 2012 ONCA 457] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} | conviction quashed |}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Jerry Lee Dun, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p34w 2006 PESCAD 19] (CanLII){{perPEICA|Mitchell CJ}} | new trial |}} | {{TCase|R v Jerry Lee Dun, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p34w 2006 PESCAD 19] (CanLII){{perPEICA|Mitchell CJ}} | new trial |}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Tash, [http://canlii.ca/t/fn1mw 2011 ONSC 5191] (CanLII){{perONSC|Belobaba J}} | |one officer sees person throw object away, radios second officer who sees accused matching description. Good opportunity to observe.}} | {{TCase|''R v Tash'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fn1mw 2011 ONSC 5191] (CanLII){{perONSC|Belobaba J}} | |one officer sees person throw object away, radios second officer who sees accused matching description. Good opportunity to observe.}} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase| R v Ryan, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fmhtq 2011 NLCA 53] (CanLII){{perNLCA|Hoegg JA}} |convicted | -}} | {{TCase| ''R v Ryan'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fmhtq 2011 NLCA 53] (CanLII){{perNLCA|Hoegg JA}} |convicted | -}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Corsor, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fmrp5 2011 BCPC 212] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Raven J}} | acquittal| }} | {{TCase|''R v Corsor'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fmrp5 2011 BCPC 212] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Raven J}} | acquittal| }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Tarcisyo, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bt35 2010 SKQB 234] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} | conviction | pull over-- driver pulls away after brief interaction with police}} | {{TCase|''R v Tarcisyo'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bt35 2010 SKQB 234] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} | conviction | pull over-- driver pulls away after brief interaction with police}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Desnomie, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29sg0 2010 SKCA 64] (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 273{{perSKCA|Gerwing JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Desnomie'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29sg0 2010 SKCA 64] (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 273{{perSKCA|Gerwing JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Horkoff,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b6zj 2010 SKCA 79] (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 332{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | conviction | }} | {{TCase|''R v Horkoff'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b6zj 2010 SKCA 79] (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 332{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | conviction | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Armbruster,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28cdk 2010 SKCA 25] (CanLII), [2010] 4 W.W.R. 575{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | |}} | {{TCase|''R v Armbruster'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28cdk 2010 SKCA 25] (CanLII), [2010] 4 W.W.R. 575{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | |}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Weigel, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/213v3 2008 SKCA 122] (CanLII), [2008] S.J. No. 603{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Weigel'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/213v3 2008 SKCA 122] (CanLII), [2008] S.J. No. 603{{perSKCA|Richards JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Roppel,<br> 2006 ONCJ 445{{NOCANLII}} | guilty| officer chasing car, than foot chase. Came within an arms-length of accused.}} | {{TCase|''R v Roppel'',<br> 2006 ONCJ 445{{NOCANLII}} | guilty| officer chasing car, than foot chase. Came within an arms-length of accused.}} | ||
{{TCase|''R v Cover'' (2004), <br>2004 CarswellOnt 6224 (ONSC){{NOCANLII}} | guilty | officer giving chase, made eye-contact while near driver's window, had seen driver several times in area, familiar with accused by photo on wanted bulletin. Officer ID'd accused shortly after arrest}} | {{TCase|''R v Cover'' (2004), <br>2004 CarswellOnt 6224 (ONSC){{NOCANLII}} | guilty | officer giving chase, made eye-contact while near driver's window, had seen driver several times in area, familiar with accused by photo on wanted bulletin. Officer ID'd accused shortly after arrest}} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} | ||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
==Video tape ID== | ==Video tape ID== | ||
{{TCaseHeader}} | {{TCaseHeader}} | ||
{{TCase|R v Leaney,<br> [1989] 2 SCR 393 [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft3h 1989 CanLII 28] (SCC){{perSCC|McLachlin J}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v Leaney'',<br> [1989] 2 SCR 393 [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft3h 1989 CanLII 28] (SCC){{perSCC|McLachlin J}} | | }} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} |
Revision as of 10:21, 13 January 2019
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
Identification
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Banish, 2012 ABPC 350 (CanLII), per Fraser J |
ID in sexual assault case established by proof of IP and email address source and vehicle ownership. Victim could not visually ID assailant. | |
R v Oliver, 2012 CanLII 38957 (NL SCTD), per Adams J |
acquitted | |
R v Wheyee, 2012 ABPC 35 (CanLII), per Fradsham J |
acquitted | home invasion -- acquitted- thorough canvas of evidence |
R v Colwell, 2011 ONCJ 611 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J |
acquitted | assault |
R v Smith, 2011 BCCA 362 (CanLII), per Neilson JA |
guilty | |
R v Flynn, 2011 CanLII 77299 (NL PC), per Orr J |
acquitted | dog tracking |
R v McNaughton, 2011 ABPC 356 (CanLII), per Lamoureux J |
acquitted | drug trafficking -- no line up made |
R v Wilband, 2011 ABPC 298 (CanLII), per Fraser J |
convicted | bank robbery |
R v Benmore, 2011 CanLII 77762 (NL PC), per Flynn J |
guilty | attempted case |
R v Pierce, 2011 BCCA 485 (CanLII), per Smith J |
conviction upheld | |
R v Al-Kisadi, 2011 ONSC 6412 (CanLII), per Kelly J |
acquitted | |
R v John, 2010 ONSC 6085 (CanLII), per Code J |
acquitted | |
R v T.(R.), 2010 ONCJ 289 (CanLII), per Barnes J |
||
R v L.(W.M), 2010 BCCA 355 (CanLII), per Groberman J |
conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID | |
R v Thompson, 2009 NSPC 51 (CanLII), per Tax J |
acquitted | |
R v Martin, 2007 NSCA 121 (CanLII), per Oland JA |
conviction | |
R v Hill, 2005 NSCA 108 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA |
||
R v Goulart-Nelson, 2004 CanLII 32077 (Ont.C.A.), per curiam |
||
R v Zurowski, 2003 ABCA 315 (CanLII), per McClung JA (2:1) |
acquitted on appeal to SCC | |
R v Williams [2003] OJ No 4095, 2003 CanLII 21327 (ON CA), per curiam |
||
R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 (CanLII), per Arbour J |
||
R v Dhillon (2002), 166 CCC (3d) 262 (ONCA), 2002 CanLII 41540 (ONCA), per Laskin and Goudge JJA |
acquitted | witness shown only one photo |
R v Thompson 2000 CanLII 5746 (ON C.A.), per Moldaver and MacPherson JJA |
||
R v Wristen 1999 CanLII 3824 (ON C.A.), per Laskin and Rosenberg JA |
||
R v Field 1999 BCCA 382 (CanLII), (1999), 126 BCAC 103{, per Esson JA |
||
R v Reitsma, 1998 CanLII 825 (S.C.C.), [1998] 1 SCR 769, rev’g (1997), 125 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA) |
||
R v Vu [1998] BCJ No. 986 1998 CanLII 6791 (BCSC), per Romilly J |
||
R v Vu [1997] BCJ No. 756 1997 CanLII 2864 (BCCA), per Hall JA |
||
R v Tat and Long (1997) 117 CCC (3d) 481 1997 CanLII 2234 (ONCA), per Doherty JA |
||
R v Miaponoose, 1996 CanLII 1268 (ONCA), per Charron JA |
||
R v Tam (1995), 1995 CanLII 1805 (BC CA), 100 CCC (3d) 196 (BCCA), per Prowse JA |
||
R v Fengstad 1994 CanLII 240 (BC C.A.), (1994), 27 C.R. (4th) 383 (BCCA), per curiam |
||
R v Dilling, 1993 CanLII 1943 (BCCA), per Goldie JA |
||
R v Izzard 1990 CanLII 11055 (ON CA), [1990] 54 CCC (3d) 252, per Morden JA |
||
R v Quercia, 1990 CanLII 2595 (ONCA), per Doherty JA |
||
R v Hang 1990 CanLII 8 (BCCA), (1990), 55 CCC (3d) 195 (BCCA), per curiam |
||
R v Virk (1983), 33 C.R. (3d) 378 (BCCA) (*no CanLII links) |
||
R v Faryna [1982] 3 CCC (3d) 58, 1982 CanLII 3796 (MB CA), per Huband JA (2:1) |
||
R v Spatola, 1970 CanLII 390 (ON CA), [1970] 3 O.R. 74-84, per Laskin JA (2:1) |
duty to direct jury on frailties of ID | |
R v Howarth (1970), 1 CCC (2d) 546 (Ont.C.A.), 1970 CanLII 1065 (ON CA), per Gale CJ |
||
R v Smith 1952 CanLII 116 (ON CA), [1952] 103 CCC 58 (Ont. CA), per MacKay JA |
||
R v Smierciak [1947] 2 DLR 156, 1946 CanLII 331 (ON CA), per Laidlaw JA |
Voice identification
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Badgerow, 2010 ONSC 937 (CanLII), per Taylor J |
Line-up ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Bear, 2012 ABCA 85 (CanLII), per curiam |
lineup ID sufficient even thought witness ID’d at 70-80% accuracy stating that it “maybe” was the accused | |
R v Lussier, 1998 CanLII 4143 (BCCA), per MacKenzie JA |
line-up conducted, accused ID'd by complainant sometime later and admitted she was not sure | |
R v Atfield 1983 ABCA 44 (CanLII), [1983] AJ No 870, per Belzil JA |
some time after sexual assault, accused was ID'd in a line-up by a "fleeting glance" eye-witness. The line up process used by the police in that case as "unacceptable, botched and farcical". |
Out of Court ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Basi, 2008 ONCJ 469 (CanLII), per Bovard J |
acquitted | |
R v Moran, 2008 SKPC 33 (CanLII), per Hinds J |
||
R v Meier, 2009 SKPC 29 (CanLII), per Morgan J |
||
R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145 (CanLII), per Jackson JA |
||
R v Coutu et al., 2008 MBCA 151 (CanLII), per Freedman JA |
||
R v Goran, 2008 ONCA 195 (CanLII), per Blair JA |
||
R v Jones, 2005 CanLII 60168 (MBPC), per Kopstein J |
||
R v Delorme, 2004 SKPC 130 (CanLII), per Kolenick J |
ID by Constable
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Schmidt, 2012 BCPC 247 (CanLII), per Woods J | convicted | based on recognition evidence |
R v Cranham, 2012 ONCA 457 (CanLII), per curiam | conviction quashed | |
R v Jerry Lee Dun, 2006 PESCAD 19 (CanLII), per Mitchell CJ | new trial | |
R v Tash, 2011 ONSC 5191 (CanLII), per Belobaba J | one officer sees person throw object away, radios second officer who sees accused matching description. Good opportunity to observe. |
Of a Driver
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Ryan, 2011 NLCA 53 (CanLII), per Hoegg JA |
convicted | - |
R v Corsor, 2011 BCPC 212 (CanLII), per Raven J |
acquittal | |
R v Tarcisyo, 2010 SKQB 234 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J |
conviction | pull over-- driver pulls away after brief interaction with police |
R v Desnomie, 2010 SKCA 64 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 273, per Gerwing JA |
||
R v Horkoff, 2010 SKCA 79 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 332, per Richards JA |
conviction | |
R v Armbruster, 2010 SKCA 25 (CanLII), [2010] 4 W.W.R. 575, per Richards JA |
||
R v Weigel, 2008 SKCA 122 (CanLII), [2008] S.J. No. 603, per Richards JA |
||
R v Roppel, 2006 ONCJ 445(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer chasing car, than foot chase. Came within an arms-length of accused. |
R v Cover (2004), 2004 CarswellOnt 6224 (ONSC)(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer giving chase, made eye-contact while near driver's window, had seen driver several times in area, familiar with accused by photo on wanted bulletin. Officer ID'd accused shortly after arrest |
Video tape ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Leaney, [1989] 2 SCR 393 1989 CanLII 28 (SCC), per McLachlin J |