Impaired Driving and Over 80 (Offence Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>" |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !!s.10(b) !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Lee,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flsrr 2011 BCPC 88] (CanLII) ||Y ||-||-||Y||s. 8 violation on ASD, removed from evidence | | ''R v Lee'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flsrr 2011 BCPC 88] (CanLII) ||Y ||-||-||Y||s. 8 violation on ASD, removed from evidence | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hannigan,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9x 2011 ABPC 305] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y||N|| | | ''R v Hannigan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9x 2011 ABPC 305] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Paterson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dnpd 2010 BCCA 442] (CanLII)||Y||-||-||?||s. 8 no grounds of arrest | | Paterson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dnpd 2010 BCCA 442] (CanLII)||Y||-||-||?||s. 8 no grounds of arrest | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v White,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/263qq 2009 BCPC 312] (CanLII)||?||?||Y||N|| | | ''R v White'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/263qq 2009 BCPC 312] (CanLII)||?||?||Y||N|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Monykal,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2503d 2009 ABPC 220] (CanLII) || Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period. | |''R v Monykal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2503d 2009 ABPC 220] (CanLII) || Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Ogertschnig, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2185f 2008 ABPC 293] (CanLII)|| no grounds for suspicion | | ''R v Ogertschnig'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2185f 2008 ABPC 293] (CanLII)|| no grounds for suspicion | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Ellis,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng0j2011 SKPC 148] (CanLII) || no breach | | ''R v Ellis'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng0j2011 SKPC 148] (CanLII) || no breach | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nahorniak,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b0mz 2010 SKCA 68] (CanLII)|| | | ''R v Nahorniak'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b0mz 2010 SKCA 68] (CanLII)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hansen,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b9zz 2010 ABPC 195] (CanLII)|| | | ''R v Hansen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b9zz 2010 ABPC 195] (CanLII)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Steeves,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmzr 2011 ABQB 661] (CanLII)|| reasonable grounds based on failed screening device | |''R v Steeves'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmzr 2011 ABQB 661] (CanLII)|| reasonable grounds based on failed screening device | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Formales,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnf7k 2011 BCPC 257] (CanLII) || breach; excluded certificate | | ''R v Formales'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnf7k 2011 BCPC 257] (CanLII) || breach; excluded certificate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Rosien,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp50c 2011 ONCJ 608] (CanLII) || impaired charge - not enough grounds -- acquitted | | ''R v Rosien'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp50c 2011 ONCJ 608] (CanLII) || impaired charge - not enough grounds -- acquitted | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Mailey,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqqv5 2012 ABQB 138] (CanLII) || good overview of history of "soon as practicable" - 25 min of a 37 min delay was due to driver sitting on a Check Stop bus | | ''R v Mailey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqqv5 2012 ABQB 138] (CanLII) || good overview of history of "soon as practicable" - 25 min of a 37 min delay was due to driver sitting on a Check Stop bus | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hughes, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnf85 2011 BCPC 263] (CanLII)||judicial stay | | ''R v Hughes'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnf85 2011 BCPC 263] (CanLII)||judicial stay | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Malenfant, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fndh9 2011 ONCJ 510] (CanLII)||no violation | | ''R v Malenfant'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fndh9 2011 ONCJ 510] (CanLII)||no violation | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v McGonigal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm5wh 2011 ABPC 183] (CanLII)|| 45 minute wait for tow truck | | ''R v McGonigal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm5wh 2011 ABPC 183] (CanLII)|| 45 minute wait for tow truck | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Kleinsasser,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm6fc 2011 ABPC 206] (CanLII)|| | | ''R v Kleinsasser'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm6fc 2011 ABPC 206] (CanLII)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Thompson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmm12 2011 BCPC 202] (CanLII)|| | | ''R v Thompson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmm12 2011 BCPC 202] (CanLII)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Megahy,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1x27d 2008 ABCA 207] (CanLII) || 34 minute delay resulted in Charter violation | |''R v Megahy'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1x27d 2008 ABCA 207] (CanLII) || 34 minute delay resulted in Charter violation | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Lemarchant<br> [2009] OJ No 4297 (S.C.J.) {{NOCANLII}}|| | |R v Lemarchant<br> [2009] OJ No 4297 (S.C.J.) {{NOCANLII}}|| | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| R v Singleton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pwh9 2006 CanLII 36500] (ON SC), [2006] OJ 4332 || 29 minute delay - not ASAP - driver failed ASD, transported to station, demand read at station 29 minutes later. Officer fails to explain the full delay. | | R v Singleton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pwh9 2006 CanLII 36500] (ON SC), [2006] OJ 4332 || 29 minute delay - not ASAP - driver failed ASD, transported to station, demand read at station 29 minutes later. Officer fails to explain the full delay. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Squires,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ctn1 2002 CanLII 44982] (ON CA), [2002] OJ No 2314 || 59 minutes after arrest -- vehicle collision, driver taken to hospital by ambulance, police delayed until patient available to speak | | ''R v Squires'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ctn1 2002 CanLII 44982] (ON CA), [2002] OJ No 2314 || 59 minutes after arrest -- vehicle collision, driver taken to hospital by ambulance, police delayed until patient available to speak | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Janssen<br> (1997) OJ 758 {{NOCANLII}}|| 93 minute delay after encountering driver - vehicle collision, ambulance takes driver to hospital, accused claims to have had a stroke. | | R v Janssen<br> (1997) OJ 758 {{NOCANLII}}|| 93 minute delay after encountering driver - vehicle collision, ambulance takes driver to hospital, accused claims to have had a stroke. | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Andersen,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqs4q 2012 SKCA 37] (CanLII) || guilty || asleep in drivers seat, engine running, doors locked | | ''R v Andersen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqs4q 2012 SKCA 37] (CanLII) || guilty || asleep in drivers seat, engine running, doors locked | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Page,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng12 2011 SKPC 152] (CanLII) || guilty|| | |''R v Page'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fng12 2011 SKPC 152] (CanLII) || guilty|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Zmurchyk,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2d8kw 2010 ABPC 359] (CanLII) || guilty || review of case law | | ''R v Zmurchyk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2d8kw 2010 ABPC 359] (CanLII) || guilty || review of case law | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Yakobchuk<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lhc5 2005 ABPC 189] (CanLII) || not guilty || | | R v Yakobchuk<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lhc5 2005 ABPC 189] (CanLII) || not guilty || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Brahniuk,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5hqg 2002 SKCA 104] (CanLII) || guilty || turned on truck, locked door and passed out across the front seats. Risk of putting in motion. | | ''R v Brahniuk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5hqg 2002 SKCA 104] (CanLII) || guilty || turned on truck, locked door and passed out across the front seats. Risk of putting in motion. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Sherbrook, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nv0q 1998 CanLII 13896] (SK QB), [1998] S.J. No. 88 (Sask.Q.B.) || not guilty || | | ''R v Sherbrook'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1nv0q 1998 CanLII 13896] (SK QB), [1998] S.J. No. 88 (Sask.Q.B.) || not guilty || | ||
|} | |} | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 13 January 2019