Warrantless Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([^\s]+)\s([0-9]{4} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)[\s]*\|" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}|"
Line 11: Line 11:
||N||Y||N||
||N||Y||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Brown'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnmv1 2011 ONSC 6250] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Brown|fnmv1|2011 ONSC 6250 (CanLII)}}|| -||N||N|| vehicle pulled over after chase; alleged detained by police pursuit
|| -||N||N|| vehicle pulled over after chase; alleged detained by police pursuit
|-
|-
| ''R v Ryan'',<br>2010 NJ No. 173|| N || Y || Y || breath test
| ''R v Ryan'',<br>2010 NJ No. 173|| N || Y || Y || breath test
|-
|-
|''R v GC'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27xmm 2010 NSPC 10] (CanLII)|| N|| N||N || while executing search warrant, pat-down search of accused for weapons; finds drugs
|{{CanLIIR-S|GC|27xmm|2010 NSPC 10 (CanLII)}}|| N|| N||N || while executing search warrant, pat-down search of accused for weapons; finds drugs
|-
|-
|''R v Cunsolo'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26ghq 2009 CanLII 60775] (ON S.C.) ||N||Y||N|| premature arrest of fraudster
|''R v Cunsolo'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26ghq 2009 CanLII 60775] (ON S.C.) ||N||Y||N|| premature arrest of fraudster
|-
|-
|''R v NO'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/22ms4 2009 ABCA 75] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|NO|22ms4|2009 ABCA 75 (CanLII)}}||N||Y||Y|| police observe hand-to-hand, search accused, find drugs
||N||Y||Y|| police observe hand-to-hand, search accused, find drugs
|-
|-
|''R v Nguyen'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2202p 2008 SKCA 160] (CanLII) || Y||Y || Y || accused was stopped for speeding, then detained for criminal investigation on basis of nervousness and being in a rental.   
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen|2202p|2008 SKCA 160 (CanLII)}}|| Y||Y || Y || accused was stopped for speeding, then detained for criminal investigation on basis of nervousness and being in a rental.   
|-
|-
|''R v Harada'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21597 2008 BCSC 1346] (CanLII) ||N||N||N|| pull over car; patdown search of driver
|{{CanLIIR-S|Harada|21597|2008 BCSC 1346 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| pull over car; patdown search of driver
|-
|-
|''R v Nesbeth'',<br> [2008] O.J. No. 3086 (C.A.) || - ||Y||Y||
|''R v Nesbeth'',<br> [2008] O.J. No. 3086 (C.A.) || - ||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Peters'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1rlst 2007 ABCA 181] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Peters|1rlst|2007 ABCA 181 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| police see accused matching description of person with gun; searched backpack twice, found gun
||N||N||N|| police see accused matching description of person with gun; searched backpack twice, found gun
|-
|-
|''R v Chambers'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1txkj 2007 ABQB 712] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Chambers|1txkj|2007 ABQB 712 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| after seeing signs of drug transaction, accused is strip searched, and searched vehicle  
||N||N||N|| after seeing signs of drug transaction, accused is strip searched, and searched vehicle  
|-
|-
|''R v SY'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1pwm8 2006 ONCJ 403] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| person standing near car registered to person with warrant; several minor reasons for pull-over
|{{CanLIIR-S|SY|1pwm8|2006 ONCJ 403 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| person standing near car registered to person with warrant; several minor reasons for pull-over
|-
|-
|''R v Ngo'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1l3f4 2005 ONCJ 217] (CanLII) || || || ||arbitrary detention
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ngo|1l3f4|2005 ONCJ 217 (CanLII)}}|| || || ||arbitrary detention
|-
|-
|''R v BADG'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/1m0bb 2005 BCPC 504] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| police get report of B&E suspects, see accused shortly after; patdown search reveals knife
|{{CanLIIR-S|BADG|1m0bb|2005 BCPC 504 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| police get report of B&E suspects, see accused shortly after; patdown search reveals knife
|-
|-
|''R v Sepulveda'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1l13l 2005 BCPC 236] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| pat-down search of woman known to police; accused spit on officer
|{{CanLIIR-S|Sepulveda|1l13l|2005 BCPC 236 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| pat-down search of woman known to police; accused spit on officer
|-
|-
|''R v KW'',<br>2004 O.J. No.5327 (OCJ)  
|''R v KW'',<br>2004 O.J. No.5327 (OCJ)  
|| || Y || || police officers had no grounds to suspect that the accused was connected to any criminal activity; he “must be doing something” because of the very general surrounding circumstances.
|| || Y || || police officers had no grounds to suspect that the accused was connected to any criminal activity; he “must be doing something” because of the very general surrounding circumstances.
|-
|-
|''R v Power'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/56v9 2003 SKQB 334] (CanLII)  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}|| || || ||
|| || || ||
|-
|-
|''R v Burke'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npm7 1997 CanLII 10867] (NL C.A.)
|''R v Burke'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npm7 1997 CanLII 10867] (NL C.A.)
Line 60: Line 55:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Payette'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2cfrw 2010 BCCA 392] (CanLII) ||Y|| || Y|| vehicle stop, use of drug dog, found marijuana. Officer observed newer vehicle owned by third party, unshaven, wearing hoodie, radar detector and messy floor.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Payette|2cfrw|2010 BCCA 392 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| vehicle stop, use of drug dog, found marijuana. Officer observed newer vehicle owned by third party, unshaven, wearing hoodie, radar detector and messy floor.
|-
|-
| ''R v Vulic'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frn9r 2012 SKQB 221] (CanLII)|| - || Y || Y || drugs excluded
| {{CanLIIR-S|Vulic|frn9r|2012 SKQB 221 (CanLII)}}|| - || Y || Y || drugs excluded
|-
|-
| ''R v McCammon'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frj67 2012 MBQB 154] (CanLII)|| - ||Y || Y || evidence excluded
| {{CanLIIR-S|McCammon|frj67|2012 MBQB 154 (CanLII)}}|| - ||Y || Y || evidence excluded
|-
|-
| ''R v Blazevic'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27c82 2010 ONSC 137] (CanLII), [2010] OJ. No 67 || Y || ? || Y || Officers investigating impaired driving by pulling accused over. They find out he is violating conditions and arrest him. They search his car and find 1.46 lb of marijuana. Drugs are excluded.
| ''R v Blazevic'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27c82 2010 ONSC 137] (CanLII), [2010] OJ. No 67 || Y || ? || Y || Officers investigating impaired driving by pulling accused over. They find out he is violating conditions and arrest him. They search his car and find 1.46 lb of marijuana. Drugs are excluded.
Line 78: Line 73:
|''R v Rose'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdv2012 ONSC 350] (CanLII)|| ?||Y||Y|| arrested accused based on finding marijuana on co-accused.
|''R v Rose'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdv2012 ONSC 350] (CanLII)|| ?||Y||Y|| arrested accused based on finding marijuana on co-accused.
|-
|-
| ''R v Osolky'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/25sqz 2009 ONCJ 445] (CanLII) || Y || N || Y || patdown search; evidence excluded
| {{CanLIIR-S|Osolky|25sqz|2009 ONCJ 445 (CanLII)}}|| Y || N || Y || patdown search; evidence excluded
|-
|-
|R v F. (C.J.),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wkt1 2008 SKPC 51] (CanLII)|| N||N||N||officer responds to mischief complaint; sees youths; accused run away; searches him and finds weapon;
|R v F. (C.J.),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wkt1 2008 SKPC 51] (CanLII)|| N||N||N||officer responds to mischief complaint; sees youths; accused run away; searches him and finds weapon;
Line 93: Line 88:
|''R v Sandhu'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/264g3 2009 CanLII 55322] (ON SC)|| Y|| ?|| Y|| 205 kg of cocaine || Warrantless seizure from a truck was "egregious"
|''R v Sandhu'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/264g3 2009 CanLII 55322] (ON SC)|| Y|| ?|| Y|| 205 kg of cocaine || Warrantless seizure from a truck was "egregious"
|-
|-
|''R v Turpin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr8tt 2012 SKCA 50] (CanLII)||Y||Y||Y|| drugs||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Turpin|fr8tt|2012 SKCA 50 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y||Y|| drugs||
|-
|-
|''R v Forster'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/261jz 2009 ABPC 278] (CanLII)|| Y||-||Y|| drugs|| search of vehicle incident to arrest was improper. The officer cannot have reasonably expected to find evidence in vehicle from an offence 6 months prior.(para 18-19). Excluded under s. 24(2), police were careless.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Forster|261jz|2009 ABPC 278 (CanLII)}}|| Y||-||Y|| drugs|| search of vehicle incident to arrest was improper. The officer cannot have reasonably expected to find evidence in vehicle from an offence 6 months prior.(para 18-19). Excluded under s. 24(2), police were careless.
|-
|-
|''R v Anderson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnrvr 2011 ABPC 326] (CanLII)  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Anderson|fnrvr|2011 ABPC 326 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||Y|| crack cocaine || drugs found in vehicle
||Y||N||Y|| crack cocaine || drugs found in vehicle
|-
|-
|''R v Ruddock'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fkpsk 2011 ABPC 105] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ruddock|fkpsk|2011 ABPC 105 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||Y|| || also found breach of s.10(a) and 10(b)
||Y||N||Y|| || also found breach of s.10(a) and 10(b)
|-
|-
|''R v Savage'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flmz9 2011 SKCA 65] (CanLII) ||N||N||N|| ||use of sniffer dog;
|{{CanLIIR-S|Savage|flmz9|2011 SKCA 65 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| ||use of sniffer dog;
|-
|-
|''R v Chubak'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2224h 2009 ABCA 8] (CanLII)|| N|| - || - || drugs ||Officers respond to report of stabbing/beating—see vehicle with D inside with bear spray- D searched and find knife on him; police search car for more weapons; police find weapons, drugs, and ringing cell phone; trial judge says police can’t search for drugs; appeal court says they can; search for multiple reasons is valid as long as objectively justified (para 18)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Chubak|2224h|2009 ABCA 8 (CanLII)}}|| N|| - || - || drugs ||Officers respond to report of stabbing/beating—see vehicle with D inside with bear spray- D searched and find knife on him; police search car for more weapons; police find weapons, drugs, and ringing cell phone; trial judge says police can’t search for drugs; appeal court says they can; search for multiple reasons is valid as long as objectively justified (para 18)
|-
|-
|''R v Arabi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sz83 2007 ABQB 303] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Arabi|1sz83|2007 ABQB 303 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y||Y||  ||search of person and vehicle after seeing possible drug transaction
||Y||Y||Y||  ||search of person and vehicle after seeing possible drug transaction
|-
|-
| ''R v Dykhuizen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sbml 2007 ABQB 489] (CanLII) || Y || - || ? ||  ||mistaken ID of accused for a kidnapping suspect; found licence was expired; searched
| {{CanLIIR-S|Dykhuizen|1sbml|2007 ABQB 489 (CanLII)}}|| Y || - || ? ||  ||mistaken ID of accused for a kidnapping suspect; found licence was expired; searched
|-
|-
|''R v Calder'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1pss5 2006 ABCA 307] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Calder|1pss5|2006 ABCA 307 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y||Y|| gun ||sees possible drug transaction; searches backpack, finds gun
||Y||Y||Y|| gun ||sees possible drug transaction; searches backpack, finds gun
|-
|-
| ''R v TTH'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q28c 2006 ABPC 320] (CanLII) || Y || - || N ||  ||search vehicle based on unsafe driving and suspicious comments from driver
| {{CanLIIR-S|TTH|1q28c|2006 ABPC 320 (CanLII)}}|| Y || - || N ||  ||search vehicle based on unsafe driving and suspicious comments from driver
|-
|-
|''R v Batzer'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lm3g 2005 CanLII 33026] (ON C.A.) ||Y||N||Y||  ||search of glovebox of car after detaining accused on rough description
|''R v Batzer'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lm3g 2005 CanLII 33026] (ON C.A.) ||Y||N||Y||  ||search of glovebox of car after detaining accused on rough description
Line 132: Line 123:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Fierro'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpn4t 2012 ABPC 1] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| detailed review of law
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fierro|fpn4t|2012 ABPC 1 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| detailed review of law
|-
|-
|''R v Grunwald'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b29n 2010 BCCA 288] (CanLII) ||N||N||N||  traffic check set-up; stops accused's vehicle, smells marijuana, sees large bags in back of truck; no expectation of privacy
|''R v Grunwald'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b29n 2010 BCCA 288] (CanLII) ||N||N||N||  traffic check set-up; stops accused's vehicle, smells marijuana, sees large bags in back of truck; no expectation of privacy
|-
|-
| ''R v Harding'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/2b3lw 2010 ABCA 180] (CanLII) || N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car,  two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Harding|2b3lw|2010 ABCA 180 (CanLII)}}|| N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car,  two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b)
|-
|-
| ''R v Pearson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/245g7 2009 ABQB 382] (CanLII)||Y||-||N|| breach found but evidence admitted
| {{CanLIIR-S|Pearson|245g7|2009 ABQB 382 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N|| breach found but evidence admitted
|-
|-
|''R v McKenzie'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26d54 2009 SKQB 415] (CanLII) || Y|| ? || Y|| use of sniffer dog search unconstitutional
|{{CanLIIR-S|McKenzie|26d54|2009 SKQB 415 (CanLII)}}|| Y|| ? || Y|| use of sniffer dog search unconstitutional
|-
|-
| ''R v Hood'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/20ph8 2008 BCPC 217] (CanLII) ||Y||?||Y||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hood|20ph8|2008 BCPC 217 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Rosa'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/21svv 2008 ABQB 723] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Rosa|21svv|2008 ABQB 723 (CanLII)}}|| || || ||
|| || || ||
|-
|-
|''R v Webster'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/21ls8 2008 BCCA 458] (CanLII) ||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Webster|21ls8|2008 BCCA 458 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Favorite'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wb3h 2008 CanLII 13364] ||N||N||N||
|''R v Favorite'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wb3h 2008 CanLII 13364] ||N||N||N||
Line 153: Line 143:
|''R v Charles'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t13k 2007 CanLII 39760] (ON SC) ||Y||?||Y||
|''R v Charles'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t13k 2007 CanLII 39760] (ON SC) ||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Huynh'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1m3cb 2005 ABPC 238] (CanLII) ||N ||-||-|| no s.8 breach found
|{{CanLIIR-S|Huynh|1m3cb|2005 ABPC 238 (CanLII)}}||N ||-||-|| no s.8 breach found
|-
|-
|''R v Calderon'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hpvs 2004 CanLII 7569] ||Y||Y||Y||
|''R v Calderon'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hpvs 2004 CanLII 7569] ||Y||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Ladouceur'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1p 2002 SKCA 73] (CanLII) ||?||Y||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ladouceur|5k1p|2002 SKCA 73 (CanLII)}}||?||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Sewell'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/57ss 2003 SKCA 52] (CanLII) ||N ||-||-||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Sewell|57ss|2003 SKCA 52 (CanLII)}}||N ||-||-||  
|-
|-
|''R v Power'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/56v9 2003 SKQB 334] (CanLII)||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|R v Yan & Chan,<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/5dj9 2002 BCPC 574] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y|| pull over on basis of broad search for cat burglar; smells marijuana from car ; breach of s. 8 found -- evidence excluded
|R v Yan & Chan,<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/5dj9 2002 BCPC 574] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y|| pull over on basis of broad search for cat burglar; smells marijuana from car ; breach of s. 8 found -- evidence excluded
|-
|-
|''R v Duong'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4z0q 2002 BCCA 43] (CanLII)|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
|-
|-
|''R v Zagar'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5rc4 1998 ABPC 59] (CanLII)
|''R v Zagar'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5rc4 1998 ABPC 59] (CanLII)
Line 187: Line 177:
|''R v Franko'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fr8f7 2012 ABQB 282] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
|''R v Franko'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fr8f7 2012 ABQB 282] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
|-
|-
|''R v Perpeluk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frdgx 2012 SKQB 189] (CanLII) ||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Perpeluk|frdgx|2012 SKQB 189 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips  
|-
|-
|''R v Quach'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqhdh 2012 ABPC 57] (CanLII)||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer   
|{{CanLIIR-S|Quach|fqhdh|2012 ABPC 57 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer   
|-
|-
|''R v Soto'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf39 2011 ONCA 828] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| informer reports dealing out of a house; police corroborate with observations of house
|''R v Soto'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf39 2011 ONCA 828] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| informer reports dealing out of a house; police corroborate with observations of house
Line 198: Line 188:
|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable
|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable
|-
|-
|''R v Jir'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2d71m 2010 BCCA 497] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Jir|2d71m|2010 BCCA 497 (CanLII)}}|| Y||N||N||
|| Y||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Safi'',  <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29m7q 2010 ABCA 151] (CanLII)
|''R v Safi'',  <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29m7q 2010 ABCA 151] (CanLII)
Line 213: Line 202:
||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded.
||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded.
|-
|-
|''R v Tetreault'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1tnfs 2007 BCSC 1624] (CanLII)|| N ||-||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Tetreault|1tnfs|2007 BCSC 1624 (CanLII)}}|| N ||-||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Wing'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/1wvg6 2007 BCSC 1959] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Wing|1wvg6|2007 BCSC 1959 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||N||  
||Y||?||N||  
|-
|-
|''R v McCallum'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1nw48 2006 SKQB 287] (CanLII)
|''R v McCallum'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1nw48 2006 SKQB 287] (CanLII)
Line 223: Line 211:
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N||
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Layton'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/20pj5 2006 BCPC 655] (CanLII) ||N||?||?||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Layton|20pj5|2006 BCPC 655 (CanLII)}}||N||?||?||
|-
|-
|''R v Murphy'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n2l1 2006 CanLII 12417] (ON CA)
|''R v Murphy'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n2l1 2006 CanLII 12417] (ON CA)
|| N ||N ||N||confidential informer gave sufficient details to form grounds of arrest
|| N ||N ||N||confidential informer gave sufficient details to form grounds of arrest
|-
|-
|''R v Bracchi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lr2q 2005 BCCA 461] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Bracchi|1lr2q|2005 BCCA 461 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Campbell'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/55zz 2003 MBCA 76] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Campbell|55zz|2003 MBCA 76 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N||
||Y||-||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Myers'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6m2q 2003 CanLII 36859] (ON SC)
|''R v Myers'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6m2q 2003 CanLII 36859] (ON SC)
||Y||N||N||
||Y||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Ungaro'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5b7w 2003 BCPC 137] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ungaro|5b7w|2003 BCPC 137 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||Y||
||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Philpott'',<br> [2002] O.J. No. 4872  
|''R v Philpott'',<br> [2002] O.J. No. 4872  
Line 246: Line 231:
|| Y||-||Y|| warrant to search apartment
|| Y||-||Y|| warrant to search apartment
|-
|-
|''R v Warford'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4vd7 2001 NFCA 64] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Warford|4vd7|2001 NFCA 64 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Lewis'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/4q25 1998 CanLII 7116] (ON CA)
|''R v Lewis'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/4q25 1998 CanLII 7116] (ON CA)
Line 276: Line 260:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Schira'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fncbn 2011 SKPC 140] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Schira|fncbn|2011 SKPC 140 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||Y|| breach of s.10(b) as well; contents of blackberry messages excluded
||Y||N||Y|| breach of s.10(b) as well; contents of blackberry messages excluded
|-
|-
| ''R v Ward'',<Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/275mm 2010 BCCA 1] (CanLII)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ward|275mm|2010 BCCA 1 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||N|| search incident to arrest -- found crack
|| Y||?||N|| search incident to arrest -- found crack
|-
|-
| ''R v Tosczak'',<Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/27skz 2010 SKCA 10] (CanLII)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Tosczak|27skz|2010 SKCA 10 (CanLII)}}||N||?||N|| pat-down search incident to arrest for possession of marijuana
||N||?||N|| pat-down search incident to arrest for possession of marijuana
|-
|-
| ''R v Goodwin'',<Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/270hm 2009 ABQB 710] (CanLII)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Goodwin|270hm|2009 ABQB 710 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||?||  arrest invalid
||Y||?||?||  arrest invalid
|-
|-
| ''R v Chubak'',<Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2224h 2009 ABCA 8] (CanLII)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Chubak|2224h|2009 ABCA 8 (CanLII)}}||?||?||?||
||?||?||?||
|-
|-
| ''R v Lamour'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1rbqt 2007 CanLII 15242] (ON S.C.)
| ''R v Lamour'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1rbqt 2007 CanLII 15242] (ON S.C.)
Line 308: Line 287:
|R v Latham and Ryan,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqt8b 2012 BCPC 78] (CanLII)|| Y|| -|| Y|| warrantless search of basement apartment
|R v Latham and Ryan,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqt8b 2012 BCPC 78] (CanLII)|| Y|| -|| Y|| warrantless search of basement apartment
|-
|-
|''R v Helary'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpql0 2012 SKPC 15] (CanLII)|| Y||?||Y||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y||  
|-
|-
|''R v Laliberte'', <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpg3p 2011 SKPC 190] (CanLII)|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
|''R v Laliberte'', <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpg3p 2011 SKPC 190] (CanLII)|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
Line 314: Line 293:
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
|-
|-
|''R v Stevens'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphjm 2011 ONCJ 794] (CanLII) || Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
|-
|-
|''R v Thompson'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29sdv 2010 ONSC 2862] (CanLII) ||Y||-||N|| search of home found drugs  
|''R v Thompson'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29sdv 2010 ONSC 2862] (CanLII) ||Y||-||N|| search of home found drugs  
|-
|-
| ''R v Watson'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27q30 2010 ONSC 448] (CanLII) ||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watson|27q30|2010 ONSC 448 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 331: Line 310:
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
|-
|-
| ''R v Groves'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7j4 2011 ONCJ 350] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Dorey'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnvbd 2011 NSPC 85] (CanLII)||
| ''R v Dorey'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnvbd 2011 NSPC 85] (CanLII)||
Line 341: Line 320:
| ''R v Fearon'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f869 2010 ONCJ 645] (CanLII)||
| ''R v Fearon'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f869 2010 ONCJ 645] (CanLII)||
|-
|-
| ''R v Zahrebelny'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2ftfr 2010 NSPC 91] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Finnikin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29jjs 2009 CanLII 82187] (ON SC)||
| ''R v Finnikin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29jjs 2009 CanLII 82187] (ON SC)||
Line 352: Line 331:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Bacon'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs5sn 2012 BCCA 323] (CanLII) || warrantless tracker violated s.8 but saved under 24(2)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Bacon|fs5sn|2012 BCCA 323 (CanLII)}}|| warrantless tracker violated s.8 but saved under 24(2)
|}
|}


Line 360: Line 339:
! Case Name!! Summary
! Case Name!! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Stevens'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr96q 2012 ONCA 307] (CanLII) || Throwing a firearm out the window into a neighbour's yard is a form of abandonment
| {{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fr96q|2012 ONCA 307 (CanLII)}}|| Throwing a firearm out the window into a neighbour's yard is a form of abandonment
|}
|}
[[Category:Search and Seizure Case Digests]]
[[Category:Search and Seizure Case Digests]]
[[Category:Warrantless Searches]]
[[Category:Warrantless Searches]]
-->
-->

Revision as of 15:41, 28 February 2021

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Warrantless_Searches_(Cases)&oldid=62860"