Procedure in a LTO/DO Designation Hearing: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "'''([A-Z][a-z]+)'''<br>" to "; $1"
m Text replacement - "'''([a-zA-Z]+ [a-zA-Z]+)'''<br>" to "; $1"
Line 49: Line 49:
==Evidence in Hearing==
==Evidence in Hearing==


'''Expert Evidence'''<br>
; Expert Evidence
Before any findings can be made under s. 753(1)(a)(i) or (ii), the Court must consider and weigh expert opinion evidence relating to risk of re-offence along with all other evidence adduced.<ref>
Before any findings can be made under s. 753(1)(a)(i) or (ii), the Court must consider and weigh expert opinion evidence relating to risk of re-offence along with all other evidence adduced.<ref>
''R v Montgrand'', [http://canlii.ca/t/h4j1t 2017 SKCA 49] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}}{{at|15}}
''R v Montgrand'', [http://canlii.ca/t/h4j1t 2017 SKCA 49] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}}{{at|15}}
</ref>
</ref>


'''Victim Evidence'''<br>
; Victim Evidence
{{quotation|
{{quotation|
'''Victim evidence'''<br>
; Victim evidence
753.02 Any evidence given during the hearing of an application made under subsection 753(1) by a victim of an offence for which the offender was convicted is deemed also to have been given during any hearing held with respect to the offender under paragraph 753(5)(a) or subsection 753.01(5) or (6).
753.02 Any evidence given during the hearing of an application made under subsection 753(1) by a victim of an offence for which the offender was convicted is deemed also to have been given during any hearing held with respect to the offender under paragraph 753(5)(a) or subsection 753.01(5) or (6).
{{LegHistory|2008, c. 6, s. 43.}}
{{LegHistory|2008, c. 6, s. 43.}}
Line 72: Line 72:
</ref>
</ref>


'''Character Evidence'''<br>
; Character Evidence
{{quotation|
{{quotation|
'''Evidence of character'''<br>
'''Evidence of character'''<br>

Revision as of 17:35, 20 January 2019

General Principles

A dangerous offender designation is available under s. 753 while a long term offender designation is available under s. 753.1.

Jurisdiction

A judge of a provincial court or a superior court judge may issue a LTO or DO order.[1]

  1. See s. 752 defining "court" as a "court by which an offender in relation to whom an application under this Part is made was convicted, or a superior court of criminal jurisdiction;"

Hearing

Timing of DO Application

753
...
Time for making application
(2) An application under subsection (1) must be made before sentence is imposed on the offender unless

(a) before the imposition of sentence, the prosecutor gives notice to the offender of a possible intention to make an application under section 752.1 and an application under subsection (1) not later than six months after that imposition; and
(b) at the time of the application under subsection (1) that is not later than six months after the imposition of sentence, it is shown that relevant evidence that was not reasonably available to the prosecutor at the time of the imposition of sentence became available in the interim.


...

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 753; 1997, c. 17, s. 4; 2008, c. 6, s. 42.


CCC

Application

Hearing of application
754 (1) With the exception of an application for remand for assessment, the court may not hear an application made under this Part unless

(a) the Attorney General of the province in which the offender was tried has, either before or after the making of the application, consented to the application;
(b) at least seven days notice has been given to the offender by the prosecutor, following the making of the application, outlining the basis on which it is intended to found the application; and
(c) a copy of the notice has been filed with the clerk of the court or the provincial court judge, as the case may be.

By court alone
(2) An application under this Part shall be heard and determined by the court without a jury.
When proof unnecessary
(3) For the purposes of an application under this Part, where an offender admits any allegations contained in the notice referred to in paragraph (1)(b), no proof of those allegations is required.
Proof of consent
(4) The production of a document purporting to contain any nomination or consent that may be made or given by the Attorney General under this Part and purporting to be signed by the Attorney General is, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, proof of that nomination or consent without proof of the signature or the official character of the person appearing to have signed the document.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 754; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203; 2008, c. 6, s. 48.


CCC

Evidence in Hearing

Expert Evidence

Before any findings can be made under s. 753(1)(a)(i) or (ii), the Court must consider and weigh expert opinion evidence relating to risk of re-offence along with all other evidence adduced.[1]

Victim Evidence
Victim evidence

753.02 Any evidence given during the hearing of an application made under subsection 753(1) by a victim of an offence for which the offender was convicted is deemed also to have been given during any hearing held with respect to the offender under paragraph 753(5)(a) or subsection 753.01(5) or (6). 2008, c. 6, s. 43.


CCC

Proof of Criminal Records
The crown may rely on court records to prove the circumstances surrounding the prior offences as long as they are from a "reliable and trustworthy" source.[2]

Use of evidence excluded at trial
Evidence that was excluded under section 24(2) of the charter due to a constitutional violation cannot then be used at a subsequent dangerous offender hearing.[3]

Character Evidence

Evidence of character
757 Without prejudice to the right of the offender to tender evidence as to their character and repute, if the court thinks fit, evidence of character and repute may be admitted

(a) on the question of whether the offender is or is not a dangerous offender or a long-term offender; and
(b) in connection with a sentence to be imposed or an order to be made under this Part.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 757; 1997, c. 17, s. 5; 2008, c. 6, s. 50.


CCC

  1. R v Montgrand, 2017 SKCA 49 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA, at para 15
  2. R v Ziegler, 2012 BCCA 353 (CanLII), per Neilson JA at para 73
  3. R v Ricciardi, 2018 ONSC 445 (CanLII), per Di Luca J

Presence of the Accused at the Hearing

Presence of accused at hearing of application
758 (1) The offender shall be present at the hearing of the application under this Part and if at the time the application is to be heard

(a) he is confined in a prison, the court may order, in writing, the person having the custody of the accused to bring him before the court; or
(b) he is not confined in a prison, the court shall issue a summons or a warrant to compel the accused to attend before the court and the provisions of Part XVI relating to summons and warrant are applicable with such modifications as the circumstances require.
Exception

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the court may

(a) cause the offender to be removed and to be kept out of court, where he misconducts himself by interrupting the proceedings so that to continue the proceedings in his presence would not be feasible; or
(b) permit the offender to be out of court during the whole or any part of the hearing on such conditions as the court considers proper.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 693; 1976-77, c. 53, s. 14.


CCC