Principles and Factors of Sentencing Cases: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "'''([A-Z][a-z]+)'''<br>" to "; $1" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([^\s]+)\s([0-9]{4} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)[\s]*\|" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}|" |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Maroti|29v39|2010 MBCA 54 (CanLII)}}|| 7 robberies in 10 days | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Roberts|1jk8b|2005 ABCA 11 (CanLII)}}|| flight in a motor vehicle | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Maroti|29v39|2010 MBCA 54 (CanLII)}}|| 7 robberies in 10 days | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Oshanski|1j11c|2004 ABPC 187 (CanLII)}}|| CSO terminated; procedure considered | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Dragusica<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bdt4 2010 BCSC 936] (CanLII) || Procedure for evidence considered | | R v Dragusica<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bdt4 2010 BCSC 936] (CanLII) || Procedure for evidence considered | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Maroti|29v39|2010 MBCA 54 (CanLII)}}|| 7 robberies in 10 days | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Castro|2d38x|2010 ONCA 718 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Factors== | ==Factors== | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Maroti|29v39|2010 MBCA 54 (CanLII)}}|| 7 robberies in 10 days | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Downes'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mkm6 2006 CanLII 3957] (ON C.A.)|| | |''R v Downes'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mkm6 2006 CanLII 3957] (ON C.A.)|| | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Maroti|29v39|2010 MBCA 54 (CanLII)}}|| 7 robberies in 10 days | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Gartner'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frp89 2012 ABPC 165] (CanLII) || granted | |''R v Gartner'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frp89 2012 ABPC 165] (CanLII) || granted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Jeerh|1k6hx|2005 ABPC 76 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v McLean'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1h82t 2002 CanLII 41314] (MBPC)|| | | ''R v McLean'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1h82t 2002 CanLII 41314] (MBPC)|| | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| R v Kalyniak <Br>[1996] AJ No 370 || | | R v Kalyniak <Br>[1996] AJ No 370 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Ahenakew|1l760|2005 SKCA 93 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Elendiuk'', <Br>[1986] AJ No 132 , 27 CCC (3d) 94 (Alta. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/2djv4 1986 ABCA 52] (CanLII)|| | | ''R v Elendiuk'', <Br>[1986] AJ No 132 , 27 CCC (3d) 94 (Alta. C.A.) [http://canlii.ca/t/2djv4 1986 ABCA 52] (CanLII)|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
--> | --> |