Objections Cheatsheet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{HeaderForms}} | {{HeaderForms}} | ||
==Generally== | ==Generally== | ||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
* {{Box}} Irrelevance | * {{Box}} Irrelevance | ||
* {{Box}} Compound Question | * {{Box}} Compound Question | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
* {{Box}} Vague/Misleading question | * {{Box}} Vague/Misleading question | ||
* {{Box}} Contradicting Collateral Facts (see [[Collateral Fact Rule]] | * {{Box}} Contradicting Collateral Facts (see [[Collateral Fact Rule]] | ||
|} | |||
==On Direct Examination Only== | ==On Direct Examination Only== | ||
Revision as of 10:21, 13 February 2019
Generally
- ☐ Irrelevance
- ☐ Compound Question
- ☐ No foundation/Assumes facts not proven
- ☐ Misquoting prior evidence/statement
- ☐ Hearsay
- ☐ Asked and answered
- ☐ Badgering, harassing witness
- ☐ arguing with witness
- ☐ Asking witness for inadmissible opinion
- ☐ Character not in issue
- ☐ Monologuing/Editorizating
- ☐ Privilege (Solicitor-Client; Informer; Litigation)
- ☐ Vague/Misleading question
- ☐ Contradicting Collateral Facts (see Collateral Fact Rule
On Direct Examination Only
- ☐ Leading Question
On Sexual Assault Cases
- Prior Sexual History
- ☐ Sexual contact with anyone, except contact at issue in trial
- Sexual Assault Myths
- Failure of the complainant to "fight back"
- Failure of the complainant to "scream" or "call for help"
- Failure of the complainant to report the assault in a timely manner
On Calling Counter-Evidence
- Failure to confront opposing witness with counter-story (Rule in Browne v Dunn)