Seizure of Property: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
* [[Access to Things Detained Under Section 490]]
* [[Access to Things Detained Under Section 490]]
* Disposal of Things Detained Under Section 490
* Disposal of Things Detained Under Section 490
** [[Forfeiture of Things Detained Under Section 490]
** [[Forfeiture of Things Detained Under Section 490]]
** [[Return of Things Seized to Lawful Owners]]
** [[Return of Things Seized to Lawful Owners]]



Revision as of 09:33, 4 March 2018

Introduction

Property can be seized and then detain by police under the Code in several ways.

Detention can occur as:

For any warrantless seizure of property, the burden is upon the Crown to prove that it did not violate s. 8 of the Charter. To put the burden on the accused "ignores the reality that the Crown is in the best position to know how and why the seizure took place"[1]

Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule".[2]

  1. R v Hass, 2005 CanLII 26440 (ON CA) at para 37
  2. R v Pham, 1999 BCCA 571 (CanLII)

Topics

General Seizure Powers

Detention, Access, Disposal of Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11

Other Seizure and Detention Powers

See Also