Charter Delay (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\| ([0-9]*) months \|" to "| {{JailM|$1}} |" |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Xiu Jin Teng'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gx4nj 2017 ONSC 568] (CanLII){{perONSC|MacDonnell J}}| murder | | denied | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Xiu Jin Teng'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gx4nj 2017 ONSC 568] (CanLII){{perONSC|MacDonnell J}}| murder | | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Dass'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gtqsr 2016 BCSC 1701] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Johnston J}} | theft and fraud | 33 | {{DelayCase|''R v Dass'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gtqsr 2016 BCSC 1701] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Johnston J}} | theft and fraud | {{JailM|33}} | granted | Total time was 39 before subtracting defence time. }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v JM'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gx04f 2017 ONCJ 4] (CanLII){{perONCJ| Paciocco J}} | sexual offences | 12 months and 12 days | granted | The accused was a youth. }} | {{DelayCase|''R v JM'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gx04f 2017 ONCJ 4] (CanLII){{perONCJ| Paciocco J}} | sexual offences | 12 months and 12 days | granted | The accused was a youth. }} | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
{{DelayCaseHeader}} | {{DelayCaseHeader}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Belle'',<br> 2018 ONSC 7728 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Harris J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Belle'',<br> 2018 ONSC 7728 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Harris J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v RT'',<br> 2018 NLSC 44 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Murphy J}} | | 26+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v RT'',<br> 2018 NLSC 44 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Murphy J}} | | 26+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Cola'',<br> 2018 QCCS 334 (CanLII) {{perQCCS|Royer J}} | | 17.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Cola'',<br> 2018 QCCS 334 (CanLII) {{perQCCS|Royer J}} | | 17.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Buckley'',<br> 2018 NSSC 3 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Arnold J}} | | 26 | {{DelayCase|''R v Buckley'',<br> 2018 NSSC 3 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Arnold J}} | | {{JailM|26}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Lecompte'',<br> 2018 NBCA 33 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Quigg JA}} | | 16 | {{DelayCase|''R v Lecompte'',<br> 2018 NBCA 33 (CanLII) {{perONSC|Quigg JA}} | | {{JailM|16}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Carter''<Br> 2018 ABQB 657 (CanLII){{perABQB|Poelman J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Carter''<Br> 2018 ABQB 657 (CanLII){{perABQB|Poelman J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Jerace'',<br> 2018 ABCA 152 (CanLII){{perABCA| Velduis JA}} | | 15 | {{DelayCase|''R v Jerace'',<br> 2018 ABCA 152 (CanLII){{perABCA| Velduis JA}} | | {{JailM|15}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Nafke'', <br>2018 ABPC 1104 (CanLII){{perABPC| Fradsham J}} | | 16 | {{DelayCase|''R v Nafke'', <br>2018 ABPC 1104 (CanLII){{perABPC| Fradsham J}} | | {{JailM|16}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Brown'', <Br>2018 ONCJ 799 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Mulligan J}} | | 16.5 months | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Brown'', <Br>2018 ONCJ 799 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Mulligan J}} | | 16.5 months | stayed | }} | ||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Truong'', <br> 2017 BCSC 736 (CanLII){{perBCSC|Kent J}} | | 24.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Truong'', <br> 2017 BCSC 736 (CanLII){{perBCSC|Kent J}} | | 24.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Wu'', <Br>{{CanLII| | 2017 BCSC 2373}}{{perBCSC|Watchuk J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Wu'', <Br>{{CanLII| | 2017 BCSC 2373}}{{perBCSC|Watchuk J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Harris'', <Br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCSC 1091{{perBCSC|Gray J}} | | 28+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Harris'', <Br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCSC 1091{{perBCSC|Gray J}} | | 28+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Hammer'',<br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCPC 377}}{{perBCPC|Keyes J}}| | 17 | {{DelayCase|''R v Hammer'',<br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCPC 377}}{{perBCPC|Keyes J}}| | {{JailM|17}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Matheson'', <Br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCSC 166}}{{perBCSC|MacKenzie J}} | | 29 | {{DelayCase|''R v Matheson'', <Br> {{CanLII| |2017 BCSC 166}}{{perBCSC|MacKenzie J}} | | {{JailM|29}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Gambilla'', <br> 2017 ABCA 347 (CanLII){{perABCA|Watson JA}} | | 29+ months | not stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v Gambilla'', <br> 2017 ABCA 347 (CanLII){{perABCA|Watson JA}} | | 29+ months | not stayed |}} | ||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Tetrault'', <br>2017 ABQB 534{{perABQB|Renke J}} | | 19.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Tetrault'', <br>2017 ABQB 534{{perABQB|Renke J}} | | 19.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Paulishyn'', 2017 ABQB 61{{perABQB| Yamauchi J}} | | 22 | {{DelayCase|''R v Paulishyn'', 2017 ABQB 61{{perABQB| Yamauchi J}} | | {{JailM|22}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Grayson'', 2017 ABQB 108{{perABQB| Wilson J}} | | 28+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Grayson'', 2017 ABQB 108{{perABQB| Wilson J}} | | 28+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Grant, <Br>{{CanLII| | 2017 MBQB 39}}{{perMBQB|Toews J}} | | 15.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Grant, <Br>{{CanLII| | 2017 MBQB 39}}{{perMBQB|Toews J}} | | 15.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Mebrahtu'',<Br> {{CanLII| |2017 MBQB 59}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Mebrahtu'',<Br> {{CanLII| |2017 MBQB 59}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Arbique'', <br> 2017 NSPC 11 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Landry J}} | | 25+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Arbique'', <br> 2017 NSPC 11 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Landry J}} | | 25+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Testroete'', <br> 2017 NSPC 50 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 16.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Testroete'', <br> 2017 NSPC 50 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 16.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Bowers'', <br> 2017 NSPC 21 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 16 | {{DelayCase|''R v Bowers'', <br> 2017 NSPC 21 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | {{JailM|16}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Mahar'', <br> 2017 NSPC 9 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Derrick J}} | | 13 | {{DelayCase|''R v Mahar'', <br> 2017 NSPC 9 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Derrick J}} | | {{JailM|13}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Longaphy'', <br> 2017 NSPC 67 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 18 | {{DelayCase|''R v Longaphy'', <br> 2017 NSPC 67 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | {{JailM|18}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Aecon'', <br> 2017 NSPC 61 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Lenehan J}} | | 17+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Aecon'', <br> 2017 NSPC 61 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Lenehan J}} | | 17+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Melvin'', <br> 2017 NSSC 149 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Gabriel J}} | | 21 | {{DelayCase|''R v Melvin'', <br> 2017 NSSC 149 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Gabriel J}} | | {{JailM|21}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v McCully'', <br> 2017 NSPC 70 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 17.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v McCully'', <br> 2017 NSPC 70 (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} | | 17.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Creglia'',<Br> 2018 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Pringle J}} | | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Creglia'',<Br> 2018 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Pringle J}} | | {{JailM|24}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Gnanaasubramaniam'', <Br>2017 ONCJ 14 (CanLII) {{perONCJ| J}} | | 17 months+ | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Gnanaasubramaniam'', <Br>2017 ONCJ 14 (CanLII) {{perONCJ| J}} | | 17 months+ | stayed | }} | ||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Tsekouras'', <br> 2017 ONSC 7112 (CanLII){{perONSC|Smith J}} | | 25.5 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Tsekouras'', <br> 2017 ONSC 7112 (CanLII){{perONSC|Smith J}} | | 25.5 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Brissett'', <br> 2017 ONSC 402 (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} | | 27 | {{DelayCase|''R v Brissett'', <br> 2017 ONSC 402 (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} | | {{JailM|27}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Tsega'', <br> 2017 ONSC 3090 (CanLII){{perONSC|Aiken J}} | | 17 | {{DelayCase|''R v Tsega'', <br> 2017 ONSC 3090 (CanLII){{perONSC|Aiken J}} | | {{JailM|17}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Taylor'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2263 (CanLII){{perONSC|Gordon J}} | | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Taylor'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2263 (CanLII){{perONSC|Gordon J}} | | {{JailM|24}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Shum'', <br> 2017 ONSC 336 (CanLII){{perONSC|Maranger J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Shum'', <br> 2017 ONSC 336 (CanLII){{perONSC|Maranger J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Gordon'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1428 (CanLII){{perONSC|Ducharme J}} | | 17 months+ | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Gordon'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1428 (CanLII){{perONSC|Ducharme J}} | | 17 months+ | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Garcia'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4021 (CanLII){{perONSC|Mitchell J}} | | 25 | {{DelayCase|''R v Garcia'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4021 (CanLII){{perONSC|Mitchell J}} | | {{JailM|25}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Patel'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5827 (CanLII){{perONSC|Sutherland J}} | | 30 | {{DelayCase|''R v Patel'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5827 (CanLII){{perONSC|Sutherland J}} | | {{JailM|30}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Bomberry'', <br> 2017 ONSC 7147 (CanLII){{perONSC|Del Frate J}} | | 29 months+ | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Bomberry'', <br> 2017 ONSC 7147 (CanLII){{perONSC|Del Frate J}} | | 29 months+ | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v WH'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5014 (CanLII){{perONSC|Quigley J}} | | 29 | {{DelayCase|''R v WH'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5014 (CanLII){{perONSC|Quigley J}} | | {{JailM|29}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Clarke'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4880 (CanLII){{perONSC|O'Marra J}} | | 28 months+ | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Clarke'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4880 (CanLII){{perONSC|O'Marra J}} | | 28 months+ | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Mallozzi'', <br> 2017 ONCA 644 (CanLII){{perONCA|Benotto JA}} | | 23 | {{DelayCase|''R v Mallozzi'', <br> 2017 ONCA 644 (CanLII){{perONCA|Benotto JA}} | | {{JailM|23}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Belcourt'', <br> 2017 ONSC 3934 (CanLII){{perONSC|Fregeau J}} | | 27.9 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Belcourt'', <br> 2017 ONSC 3934 (CanLII){{perONSC|Fregeau J}} | | 27.9 months | not stayed | }} | ||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Barra'', <br> 2017 ONSC 6008 (CanLII){{perONSC|Labrosse J}} | | 26+ and 27 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Barra'', <br> 2017 ONSC 6008 (CanLII){{perONSC|Labrosse J}} | | 26+ and 27 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Magiri'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2818 (CanLII){{perONSC|McWatt J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Magiri'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2818 (CanLII){{perONSC|McWatt J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v RD'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1770 (CanLII){{perONSC|Molloy J}} | | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v RD'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1770 (CanLII){{perONSC|Molloy J}} | | {{JailM|28}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v MB'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2882 (CanLII){{perONSC|Allen J}} | | 27 months+ | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v MB'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2882 (CanLII){{perONSC|Allen J}} | | 27 months+ | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Green'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2628 (CanLII){{perONSC|Newton J}} | | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Green'', <br> 2017 ONSC 2628 (CanLII){{perONSC|Newton J}} | | {{JailM|24}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Green'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1538 (CanLII){{perONSC|Beaudoin J}} | | 21 | {{DelayCase|''R v Green'', <br> 2017 ONSC 1538 (CanLII){{perONSC|Beaudoin J}} | | {{JailM|21}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Codina'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4886 (CanLII){{perONSC|Akhtar J}} | | 25 | {{DelayCase|''R v Codina'', <br> 2017 ONSC 4886 (CanLII){{perONSC|Akhtar J}} | | {{JailM|25}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Corner'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5629 (CanLII){{perONSC|McKelvey J}} | | 25 | {{DelayCase|''R v Corner'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5629 (CanLII){{perONSC|McKelvey J}} | | {{JailM|25}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Dabreo'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5425 (CanLII){{perONSC|Seppi J}} | | 29+ months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Dabreo'', <br> 2017 ONSC 5425 (CanLII){{perONSC|Seppi J}} | | 29+ months | not stayed | }} | ||
Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Fox'',<Br> {{CanLII| | 2016 BCSC 2496}}{{perBCSC| Kelleher J}} | | ? | not stayed | }}} | {{DelayCase|''R v Fox'',<Br> {{CanLII| | 2016 BCSC 2496}}{{perBCSC| Kelleher J}} | | ? | not stayed | }}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Dutra'', <Br> {{CanLII||2016 BCPC 448}}{{perBCPC|Rounthwaite J}} | | 16 | {{DelayCase|''R v Dutra'', <Br> {{CanLII||2016 BCPC 448}}{{perBCPC|Rounthwaite J}} | | {{JailM|16}} | not stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v RL'', <br> 2016 ONSC 8008 (CanLII){{perONSC|Glithero J}} | | 26 | {{DelayCase|''R v RL'', <br> 2016 ONSC 8008 (CanLII){{perONSC|Glithero J}} | | {{JailM|26}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Coulter'', <br> 2016 ONCA 704 (CanLII){{perONCA|Gillese JA}} | | 17 | {{DelayCase|''R v Coulter'', <br> 2016 ONCA 704 (CanLII){{perONCA|Gillese JA}} | | {{JailM|17}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Isaacs'', <br> 2016 ONSC 6214 (CanLII){{perONSC|LeMay J}} | | 22+ and 24 months | not stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Isaacs'', <br> 2016 ONSC 6214 (CanLII){{perONSC|LeMay J}} | | 22+ and 24 months | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Gandhi'', <br> 2016 ONSC 5612 (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} | | 27 | {{DelayCase|''R v Gandhi'', <br> 2016 ONSC 5612 (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}} | | {{JailM|27}} | not stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Ching'', <br> 2016 ONSC 7533 (CanLII){{perONSC|Ducharme J}} | |32 months | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Ching'', <br> 2016 ONSC 7533 (CanLII){{perONSC|Ducharme J}} | |32 months | stayed | }} | ||
Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Han'',<Br> 2016 ONCJ 648 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Pringle J}} | | 17 months+| stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Han'',<Br> 2016 ONCJ 648 (CanLII) {{perONCJ|Pringle J}} | | 17 months+| stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Noltcho'', <Br>2016 SKPC 26 (CanLII) {{perSKPC|Martinez J}} | | 15 | {{DelayCase|''R v Noltcho'', <Br>2016 SKPC 26 (CanLII) {{perSKPC|Martinez J}} | | {{JailM|15}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Keller'', 2016 SKQB 316 (CanLII) {{perSKQB|Layh J}} | |17.5 months | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Keller'', 2016 SKQB 316 (CanLII) {{perSKQB|Layh J}} | |17.5 months | stayed | }} | ||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
{{DelayCaseHeader}} | {{DelayCaseHeader}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Jaworek'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gs385 2016 ONCJ 349] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Kenkel J}} | assault | 12 | {{DelayCase|''R v Jaworek'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gs385 2016 ONCJ 349] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Kenkel J}} | assault | {{JailM|12}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Gould'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gs1f9 2016 CanLII 34478] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC| Mennie J}}| drug trafficking | 43 | {{DelayCase|''R v Gould'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gs1f9 2016 CanLII 34478] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC| Mennie J}}| drug trafficking | {{JailM|43}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Bromley'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gpq3f 2016 ABPC 52] (CanLII){{perABPC|Groves J}} | impaired | 8.5 months | denied | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Bromley'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gpq3f 2016 ABPC 52] (CanLII){{perABPC|Groves J}} | impaired | 8.5 months | denied | }} | ||
Line 305: | Line 305: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Nash'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gf133 2014 ONSC 6025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bale J}}| impaired | 11.3 months | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Nash'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gf133 2014 ONSC 6025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bale J}}| impaired | 11.3 months | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Shepherd'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gfgdj 2014 SKCA 123] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Herauf JA}}| impaired | 37 | {{DelayCase|''R v Shepherd'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gfgdj 2014 SKCA 123] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Herauf JA}}| impaired | {{JailM|37}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Desjarlais'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gdr67 2014 SKPC 154] (CanLII){{perSKPC|B Wright J}}| assault | 27 | {{DelayCase|''R v Desjarlais'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gdr67 2014 SKPC 154] (CanLII){{perSKPC|B Wright J}}| assault | {{JailM|27}} | denied| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Ahmed'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw3tt 2013 ONCJ 56] (CanLII){{perONCJ|McArthur J}}| impaired |13 months | denied | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Ahmed'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw3tt 2013 ONCJ 56] (CanLII){{perONCJ|McArthur J}}| impaired |13 months | denied | }} | ||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Milani'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fv1mf 2012 ONSC 6892] (CanLII){{perONSC|Pierce J}} | B&E | 301 days | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Milani'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fv1mf 2012 ONSC 6892] (CanLII){{perONSC|Pierce J}} | B&E | 301 days | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Jordan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftwtw 2012 BCSC 1735] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Verhoeven J}} | trafficking | 25 | {{DelayCase|''R v Jordan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftwtw 2012 BCSC 1735] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Verhoeven J}} | trafficking | {{JailM|25}} | denied| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Patrick'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fshp9 2012 SKQB 331] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} | trafficking | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Patrick'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fshp9 2012 SKQB 331] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} | trafficking | {{JailM|28}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Anderson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frhnk 2012 ABPC 146] (CanLII){{perABPC|Creighton J}}|assault | | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Anderson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frhnk 2012 ABPC 146] (CanLII){{perABPC|Creighton J}}|assault | | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Richards'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frrlm 2012 ONSC 3479] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | impaired | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Richards'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frrlm 2012 ONSC 3479] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | impaired | {{JailM|24}} | denied| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Sasikaran'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvk2f 2012 ONCJ 794] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Bourque J}}| impaired| 27 | {{DelayCase|''R v Sasikaran'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvk2f 2012 ONCJ 794] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Bourque J}}| impaired| {{JailM|27}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Rutherford'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frg0z 2012 ONSC 2969] (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}}| impaired | | denied | appeal from stay }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Rutherford'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frg0z 2012 ONSC 2969] (CanLII){{perONSC|Code J}}| impaired | | denied | appeal from stay }} | ||
Line 333: | Line 333: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v McAllister'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frbn3 2012 ONSC 2857] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}}| impaired | 8.5 months | denied | appeal from a stay}} | {{DelayCase|''R v McAllister'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frbn3 2012 ONSC 2857] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}}| impaired | 8.5 months | denied | appeal from a stay}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Carlston'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr25q 2012 SKQB 150] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Zarzeczny J}} | B&E | 11 | {{DelayCase|''R v Carlston'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr25q 2012 SKQB 150] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Zarzeczny J}} | B&E | {{JailM|11}} |stayed|}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Lauber'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr0vr 2012 MBPC 12] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Preston J}} | impaired |24 months |stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v Lauber'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fr0vr 2012 MBPC 12] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Preston J}} | impaired |24 months |stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Joe'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqt5z 2012 BCPC 84] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | arson | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Joe'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqt5z 2012 BCPC 84] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | arson | {{JailM|24}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Farano'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs5bm 2012 ONCJ 495] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | impaired | 15 | {{DelayCase|''R v Farano'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs5bm 2012 ONCJ 495] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | impaired | {{JailM|15}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Haglof'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqslb 2012 BCSC 449] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Williams J}} | refusal | 19 | {{DelayCase|''R v Haglof'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqslb 2012 BCSC 449] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Williams J}} | refusal | {{JailM|19}} | denied| overturned from provincial decision }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Warlow'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fppvm 2012 ONCJ 28] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Reinhardt J}} | impaired | 15 | {{DelayCase|''R v Warlow'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fppvm 2012 ONCJ 28] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Reinhardt J}} | impaired | {{JailM|15}} | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Sivanandamoorthy'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frsgk 2012 ONSC 3629] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | impaired | 18 | {{DelayCase|''R v Sivanandamoorthy'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/frsgk 2012 ONSC 3629] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}} | impaired | {{JailM|18}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Sanderson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpstx 2012 ONCJ 41] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Maund J}} |impaired | 13 | {{DelayCase|''R v Sanderson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpstx 2012 ONCJ 41] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Maund J}} |impaired | {{JailM|13}} | denied |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Flumerfelt'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmbt 2011 BCPC 389] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | uttering threats| 19 | {{DelayCase|''R v Flumerfelt'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmbt 2011 BCPC 389] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | uttering threats| {{JailM|19}} | denied|}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Austin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmbk 2011 BCPC 387] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | indecent act and prowling | 16 months | stayed| }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Austin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmbk 2011 BCPC 387] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Merrick J}} | indecent act and prowling | 16 months | stayed| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Reichwald'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpn2g 2011 ABPC 391] (CanLII){{perABPC|Kerby J}} | aggravated assault | 28 | {{DelayCase|''R v Reichwald'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpn2g 2011 ABPC 391] (CanLII){{perABPC|Kerby J}} | aggravated assault | {{JailM|28}} | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Tran'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fplzd 2012 ONCA 18] (CanLII){{perONCA|Simmons JA}} | 19 | {{DelayCase|''R v Tran'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fplzd 2012 ONCA 18] (CanLII){{perONCA|Simmons JA}} | {{JailM|19}} | drug trafficking | denied|}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v McDevitt'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg7r 2011 ONCJ 773] (CanLII){{perONCJ|MacLean J}} | impaired | 16.4 months | stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v McDevitt'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg7r 2011 ONCJ 773] (CanLII){{perONCJ|MacLean J}} | impaired | 16.4 months | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v De La Torre'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg7g 2011 ONCJ 775] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Chisvin J}} | impaired | 14 | {{DelayCase|''R v De La Torre'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg7g 2011 ONCJ 775] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Chisvin J}} | impaired | {{JailM|14}} | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Thomas'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgqw 2011 ONSC 7005] (CanLII){{perONSC|MacDonnell J}} | aggravated sexual assault |42 months | stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v Thomas'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgqw 2011 ONSC 7005] (CanLII){{perONSC|MacDonnell J}} | aggravated sexual assault |42 months | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Mahmood'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg82 2011 ONCJ 779] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Grossman J}} | sexual assault | 18 | {{DelayCase|''R v Mahmood'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpg82 2011 ONCJ 779] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Grossman J}} | sexual assault | {{JailM|18}} | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v MacIntosh'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp7rc 2011 NSCA 111] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Beveridge JA}} aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/fx5b7 2013 SCC 23] (CanLII){{perSCC|McLachlin CJ}} | sexual interference |14 years | stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v MacIntosh'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp7rc 2011 NSCA 111] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Beveridge JA}} aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/fx5b7 2013 SCC 23] (CanLII){{perSCC|McLachlin CJ}} | sexual interference |14 years | stayed |}} | ||
Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Goreski'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp542 2011 ABPC 361] (CanLII){{perABPC|Anderson J}} | impaired driving | 15.5 months | stayed |}} | {{DelayCase|''R v Goreski'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp542 2011 ABPC 361] (CanLII){{perABPC|Anderson J}} | impaired driving | 15.5 months | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Cheung'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp0ht 2011 ONCJ 585] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | production | 22 | {{DelayCase|''R v Cheung'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fp0ht 2011 ONCJ 585] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | production | {{JailM|22}} | stayed |}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Ouellette'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fns82 2011 ONCJ 555] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Schwarzl J}} | impaired driving | 18 | {{DelayCase|''R v Ouellette'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fns82 2011 ONCJ 555] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Schwarzl J}} | impaired driving | {{JailM|18}} | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Matadin'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fndqw 2011 ONCJ 512] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Feldman J}} |impaired | 13 | {{DelayCase|''R v Matadin'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fndqw 2011 ONCJ 512] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Feldman J}} |impaired | {{JailM|13}} | granted| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Unger'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnf9n 2011 BCPC 248] (CanLII){{perBCPC|RR Smith J}} |care and control | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v Unger'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnf9n 2011 BCPC 248] (CanLII){{perBCPC|RR Smith J}} |care and control | {{JailM|24}} | granted | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Amiri'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9v 2011 ABPC 293] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} |aggravated assault | 24.5 months | granted| }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Amiri'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fnm9v 2011 ABPC 293] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fraser J}} |aggravated assault | 24.5 months | granted| }} | ||
Line 387: | Line 387: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Bagga'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28vkb 2010 ONCJ 97] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | impaired | 16.5 months | stayed | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Bagga'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28vkb 2010 ONCJ 97] (CanLII){{perONCJ|M Green J}} | impaired | 16.5 months | stayed | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v HSO'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/282fw 2010 BCPC 15] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Bennett J}} | assault | 24 | {{DelayCase|''R v HSO'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/282fw 2010 BCPC 15] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Bennett J}} | assault | {{JailM|24}} | granted | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Trenaman'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2h 2011 BCPC 62] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Bryne J}} | Impaired/.08 | 26 | {{DelayCase|''R v Trenaman'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2h 2011 BCPC 62] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Bryne J}} | Impaired/.08 | {{JailM|26}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Ghislieri'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f018 2010 BCPC 321] (CanLII){{perBCPC|MacKay J}} | Impaired/.08 | 25 | {{DelayCase|''R v Ghislieri'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f018 2010 BCPC 321] (CanLII){{perBCPC|MacKay J}} | Impaired/.08 | {{JailM|25}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Cantrill'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2dv1l 2010 BCPC 318] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Daley J}} | Impaired/.08 | 32 | {{DelayCase|''R v Cantrill'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2dv1l 2010 BCPC 318] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Daley J}} | Impaired/.08 | {{JailM|32}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Moskal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dkkf 2010 BCPC 294] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Gulbransen J}} | Impaired/refusal| 32 | {{DelayCase|''R v Moskal'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2dkkf 2010 BCPC 294] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Gulbransen J}} | Impaired/refusal| {{JailM|32}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Archibald'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2df6m 2010 BCPC 273] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Byrne}} | Impaired/.08| 36 months| | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Archibald'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2df6m 2010 BCPC 273] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Byrne}} | Impaired/.08| 36 months| | }} | ||
Line 403: | Line 403: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Baldini'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2cvqn 2010 BCPC 254] (CanLII){{perBCPC|R Smith J}} | Fraud| 17 months| denied | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Baldini'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2cvqn 2010 BCPC 254] (CanLII){{perBCPC|R Smith J}} | Fraud| 17 months| denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Teske'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2csb5 2010 BCPC 246] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Daley J}} | Impaired/.08| 18 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Teske'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2csb5 2010 BCPC 246] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Daley J}} | Impaired/.08| {{JailM|18}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Pederson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2csg1 2010 BCPC 224] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Byrne}} | Traffic ticket| 17.5 months| |}} | {{DelayCase| ''R v Pederson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2csg1 2010 BCPC 224] (CanLII){{perBCPC|O'Byrne}} | Traffic ticket| 17.5 months| |}} | ||
Line 421: | Line 421: | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Oliveira'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/230r3 2009 CanLII 14794] (ONSC){{perONSC|Himel J}} | Impaired/.08| 16 months total, 2 months of which attributed to defence | stayed | Successful defence appeal of denied stay.}} | {{DelayCase| ''R v Oliveira'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/230r3 2009 CanLII 14794] (ONSC){{perONSC|Himel J}} | Impaired/.08| 16 months total, 2 months of which attributed to defence | stayed | Successful defence appeal of denied stay.}} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Chen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25nfl 2009 ONCJ 417] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Blouin J}} | Drugs| 21 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Chen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25nfl 2009 ONCJ 417] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Blouin J}} | Drugs| {{JailM|21}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Thomson'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26g5w 2009 ONCA 771] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} | aggravated assault | 48.5 months | granted | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Thomson'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26g5w 2009 ONCA 771] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} | aggravated assault | 48.5 months | granted | }} | ||
Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Kvlividze'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2413x 2009 ONCJ 280] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Grossman J}} | impaired | 11 months (institution) | denied | }} | {{DelayCase|''R v Kvlividze'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2413x 2009 ONCJ 280] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Grossman J}} | impaired | 11 months (institution) | denied | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Godin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/23rhf 2009 SCC 26] (CanLII){{perSCC|Cromwell J}} | Sexual assault| 30 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Godin'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/23rhf 2009 SCC 26] (CanLII){{perSCC|Cromwell J}} | Sexual assault| {{JailM|30}} | |}} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Holowaty''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22d79 2008 BCPC 364] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Bowry J}} | Sexual assault| 22.5 months | | }} | {{DelayCase| ''R v Holowaty''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22d79 2008 BCPC 364] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Bowry J}} | Sexual assault| 22.5 months | | }} | ||
Line 437: | Line 437: | ||
{{DelayCase|R v Deosaran <br>2008 OJ No 3850{{NOCANLII}} | impaired | 12 months| | }} | {{DelayCase|R v Deosaran <br>2008 OJ No 3850{{NOCANLII}} | impaired | 12 months| | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Adair'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/21dw8 2008 ONCJ 554] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Campbell J}} | Impaired/.08| 14 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Adair'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/21dw8 2008 ONCJ 554] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Campbell J}} | Impaired/.08| {{JailM|14}} | |}} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Tricker'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/218m4 2008 ONCJ 510] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Finnestad J}} | Impaired/.08| 17 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Tricker'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/218m4 2008 ONCJ 510] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Finnestad J}} | Impaired/.08| {{JailM|17}} | |}} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v McCullough'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/218m3 2008 ONCJ 509] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Finnestad J}} | Impaired/.08| 25 | {{DelayCase| ''R v McCullough'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/218m3 2008 ONCJ 509] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Finnestad J}} | Impaired/.08| {{JailM|25}} | |}} | ||
{{DelayCase| R v Allain <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2159t 2008 NBPC 49] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Duffie J}} |Impaired/.08| 12.5 months| |}} | {{DelayCase| R v Allain <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2159t 2008 NBPC 49] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Duffie J}} |Impaired/.08| 12.5 months| |}} | ||
Line 447: | Line 447: | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Guilbride'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1p8lz 2006 BCCA 392] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | Drug conspiracy| 62 months| denied| }} | {{DelayCase| ''R v Guilbride'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1p8lz 2006 BCCA 392] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | Drug conspiracy| 62 months| denied| }} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Moffatt'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hf9z 2004 CanLII 1539] (ON SC){{perONSC|Dunnet J}} | impaired | 13 | {{DelayCase|''R v Moffatt'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hf9z 2004 CanLII 1539] (ON SC){{perONSC|Dunnet J}} | impaired | {{JailM|13}} | stayed | 10 to 11 months Crown or institutional delay.}} | ||
{{DelayCase| R v SRC Law Corp., <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5dvt 2003 BCSC 64] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Koenigsberg J}} | speeding ticket| 18 months| stayed| }} | {{DelayCase| R v SRC Law Corp., <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5dvt 2003 BCSC 64] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Koenigsberg J}} | speeding ticket| 18 months| stayed| }} | ||
Line 460: | Line 460: | ||
{{DelayCaseHeader}} | {{DelayCaseHeader}} | ||
{{DelayCase|''R v Sarava'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1cc7n 1999 CanLII 5316] (BC SC){{perBCSC|Humpheries J}} | impaired | 20 | {{DelayCase|''R v Sarava'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1cc7n 1999 CanLII 5316] (BC SC){{perBCSC|Humpheries J}} | impaired | {{JailM|20}} | denied| }} | ||
{{DelayCase| R v Fagan <br>[1998] BCJ No. 2886 (BCCA){{NOCANLII}} | Drugs|33 months |denied| }} | {{DelayCase| R v Fagan <br>[1998] BCJ No. 2886 (BCCA){{NOCANLII}} | Drugs|33 months |denied| }} | ||
Line 472: | Line 472: | ||
{{DelayCase| R v Morin <br>[1992] 1 SCR 771, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsc6 1992 CanLII 89] (SCC){{perSCC|Sopinka J}} | Impaired/.08| 14.5 months| | }} | {{DelayCase| R v Morin <br>[1992] 1 SCR 771, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsc6 1992 CanLII 89] (SCC){{perSCC|Sopinka J}} | Impaired/.08| 14.5 months| | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| ''R v Askov'',<br> [1990] 2 SCR 1199, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsrp 1990 CanLII 45] (SCC){{perSCC|Cory J}} | Extortion| 30 | {{DelayCase| ''R v Askov'',<br> [1990] 2 SCR 1199, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsrp 1990 CanLII 45] (SCC){{perSCC|Cory J}} | Extortion| {{JailM|30}} | | }} | ||
{{DelayCase| R v Conway <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4d 1989 CanLII 66] (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 1659{{perSCC|Lamer J and L'Heureux‑Dubé J}} | | | | }} | {{DelayCase| R v Conway <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4d 1989 CanLII 66] (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 1659{{perSCC|Lamer J and L'Heureux‑Dubé J}} | | | | }} |
Revision as of 08:02, 15 April 2020
Section 11(b) - trial in reasonable time
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Lemioer, 2017 SKQB 106 (CanLII), per Elson J |
Cocaine trafficking and firearms | granted | {{{5}}} | |
R v McConnell, 2017 ONCJ 104 (CanLII), per P Wright J |
Over 80 | 24 months (Prov Crt) | granted | |
R v Shum, 2017 ONSC 336 (CanLII), per Maranger J |
Federal Statute | 28 months (Sup Crt) | denied | Total time calculated from 35 months. |
R v Xiu Jin Teng, 2017 ONSC 568 (CanLII), per MacDonnell J |
murder | denied | ||
R v Dass, 2016 BCSC 1701 (CanLII), per Johnston J |
theft and fraud | 33 months imprisonment | granted | Total time was 39 before subtracting defence time. |
R v JM, 2017 ONCJ 4 (CanLII), per Paciocco J | sexual offences | 12 months and 12 days | granted | The accused was a youth. |
Exceptional Circumstances Cases
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Regan, 2018 ABCA 55 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Truax, 2018 ABPC 215 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Klassen, 2018 ABCA 258 (CanLII), per JA |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Carey, 2018 ONCJ 255 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Giles, 2017 BCSC 73 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v McBride, 2017 BCSC 1480 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Tsekouras, 2017 ONSC 7112 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Pavao, 2017 ONSC 6873 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Barra, 2017 ONSC 6008 (CanLII), per Labrosse J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Houle, 2017 ONCA 772 (CanLII), per JA |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Klaus, 2017 ABQB 537 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Noftall, 2017 CanLII 61603 (NL SC), per Faour J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Millard, 2017 ONSC 4030 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Majeed, 2017 ONSC 3554 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Tsega, 2017 ONSC 3090 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Picard, 2017 ONCA 692 (CanLII), per JA |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Powell, 2017 ONSC 5658 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Basha, 2017 ONSC 5697 (CanLII), per J |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Gopie, 2017 ONCA 728 (CanLII), per JA |
complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Amero, 2017 QCCQ 17971 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Beaulieu, 2017 ONSC 6543 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Rosenthal, 2017 ONSC 6523 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Jackson, 2017 ONSC 5925 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} | ||
R v Shaheen, 2017 ONCJ 638 (CanLII), per J |
not complex | {{{5}}} |
Below Ceiling Cases
{{DelayCase|R v Harris,2017 BCSC 1091, per Gray J
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Belle, 2018 ONSC 7728 (CanLII) , per Harris J |
28 months imprisonment | stayed | ||
R v RT, 2018 NLSC 44 (CanLII) , per Murphy J |
26+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Cola, 2018 QCCS 334 (CanLII) , per Royer J |
17.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Buckley, 2018 NSSC 3 (CanLII) , per Arnold J |
26 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Lecompte, 2018 NBCA 33 (CanLII) , per Quigg JA |
16 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Carter 2018 ABQB 657 (CanLII), per Poelman J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Jerace, 2018 ABCA 152 (CanLII), per Velduis JA |
15 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Nafke, 2018 ABPC 1104 (CanLII), per Fradsham J |
16 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Brown, 2018 ONCJ 799 (CanLII) , per Mulligan J |
16.5 months | stayed | ||
R v RG, 2018 ONSC 130 (CanLII), per Gordon J |
25.6 months | not stayed | ||
R v Nowack, 2018 ONSC 826 (CanLII), per Ducharme J |
29 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v Patrois, 2018 ONSC 934 (CanLII), per RJ Smith J |
28.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v MacIsaac, 2018 ONCA 650 (CanLII), per Huscroft JA |
13 months (trial) 17 months (appeal) |
stayed | ||
R v KN, 2018 BCCA 246 (CanLII), per Fenlon JA |
<9 months | not stayed | ||
R v Pipping, 2018 BCPC 73 (CanLII), per Gill J |
<18 months | not stayed | ||
R v McLean, 2018 BCSC 191 (CanLII), per Tindale J |
28+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Nazarek, 2017 BCSC 2340 (CanLII), per Watchuk J |
27+ months | not stayed | ||
R v DCR, 2017 BCPC 326 (CanLII), per Fisher J |
28.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Truong, 2017 BCSC 736 (CanLII), per Kent J |
24.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Wu, 2017 BCSC 2373, per Watchuk J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Hammer, 2017 BCPC 377, per Keyes J |
17 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Matheson, 2017 BCSC 166, per MacKenzie J |
29 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Gambilla, 2017 ABCA 347 (CanLII), per Watson JA |
29+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Nasery, 2017 ABQB 564, per Gates J |
28 and 26 months | not stayed | ||
R v Heerema, 2017 ABQB 787, per Yamauchi J |
23+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Mitchell, 2017 ABQB 717, per Yamauchi J |
<30 months | not stayed | ||
R v Tetrault, 2017 ABQB 534, per Renke J |
19.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Paulishyn, 2017 ABQB 61, per Yamauchi J | 22 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Grayson, 2017 ABQB 108, per Wilson J | 28+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Khalon, 2017 ABQB 627, per Yungwirth J |
29+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Jerace, 2017 ABQB 580, per Mandescheid J |
12+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266, per Fradsham J |
4.6 months | not stayed | ||
R v Chonkolay, 2017 ABQB 148, per Topolniski J |
18+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Abzakh, 2016 ABQB 694, per Gill J |
29.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Jones, 2016 ABQB 691, per Nielsen J |
23+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Jerace, 2016 ABPC 691, per MacDonald J |
11+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Fauolo, 2016 ABPC 192, per Semenuk J |
13 months | not stayed | ||
R v Moosomin, 2017 SKQB 182, per Smith J |
? | not stayed | ||
R v Keller, 2016 SKQB 319, per Layh J |
17.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v McNab, 2016 SKQB 333, per McMurtry J |
27.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Park, 2016 SKPC 137, per Martinez J |
17+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Schenkels, 2017 MBCA 62, per Hamilton JA |
29+ months | Not stayed | ||
R v Richard, 2017 MBQB 11, per Simonsen J |
27 months (trial #1) 22.5 months (trial #2) |
not stayed | ||
R v Grant, 2017 MBQB 39, per Toews J |
15.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Mebrahtu, 2017 MBQB 59, per Greenberg J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Arbique, 2017 NSPC 11 (CanLII), per Landry J |
25+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Testroete, 2017 NSPC 50 (CanLII), per Tax J |
16.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Bowers, 2017 NSPC 21 (CanLII), per Tax J |
16 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Mahar, 2017 NSPC 9 (CanLII), per Derrick J |
13 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67 (CanLII), per Tax J |
18 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Aecon, 2017 NSPC 61 (CanLII), per Lenehan J |
17+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Melvin, 2017 NSSC 149 (CanLII), per Gabriel J |
21 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v McCully, 2017 NSPC 70 (CanLII), per Tax J |
17.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Curtis, 2017 MBPC 55 (CanLII), per Rolston J |
17+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Creglia, 2018 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) , per Pringle J |
24 months imprisonment | stayed | ||
R v Gnanaasubramaniam, 2017 ONCJ 14 (CanLII) , per J |
17 months+ | stayed | ||
R v Jeyakanth, 2017 ONCJ 31 (CanLII), per Henschel J |
14 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v Falkowski, 2017 ONCA 253 (CanLII) |
16.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Tsekouras, 2017 ONSC 7112 (CanLII), per Smith J |
25.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Brissett, 2017 ONSC 402 (CanLII), per Code J |
27 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Tsega, 2017 ONSC 3090 (CanLII), per Aiken J |
17 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Taylor, 2017 ONSC 2263 (CanLII), per Gordon J |
24 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Shum, 2017 ONSC 336 (CanLII), per Maranger J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Gordon, 2017 ONSC 1428 (CanLII), per Ducharme J |
17 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v Garcia, 2017 ONSC 4021 (CanLII), per Mitchell J |
25 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Patel, 2017 ONSC 5827 (CanLII), per Sutherland J |
30 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Bomberry, 2017 ONSC 7147 (CanLII), per Del Frate J |
29 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v WH, 2017 ONSC 5014 (CanLII), per Quigley J |
29 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Clarke, 2017 ONSC 4880 (CanLII), per O'Marra J |
28 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v Mallozzi, 2017 ONCA 644 (CanLII), per Benotto JA |
23 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Belcourt, 2017 ONSC 3934 (CanLII), per Fregeau J |
27.9 months | not stayed | ||
R v Bassaragh, 2017 ONSC 4668 (CanLII), per O'Marra J |
26.9 months | not stayed | ||
R v Basha, 2017 ONSC 337 (CanLII), per Maranger J |
28 and 29 months | not stayed | ||
R v Barra, 2017 ONSC 6008 (CanLII), per Labrosse J |
26+ and 27 months | not stayed | ||
R v Magiri, 2017 ONSC 2818 (CanLII), per McWatt J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v RD, 2017 ONSC 1770 (CanLII), per Molloy J |
28 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v MB, 2017 ONSC 2882 (CanLII), per Allen J |
27 months+ | not stayed | ||
R v Green, 2017 ONSC 2628 (CanLII), per Newton J |
24 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Green, 2017 ONSC 1538 (CanLII), per Beaudoin J |
21 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Codina, 2017 ONSC 4886 (CanLII), per Akhtar J |
25 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Corner, 2017 ONSC 5629 (CanLII), per McKelvey J |
25 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Dabreo, 2017 ONSC 5425 (CanLII), per Seppi J |
29+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Jansen, 2017 ONSC 2954 (CanLII), per Sosna J |
27.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Saccoccia, 2017 ONSC 2737 (CanLII), per Thorburn J |
28.5 months | not stayed | ||
R v Fox, 2016 BCSC 2496, per Kelleher J |
? | not stayed | ||
R v Dutra, 2016 BCPC 448, per Rounthwaite J |
16 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v RL, 2016 ONSC 8008 (CanLII), per Glithero J |
26 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Coulter, 2016 ONCA 704 (CanLII), per Gillese JA |
17 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Isaacs, 2016 ONSC 6214 (CanLII), per LeMay J |
22+ and 24 months | not stayed | ||
R v Gandhi, 2016 ONSC 5612 (CanLII), per Code J |
27 months imprisonment | not stayed | ||
R v Ching, 2016 ONSC 7533 (CanLII), per Ducharme J |
32 months | stayed | ||
R v Gasana, 2016 ONCJ 724 (CanLII), per Monahan J |
15+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Porter, 2016 ONSC 7173 (CanLII), per Monahan J |
23.9 months | not stayed | ||
R v Manh, 2016 ONSC 6970 (CanLII), per Edwards J |
28+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Maione, 2016 ONSC 7207 (CanLII), per Varpio J |
27+ months | not stayed | ||
R v Ashraf, 2016 ONCJ 584 (CanLII) , per Band J |
17 months+ | stayed | ||
R v Reynolds, 2016 ONCJ 606 (CanLII) , per Monahan J |
15.5 months | stayed | ||
R v DeSouza, 2016 ONCJ 588 (CanLII) , per Kenkel J |
15 months | stayed | ||
R v Han, 2016 ONCJ 648 (CanLII) , per Pringle J |
17 months+ | stayed | ||
R v Noltcho, 2016 SKPC 26 (CanLII) , per Martinez J |
15 months imprisonment | stayed | ||
R v Keller, 2016 SKQB 316 (CanLII) , per Layh J | 17.5 months | stayed |
Pre-Jordan Cases
2010 to July 2016
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Jaworek, 2016 ONCJ 349 (CanLII), per Kenkel J |
assault | 12 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Gould, 2016 CanLII 34478 (NL SCTD), per Mennie J |
drug trafficking | 43 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Bromley, 2016 ABPC 52 (CanLII), per Groves J |
impaired | 8.5 months | denied | |
R v Boutin, 2016 SKQB 77 (CanLII), per Kalmakoff J |
impaired | 7 years, 2 months | stayed | |
R v Levesque and Lankisch, 2016 NBQB 81 (CanLII), per Stephenson J |
robbery | 31.5 months | denied | |
R v Fernandes, 2016 ONSC 2915 (CanLII), per Sproat J |
drug trafficking | 44.5 months | stayed | |
R v Chamassian, 2015 ONSC 3150 (CanLII), per Quinlan J |
impaired | 12 months (inst.) | stayed | |
R v Nash, 2014 ONSC 6025 (CanLII), per Bale J |
impaired | 11.3 months | stayed | |
R v Shepherd, 2014 SKCA 123 (CanLII), per Herauf JA |
impaired | 37 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Desjarlais, 2014 SKPC 154 (CanLII), per B Wright J |
assault | 27 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Ahmed, 2013 ONCJ 56 (CanLII), per McArthur J |
impaired | 13 months | denied | |
R v Krywucky and Segal, 2013 ONSC 1112 (CanLII), per A Goodman J |
28 month | stayed | ||
R v Durocher, 2012 ABQB 705 (CanLII), per Ouellette J |
sexual assault | 2.5 years | granted | |
R v Richards, 2012 SKCA 120 (CanLII), per Richards JA |
trafficking | 2 years 9 months | denied | appeal from stay |
R v Milani, 2012 ONSC 6892 (CanLII), per Pierce J |
B&E | 301 days | stayed | |
R v Jordan, 2012 BCSC 1735 (CanLII), per Verhoeven J |
trafficking | 25 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Patrick, 2012 SKQB 331 (CanLII), per McMurtry J |
trafficking | 28 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Anderson, 2012 ABPC 146 (CanLII), per Creighton J |
assault | stayed | ||
R v Richards, 2012 ONSC 3479 (CanLII), per Kelly J |
impaired | 24 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Sasikaran, 2012 ONCJ 794 (CanLII), per Bourque J |
impaired | 27 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Rutherford, 2012 ONSC 2969 (CanLII), per Code J |
impaired | denied | appeal from stay | |
R v McAllister, 2012 ONSC 2857 (CanLII), per Trotter J |
impaired | 8.5 months | denied | appeal from a stay |
R v Carlston, 2012 SKQB 150 (CanLII), per Zarzeczny J |
B&E | 11 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Lauber, 2012 MBPC 12 (CanLII), per Preston J |
impaired | 24 months | stayed | |
R v Joe, 2012 BCPC 84 (CanLII), per Merrick J |
arson | 24 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Farano, 2012 ONCJ 495 (CanLII), per M Green J |
impaired | 15 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Haglof, 2012 BCSC 449 (CanLII), per Williams J |
refusal | 19 months imprisonment | denied | overturned from provincial decision |
R v Warlow, 2012 ONCJ 28 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J |
impaired | 15 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Sivanandamoorthy, 2012 ONSC 3629 (CanLII), per Kelly J |
impaired | 18 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Sanderson, 2012 ONCJ 41 (CanLII), per Maund J |
impaired | 13 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Flumerfelt, 2011 BCPC 389 (CanLII), per Merrick J |
uttering threats | 19 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Austin, 2011 BCPC 387 (CanLII), per Merrick J |
indecent act and prowling | 16 months | stayed | |
R v Reichwald, 2011 ABPC 391 (CanLII), per Kerby J |
aggravated assault | 28 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Tran, 2012 ONCA 18 (CanLII), per Simmons JA |
19 months imprisonment | drug trafficking | denied | |
R v McDevitt, 2011 ONCJ 773 (CanLII), per MacLean J |
impaired | 16.4 months | stayed | |
R v De La Torre, 2011 ONCJ 775 (CanLII), per Chisvin J |
impaired | 14 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Thomas, 2011 ONSC 7005 (CanLII), per MacDonnell J |
aggravated sexual assault | 42 months | stayed | |
R v Mahmood, 2011 ONCJ 779 (CanLII), per Grossman J |
sexual assault | 18 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v MacIntosh, 2011 NSCA 111 (CanLII), per Beveridge JA aff'd 2013 SCC 23 (CanLII), per McLachlin CJ |
sexual interference | 14 years | stayed | |
R v Goreski, 2011 ABPC 361 (CanLII), per Anderson J |
impaired driving | 15.5 months | stayed | |
R v Cheung, 2011 ONCJ 585 (CanLII), per M Green J |
production | 22 months imprisonment | stayed | |
R v Ouellette, 2011 ONCJ 555 (CanLII), per Schwarzl J |
impaired driving | 18 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Matadin, 2011 ONCJ 512 (CanLII), per Feldman J |
impaired | 13 months imprisonment | granted | |
R v Unger, 2011 BCPC 248 (CanLII), per RR Smith J |
care and control | 24 months imprisonment | granted | |
R v Amiri, 2011 ABPC 293 (CanLII), per Fraser J |
aggravated assault | 24.5 months | granted | |
R v Howser, 2011 ONCJ 534 (CanLII), per M Green J |
public disturbance | 15.5 months | denied | |
R v Kaiser, 2011 BCPC 168 (CanLII), per Brecknell J |
assault causing bodily harm | granted | ||
R v Routledge, 2010 NSPC 45 (CanLII), per Ross J |
10 months | denied | ||
R v Bagga, 2010 ONCJ 97 (CanLII), per M Green J |
impaired | 16.5 months | stayed | |
R v HSO, 2010 BCPC 15 (CanLII), per Bennett J |
assault | 24 months imprisonment | granted | |
R v Trenaman, 2011 BCPC 62 (CanLII), per O'Bryne J |
Impaired/.08 | 26 months imprisonment | ||
R v Ghislieri, 2010 BCPC 321 (CanLII), per MacKay J |
Impaired/.08 | 25 months imprisonment | ||
R v Cantrill, 2010 BCPC 318 (CanLII), per Daley J |
Impaired/.08 | 32 months imprisonment | ||
R v Moskal, 2010 BCPC 294 (CanLII), per Gulbransen J |
Impaired/refusal | 32 months imprisonment | ||
R v Archibald, 2010 BCPC 273 (CanLII), per O'Byrne |
Impaired/.08 | 36 months | ||
R v McComber, 2010 BCPC 255 (CanLII), per Brecknell J |
Impaired/refusal | 20.5 months | ||
R v Baldini, 2010 BCPC 254 (CanLII), per R Smith J |
Fraud | 17 months | denied | |
R v Teske, 2010 BCPC 246 (CanLII), per Daley J |
Impaired/.08 | 18 months imprisonment | ||
R v Pederson, 2010 BCPC 224 (CanLII), per O'Byrne |
Traffic ticket | 17.5 months | ||
R v Bains, 2010 BCCA 178 (CanLII), per D Smith J |
Drug conspiracy | 45 months | denied | |
R v Ghavami, 2010 BCCA 126 (CanLII), per Donald and Huddart JJA |
Drug conspiracy | 45 months | denied | |
R v Ollenberger, 2010 BCPC 93 (CanLII), per O'Byrne J |
Impaired/.08 | 18 months |
2000 to 2009
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Oliveira, 2009 CanLII 14794 (ONSC), per Himel J |
Impaired/.08 | 16 months total, 2 months of which attributed to defence | stayed | Successful defence appeal of denied stay. |
R v Chen, 2009 ONCJ 417 (CanLII), per Blouin J |
Drugs | 21 months imprisonment | ||
R v Thomson, 2009 ONCA 771 (CanLII), per curiam |
aggravated assault | 48.5 months | granted | |
Do and Ngo, 2009 ONCJ 402 (CanLII), per Armstrong J |
drug production | stayed | ||
R v Kvlividze, 2009 ONCJ 280 (CanLII), per Grossman J |
impaired | 11 months (institution) | denied | |
R v Godin, 2009 SCC 26 (CanLII), per Cromwell J |
Sexual assault | 30 months imprisonment | ||
R v Holowaty 2008 BCPC 364 (CanLII), per Bowry J |
Sexual assault | 22.5 months | ||
R v Carapiet, 2008 ONCJ 453 (CanLII), per Kehoe J |
Impaired/.08 | 11.5 months | ||
R v Deosaran 2008 OJ No 3850(*no CanLII links) |
impaired | 12 months | ||
R v Adair, 2008 ONCJ 554 (CanLII), per Campbell J |
Impaired/.08 | 14 months imprisonment | ||
R v Tricker, 2008 ONCJ 510 (CanLII), per Finnestad J |
Impaired/.08 | 17 months imprisonment | ||
R v McCullough, 2008 ONCJ 509 (CanLII), per Finnestad J |
Impaired/.08 | 25 months imprisonment | ||
R v Allain 2008 NBPC 49 (CanLII), per Duffie J |
Impaired/.08 | 12.5 months | ||
R v Guilbride, 2006 BCCA 392 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
Drug conspiracy | 62 months | denied | |
R v Moffatt, 2004 CanLII 1539 (ON SC), per Dunnet J |
impaired | 13 months imprisonment | stayed | 10 to 11 months Crown or institutional delay. |
R v SRC Law Corp., 2003 BCSC 64 (CanLII), per Koenigsberg J |
speeding ticket | 18 months | stayed | |
R v Newbold, 2002 BCPC 142 (CanLII), per Pothecary J |
Impaired/.08 | 17 months | ||
R v Alliston, 2000 BCPC 60 (CanLII), per Bruce J |
Impaired/.08 | 20 months |
1980 to 1999
Case Name | Charge | delay | s.11(b) stay | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Sarava, 1999 CanLII 5316 (BC SC), per Humpheries J |
impaired | 20 months imprisonment | denied | |
R v Fagan [1998] BCJ No. 2886 (BCCA)(*no CanLII links) |
Drugs | 33 months | denied | |
R v Loewen, 1997 CanLII 4338 (MB CA), per Helper JA |
Money laundering | 33 months | ||
R v Pilon, 1996 CanLII 8447 (BCSC), per Parrett J |
Aggravated assault | 48 months | denied | |
R v Allan, 1996 CanLII 4011 (ON CA), per Doherty JA |
Fraud | 46 months | denied | |
R v Morin [1992] 1 SCR 771, 1992 CanLII 89 (SCC), per Sopinka J |
Impaired/.08 | 14.5 months | ||
R v Askov, [1990] 2 SCR 1199, 1990 CanLII 45 (SCC), per Cory J |
Extortion | 30 months imprisonment | ||
R v Conway 1989 CanLII 66 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 1659, per Lamer J and L'Heureux‑Dubé J |
||||
R v Mills, 1986 CanLII 17 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 863, per McIntyre J and La Forest J |