Position of Trust as a Factor in Sentencing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\', \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} [BASMOQNP][CBKNCSL][A-Z]+ [0-9]+\] \(CanLII\))\{" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
"Position of trust" is not defined in the criminal code. Courts will occasionally resort to the use of dictionary definition to interpret its meaning.<ref> | "Position of trust" is not defined in the criminal code. Courts will occasionally resort to the use of dictionary definition to interpret its meaning.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIR|MC|fr2tj|2012 ONSC 2505] (CanLII) (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Thorburn J}}{{atL|fr2tj|26}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
; Child Abuse | ; Child Abuse | ||
A person who is a babysitter will generally be considered in a position of trust.<ref> | A person who is a babysitter will generally be considered in a position of trust.<ref> | ||
e.g. | e.g. {{CanLIIR|AGA|2875r|2010 ABCA 61] (CanLII) (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; Employees | ; Employees | ||
An aircraft maintenance employee is not in a position of trust with respect to passengers on a plane.<ref> | An aircraft maintenance employee is not in a position of trust with respect to passengers on a plane.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIR|Rocha|fq4vd|2012 ABPC 24] (CanLII) (CanLII)}}{{perABPC| Groves J}} (offence of voyeurism by taking photos up the skirt of a passenger)<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 27 January 2021
General Principles
It is an aggravating factor in sentencing for the offender to have been in a position of trust.[1] A position of trust is distinctive from a position of authority and will be determined on the specific facts including the conduct of the offender.[2]
"Position of trust" is not defined in the criminal code. Courts will occasionally resort to the use of dictionary definition to interpret its meaning.[3]
"Trust" refers to "confidence in or reliance on some quality or attribute of a person".[4] In considering whether there is a position of trust, courts must consider parliament's purpose in protecting young persons who are vulnerable and weak in relation to the accused.[5]
The existence will depend on "all the factual circumstances relevant to the characterization of the relationship".[6]
Considerations include:[7]
- difference in ages
- evolution of the relationship
- status of the accused in relation to the victim
- Limited Trust Positions
Adult persons who enter into relationships with young persons can put themselves into "qualified positions of trust" or form "low-end trust relationships".[8]
- Child Abuse
A person who is a babysitter will generally be considered in a position of trust.[9]
- Employees
An aircraft maintenance employee is not in a position of trust with respect to passengers on a plane.[10]
- ↑ see s. 718.2(a)(iii)
- ↑ R v Audet, 1996 CanLII 198 (SCC), [1996] 2 SCR 171, per La Forest J
- ↑
R v MC, 2012 ONSC 2505 (CanLII) (CanLII)], per Thorburn J, at para 26
- ↑ Audet, supra, at para 35
- ↑ Audet, supra, at para 36
- ↑ Audet, supra
- ↑ Audet, supra
- ↑
see R v Fones, 2012 MBCA 110 (CanLII), [2012] M.J. No. 407, per Hamilton JA, at para 68
R v R(GW), 2011 MBCA 62 (CanLII), [2011] M.J. No. 246, per Steel JA, at para 42
- ↑ e.g. R v AGA, 2010 ABCA 61 (CanLII) (CanLII)], per curiam
- ↑
R v Rocha, 2012 ABPC 24 (CanLII) (CanLII)], per Groves J (offence of voyeurism by taking photos up the skirt of a passenger)