Selecting Jurors From Panel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{seealso|Jury Selection}} | {{seealso|Jury Selection}} | ||
The selection process is governed by each province's Juries Act in addition to s. 631 to 644 of the Code.<ref> | The selection process is governed by each province's Juries Act in addition to s. 631 to 644 of the Code.<ref> | ||
e.g. R v Pan, [http://canlii.ca/t/gfm83 2014 ONSC 1393] (CanLII) at para 30<br> | e.g. R v Pan, [http://canlii.ca/t/gfm83 2014 ONSC 1393] (CanLII){{perONSC|Boswell J}} at para 30<br> | ||
Jury Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/52gb7 RSBC 1996, c 242] <br> | Jury Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/52gb7 RSBC 1996, c 242] <br> | ||
Juries Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/jp2d SNS 1998, c 16]<br> | Juries Act, [http://canlii.ca/t/jp2d SNS 1998, c 16]<br> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
The judge must vet the jury for hardship exemptions before beginning with peremptory challenges or challenges for cause. To do otherwise effectively reduces the number of challenges that each side may have.<ref> | The judge must vet the jury for hardship exemptions before beginning with peremptory challenges or challenges for cause. To do otherwise effectively reduces the number of challenges that each side may have.<ref> | ||
R v Douglas, [http://canlii.ca/t/1cddv 2002 CanLII 38799] (ON CA) | R v Douglas, [http://canlii.ca/t/1cddv 2002 CanLII 38799] (ON CA){{perONCA|Moldaver JA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 26 November 2018
- < Procedure and Practice
- < Trials
- < Juries
General Principles
The selection process is governed by each province's Juries Act in addition to s. 631 to 644 of the Code.[1]
Jury List and Jury Panel
The "jury roll" (or "jury list") is prepared either by the sheriff's office or the regional Court's prothonotary based on persons resident in a certain geographical region.[2]
From the List a jury panel is randomly created.[3]
Selection Judge Not Necessarily Trial Judge
The judge presiding over a trial does not necessarily have to be the same judge who presides over the selection:
Presiding judge
626.1 The judge before whom an accused is tried may be either the judge who presided over matters pertaining to the selection of a jury before the commencement of a trial or another judge of the same court.
2002, c. 13, s. 51.
– CCC
- ↑
e.g. R v Pan, 2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII), per Boswell J at para 30
Jury Act, RSBC 1996, c 242
Juries Act, SNS 1998, c 16
Jury Act, 1991, SNL 1991, c 16
Jury Act, RSNB 2016, c 103
Jury Act, RSA 2000, c J-3
The Jury Act, 1998, SS 1998, c J-4.2
Juries Act, RSO 1990, c J.3
Jury Act, RSNWT (Nu) 1988, c J-2
Jury Act, RSPEI 1988, c J-5.1
Jury Act, RSY 2002, c 129
- ↑
Pan, ibid. at para 30
- ↑
Pan, ibid. at para 34
Selecting Jurors From the Panel
Names of jurors on cards
631. (1) The name of each juror on a panel of jurors that has been returned, his number on the panel and his address shall be written on a separate card, and all the cards shall, as far as possible, be of equal size.
To be placed in box
(2) The sheriff or other officer who returns the panel shall deliver the cards referred to in subsection (1) to the clerk of the court who shall cause them to be placed together in a box to be provided for the purpose and to be thoroughly shaken together.
(2.1)...
(2.2)...
Cards to be drawn by clerk of court
(3) If the array of jurors is not challenged or the array of jurors is challenged but the judge does not direct a new panel to be returned, the clerk of the court shall, in open court, draw out one after another the cards referred to in subsection (1), call out the number on each card as it is drawn and confirm with the person who responds that he or she is the person whose name appears on the card drawn, until the number of persons who have answered is, in the opinion of the judge, sufficient to provide a full jury and any alternate jurors ordered by the judge after allowing for orders to excuse, challenges and directions to stand by.
Exception
(3.1) The court, or a judge of the court, before which the jury trial is to be held may, if the court or judge is satisfied that it is necessary for the proper administration of justice, order the clerk of the court to call out the name and the number on each card.
Juror and other persons to be sworn
(4) The clerk of the court shall swear each member of the jury, and any alternate jurors, in the order in which his or her card was drawn and shall swear any other person providing technical, personal, interpretative or other support services to a juror with a physical disability.
Drawing additional cards if necessary
(5) If the number of persons who answer under subsection (3) or (3.1) is not sufficient to provide a full jury and the number of alternate jurors ordered by the judge, the clerk of the court shall proceed in accordance with subsections (3), (3.1) and (4) until 12 jurors — or 13 or 14 jurors, as the case may be, if the judge makes an order under subsection (2.2) — and any alternate jurors are sworn.
...[(6)]...R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 631; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 131; 1992, c. 41, s. 1; 1998, c. 9, s. 5; 2001, c. 32, ss. 38, 82; 2002, c. 13, s. 52; 2005, c. 32, s. 20; 2011, c. 16, s. 7.
– CCC
Section 2 defines "clerk of the court".
Section 631(6) imposes a ban on publication of information that tends to identify jurors.[1]
Excusing Jurors During Selection
Excusing jurors
632. The judge may, at any time before the commencement of a trial, order that any juror be excused from jury service, whether or not the juror has been called pursuant to subsection 631(3) or (3.1) or any challenge has been made in relation to the juror, for reasons of
- (a) personal interest in the matter to be tried;
- (b) relationship with the judge presiding over the jury selection process, the judge before whom the accused is to be tried, the prosecutor, the accused, the counsel for the accused or a prospective witness; or
- (c) personal hardship or any other reasonable cause that, in the opinion of the judge, warrants that the juror be excused.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 632; 1992, c. 41, s. 2; 2001, c. 32, s. 39; 2002, c. 13, s. 53.
– CCC
The judge must vet the jury for hardship exemptions before beginning with peremptory challenges or challenges for cause. To do otherwise effectively reduces the number of challenges that each side may have.[1]
- ↑ R v Douglas, 2002 CanLII 38799 (ON CA), per Moldaver JA
Summoning a Jurors When Pool is Exhausted
Where the Pool is Exhausted
Summoning other jurors when panel exhausted
642 (1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors considered advisable cannot be provided notwithstanding that the relevant provisions of this Part have been complied with, the court may, at the request of the prosecutor, order the sheriff or other proper officer to summon without delay as many persons, whether qualified jurors or not, as the court directs for the purpose of providing a full jury and alternate jurors.
Orally
(2) Jurors may be summoned under subsection (1) by word of mouth, if necessary.
Adding names to panel
(3) The names of the persons who are summoned under this section shall be added to the general panel for the purposes of the trial, and the same proceedings shall be taken with respect to calling and challenging those persons, excusing them and directing them to stand by as are provided in this Part with respect to the persons named in the original panel.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 642; 1992, c. 41, s. 4; 2002, c. 13, s. 56.
– CCC