Charter Remedies: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
Created page with "==Section 24(1) of the Charter== The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref> R. v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1995]..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Section 24(1) of the Charter==
==Section 24(1) of the Charter==
{{seealso|Stay of Proceedings}}


The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref>
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref>
Line 10: Line 11:


{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
==Section 24(2)==
{{seealso|Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence}}
==See Also==
* [[Costs]]

Revision as of 18:42, 3 July 2020

Section 24(1) of the Charter

See also: Stay of Proceedings

The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.[1]

Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.[2]

  1. R. v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA), 117 Nfld & PEIR 110 at paras. 67-9, 88 CCC (3d) 377 (CA)(complete citation pending)
  2. R. v Babos, 2014 SCC 16 at paras. 48-9, [2014] 1 SCR 309(complete citation pending)

Section 24(2)

See also: Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence

See Also